{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "90 of 91",
    "document_number": "93",
    "date": "12/10/20",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 90 of 91\n90\n1 evidentiary hearing within one week. In contrast, the\n2 defendant is in the same position as any newly indicted\n3 defendant who is incarcerated in terms of the need to access\n4 counsel. Indeed the defense's logic, all pretrial detainees\n5 currently incarcerated at MDC and any federal facility would\n6 need to be released to prepare their defense. To the contrary,\n7 the MDC has continued to develop procedures to ensure\n8 attorney-client access at the facility, and the defendants\n9 detained at MDC are able to conduct video and phone conferences\n10 with their attorneys. There is ongoing litigation before\n11 Judge Brodie in the Eastern District of New York about the\n12 adequacy of attorney-client access at the MDC. That is case\n13 No. 19 Civ. 660. Public filings from the court-appointed\n14 mediator in that case describe the availability of legal phone\n15 calls and video calls, video conferences for the purposes of\n16 reviewing discovery between detained defendants and their\n17 counsel, and that same report indicates that MDC is currently\n18 developing a plan to resume in-person attorney-client visits in\n19 the near future.\n20 At this stage in this case and at this point in the\n21 pandemic in New York City, these measures are sufficient to\n22 ensure Ms. Maxwell has access to her counsel. To further\n23 assuage these concerns, the court orders the government in this\n24 case, and frankly all others before it, to work with the\n25 defense to provide adequate communication between counsel and\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00001967",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 90 of 91",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "90",
      "position": "margin"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 evidentiary hearing within one week. In contrast, the\n2 defendant is in the same position as any newly indicted\n3 defendant who is incarcerated in terms of the need to access\n4 counsel. Indeed the defense's logic, all pretrial detainees\n5 currently incarcerated at MDC and any federal facility would\n6 need to be released to prepare their defense. To the contrary,\n7 the MDC has continued to develop procedures to ensure\n8 attorney-client access at the facility, and the defendants\n9 detained at MDC are able to conduct video and phone conferences\n10 with their attorneys. There is ongoing litigation before\n11 Judge Brodie in the Eastern District of New York about the\n12 adequacy of attorney-client access at the MDC. That is case\n13 No. 19 Civ. 660. Public filings from the court-appointed\n14 mediator in that case describe the availability of legal phone\n15 calls and video calls, video conferences for the purposes of\n16 reviewing discovery between detained defendants and their\n17 counsel, and that same report indicates that MDC is currently\n18 developing a plan to resume in-person attorney-client visits in\n19 the near future.\n20 At this stage in this case and at this point in the\n21 pandemic in New York City, these measures are sufficient to\n22 ensure Ms. Maxwell has access to her counsel. To further\n23 assuage these concerns, the court orders the government in this\n24 case, and frankly all others before it, to work with the\n25 defense to provide adequate communication between counsel and",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001967",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell",
      "Brodie"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "MDC",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York City",
      "Eastern District of New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "12/10/20"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "Document 93",
      "No. 19 Civ. 660",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001967"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document. It is typed and contains no handwritten text or stamps. The content discusses the access to counsel for a defendant, Ms. Maxwell, who is incarcerated at MDC during the pandemic."
}