{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "40",
    "date": "07/26/19",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "1 (Case called)\n\nTHE COURT: I had hoped to have a written decision and order by now, which I don't, one that is regarding the release/remand of Mr. Epstein, which has been the subject of multiple written submissions and, as you all know, an in-court hearing on Monday, July 15, 2019. It is not quite physically produced yet and it needs to be cite checked, but I should have it on the docket in the next hour, two hours at most. What I will do, however, is state the conclusions in the decision and order, which I had said I would do, and summarize very briefly the contents of the ruling for you.\n\nStarting with my conclusions, the government's application for continued remand is hereby granted and the defense application for pretrial release is respectfully hereby denied. Written opinion to follow.\n\nIn that opinion I will deal with all, I'll try to, all the principal issues which have been briefed. Even though it is not entirely necessary or legally required to consider both dangerousness to others and to the community as well as risk of flight, I have done so. I also deal with the defense's proposed bail package. There is obviously significant public interest in all of these legal issues, so I tried to cover them all as best I could.\n\nThere are the following headings in the decision and order. First is a background section, followed by counsel's\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00000606",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 (Case called)\n\nTHE COURT: I had hoped to have a written decision and order by now, which I don't, one that is regarding the release/remand of Mr. Epstein, which has been the subject of multiple written submissions and, as you all know, an in-court hearing on Monday, July 15, 2019. It is not quite physically produced yet and it needs to be cite checked, but I should have it on the docket in the next hour, two hours at most. What I will do, however, is state the conclusions in the decision and order, which I had said I would do, and summarize very briefly the contents of the ruling for you.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Starting with my conclusions, the government's application for continued remand is hereby granted and the defense application for pretrial release is respectfully hereby denied. Written opinion to follow.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "In that opinion I will deal with all, I'll try to, all the principal issues which have been briefed. Even though it is not entirely necessary or legally required to consider both dangerousness to others and to the community as well as risk of flight, I have done so. I also deal with the defense's proposed bail package. There is obviously significant public interest in all of these legal issues, so I tried to cover them all as best I could.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "There are the following headings in the decision and order. First is a background section, followed by counsel's",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000606",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "July 15, 2019",
      "07/26/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 40",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000606"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}