{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "18",
    "document_number": "613",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 18 of 66\n\nOf the 5 jurors seated as alternates, none disclosed on their questionnaires that they were victims of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.4\n\nOf the 12 deliberating jurors, none disclosed on their questionnaires that they were victims of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.\n\nAs we now know, however, Juror No. 50 was not telling the truth when he denied being a victim of a crime or being a victim of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.\n\nAnd as explained below, it appears a second deliberating juror was also untruthful when they denied being a victim of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.\n\nII. Juror No. 50's admissions that he wasn't truthful with the Court\n\n4 The court originally seated 6 alternates, but one alternate became a deliberating juror when an original juror was excused due to a family commitment. None of the 18 individuals selected for service as a deliberating or alternate juror answered \"yes\" when asked if they were a victim of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.\n\n11\nDOJ-OGR-00009019",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 18 of 66",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Of the 5 jurors seated as alternates, none disclosed on their questionnaires that they were victims of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.4",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Of the 12 deliberating jurors, none disclosed on their questionnaires that they were victims of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "As we now know, however, Juror No. 50 was not telling the truth when he denied being a victim of a crime or being a victim of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "And as explained below, it appears a second deliberating juror was also untruthful when they denied being a victim of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "II. Juror No. 50's admissions that he wasn't truthful with the Court",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "4 The court originally seated 6 alternates, but one alternate became a deliberating juror when an original juror was excused due to a family commitment. None of the 18 individuals selected for service as a deliberating or alternate juror answered \"yes\" when asked if they were a victim of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "11",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009019",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Juror No. 50"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Court",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "613",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009019"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The text discusses juror responses to questionnaires regarding sexual abuse, assault, or harassment. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}