{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "68",
    "document_number": "1616620",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00338 Document 1616620 Filed 02/24/22 Page 68 of 130 A-5754\n297\nC2grdau2 Brune - direct\n1 A. What she did was what the judge had sort of given people\n2 the option of saying that they would do, which is that she said\n3 that she would submit a letter, and then we worked very hard to\n4 submit a letter that was accurate.\n5 MR. DAVIS: Mr. Wooten, could I have Government\n6 Exhibit 9, page 12, please.\n7 Could I have a moment, your Honor?\n8 THE COURT: Take your time.\n9 Q. Can you see it up there?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. Do you see where Ms. Trzaskoma, in response to the Court's\n12 inquiry, said, \"Your Honor, we were not aware of the facts that\n13 have come to light, and I think if your Honor deems it\n14 appropriate, we can submit a letter\"? Correct?\n15 A. She did say that.\n16 Q. One of the facts that had come to light was the very same\n17 suspension opinion that she had found before voir dire ever\n18 started, correct?\n19 A. I think what she is trying to convey there --\n20 Q. That's not my question.\n21 A. I'm sorry. If you could say it again.\n22 Q. I'm just asking a very straightforward question, Ms. Brune.\n23 A. I know it, but it's not a yes or no, I don't think.\n24 Q. Sure it is. The question is, one of the facts that came to\n25 light that you attached was the Westlaw report, correct? You\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00009358",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00338 Document 1616620 Filed 02/24/22 Page 68 of 130 A-5754",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "297\nC2grdau2 Brune - direct",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 A. What she did was what the judge had sort of given people\n2 the option of saying that they would do, which is that she said\n3 that she would submit a letter, and then we worked very hard to\n4 submit a letter that was accurate.\n5 MR. DAVIS: Mr. Wooten, could I have Government\n6 Exhibit 9, page 12, please.\n7 Could I have a moment, your Honor?\n8 THE COURT: Take your time.\n9 Q. Can you see it up there?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. Do you see where Ms. Trzaskoma, in response to the Court's\n12 inquiry, said, \"Your Honor, we were not aware of the facts that\n13 have come to light, and I think if your Honor deems it\n14 appropriate, we can submit a letter\"? Correct?\n15 A. She did say that.\n16 Q. One of the facts that had come to light was the very same\n17 suspension opinion that she had found before voir dire ever\n18 started, correct?\n19 A. I think what she is trying to convey there --\n20 Q. That's not my question.\n21 A. I'm sorry. If you could say it again.\n22 Q. I'm just asking a very straightforward question, Ms. Brune.\n23 A. I know it, but it's not a yes or no, I don't think.\n24 Q. Sure it is. The question is, one of the facts that came to\n25 light that you attached was the Westlaw report, correct? You",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009358",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Brune",
      "Mr. Davis",
      "Mr. Wooten",
      "Ms. Trzaskoma"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00338",
      "1616620",
      "A-5754",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009358"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}