{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "143",
    "document_number": "16166201",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 16166201 Filed 02/24/22 Page 143 of 117\nA-5829\n\nC2grdau4        Berke - cross          372\n1    learned about the juror or believed or the connection between\n2    the juror?\n3    A. No. I think I have told you the substance of what I recall\n4    of that conversation.\n5    Q. She didn't explain in any fashion why she thought it was\n6    important to tell you at that period of time?\n7    A. No.\n8    Q. Did she tell you anything else that her firm had learned\n9    that gave rise to the belief by one of their attorneys that\n10   there was a connection between Juror No. 1 and the suspended\n11   New York attorney?\n12   A. No.\n13   Q. Did she tell you any of the underlying facts?\n14   A. No. The only other thing that I recall is that when\n15   talking about the note, we both noted that we believed that\n16   Juror 1 had said she had been a plaintiff in a personal injury\n17   case, which might explain the respondeat superior. I can't say\n18   for certain it was in that identical conversation, I believe it\n19   was probably was, but I do remember talking about that as well.\n20   Q. Let me ask you this. If you had learned from somebody at\n21   the Brune firm that they had a written report showing somebody\n22   named Catherine Conrad had a personal injury or had a private\n23   lawsuit, would that be a piece of information that you would\n24   want to have had at the time in order to do your own analysis?\n25   A. Just to be clear, what I'm referring to, I believe the\n\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00009433",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 16166201 Filed 02/24/22 Page 143 of 117",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-5829",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2grdau4        Berke - cross          372",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1    learned about the juror or believed or the connection between\n2    the juror?\n3    A. No. I think I have told you the substance of what I recall\n4    of that conversation.\n5    Q. She didn't explain in any fashion why she thought it was\n6    important to tell you at that period of time?\n7    A. No.\n8    Q. Did she tell you anything else that her firm had learned\n9    that gave rise to the belief by one of their attorneys that\n10   there was a connection between Juror No. 1 and the suspended\n11   New York attorney?\n12   A. No.\n13   Q. Did she tell you any of the underlying facts?\n14   A. No. The only other thing that I recall is that when\n15   talking about the note, we both noted that we believed that\n16   Juror 1 had said she had been a plaintiff in a personal injury\n17   case, which might explain the respondeat superior. I can't say\n18   for certain it was in that identical conversation, I believe it\n19   was probably was, but I do remember talking about that as well.\n20   Q. Let me ask you this. If you had learned from somebody at\n21   the Brune firm that they had a written report showing somebody\n22   named Catherine Conrad had a personal injury or had a private\n23   lawsuit, would that be a piece of information that you would\n24   want to have had at the time in order to do your own analysis?\n25   A. Just to be clear, what I'm referring to, I believe the",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009433",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Catherine Conrad",
      "Juror No. 1",
      "Berke"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Brune firm",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00338-PAE",
      "16166201",
      "A-5829",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009433"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a header indicating the case number and document number. The text is a Q&A session between a lawyer and a witness. The footer contains a phone number and a reference number."
}