{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "17",
    "document_number": "20-cr-330(AJN)",
    "date": "2020-09-28",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 192 Filed 09/28/20 Page 17 of 20\n2020, other than daily living expenditures for her family and for professional services in the defense of Ms. Maxwell from the charges she faces. (Id. ¶ 16).\nThe Macalvins report confirms that Ms. Maxwell disclosed all of her foreign bank accounts in FBAR filings and properly disclosed her bank accounts, investments and other assets in her U.S. tax filings at all times. (Id. ¶¶ 25, 30). The report also explains that the transfers of funds between various accounts in the past few years, which the government highlighted in their initial bail submission (Dkt. 22 at 11-12), reflected movements between banks triggered by the closure of one banking relationship and the opening of new relationship, as well movements of cash maturing on deposit and other financial investments. (Id. ¶ 18).\nAt the last bail hearing, the government suggested that Ms. Maxwell's finances were \"opaque\" and that she potentially had \"significant [] undetermined and undisclosed wealth.\" (Tr. 27; Dkt. 22 at 11-12). The Macalvins report lifts this cloud of unjustified intrigue and provides a straightforward answer: Ms. Maxwell and her spouse currently have assets worth approximately $22.5 million.6 Accordingly, the proposed bond amount of $22.5 million represents all of the couple's current assets.\nThe report further shows that Ms. Maxwell has no undisclosed wealth and is not hiding assets overseas. To the contrary, for the past several years, Ms. Maxwell and her husband have disclosed their foreign assets by submitting FBAR filings regarding their\n6 We have redacted the name of the bank where\nAlthough the balance of the account is fully disclosed in the Macalvins report, we felt it necessary to redact the name of the bank because\nWe will, of course, follow the Court's guidance on how to proceed and provide the name of the bank to the Court and the government, if required. In that event, we ask that the Court establish guidelines limiting what the government can do with the information.\n17\nDOJ-OGR-00001119",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 192 Filed 09/28/20 Page 17 of 20",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2020, other than daily living expenditures for her family and for professional services in the defense of Ms. Maxwell from the charges she faces. (Id. ¶ 16).\nThe Macalvins report confirms that Ms. Maxwell disclosed all of her foreign bank accounts in FBAR filings and properly disclosed her bank accounts, investments and other assets in her U.S. tax filings at all times. (Id. ¶¶ 25, 30). The report also explains that the transfers of funds between various accounts in the past few years, which the government highlighted in their initial bail submission (Dkt. 22 at 11-12), reflected movements between banks triggered by the closure of one banking relationship and the opening of new relationship, as well movements of cash maturing on deposit and other financial investments. (Id. ¶ 18).\nAt the last bail hearing, the government suggested that Ms. Maxwell's finances were \"opaque\" and that she potentially had \"significant [] undetermined and undisclosed wealth.\" (Tr. 27; Dkt. 22 at 11-12). The Macalvins report lifts this cloud of unjustified intrigue and provides a straightforward answer: Ms. Maxwell and her spouse currently have assets worth approximately $22.5 million.6 Accordingly, the proposed bond amount of $22.5 million represents all of the couple's current assets.\nThe report further shows that Ms. Maxwell has no undisclosed wealth and is not hiding assets overseas. To the contrary, for the past several years, Ms. Maxwell and her husband have disclosed their foreign assets by submitting FBAR filings regarding their",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "6 We have redacted the name of the bank where\nAlthough the balance of the account is fully disclosed in the Macalvins report, we felt it necessary to redact the name of the bank because\nWe will, of course, follow the Court's guidance on how to proceed and provide the name of the bank to the Court and the government, if required. In that event, we ask that the Court establish guidelines limiting what the government can do with the information.",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "17",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001119",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Court",
      "government"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "U.S."
    ],
    "dates": [
      "2020"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-cr-330(AJN)",
      "Dkt. 22",
      "Tr. 27",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001119",
      "$22.5 million"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The text is mostly printed, with some redacted sections. The document discusses the financial disclosures of Ms. Maxwell and her husband, and the proposed bond amount. The footer contains a page number and a reference number."
}