{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "143",
    "document_number": "499-2",
    "date": "11/23/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 143 of 159142 LBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross 1 A. That was the conclusion of the article, yes. 2 Q. And this is in 2016, this article, correct? 3 A. It was written in '16, published in '17 perhaps, yes. 4 Q. And we are talking about, in the conclusion and 5 implications here, which is on page 9, \"The present study found 6 that individuals are not able to identify the potential 7 predatory behaviors that a child molester may employ.\" 8 Correct? 9 A. Not able to identify it ahead of time, which is different 10 than scientific literature looking at retrospective studies. 11 But, yes, you're correct that this article found that we 12 couldn't predict who is and is not, ahead of time, going to be 13 a predator, based on certain behaviors and grooming. 14 Q. Right. And the reason is, once you believe that someone 15 sexually assaulted someone, then you can, in hindsight, go back 16 and look at behavior and characterize it as grooming. Right? 17 A. That's actually not what hindsight bias in the -- as 18 referenced in the grooming literature refers to. 19 Q. So I'd like to take a look at Exhibit 6 now, which has been admitted -- or? 20 21 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't know if I admitted that, your 22 Honor. But I move for the admission of Exhibit B. 23 THE COURT: Without objection? 24 MS. POMERANTZ: I'm so sorry. 25 THE COURT: Defendant's Exhibit B. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00008011",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 143 of 159142",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 A. That was the conclusion of the article, yes. 2 Q. And this is in 2016, this article, correct? 3 A. It was written in '16, published in '17 perhaps, yes. 4 Q. And we are talking about, in the conclusion and 5 implications here, which is on page 9, \"The present study found 6 that individuals are not able to identify the potential 7 predatory behaviors that a child molester may employ.\" 8 Correct? 9 A. Not able to identify it ahead of time, which is different 10 than scientific literature looking at retrospective studies. 11 But, yes, you're correct that this article found that we 12 couldn't predict who is and is not, ahead of time, going to be 13 a predator, based on certain behaviors and grooming. 14 Q. Right. And the reason is, once you believe that someone 15 sexually assaulted someone, then you can, in hindsight, go back 16 and look at behavior and characterize it as grooming. Right? 17 A. That's actually not what hindsight bias in the -- as 18 referenced in the grooming literature refers to. 19 Q. So I'd like to take a look at Exhibit 6 now, which has been admitted -- or? 20 21 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't know if I admitted that, your 22 Honor. But I move for the admission of Exhibit B. 23 THE COURT: Without objection? 24 MS. POMERANTZ: I'm so sorry. 25 THE COURT: Defendant's Exhibit B.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008011",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Rocchio",
      "PAGLIUCA",
      "POMERANTZ"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "2016",
      "2017",
      "11/23/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "499-2",
      "143",
      "159142",
      "DOJ-OGR-00008011",
      "Exhibit 6",
      "Exhibit B"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}