{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "13",
    "document_number": "DOJ-OGR-00000998",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "a country that does not extradite its citizens, has access to untold financial resources, and has every motivation to escape accountability for her appalling crimes. See United States v. Boustani, 356 F. Supp. 3d 246, 255 (E.D.N.Y. 2019) (\"[T]he combination of Defendant's alleged deceptive actions, access to substantial financial resources, frequent international travel, complete lack of ties to the United States, and extensive ties to foreign countries without extradition demonstrates Defendant poses a serious risk of flight.\") (citing United States v. Zarrab, No. 15 Cr. 867 (RMB), 2016 WL 3681423, at *8 (S.D.N.Y. June 16, 2016)). The defendant's proposed bail package is essentially nothing more than an unenforceable promise to return to Court. Given the gravity of the charged crimes, the defendant's substantial resources, her willingness to evade detection, and her lies under oath, the Court should take the proposed bail package for what it is worth: nothing.\n\nV. The COVID-19 Pandemic Does Not Warrant The Defendant's Release\n\nFinally, the current pandemic is not a reason to release this defendant. Indeed, courts in this district have regularly rejected applications for release based on assertions about the generalized risks of COVID-19. See, e.g., United States v. Paulino, No. 19 Cr. 54 (PGG), 2020 WL 1847914, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 13, 2020) (Gardephe, J.) (denying bail application by defendant with hypertension, stating that \"[a]s serious as it is, the outbreak of COVID-19 simply does not override the statutory detention provisions [of the Bail Reform Act]\") (internal quotation omitted)); United States v. Ortiz, 19 Cr. 198 (KPF), 2020 WL 2539124, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. May 19, 2020) (quoting United States v. Nunez, No. 20 Cr. 239 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 10, 2020) (Ramos, J.) (\"[B]ecause there is a pandemic does not mean that the jailhouse doors ought to be thrown open\")) . Significantly, the defendant has not claimed that she is at a higher risk from COVID-19",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "a country that does not extradite its citizens, has access to untold financial resources, and has every motivation to escape accountability for her appalling crimes. See United States v. Boustani, 356 F. Supp. 3d 246, 255 (E.D.N.Y. 2019) (\"[T]he combination of Defendant's alleged deceptive actions, access to substantial financial resources, frequent international travel, complete lack of ties to the United States, and extensive ties to foreign countries without extradition demonstrates Defendant poses a serious risk of flight.\") (citing United States v. Zarrab, No. 15 Cr. 867 (RMB), 2016 WL 3681423, at *8 (S.D.N.Y. June 16, 2016)). The defendant's proposed bail package is essentially nothing more than an unenforceable promise to return to Court. Given the gravity of the charged crimes, the defendant's substantial resources, her willingness to evade detection, and her lies under oath, the Court should take the proposed bail package for what it is worth: nothing.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "V. The COVID-19 Pandemic Does Not Warrant The Defendant's Release",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Finally, the current pandemic is not a reason to release this defendant. Indeed, courts in this district have regularly rejected applications for release based on assertions about the generalized risks of COVID-19. See, e.g., United States v. Paulino, No. 19 Cr. 54 (PGG), 2020 WL 1847914, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 13, 2020) (Gardephe, J.) (denying bail application by defendant with hypertension, stating that \"[a]s serious as it is, the outbreak of COVID-19 simply does not override the statutory detention provisions [of the Bail Reform Act]\") (internal quotation omitted)); United States v. Ortiz, 19 Cr. 198 (KPF), 2020 WL 2539124, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. May 19, 2020) (quoting United States v. Nunez, No. 20 Cr. 239 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 10, 2020) (Ramos, J.) (\"[B]ecause there is a pandemic does not mean that the jailhouse doors ought to be thrown open\")) . Significantly, the defendant has not claimed that she is at a higher risk from COVID-19",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "13",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000998",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "United States",
      "Court"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "United States",
      "E.D.N.Y",
      "S.D.N.Y"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "2019",
      "2016",
      "June 16, 2016",
      "Apr. 13, 2020",
      "May 19, 2020",
      "Apr. 10, 2020"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "19 Cr. 54",
      "15 Cr. 867",
      "19 Cr. 198",
      "20 Cr. 239",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000998"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a bail hearing, discussing the defendant's risk of flight and the impact of COVID-19 on the decision. The text is well-formatted and clear, with proper citations and references to court cases."
}