{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "20",
    "document_number": "136-9",
    "date": "02/04/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "1 remain.\n2 316-7. Excerpts from Ms. Maxwell's deposition. As with the entire transcript.\n3 \n4 Document No. 86, which is composite Exhibit 8.\n5 Messages involving the defendant. Portions of this document were redacted and released by the Second Circuit. So whatever\n6 happened with respect to the Second Circuit's release, we will abide by its ruling.\n7 \n8 \n9 339. Response in opposition to the motion to compel.\n10 Unseal and redact the names, identifying information, and testimony of the nonparties. With respect to Ms. Maxwell's\n11 depositions, as ordered for the whole transcript. The objections to questions 9, 10, and 11 will remain sealed\n12 because it relates to Ms. Maxwell's intimate conduct.\n13 \n14 The material on pages 17 to 19, the shaded material there shall remain sealed. Same reason.\n15 \n16 Pages 20 to 23. Testimony from or about the Does.\n17 The shaded material shall remain sealed except for Detective Recarey.\n18 \n19 \n20 340. Declaration of Mr. Pagliuca. Unseal and redact only the names and identifying information of the nonparties.\n21 \n22 I will note Detective Recarey is in there and Ms. Maxwell's depositions are in there, but those rulings are already out.\n23 \n24 340-1. Ms. Giuffre's deposition. This was already unsealed by us on docket entry 1090-32.\n25 \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00002486",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 remain.\n2 316-7. Excerpts from Ms. Maxwell's deposition. As with the entire transcript.\n3 \n4 Document No. 86, which is composite Exhibit 8.\n5 Messages involving the defendant. Portions of this document were redacted and released by the Second Circuit. So whatever\n6 happened with respect to the Second Circuit's release, we will abide by its ruling.\n7 \n8 \n9 339. Response in opposition to the motion to compel.\n10 Unseal and redact the names, identifying information, and testimony of the nonparties. With respect to Ms. Maxwell's\n11 depositions, as ordered for the whole transcript. The objections to questions 9, 10, and 11 will remain sealed\n12 because it relates to Ms. Maxwell's intimate conduct.\n13 \n14 The material on pages 17 to 19, the shaded material there shall remain sealed. Same reason.\n15 \n16 Pages 20 to 23. Testimony from or about the Does.\n17 The shaded material shall remain sealed except for Detective Recarey.\n18 \n19 \n20 340. Declaration of Mr. Pagliuca. Unseal and redact only the names and identifying information of the nonparties.\n21 \n22 I will note Detective Recarey is in there and Ms. Maxwell's depositions are in there, but those rulings are already out.\n23 \n24 340-1. Ms. Giuffre's deposition. This was already unsealed by us on docket entry 1090-32.\n25",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002486",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Mr. Pagliuca",
      "Ms. Giuffre",
      "Detective Recarey"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Second Circuit",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/04/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "136-9",
      "316-7",
      "86",
      "339",
      "340",
      "340-1",
      "1090-32",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002486"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to a case involving Ms. Maxwell and Ms. Giuffre. The text includes references to various court documents and rulings."
}