{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "281",
    "document_number": "A-5738",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "C2GFDAU1 Brune - direct 281\n1 the same problem of trying to remember what was said versus\n2 what was thought, but I think what was discussed is, look, it's\n3 not her. She's sworn before Judge Pauley, the note doesn't\n4 change the picture and, you know, this is kind of crazy. You\n5 can't start sending a private investigator out on a juror. She\n6 said she's someone else, she seems like a housewife from\n7 Bronxville. It would be unfathomable or inconceivable or\n8 something for a person who was in fact a lawyer to have sworn\n9 under oath that she was someone else. It was something where\n10 we discussed it and concluded that it made no sense, and Juror\n11 No. 1 was who she said she was.\n12 Q. So just so I'm clear, Ms. Brune, Ms. Trzaskoma did tell you\n13 in that conversation that she thought Juror No. 1 could be\n14 Catherine Conrad the suspended attorney?\n15 A. What she said is that note makes me wonder if it could be\n16 the same person.\n17 Q. And are you telling me that Ms. Trzaskoma made no mention\n18 whatsoever of the Westlaw report that she had found?\n19 A. I'm confident that's so, and here's why. Laurie Edelstein\n20 is the kind of person who will always kind of say, well, show\n21 me the case, she show me the document. She's extremely thorough,\n22 and if she had referenced the document in the conversation\n23 that's what Ms. Edelstein would have said. So I know that\n24 there was no reference to it in the conversation.\n25 Q. So even as you're standing there, Ms. Brune, the thought\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00010021",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU1 Brune - direct 281",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 the same problem of trying to remember what was said versus\n2 what was thought, but I think what was discussed is, look, it's\n3 not her. She's sworn before Judge Pauley, the note doesn't\n4 change the picture and, you know, this is kind of crazy. You\n5 can't start sending a private investigator out on a juror. She\n6 said she's someone else, she seems like a housewife from\n7 Bronxville. It would be unfathomable or inconceivable or\n8 something for a person who was in fact a lawyer to have sworn\n9 under oath that she was someone else. It was something where\n10 we discussed it and concluded that it made no sense, and Juror\n11 No. 1 was who she said she was.\n12 Q. So just so I'm clear, Ms. Brune, Ms. Trzaskoma did tell you\n13 in that conversation that she thought Juror No. 1 could be\n14 Catherine Conrad the suspended attorney?\n15 A. What she said is that note makes me wonder if it could be\n16 the same person.\n17 Q. And are you telling me that Ms. Trzaskoma made no mention\n18 whatsoever of the Westlaw report that she had found?\n19 A. I'm confident that's so, and here's why. Laurie Edelstein\n20 is the kind of person who will always kind of say, well, show\n21 me the case, she show me the document. She's extremely thorough,\n22 and if she had referenced the document in the conversation\n23 that's what Ms. Edelstein would have said. So I know that\n24 there was no reference to it in the conversation.\n25 Q. So even as you're standing there, Ms. Brune, the thought",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010021",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Brune",
      "Ms. Trzaskoma",
      "Judge Pauley",
      "Catherine Conrad",
      "Laurie Edelstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Bronxville"
    ],
    "dates": [],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "A-5738",
      "DOJ-OGR-00010021"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript. The text is typed, and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The footer contains the name and contact information of the reporting company, SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
}