{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "73",
    "document_number": "467",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 467 Filed 11/15/21 Page 73 of 158 73 LBAAMAX3ps Rocchio - Direct\n\n1 susceptible or not to grooming?\n2 THE WITNESS: To the degree that someone is engaging\n3 in risky sexual behavior, that could -- they could end up then\n4 being in circumstances where they're more vulnerable to being\n5 targeted by offenders. It could be in that way.\n6 THE COURT: No other way that you can think of, or\n7 have seen in the literature.\n8 THE WITNESS: No, not that I'm aware of right now.\n9 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.\n10 BY MS. POMERANTZ:\n11 Q. Dr. Rocchio, the defense has referred to a theory of\n12 grooming by proxy. Have you heard of that term in scientific\n13 or clinical literature?\n14 A. No, I have not.\n15 Q. Is there anything about what you're testifying about here\n16 today that says grooming can only be done for the benefit of\n17 the person doing the grooming?\n18 A. No, there's not.\n19 Q. What is your opinion based on?\n20 THE COURT: And just to clarify, the opinion, so that\n21 we not have a fight about terminology, the opinion is that the\n22 presence of another individual can facilitate the sexual abuse\n23 of minors. Is that the opinion?\n24 THE WITNESS: What, what I was asked was whether or\n25 not there's anything that, in what I've testified about the\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00007252",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 467 Filed 11/15/21 Page 73 of 158 73",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LBAAMAX3ps Rocchio - Direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 susceptible or not to grooming?\n2 THE WITNESS: To the degree that someone is engaging\n3 in risky sexual behavior, that could -- they could end up then\n4 being in circumstances where they're more vulnerable to being\n5 targeted by offenders. It could be in that way.\n6 THE COURT: No other way that you can think of, or\n7 have seen in the literature.\n8 THE WITNESS: No, not that I'm aware of right now.\n9 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.\n10 BY MS. POMERANTZ:\n11 Q. Dr. Rocchio, the defense has referred to a theory of\n12 grooming by proxy. Have you heard of that term in scientific\n13 or clinical literature?\n14 A. No, I have not.\n15 Q. Is there anything about what you're testifying about here\n16 today that says grooming can only be done for the benefit of\n17 the person doing the grooming?\n18 A. No, there's not.\n19 Q. What is your opinion based on?\n20 THE COURT: And just to clarify, the opinion, so that\n21 we not have a fight about terminology, the opinion is that the\n22 presence of another individual can facilitate the sexual abuse\n23 of minors. Is that the opinion?\n24 THE WITNESS: What, what I was asked was whether or\n25 not there's anything that, in what I've testified about the",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007252",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. POMERANTZ",
      "Dr. Rocchio"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "467",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007252"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}