{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "58",
    "document_number": "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 58 of 130 A-5743\n286\nC2GFDAU1 Brune - direct\n1 Court know.\n2 Q. And you understood that the Court had the resources and\n3 ability to get information on its own, correct?\n4 A. Oh, yes.\n5 Q. And you chose not to bring either what you had found before\n6 voir dire or what you had found on March 12th to the Court's\n7 attention, correct?\n8 A. I made no particular choice relating to May 12th because I\n9 didn't know that there was any more out there, but I certainly\n10 did not bring the Google search results to the Court.\n11 Q. When you were an AUSA, would you have felt an obligation to\n12 bring that kind of information to the Court's attention?\n13 A. I have the same obligation to the Court now as I did when I\n14 was an AUSA and had I believed that that information was\n15 accurate, I would have immediately brought it to the Court's\n16 attention.\n17 Q. But you had no basis to know, Ms. Brune, one way or the\n18 other, about the accuracy of the information, correct?\n19 A. I believed, based on the juror's sworn statements and the\n20 other factors, that she was someone else entirely.\n21 Q. Let me ask you this question: In the papers and in court\n22 you all -- talking about her, oh, she was a stay at home wife.\n23 That does not preclude the possibility that she's an attorney,\n24 correct?\n25 A. I think that's so. There certainly people who are\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00009347",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 58 of 130",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-5743",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "286\nC2GFDAU1 Brune - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Court know.\n2 Q. And you understood that the Court had the resources and\n3 ability to get information on its own, correct?\n4 A. Oh, yes.\n5 Q. And you chose not to bring either what you had found before\n6 voir dire or what you had found on March 12th to the Court's\n7 attention, correct?\n8 A. I made no particular choice relating to May 12th because I\n9 didn't know that there was any more out there, but I certainly\n10 did not bring the Google search results to the Court.\n11 Q. When you were an AUSA, would you have felt an obligation to\n12 bring that kind of information to the Court's attention?\n13 A. I have the same obligation to the Court now as I did when I\n14 was an AUSA and had I believed that that information was\n15 accurate, I would have immediately brought it to the Court's\n16 attention.\n17 Q. But you had no basis to know, Ms. Brune, one way or the\n18 other, about the accuracy of the information, correct?\n19 A. I believed, based on the juror's sworn statements and the\n20 other factors, that she was someone else entirely.\n21 Q. Let me ask you this question: In the papers and in court\n22 you all -- talking about her, oh, she was a stay at home wife.\n23 That does not preclude the possibility that she's an attorney,\n24 correct?\n25 A. I think that's so. There certainly people who are",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009347",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Brune"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "March 12th",
      "May 12th",
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "161",
      "A-5743",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009347"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}