{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "6",
    "document_number": "148",
    "date": "02/04/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 148 Filed 02/04/21 Page 6 of 23\n\nin court conferences, in lawsuits, and in the press. Without this basic information, Ms. Maxwell cannot adequately investigate the allegations against her and prepare for trial.\n\nThe voluminous discovery provided by the government, which totals in the millions of pages—the vast majority of which was produced to the defense in November 2020—does not shed any more light on the nature of the government proof or the specifics of the alleged conduct.2 The discovery contains only a handful of documents that even pertain to the time period charged in the indictment (1994-1997), and what little exists offers almost no information about the details of, for example, exactly when and where the alleged incidents of sexual abuse took place, who was allegedly present, and how the alleged conduct violated the law. Without these details, which Ms. Maxwell is requesting through a bill of particulars, she cannot identify relevant witnesses or documents that she may wish to obtain to prepare her defense.\n\nIt is clear that the detail about how these alleged offenses took place will come solely from the statements of the government’s witnesses. Accordingly, it is critical that Ms. Maxwell receive Jencks Act material and the government’s witness list, as well as 404(b) evidence, well in advance of trial so that she can conduct an adequate investigation. The unique circumstances of this case more than warrant early disclosure of this material. The conduct alleged in the indictment dates back 25 years, making investigation and preparation of the case complex and difficult. The global COVID-19 pandemic adds further complications and obstacles to trial preparation. The Court has recognized that Ms. Maxwell should be granted ample time to review documents related to witnesses in this case. (See Dkt. 73 (ordering the government to produce documents related to certain non-testifying witnesses by March 12, 2021 “to ensure that\n\n2 Ms. Maxwell is still reviewing the discovery, including the over two million pages produced in November 2020. In deference to the Court's schedule and in light of the trial date, we have not asked the Court to further extend the deadline to file pretrial motions. However, Ms. Maxwell reserves her right to supplement these motions at a later date if her review of discovery uncovers documents that warrant additional requests.\n\n2\nDOJ-OGR-00002699",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 148 Filed 02/04/21 Page 6 of 23",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "in court conferences, in lawsuits, and in the press. Without this basic information, Ms. Maxwell cannot adequately investigate the allegations against her and prepare for trial.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The voluminous discovery provided by the government, which totals in the millions of pages—the vast majority of which was produced to the defense in November 2020—does not shed any more light on the nature of the government proof or the specifics of the alleged conduct.2 The discovery contains only a handful of documents that even pertain to the time period charged in the indictment (1994-1997), and what little exists offers almost no information about the details of, for example, exactly when and where the alleged incidents of sexual abuse took place, who was allegedly present, and how the alleged conduct violated the law. Without these details, which Ms. Maxwell is requesting through a bill of particulars, she cannot identify relevant witnesses or documents that she may wish to obtain to prepare her defense.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "It is clear that the detail about how these alleged offenses took place will come solely from the statements of the government’s witnesses. Accordingly, it is critical that Ms. Maxwell receive Jencks Act material and the government’s witness list, as well as 404(b) evidence, well in advance of trial so that she can conduct an adequate investigation. The unique circumstances of this case more than warrant early disclosure of this material. The conduct alleged in the indictment dates back 25 years, making investigation and preparation of the case complex and difficult. The global COVID-19 pandemic adds further complications and obstacles to trial preparation. The Court has recognized that Ms. Maxwell should be granted ample time to review documents related to witnesses in this case. (See Dkt. 73 (ordering the government to produce documents related to certain non-testifying witnesses by March 12, 2021 “to ensure that",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2 Ms. Maxwell is still reviewing the discovery, including the over two million pages produced in November 2020. In deference to the Court's schedule and in light of the trial date, we have not asked the Court to further extend the deadline to file pretrial motions. However, Ms. Maxwell reserves her right to supplement these motions at a later date if her review of discovery uncovers documents that warrant additional requests.",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002699",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Court",
      "government"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/04/21",
      "November 2020",
      "1994-1997",
      "March 12, 2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "Document 148",
      "Dkt. 73",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002699"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is page 6 of 23."
}