{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "36",
    "document_number": "410-1",
    "date": "11/04/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 410-1 Filed 11/04/21 Page 36 of 93\n\nCount Six: Sex Trafficking of a Minor - First Element\n\nThe first element of Count Six which the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that the defendant Ms. Maxwell knowingly recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, or obtained [Jane Doe-4 pseudonym] a person. The terms \"recruited,\" \"enticed,\" \"harbored,\" \"transported,\" \"provided,\" and \"obtained\" have their ordinary, everyday meanings.\n\nAdapted from the charge given by the Hon. Kimba M. Wood in United States v. Almonte, 16 Cr. 670 (KMW); United States v. Wedd, 993 F.3d 104, 122 (2d Cir. 2021) (\"In interpreting a statute, this Court gives the statutory terms their ordinary or natural meaning.\" (internal quotation marks omitted)). See, e.g., Noble v. Weinstein, 335 F. Supp. 3d 504, 517 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (explaining that, because the verb \"entices\" is \"not defined by Congress,\" it bears its ordinary meaning).\n\nDOJ-OGR-00006102",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 410-1 Filed 11/04/21 Page 36 of 93",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Count Six: Sex Trafficking of a Minor - First Element",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The first element of Count Six which the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that the defendant Ms. Maxwell knowingly recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, or obtained [Jane Doe-4 pseudonym] a person. The terms \"recruited,\" \"enticed,\" \"harbored,\" \"transported,\" \"provided,\" and \"obtained\" have their ordinary, everyday meanings.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Adapted from the charge given by the Hon. Kimba M. Wood in United States v. Almonte, 16 Cr. 670 (KMW); United States v. Wedd, 993 F.3d 104, 122 (2d Cir. 2021) (\"In interpreting a statute, this Court gives the statutory terms their ordinary or natural meaning.\" (internal quotation marks omitted)). See, e.g., Noble v. Weinstein, 335 F. Supp. 3d 504, 517 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (explaining that, because the verb \"entices\" is \"not defined by Congress,\" it bears its ordinary meaning).",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00006102",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Kimba M. Wood",
      "Jane Doe-4"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Department of Justice"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/04/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "410-1",
      "16 Cr. 670",
      "DOJ-OGR-00006102"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a sex trafficking case. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and legible."
}