{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "5",
    "document_number": "36",
    "date": "07/24/19",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 5 of 74 5\n1 heard on their respective issues.\n2 The government always has the burden of proof. So I\n3 would start with them. They made the first application which\n4 was for remand.\n5 I should tell you -- and I will right now -- that I\n6 have some questions for each side. And I'm going to go over\n7 them with you right now so that before the government and the\n8 defense speaks, they will know what questions I would like them\n9 to address, if they wish to. Otherwise, they can say whatever\n10 they wish. But these are questions that I have on my mind.\n11 So the first question is this. It involves some\n12 discussion that I would like each side to address. As you\n13 know, this case involves two counts or two charges.\n14 These are allegations contained in the indictment.\n15 One is conspiracy to commit sex trafficking. And the other,\n16 the second count, is the substantive count of sex trafficking.\n17 The referenced statute is 18 U.S. Code, Section 1591. And for\n18 our purposes, since this is a bail proceeding, also the Bail\n19 Reform Act.\n20 Section 1591, as is relevant here -- those cases are\n21 unusual in the criminal law insofar as they carry with them a\n22 presumption that \"No condition or combination of conditions\n23 will reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required\n24 and the safety of the community.\"\n25 As you probably know already, most cases carry a\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00000515",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 5 of 74 5",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 heard on their respective issues.\n2 The government always has the burden of proof. So I\n3 would start with them. They made the first application which\n4 was for remand.\n5 I should tell you -- and I will right now -- that I\n6 have some questions for each side. And I'm going to go over\n7 them with you right now so that before the government and the\n8 defense speaks, they will know what questions I would like them\n9 to address, if they wish to. Otherwise, they can say whatever\n10 they wish. But these are questions that I have on my mind.\n11 So the first question is this. It involves some\n12 discussion that I would like each side to address. As you\n13 know, this case involves two counts or two charges.\n14 These are allegations contained in the indictment.\n15 One is conspiracy to commit sex trafficking. And the other,\n16 the second count, is the substantive count of sex trafficking.\n17 The referenced statute is 18 U.S. Code, Section 1591. And for\n18 our purposes, since this is a bail proceeding, also the Bail\n19 Reform Act.\n20 Section 1591, as is relevant here -- those cases are\n21 unusual in the criminal law insofar as they carry with them a\n22 presumption that \"No condition or combination of conditions\n23 will reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required\n24 and the safety of the community.\"\n25 As you probably know already, most cases carry a",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000515",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "07/24/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "36",
      "18 U.S. Code, Section 1591",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000515"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or a legal document related to a bail proceeding. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
}