{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "74",
    "document_number": "465",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 74 of 127 74 LB1TMAX3\n\nrespect to the issue of 17 or under 17, but more broadly, I think the question at trial will be about, among other things, the defendant's knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's preference for very young girls.\n\nTHE COURT: Well, let's say this individual were 20, is it direct evidence of the crimes being charged?\n\nMS. MOE: Yes, your Honor, but for a different reason. Under those circumstances, it would nonetheless be our position, even if the victim were 18, 19 or 20, that the defendant's specific conduct towards that victim proves other aspects of the course of conduct. In other words, the particular pattern --\n\nTHE COURT: This seems to move into the email issue, which I have excluded. That is to say, you wanted to put in emails of the defendant setting up individuals with other individuals over -- in some cases well over the age of consent, and I have excluded that. So is there a basis for distinguishing this here?\n\nMS. MOE: Yes, your Honor, there certainly is for a number of reasons. Here, the course of conduct is closely intertwined. In other words, the defendant's interactions with this victim closely mirror actions with other victims, for example, introducing sexual topics in a slow and gradual way.\n\nTHE COURT: When you say \"victim\" there, do you mean that in a legal sense? Because I still want to understand the\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 74 of 127 74 LB1TMAX3",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "respect to the issue of 17 or under 17, but more broadly, I think the question at trial will be about, among other things, the defendant's knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's preference for very young girls.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: Well, let's say this individual were 20, is it direct evidence of the crimes being charged?",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor, but for a different reason. Under those circumstances, it would nonetheless be our position, even if the victim were 18, 19 or 20, that the defendant's specific conduct towards that victim proves other aspects of the course of conduct. In other words, the particular pattern --",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: This seems to move into the email issue, which I have excluded. That is to say, you wanted to put in emails of the defendant setting up individuals with other individuals over -- in some cases well over the age of consent, and I have excluded that. So is there a basis for distinguishing this here?",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor, there certainly is for a number of reasons. Here, the course of conduct is closely intertwined. In other words, the defendant's interactions with this victim closely mirror actions with other victims, for example, introducing sexual topics in a slow and gradual way.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: When you say \"victim\" there, do you mean that in a legal sense? Because I still want to understand the",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jeffrey Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "465"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}