{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "621",
    "date": "02/25/22",
    "document_type": "Table of Contents",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 621 Filed 02/25/22 Page 2 of 51\n\nTable of Contents\n\nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT ....................................................... 2\nLEGAL STANDARD ....................................................... 2\nARGUMENT ............................................................... 3\nI. The Defendant Was Convicted of the Crimes Charged in the Indictment, So No Constructive Amendment or Variance Occurred ....................... 3\nA. Applicable Law ....................................................... 4\nB. Discussion ........................................................... 6\nII. The Court Should Enter Judgment on Counts Three and Five ....................... 24\nA. Applicable Law ....................................................... 25\nB. Discussion ........................................................... 26\nIII. The Defendant's Motion to Vacate Her Conviction and Dismiss the Indictment Based on Alleged Improper Pre-Trial Delay Should Be Denied ....................... 33\nA. The Defendant Has Failed to Demonstrate Actual and Substantial Prejudice ........... 34\nB. The Defendant Has Failed to Establish that the Government Delayed the Indictment for an Improper Purpose ............................................... 44\nIV. The Court Should Deny the Defendant's Motion for Judgment of Acquittal Under Rule 29 ............................................................... 47\nCONCLUSION ............................................................... 50\n\nDOJ-OGR-00009564",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 621 Filed 02/25/22 Page 2 of 51",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Table of Contents",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ....................................................... 2\nLEGAL STANDARD ....................................................... 2\nARGUMENT ............................................................... 3\nI. The Defendant Was Convicted of the Crimes Charged in the Indictment, So No Constructive Amendment or Variance Occurred ....................... 3\nA. Applicable Law ....................................................... 4\nB. Discussion ........................................................... 6\nII. The Court Should Enter Judgment on Counts Three and Five ....................... 24\nA. Applicable Law ....................................................... 25\nB. Discussion ........................................................... 26\nIII. The Defendant's Motion to Vacate Her Conviction and Dismiss the Indictment Based on Alleged Improper Pre-Trial Delay Should Be Denied ....................... 33\nA. The Defendant Has Failed to Demonstrate Actual and Substantial Prejudice ........... 34\nB. The Defendant Has Failed to Establish that the Government Delayed the Indictment for an Improper Purpose ............................................... 44\nIV. The Court Should Deny the Defendant's Motion for Judgment of Acquittal Under Rule 29 ............................................................... 47\nCONCLUSION ............................................................... 50",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009564",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/25/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "621",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009564"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a table of contents for a legal brief or memorandum. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
}