{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "9",
    "document_number": "311-1",
    "date": "07/02/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 311-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 9 of 23\n\nSEALED\n\n1 to do that. And I hope it's not me. But --\n2 MR. ROSSMILLER: And I believe it will apply to the\ndocketed filings in the case and not, for example, the\nunderlying discovery materials, deposition materials,\ninvestigation materials.\n5\nTHE COURT: Okay.\n6\n7 MR. ROSSMILLER: And so I think that, unfortunately,\n8 for the circumstances, for perhaps all of us, that even were\n9 the Second Circuit to grant sort of the most expansive\n10 invalidation of the protective order or sort of release of\n11 these materials, that our application would still be relevant\n12 and pending and active.\n13\nTHE COURT: Would still be relevant and pending and\n14 active. Okay.\n15\nAnd you can't explain to me why Boies Schiller didn't\n16 make a motion. Because there's no question in my mind that\n17 were this to be disclosed to the parties -- and I appreciate\n18 that we're not going to do that, but were this to be disclosed\n19 to the parties, Maxwell would protest, and the first thing that\n20 Maxwell would do would be to say the government lacks standing,\n21 it's not a party of the protective order, the issue can be\n22 litigated, if Boies Schiller chooses to make a motion to seek\n23 to be relieved from the protective order, or to quash the\n24 subpoena or to do something, but the government has no\n25 standing. It hasn't moved to intervene in the civil action.\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300 SDNY_GM_00000860\nDOJ-OGR-00004902",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 311-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 9 of 23",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SEALED",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 to do that. And I hope it's not me. But --\n2 MR. ROSSMILLER: And I believe it will apply to the\ndocketed filings in the case and not, for example, the\nunderlying discovery materials, deposition materials,\ninvestigation materials.\n5\nTHE COURT: Okay.\n6\n7 MR. ROSSMILLER: And so I think that, unfortunately,\n8 for the circumstances, for perhaps all of us, that even were\n9 the Second Circuit to grant sort of the most expansive\n10 invalidation of the protective order or sort of release of\n11 these materials, that our application would still be relevant\n12 and pending and active.\n13\nTHE COURT: Would still be relevant and pending and\n14 active. Okay.\n15\nAnd you can't explain to me why Boies Schiller didn't\n16 make a motion. Because there's no question in my mind that\n17 were this to be disclosed to the parties -- and I appreciate\n18 that we're not going to do that, but were this to be disclosed\n19 to the parties, Maxwell would protest, and the first thing that\n20 Maxwell would do would be to say the government lacks standing,\n21 it's not a party of the protective order, the issue can be\n22 litigated, if Boies Schiller chooses to make a motion to seek\n23 to be relieved from the protective order, or to quash the\n24 subpoena or to do something, but the government has no\n25 standing. It hasn't moved to intervene in the civil action.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300 SDNY_GM_00000860\nDOJ-OGR-00004902",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. ROSSMILLER",
      "Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Boies Schiller",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Second Circuit"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "07/02/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "311-1",
      "SDNY_GM_00000860",
      "DOJ-OGR-00004902"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a header indicating it is sealed. The content discusses legal proceedings and mentions specific individuals and organizations. The footer contains information about the court reporter and reference numbers."
}