{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "7",
    "document_number": "100",
    "date": "12/18/20",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 100 Filed 12/18/20 Page 7 of 36\n\nfrom us, we would respectfully request that the court leave the proceeding open for a week so that we can try to satisfy the court because we want to.\")\n\nThe Court declined the defense's request and instead concluded that the defendant posed a serious flight risk and that no combination of conditions could ensure her appearance. First, the Court found that \"the nature and circumstances of the offense weigh in favor of detention,\" given the statutory presumption of detention triggered by charges involving minor victims and the potential penalties those charges carry. (Tr. 82). Second, the Court determined that \"[t]he government's evidence at this early juncture of the case appears strong\" based on the \"multiple victims who provided detailed accounts of Ms. Maxwell's involvement in serious crimes,\" as well as corroboration in the form of \"significant contemporaneous documentary evidence.\" (Id.). Third, the Court found that the defendant's history and characteristics demonstrate that the defendant poses a risk of flight. (Tr. 83).\n\nIn addressing that third factor, the Court emphasized the defendant's \"substantial international ties,\" which \"could facilitate living abroad,\" including \"multiple foreign citizenships,\" \"familial and personal connections abroad,\" and \"at least one foreign property of significant value.\" (Tr. 83). The Court also noted that the defendant \"is a citizen of France, a nation that does not appear to extradite its citizens.\" (Id.). The Court further found that the defendant \"possesses extraordinary financial resources\" and that \"the representations made to Pretrial Services regarding the defendant's finances likely do not provide a complete and candid picture of the resources available.\" (Tr. 83-84).\n\nAlthough the Court recognized that the defendant \"does have some family and personal connections to the United States,\" the Court highlighted \"the absence of any dependents, significant family ties or employment in the United States\" in support of the conclusion that \"flight 4\n\nDOJ-OGR-00002168",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 100 Filed 12/18/20 Page 7 of 36",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "from us, we would respectfully request that the court leave the proceeding open for a week so that we can try to satisfy the court because we want to.\")",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Court declined the defense's request and instead concluded that the defendant posed a serious flight risk and that no combination of conditions could ensure her appearance. First, the Court found that \"the nature and circumstances of the offense weigh in favor of detention,\" given the statutory presumption of detention triggered by charges involving minor victims and the potential penalties those charges carry. (Tr. 82). Second, the Court determined that \"[t]he government's evidence at this early juncture of the case appears strong\" based on the \"multiple victims who provided detailed accounts of Ms. Maxwell's involvement in serious crimes,\" as well as corroboration in the form of \"significant contemporaneous documentary evidence.\" (Id.). Third, the Court found that the defendant's history and characteristics demonstrate that the defendant poses a risk of flight. (Tr. 83).",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "In addressing that third factor, the Court emphasized the defendant's \"substantial international ties,\" which \"could facilitate living abroad,\" including \"multiple foreign citizenships,\" \"familial and personal connections abroad,\" and \"at least one foreign property of significant value.\" (Tr. 83). The Court also noted that the defendant \"is a citizen of France, a nation that does not appear to extradite its citizens.\" (Id.). The Court further found that the defendant \"possesses extraordinary financial resources\" and that \"the representations made to Pretrial Services regarding the defendant's finances likely do not provide a complete and candid picture of the resources available.\" (Tr. 83-84).",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Although the Court recognized that the defendant \"does have some family and personal connections to the United States,\" the Court highlighted \"the absence of any dependents, significant family ties or employment in the United States\" in support of the conclusion that \"flight",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "4",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002168",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Pretrial Services"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "United States",
      "France"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "12/18/20"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "100",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002168"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is page 7 of 36."
}