{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "11",
    "document_number": "737",
    "date": "07/22/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 11 of 101\nM6SQmax1\n1 credible trial testimony established that the defendant took steps to make Jane comfortable and encouraged her to engage in illegal sex acts with Epstein.\n2\n3 Paragraphs 39 to 45 which describe specific conduct involving Kate, I think the specific request here -- well, first, was that it should be removed from the PSR because Kate was not a victim of the crimes charged in the indictment, and then, alternatively, that it be moved to a different paragraph with a heading offense behavior not part of relevant conduct. I don't see that this is necessary. I overrule the objection.\n4\n5 Conduct involving Kate may be considered at sentencing her testimony revealed additional details of the defendant's method of identifying and introducing to Epstein young girls for sexualized massages. Her testimony also established the defendant's knowledge of the sexualized nature of massages with Epstein.\n6\n7 Paragraph 43, the defendant contends this paragraph should include a sentence that Kate was above the age of consent at all times. I think the paragraph says that Kate was age 17 or above at all relevant times, and I have no objection to including that she was above the age of consent at all times based on the trial evidence, so I will make that change to paragraph 43 of the PSR.\n8\n9 Paragraph 54, the defendant objects that there's no evidence that Epstein paid for Annie's trip to Thailand. That\n10\n11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00011530",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 11 of 101",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M6SQmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "credible trial testimony established that the defendant took steps to make Jane comfortable and encouraged her to engage in illegal sex acts with Epstein. Paragraphs 39 to 45 which describe specific conduct involving Kate, I think the specific request here -- well, first, was that it should be removed from the PSR because Kate was not a victim of the crimes charged in the indictment, and then, alternatively, that it be moved to a different paragraph with a heading offense behavior not part of relevant conduct. I don't see that this is necessary. I overrule the objection. Conduct involving Kate may be considered at sentencing her testimony revealed additional details of the defendant's method of identifying and introducing to Epstein young girls for sexualized massages. Her testimony also established the defendant's knowledge of the sexualized nature of massages with Epstein. Paragraph 43, the defendant contends this paragraph should include a sentence that Kate was above the age of consent at all times. I think the paragraph says that Kate was age 17 or above at all relevant times, and I have no objection to including that she was above the age of consent at all times based on the trial evidence, so I will make that change to paragraph 43 of the PSR. Paragraph 54, the defendant objects that there's no evidence that Epstein paid for Annie's trip to Thailand. That",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00011530",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane",
      "Kate",
      "Epstein",
      "Annie"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Thailand"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "07/22/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "737",
      "DOJ-OGR-00011530"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to a case involving Jeffrey Epstein. The text is mostly typed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The content discusses the defendant's actions and testimony related to illegal sex acts and the age of consent."
}