{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "8",
    "document_number": "208",
    "date": "04/16/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 16\nwas sent to more than 6 and probably less than 30 media representatives. The email to the media members read:\nTo Whom It May Concern,\nPlease find attached a quotable statement on behalf of Ms. Maxwell. No further communication will be provided by her on this matter.\nThanks for your understanding.\nBest\nRoss\nRoss Gow\nACUITY Reputation\nJane Doe 3 is Virginia Roberts—so not a new individual. The allegations made by Victoria Roberts against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue. The original allegations are not new and have been fully responded to and shown to be untrue.\nEach time the story is re told [sic] it changes with new salacious details about public figures and world leaders and now it is alleged by Ms Roberts [sic] that Alan Dershowitz [sic] is involved in having sexual relations with her, which he denies.\nMs Roberts claims are obvious lies and should be treated as such and not publicised as news, as they are defamatory.\nGhislaine Maxwell's original response to the lies and defamatory claims remains the same. Maxwell strongly denies allegations of an unsavoury nature, which have appeared in the British press and elsewhere and reserves her right to seek redress at the repetition of such old defamatory claims.\nEx. N\nEight years after Epstein's guilty plea, Giuffre brought the defamation action, repeating many of the allegations she made in her CVRA joinder motion. The complaint alleged that the January 2015 statement \"contained the following deliberate falsehoods\":\n(a) That Giuffre's sworn allegations \"against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue.\"\n(b) That the allegations have been \"shown to be untrue.\"\n(c) That Giuffre's \"claims are obvious lies.\"\n4\nDOJ-OGR-00003716",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 16",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "was sent to more than 6 and probably less than 30 media representatives. The email to the media members read:\nTo Whom It May Concern,\nPlease find attached a quotable statement on behalf of Ms. Maxwell. No further communication will be provided by her on this matter.\nThanks for your understanding.\nBest\nRoss\nRoss Gow\nACUITY Reputation\nJane Doe 3 is Virginia Roberts—so not a new individual. The allegations made by Victoria Roberts against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue. The original allegations are not new and have been fully responded to and shown to be untrue.\nEach time the story is re told [sic] it changes with new salacious details about public figures and world leaders and now it is alleged by Ms Roberts [sic] that Alan Dershowitz [sic] is involved in having sexual relations with her, which he denies.\nMs Roberts claims are obvious lies and should be treated as such and not publicised as news, as they are defamatory.\nGhislaine Maxwell's original response to the lies and defamatory claims remains the same. Maxwell strongly denies allegations of an unsavoury nature, which have appeared in the British press and elsewhere and reserves her right to seek redress at the repetition of such old defamatory claims.\nEx. N\nEight years after Epstein's guilty plea, Giuffre brought the defamation action, repeating many of the allegations she made in her CVRA joinder motion. The complaint alleged that the January 2015 statement \"contained the following deliberate falsehoods\":\n(a) That Giuffre's sworn allegations \"against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue.\"\n(b) That the allegations have been \"shown to be untrue.\"\n(c) That Giuffre's \"claims are obvious lies.\"",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "4",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00003716",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Virginia Roberts",
      "Victoria Roberts",
      "Alan Dershowitz",
      "Giuffre",
      "Epstein",
      "Ross Gow"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "ACUITY Reputation",
      "British press"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "04/16/21",
      "January 2015"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "208",
      "DOJ-OGR-00003716"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes a statement on behalf of Maxwell and discusses allegations made against her. The document is well-formatted and free of significant damage or redactions."
}