{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "10",
    "document_number": "4",
    "date": "July 2, 2020",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": true,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 4 Filed 07/02/20 Page 10 of 10 Dated: New York, July 2, 2020 As set forth above, the defendant is an extreme risk of flight. The Government respectfully submits that the defendant cannot meet her burden of overcoming the statutory presumption in favor of detention. There are no conditions of bail that would assure the defendant's presence in court proceedings in this case. Accordingly, any application for bail should be denied. (same); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp. 2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same). United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2002) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring \"at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start\"); (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) CONCLUSION By: Alison Moe Alex Rossmiller Assistant United States Attorneys (212) 637-2225 Respectfully submitted, AUDREY STRAUSS Acting United States Attorney DOJ-OGR-00001496",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 4 Filed 07/02/20 Page 10 of 10",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Dated: New York, July 2, 2020",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "As set forth above, the defendant is an extreme risk of flight. The Government respectfully submits that the defendant cannot meet her burden of overcoming the statutory presumption in favor of detention. There are no conditions of bail that would assure the defendant's presence in court proceedings in this case. Accordingly, any application for bail should be denied.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(same); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp. 2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same). United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2002) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring \"at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start\"); (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000)",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "CONCLUSION",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "By:",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Alison Moe Alex Rossmiller Assistant United States Attorneys (212) 637-2225",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Respectfully submitted, AUDREY STRAUSS Acting United States Attorney",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001496",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison Moe",
      "Alex Rossmiller",
      "Audrey Strauss",
      "Gleeson, J."
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States Attorney's Office"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York",
      "N.D. Cal.",
      "D.D.C.",
      "E.D.N.Y."
    ],
    "dates": [
      "July 2, 2020",
      "Feb. 2018",
      "2005",
      "Oct. 10, 2002",
      "Aug. 4, 2000"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "Document 4",
      "No. 18 Cr. 047",
      "No. 02 Cr. 099",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001496"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a bail application. The text is mostly printed, with some handwritten elements. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
}