{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "40",
    "document_number": "465",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 40 of 127 40 LB15MAX2 raising any issues concerning Ms. Maxwell, I think it is entirely premature and it will depend upon testimony from their witnesses and they know well what their witnesses have said that could support that. I don't think we need to delve into that at this point. It is not anything that we are opening on. We need to see how the evidence plays out. THE COURT: OK. MS. MOE: Your Honor, if the defense is not opening on this issue we are certainly happy to raise it during the trial. We would ask that the defense be required to front this issue before asking witnesses questions about this on cross-examination because for the reasons set forth in the government's moving papers, the government submits that evidence along these lines would not be relevant. Briefly, your Honor, with respect to the sealing issue, the government understands the Court's concerns and would certainly not object to unseeing this portion of the motion at the conclusion of the trial but I -- THE COURT: I don't see why -- I just don't see how -- obviously some sealing on issues is appropriate in order to protect interests that are in play during the course of the trial. This just doesn't fall within that. So my inclination is, no -- and I have not had the ability to go through the complicated set of sometimes overlapping, sometimes not overlapping redaction requests contained throughout these SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00007091",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 40 of 127 40 LB15MAX2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "raising any issues concerning Ms. Maxwell, I think it is entirely premature and it will depend upon testimony from their witnesses and they know well what their witnesses have said that could support that. I don't think we need to delve into that at this point. It is not anything that we are opening on. We need to see how the evidence plays out.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: OK.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MOE: Your Honor, if the defense is not opening on this issue we are certainly happy to raise it during the trial. We would ask that the defense be required to front this issue before asking witnesses questions about this on cross-examination because for the reasons set forth in the government's moving papers, the government submits that evidence along these lines would not be relevant.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Briefly, your Honor, with respect to the sealing issue, the government understands the Court's concerns and would certainly not object to unseeing this portion of the motion at the conclusion of the trial but I --",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: I don't see why -- I just don't see how -- obviously some sealing on issues is appropriate in order to protect interests that are in play during the course of the trial. This just doesn't fall within that. So my inclination is, no -- and I have not had the ability to go through the complicated set of sometimes overlapping, sometimes not overlapping redaction requests contained throughout these",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007091",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 465",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007091"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}