{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "33",
    "document_number": "1:20-cv-03363-PAE",
    "date": "08/24/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cv-03363-PAE Document 61-2 Filed 08/24/22 Page 33 of 130\nA-5720\n263\nC2GFDAU1 Brune - direct\n1 Ms. Trzaskoma certainly accessed it on the computer, and I now\n2 know that that opinion or decision includes the middle initial.\n3 Q. And it was the identical name, Catherine M. Conrad, that\n4 appeared on the potential juror list that the clerk's office\n5 provided, correct?\n6 A. I now know that to be so.\n7 Q. Well, and that opinion was not just any suspension opinion,\n8 it was a New York court opinion, correct?\n9 A. That's right.\n10 Q. And you could have asked your team prior to the start of\n11 voir dire to do additional research on this issue, correct?\n12 A. I certainly could have.\n13 Q. And you chose not to?\n14 A. I don't think I put it that way. The plan was to hear from\n15 her on voir dire and find out based on her answers to Judge\n16 Pauley whether she was the same person.\n17 Q. Well, you didn't do it, correct, Ms. Brune?\n18 A. If the question is --\n19 Q. It's a simple question.\n20 A. I know, and I'm trying really hard to answer it.\n21 Q. It's really a yes or no. Did you or did you not ask any of\n22 your team prior to voir dire to do additional research?\n23 A. Oh, I did not. That's absolutely so.\n24 Q. You had everybody, you had a team of literally almost two\n25 dozen people available to you, correct?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00009324",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cv-03363-PAE Document 61-2 Filed 08/24/22 Page 33 of 130",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-5720",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "263",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU1 Brune - direct",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Ms. Trzaskoma certainly accessed it on the computer, and I now\n2 know that that opinion or decision includes the middle initial.\n3 Q. And it was the identical name, Catherine M. Conrad, that\n4 appeared on the potential juror list that the clerk's office\n5 provided, correct?\n6 A. I now know that to be so.\n7 Q. Well, and that opinion was not just any suspension opinion,\n8 it was a New York court opinion, correct?\n9 A. That's right.\n10 Q. And you could have asked your team prior to the start of\n11 voir dire to do additional research on this issue, correct?\n12 A. I certainly could have.\n13 Q. And you chose not to?\n14 A. I don't think I put it that way. The plan was to hear from\n15 her on voir dire and find out based on her answers to Judge\n16 Pauley whether she was the same person.\n17 Q. Well, you didn't do it, correct, Ms. Brune?\n18 A. If the question is --\n19 Q. It's a simple question.\n20 A. I know, and I'm trying really hard to answer it.\n21 Q. It's really a yes or no. Did you or did you not ask any of\n22 your team prior to voir dire to do additional research?\n23 A. Oh, I did not. That's absolutely so.\n24 Q. You had everybody, you had a team of literally almost two\n25 dozen people available to you, correct?",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009324",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Trzaskoma",
      "Catherine M. Conrad",
      "Ms. Brune",
      "Judge Pauley"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cv-03363-PAE",
      "61-2",
      "A-5720",
      "C2GFDAU1",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009324"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}