{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "143",
    "document_number": "A-5796",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": true,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330 Document #:61 Filed:02/24/22 Page 143 of 130\nA-5796\n339\nC2GFDAU3 Edelstein\n1 Bronxville, but the same phone number.\n2 Q. You would agree with me, would you not, that that's the\n3 very same computer research over the course of a couple of\n4 minutes that you could have done on May 12th, right?\n5 A. Well, one could have done that on May 12th. We didn't have\n6 Ms. Conrad's phone number on May 12.\n7 Q. So the answer is yes, you could have done that research on\n8 May 12th, right?\n9 A. I could have done a Google search --\n10 Q. Was there something unintelligible about my question?\n11 MR. SCHECTMAN: There's nothing unintelligible about\n12 the answer, if you would allow the witness to finish.\n13 THE COURT: Overruled.\n14 Q. Could you answer? Could you have done that research on\n15 May 12?\n16 A. No. I can explain.\n17 Q. Well, you were informed there was a Catherine Conrad\n18 suspension report by Theresa Trzaskoma, correct?\n19 A. No.\n20 Q. Didn't Theresa Trzaskoma tell you that she had seen\n21 evidence that there was a suspended New York attorney named\n22 Catherine Conrad? Didn't you just tell that to us a few\n23 minutes ago?\n24 A. No. What I said was she had told me there was a suspended\n25 lawyer with the name Catherine Conrad. She did not mention a\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00009400",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330 Document #:61 Filed:02/24/22 Page 143 of 130",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "A-5796",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "339\nC2GFDAU3 Edelstein\n1 Bronxville, but the same phone number.\n2 Q. You would agree with me, would you not, that that's the\n3 very same computer research over the course of a couple of\n4 minutes that you could have done on May 12th, right?\n5 A. Well, one could have done that on May 12th. We didn't have\n6 Ms. Conrad's phone number on May 12.\n7 Q. So the answer is yes, you could have done that research on\n8 May 12th, right?\n9 A. I could have done a Google search --\n10 Q. Was there something unintelligible about my question?\n11 MR. SCHECTMAN: There's nothing unintelligible about\n12 the answer, if you would allow the witness to finish.\n13 THE COURT: Overruled.\n14 Q. Could you answer? Could you have done that research on\n15 May 12?\n16 A. No. I can explain.\n17 Q. Well, you were informed there was a Catherine Conrad\n18 suspension report by Theresa Trzaskoma, correct?\n19 A. No.\n20 Q. Didn't Theresa Trzaskoma tell you that she had seen\n21 evidence that there was a suspended New York attorney named\n22 Catherine Conrad? Didn't you just tell that to us a few\n23 minutes ago?\n24 A. No. What I said was she had told me there was a suspended\n25 lawyer with the name Catherine Conrad. She did not mention a",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009400",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Edelstein",
      "Ms. Conrad",
      "Theresa Trzaskoma",
      "Catherine Conrad",
      "MR. SCHECTMAN"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Bronxville",
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "May 12th",
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330",
      "A-5796",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009400"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with some handwritten annotations. The text is mostly clear, but there may be some minor issues with OCR accuracy due to the font and formatting."
}