{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "1",
    "document_number": "535",
    "date": "12/09/21",
    "document_type": "MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": true
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 535 Filed 12/09/21 Page 1 of 8\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\nUnited States,\n-v-\nGhislainc Maxwell,\nDefendant.\n20-cr-330 (AJN)\nMEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER\nALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:\nThe Government seeks to admit what has been identified as Government Exhibit 52 (\"GX 52\"), and submit to the jury a redacted version of GX 52. The Defense objects to the admission of GX 52 on authentication and hearsay grounds. The admissibility of the exhibit has been the subject of pretrial motion in limine briefing and extensive supplemental briefing. See Dkt. Nos. 390, 397, 398, 457, 476, 490. This includes supplemental briefing received on December 8, 2021, after the authenticating witness, Mr. Juan Alessi, underwent direct examination by the Government and voir dire by the Defense. The Court reserved ruling on the exhibit, pending what was anticipated to be additional testimony. Trial Tr. at 876. The Court now overrules the Defense's objections.\nI. LEGAL STANDARD\nFederal Rule of Evidence 901 provides that to properly authenticate or identify an item of evidence, \"the proponent must produce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims it is.\" Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). The bar for authentication is \"not\nThe Defense previously agreed that if GX 52 is admitted, it will stipulate that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and 52H are true and correct photocopies of five pages from GX 52. Trial Tr. at 858.",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 535 Filed 12/09/21 Page 1 of 8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "United States,\n-v-\nGhislainc Maxwell,\nDefendant.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "stamp",
      "content": "USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 12/9/21",
      "position": "margin"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "20-cr-330 (AJN)\nMEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:\nThe Government seeks to admit what has been identified as Government Exhibit 52 (\"GX 52\"), and submit to the jury a redacted version of GX 52. The Defense objects to the admission of GX 52 on authentication and hearsay grounds. The admissibility of the exhibit has been the subject of pretrial motion in limine briefing and extensive supplemental briefing. See Dkt. Nos. 390, 397, 398, 457, 476, 490. This includes supplemental briefing received on December 8, 2021, after the authenticating witness, Mr. Juan Alessi, underwent direct examination by the Government and voir dire by the Defense. The Court reserved ruling on the exhibit, pending what was anticipated to be additional testimony. Trial Tr. at 876. The Court now overrules the Defense's objections.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "I. LEGAL STANDARD\nFederal Rule of Evidence 901 provides that to properly authenticate or identify an item of evidence, \"the proponent must produce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims it is.\" Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). The bar for authentication is \"not",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Defense previously agreed that if GX 52 is admitted, it will stipulate that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and 52H are true and correct photocopies of five pages from GX 52. Trial Tr. at 858.",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008303",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Juan Alessi",
      "Ghislainc Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States District Court",
      "Southern District of New York"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "12/09/21",
      "December 8, 2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 535",
      "20-cr-330 (AJN)",
      "Dkt. Nos. 390, 397, 398, 457, 476, 490",
      "GX 52",
      "Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and 52H"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a stamp indicating electronic filing. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
}