{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "55 of 74",
    "document_number": "36",
    "date": "07/24/19",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 55 of 74 55\n1 Mr. Epstein's compliance and not fleeing an almost elaboratory\n2 setting where in 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007, Mr. Epstein was\n3 facing the same vigorous U.S. attorneys.\n4 It wasn't until the negotiations that he knew that\n5 they were open to a negotiated resolution. But until then, he\n6 was facing the same power of a very large, very resourced\n7 United States Attorney's Office.\n8 I did want to address the last point which is the\n9 private security point, your Honor.\n10 THE COURT: Sure.\n11 MR. WEINBERG: I'm familiar with your Honor's\n12 decision. I've read it several times regarding the citizen of\n13 Turkey and Iran and Macedonia that had foreign passports and no\n14 ties to the United States except he was arrested while visiting\n15 Disneyland, who lied to pretrial about his background which\n16 Mr. Epstein did not.\n17 He's not that man. Before we even get to the issue of\n18 whether or not your Honor would reconsider your strongly felt\n19 feelings about whether or not the additional condition, on top\n20 of all of the other conditions of money and home detention, the\n21 additional conditions -- I could frame it as a trustee, which\n22 is somebody that the U.S. Attorney would respect, be credible,\n23 living at Mr. Epstein's home, and making sure that there were\n24 no violations.\n25 I know the government would say that's like a\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00000565",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 55 of 74 55",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000565",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Mr. Epstein's compliance and not fleeing an almost elaboratory\n2 setting where in 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007, Mr. Epstein was\n3 facing the same vigorous U.S. attorneys.\n4 It wasn't until the negotiations that he knew that\n5 they were open to a negotiated resolution. But until then, he\n6 was facing the same power of a very large, very resourced\n7 United States Attorney's Office.\n8 I did want to address the last point which is the\n9 private security point, your Honor.\n10 THE COURT: Sure.\n11 MR. WEINBERG: I'm familiar with your Honor's\n12 decision. I've read it several times regarding the citizen of\n13 Turkey and Iran and Macedonia that had foreign passports and no\n14 ties to the United States except he was arrested while visiting\n15 Disneyland, who lied to pretrial about his background which\n16 Mr. Epstein did not.\n17 He's not that man. Before we even get to the issue of\n18 whether or not your Honor would reconsider your strongly felt\n19 feelings about whether or not the additional condition, on top\n20 of all of the other conditions of money and home detention, the\n21 additional conditions -- I could frame it as a trustee, which\n22 is somebody that the U.S. Attorney would respect, be credible,\n23 living at Mr. Epstein's home, and making sure that there were\n24 no violations.\n25 I know the government would say that's like a",
      "position": "main content"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Epstein",
      "Mr. Weinberg"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "U.S. Attorney's Office",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "United States",
      "Turkey",
      "Iran",
      "Macedonia",
      "Disneyland"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "2004",
      "2005",
      "2006",
      "2007",
      "07/24/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 36",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000565"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript, with a formal tone and language. The content is a discussion between a lawyer (Mr. Weinberg) and the court about Mr. Epstein's case."
}