{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "49",
    "document_number": "465",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 49 of 127 49 LB15MAX2\n1 says go to so and so's home at the following address --\n2 MS. MENNINGER: Or what is going to happen there and\n3 why do I think it is going to happen there -- those kinds of\n4 things -- that is really getting into the circumventing the\n5 not-for-the-truth issue.\n6 THE COURT: I don't think those other points could\n7 come in because they would be for the truth.\n8 MS. MENNINGER: Hearsay, right.\n9 THE COURT: So they don't come in, obviously you can't\n10 attack credibility.\n11 Ms. Moe, do you disagree with any of that?\n12 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. The government agrees. And\n13 if this issue arises, we would certainly agree to a limiting\n14 instruction about those out-of-court statements not being\n15 offered for their truth. We don't anticipate that there would\n16 be any testimony from an out-of-court declarant who is a victim\n17 offered for its truth at this trial, and so we don't anticipate\n18 option the door.\n19 THE COURT: If the government thinks any of these, of\n20 what it does intend to offer, is close to the line on that\n21 question, it must raise them before inquiring or raising it in\n22 opening.\n23 MS. MOE: Certainly, your Honor.\n24 THE COURT: OK.\n25 Anything further on that?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00007100",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 49 of 127 49 LB15MAX2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 says go to so and so's home at the following address --\n2 MS. MENNINGER: Or what is going to happen there and\n3 why do I think it is going to happen there -- those kinds of\n4 things -- that is really getting into the circumventing the\n5 not-for-the-truth issue.\n6 THE COURT: I don't think those other points could\n7 come in because they would be for the truth.\n8 MS. MENNINGER: Hearsay, right.\n9 THE COURT: So they don't come in, obviously you can't\n10 attack credibility.\n11 Ms. Moe, do you disagree with any of that?\n12 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. The government agrees. And\n13 if this issue arises, we would certainly agree to a limiting\n14 instruction about those out-of-court statements not being\n15 offered for their truth. We don't anticipate that there would\n16 be any testimony from an out-of-court declarant who is a victim\n17 offered for its truth at this trial, and so we don't anticipate\n18 option the door.\n19 THE COURT: If the government thinks any of these, of\n20 what it does intend to offer, is close to the line on that\n21 question, it must raise them before inquiring or raising it in\n22 opening.\n23 MS. MOE: Certainly, your Honor.\n24 THE COURT: OK.\n25 Anything further on that?",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007100",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 465",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007100"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}