{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "22 of 24",
    "document_number": "20",
    "date": "07/16/19",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 20 Filed 07/16/19 Page 22 of 24 22\nproveable. That is the answer to the obstruction issue.\nTHE COURT: All right. So you want to adjourn the detention hearing until Thursday?\nMR. WEINGARTEN: Yes.\nTHE COURT: All right. Is there any objection to that from the government? I think under the statute he is entitled to three days.\nMR. ROSSMILLER: That is, of course, fine, your Honor. I think we would like just a very brief opportunity to respond to some of those arguments so that they don't sort of hang with the court for three days unresponded to.\nTHE COURT: All right. Go ahead.\nMR. ROSSMILLER: Just very briefly, your Honor, I think a lot of that discussion was entirely orthogonal to the issues here.\nBut just very briefly, with respect to the charges here, there is simply no force required for underage victims. A grand jury has properly returned an indictment, and these are fact issues that are being presented in large part.\nCertainly the concept of child prostitution is, frankly, offensive and not recognized in federal law. The idea that children can consent to sex and be prostitutes is beyond the realm of federal law which contemplates trafficking, which is what has been charged here. Mr. Weingarten is free to argue to a jury that trafficking minors was only statutory rape or\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00000427",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 20 Filed 07/16/19 Page 22 of 24 22",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "proveable. That is the answer to the obstruction issue.\nTHE COURT: All right. So you want to adjourn the detention hearing until Thursday?\nMR. WEINGARTEN: Yes.\nTHE COURT: All right. Is there any objection to that from the government? I think under the statute he is entitled to three days.\nMR. ROSSMILLER: That is, of course, fine, your Honor. I think we would like just a very brief opportunity to respond to some of those arguments so that they don't sort of hang with the court for three days unresponded to.\nTHE COURT: All right. Go ahead.\nMR. ROSSMILLER: Just very briefly, your Honor, I think a lot of that discussion was entirely orthogonal to the issues here.\nBut just very briefly, with respect to the charges here, there is simply no force required for underage victims. A grand jury has properly returned an indictment, and these are fact issues that are being presented in large part.\nCertainly the concept of child prostitution is, frankly, offensive and not recognized in federal law. The idea that children can consent to sex and be prostitutes is beyond the realm of federal law which contemplates trafficking, which is what has been charged here. Mr. Weingarten is free to argue to a jury that trafficking minors was only statutory rape or",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000427",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. WEINGARTEN",
      "MR. ROSSMILLER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "07/16/19",
      "Thursday"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 20",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000427"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}