{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "7",
    "document_number": "397-1",
    "date": "10/29/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-1 Filed 10/29/21 Page 7 of 43\n962\nN. Bennett and W. O'Donobue\nTABLE 3 Proposed Stages of Grooming\nAuthor\tStages of Grooming\nvan Dam (2001)\t1. Identify vulnerable child\n\t2. Engage that child in peerlike environment\n\t3. Desensitize the child to touch\n\t4. Isolate the child\n\t5. Make the child feel responsible\nBrackenridge (2001)\tApplies to grooming in sport.\n\t1. Targeting a potential victim\n\t2. Building trust and friendship\n\t3. Developing isolation and control, building loyalty\n\t4. Initiation of sexual abuse and securing secrecy\nWyre (1987) as discussed in Howitt (1995)\tApplies to extrafamilial grooming:\n\t1. The offender masturbates and fantasizes about future contacts, a boy is befriended while an effort is made to earn his parents' trust, outings are common to achieve intimacy\n\t2. The offender finds out about the boy's home/school problems-a \"counseling\" role is created\n\t3. Physical contact of a nonsexual sort begins, offender's masturbation and fantasy continue, sexual touches begin and gradually increase in severity\n\tApplies to intrafamilial grooming:\n\t1. Tickling the child\n\t2. Bathing\n\t3. The offender's sexual arousal and fantasy\n\t4. The child going to the offender's bed\n\t5. The offender knows the child likes being tickled\n\t6. \"Sex education\"\n\t7. Tickling reaches child's sexual parts\n\t8. Offender masturbates the child's genitals\n\t9. The child is trapped into silence\n\t10. Sexual contact is increased\n\t11. Offenders cognitive distortions increase\n\t12. Becomes difficult to end sexual contact\n\t13. Offending behavior reinforced through masturbation to fantasies\nChristiansen and Blake (1990)\tApplies to father-daughter grooming.\n\t1. Trust\n\t2. Favoritism\n\t3. Alienation\n\t4. Secrecy\n\t5. Boundary violations\nO'Connell (2003)\tApplies to online grooming.\n\t1. Friendship-forming\n\t2. Relationship-forming\n\t3. Risk assessment\n\t4. Exclusivity\n\t5. Sexual\nDOJ-OGR-00005874",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-1 Filed 10/29/21 Page 7 of 43",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "962\nN. Bennett and W. O'Donobue",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE 3 Proposed Stages of Grooming",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Author\tStages of Grooming\nvan Dam (2001)\t1. Identify vulnerable child\n\t2. Engage that child in peerlike environment\n\t3. Desensitize the child to touch\n\t4. Isolate the child\n\t5. Make the child feel responsible\nBrackenridge (2001)\tApplies to grooming in sport.\n\t1. Targeting a potential victim\n\t2. Building trust and friendship\n\t3. Developing isolation and control, building loyalty\n\t4. Initiation of sexual abuse and securing secrecy\nWyre (1987) as discussed in Howitt (1995)\tApplies to extrafamilial grooming:\n\t1. The offender masturbates and fantasizes about future contacts, a boy is befriended while an effort is made to earn his parents' trust, outings are common to achieve intimacy\n\t2. The offender finds out about the boy's home/school problems-a \"counseling\" role is created\n\t3. Physical contact of a nonsexual sort begins, offender's masturbation and fantasy continue, sexual touches begin and gradually increase in severity\n\tApplies to intrafamilial grooming:\n\t1. Tickling the child\n\t2. Bathing\n\t3. The offender's sexual arousal and fantasy\n\t4. The child going to the offender's bed\n\t5. The offender knows the child likes being tickled\n\t6. \"Sex education\"\n\t7. Tickling reaches child's sexual parts\n\t8. Offender masturbates the child's genitals\n\t9. The child is trapped into silence\n\t10. Sexual contact is increased\n\t11. Offenders cognitive distortions increase\n\t12. Becomes difficult to end sexual contact\n\t13. Offending behavior reinforced through masturbation to fantasies\nChristiansen and Blake (1990)\tApplies to father-daughter grooming.\n\t1. Trust\n\t2. Favoritism\n\t3. Alienation\n\t4. Secrecy\n\t5. Boundary violations\nO'Connell (2003)\tApplies to online grooming.\n\t1. Friendship-forming\n\t2. Relationship-forming\n\t3. Risk assessment\n\t4. Exclusivity\n\t5. Sexual",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005874",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "van Dam",
      "Brackenridge",
      "Wyre",
      "Howitt",
      "Christiansen",
      "Blake",
      "O'Connell",
      "N. Bennett",
      "W. O'Donobue"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "2001",
      "1987",
      "1995",
      "1990",
      "2003",
      "10/29/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "397-1",
      "DOJ-OGR-00005874"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a table detailing various stages of grooming as proposed by different authors. The content is sensitive and relates to child abuse."
}