{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "91",
    "document_number": "465",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 91 of 127\nLB1TMAX3\n1\nTHE COURT: Defendant's 6 is evidence of the defendant's alleged false statements and regarding redacting allegations related to the perjury counts in the indictment, which I severed. The government has agreed not to introduce evidence of these alleged false statements and agrees to the proposed redaction.\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\nAnything else that we need to address here, Ms. Moe?\n8\nMS. MOE: No, your Honor.\n9\nMR. EVERDELL: No, your Honor, thank you.\n10\nTHE COURT: Thank you.\n11\nDefendant's 7 is Exhibit 52, which I think we have addressed. Do we need to discuss that any further at this point?\n13\nMS. MOE: Nothing further from the government, your Honor, thank you.\n15\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I think we do need to discuss this a little bit further.\n17\nThe problem that we have on the defense side of this is that the government says that we can establish a foundation for this, but I'm quite frankly very skeptical about the provenance of that foundation.\n20\nThis is an exhibit that surfaces in 2009, and we don't know how it surfaced. Assuming it was stolen by now deceased, twice convicted felon Alfredo Rodriguez and sold to the government, assume that for a moment, we don't know where it\n24\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00007142",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 91 of 127",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LB1TMAX3",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1\nTHE COURT: Defendant's 6 is evidence of the defendant's alleged false statements and regarding redacting allegations related to the perjury counts in the indictment, which I severed. The government has agreed not to introduce evidence of these alleged false statements and agrees to the proposed redaction.\n\n7\nAnything else that we need to address here, Ms. Moe?\n\n8\nMS. MOE: No, your Honor.\n\n9\nMR. EVERDELL: No, your Honor, thank you.\n\n10\nTHE COURT: Thank you.\n\n11\nDefendant's 7 is Exhibit 52, which I think we have addressed. Do we need to discuss that any further at this point?\n\n13\nMS. MOE: Nothing further from the government, your Honor, thank you.\n\n15\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I think we do need to discuss this a little bit further.\n\n17\nThe problem that we have on the defense side of this is that the government says that we can establish a foundation for this, but I'm quite frankly very skeptical about the provenance of that foundation.\n\n20\nThis is an exhibit that surfaces in 2009, and we don't know how it surfaced. Assuming it was stolen by now deceased, twice convicted felon Alfredo Rodriguez and sold to the government, assume that for a moment, we don't know where it",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007142",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Moe",
      "Mr. Everdell",
      "Mr. Pagliuca",
      "Alfredo Rodriguez"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21",
      "2009"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 465",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007142"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}