{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "88 of 91",
    "document_number": "93",
    "date": "12/10/20",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 88 of 91\nk7e2MaxC kjc\n1 start. Likewise, the possibility that Ms. Maxwell could evade security guards or monitoring is a significant one.\n2\n3 The court finds by a preponderance of the evidence\n4 that no combination of conditions could reasonably assure her\n5 presence in court. The risks are simply too great.\n6 Defense cites a number of cases, including Esposito,\n7 Dreier, and Madoff, as examples of serious and high-profile\n8 prosecutions where the courts, over the government's objection,\n9 granted bail to defendants with significant financial\n10 resources. But unlike those defendants, Ms. Maxwell possesses\n11 significant foreign connections.\n12 This case is distinguishable for other reasons, as\n13 well. For example, the risk of flight in Esposito appears to\n14 have been based on the resources available to defendant, not\n15 foreign connections or experience and a record of hiding from\n16 being found.\n17 In Madoff, the defendant had already been released on\n18 a bail package agreed to by the parties for a considerable\n19 period of time before the government sought detention. The\n20 court there found there were no circumstances in the\n21 intervening period showing that the defendant had become a\n22 flight risk. Because of these crucial factual differences, the\n23 court finds the cases not on point and not persuasive.\n24 Finally, in arguing for release, the defense raises\n25 the challenges and risks posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00001965",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 88 of 91",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "k7e2MaxC kjc\n1 start. Likewise, the possibility that Ms. Maxwell could evade security guards or monitoring is a significant one.\n2\n3 The court finds by a preponderance of the evidence\n4 that no combination of conditions could reasonably assure her\n5 presence in court. The risks are simply too great.\n6 Defense cites a number of cases, including Esposito,\n7 Dreier, and Madoff, as examples of serious and high-profile\n8 prosecutions where the courts, over the government's objection,\n9 granted bail to defendants with significant financial\n10 resources. But unlike those defendants, Ms. Maxwell possesses\n11 significant foreign connections.\n12 This case is distinguishable for other reasons, as\n13 well. For example, the risk of flight in Esposito appears to\n14 have been based on the resources available to defendant, not\n15 foreign connections or experience and a record of hiding from\n16 being found.\n17 In Madoff, the defendant had already been released on\n18 a bail package agreed to by the parties for a considerable\n19 period of time before the government sought detention. The\n20 court there found there were no circumstances in the\n21 intervening period showing that the defendant had become a\n22 flight risk. Because of these crucial factual differences, the\n23 court finds the cases not on point and not persuasive.\n24 Finally, in arguing for release, the defense raises\n25 the challenges and risks posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00001965",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Esposito",
      "Dreier",
      "Madoff"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "12/10/20"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "Document 93",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001965"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is from the Southern District Reporters, P.C. and includes a reference number DOJ-OGR-00001965."
}