{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "149-152",
    "document_number": "A-5647",
    "date": "February 15, 2012",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": true
  },
  "full_text": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,\nFebruary 15, 2012\nPage 149\nC2FDAU4 Conrad - direct\n1 A. I hope so.\n2 Q. Let me --\n3 A. These are semantics, sir. Your client is still guilty as\n4 charged with our verdict, and that's it.\n5 Q. Well, I think --\n6 A. Myself and eleven other unbiased jurors determined that.\n7 Q. Do you have a better handle on what the word \"bias\" means\n8 than you do on what the word \"irrational\" means?\n9 A. Absolutely. I've been a plaintiff and a defendant and I've\n10 also represented plaintiffs and defendants.\n11 Q. Okay. So is it your testimony that you resided at both\n12 places, both the Bronx and Bronxville, when you were questioned\n13 on voir dire on March 1?\n14 A. If that was the date, yes.\n15 (Continued next page)\n...\nPage 152\nC2frdau5 Conrad - direct\n1 Q. Bronxville.\n2 A. Probably because it was a little more reputable.\n3 Q. Were you embarrassed by living in the Bronx?\n4 A. No.\n5 Q. What does the fact that Bronxville is more reputable than\n6 the Bronx have to do with anything?\n7 A. The average household income.\n8 Q. Why did it matter to you that you portray yourself in this\n9 court as living in a more affluent area than you actually lived\n10 in?\n11 A. You're from Chicago. You don't really know that. So I\n12 don't know how to answer your question.\n13 Q. You don't know how to answer my question because you don't\n14 know what I don't know?\n15 A. I don't know how to answer that even.\n16 Q. That I'm not surprised by.\n17 MR. OKULA: Objection, your Honor.\n18 THE COURT: Sustained. Put a question to the witness.\n19 The last question was unanswerable.\n20 Q. Ms. Conrad, was it your intention to portray yourself to\n21 this Court as living in a more affluent area than you actually\n22 lived in?\n23 A. No, not really. No, I never thought of it like that.\n24 Q. Isn't that what you just said?\n25 A. Bronxville is an affluent community. My parents are there,",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "February 15, 2012",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Page 149",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2FDAU4 Conrad - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 A. I hope so.\n2 Q. Let me --\n3 A. These are semantics, sir. Your client is still guilty as\n4 charged with our verdict, and that's it.\n5 Q. Well, I think --\n6 A. Myself and eleven other unbiased jurors determined that.\n7 Q. Do you have a better handle on what the word \"bias\" means\n8 than you do on what the word \"irrational\" means?\n9 A. Absolutely. I've been a plaintiff and a defendant and I've\n10 also represented plaintiffs and defendants.\n11 Q. Okay. So is it your testimony that you resided at both\n12 places, both the Bronx and Bronxville, when you were questioned\n13 on voir dire on March 1?\n14 A. If that was the date, yes.\n15 (Continued next page)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Page 152",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2frdau5 Conrad - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Q. Bronxville.\n2 A. Probably because it was a little more reputable.\n3 Q. Were you embarrassed by living in the Bronx?\n4 A. No.\n5 Q. What does the fact that Bronxville is more reputable than\n6 the Bronx have to do with anything?\n7 A. The average household income.\n8 Q. Why did it matter to you that you portray yourself in this\n9 court as living in a more affluent area than you actually lived\n10 in?\n11 A. You're from Chicago. You don't really know that. So I\n12 don't know how to answer your question.\n13 Q. You don't know how to answer my question because you don't\n14 know what I don't know?\n15 A. I don't know how to answer that even.\n16 Q. That I'm not surprised by.\n17 MR. OKULA: Objection, your Honor.\n18 THE COURT: Sustained. Put a question to the witness.\n19 The last question was unanswerable.\n20 Q. Ms. Conrad, was it your intention to portray yourself to\n21 this Court as living in a more affluent area than you actually\n22 lived in?\n23 A. No, not really. No, I never thought of it like that.\n24 Q. Isn't that what you just said?\n25 A. Bronxville is an affluent community. My parents are there,",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "stamp",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009930",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "PAUL M. DAUGERDAS",
      "Conrad",
      "Judge Pauley",
      "MR. OKULA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS",
      "THE COURT"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Bronx",
      "Bronxville",
      "New York",
      "Chicago",
      "Westchester"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "February 15, 2012",
      "March 1",
      "February 26th",
      "March 2nd",
      "February 28th"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "A-5647",
      "C2FDAU4",
      "C2frdau5",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009930"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document is a court transcript with some redactions and annotations. The quality is generally good, but there may be some minor issues with readability due to the scanning process."
}