{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "13",
    "document_number": "737",
    "date": "07/22/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 13 of 101 13 M6SQmax1\n\n1 inconsistent and unreliable. I overrule this objection.\n2 Carolyn testified at trial that Virginia first brought her to\n3 Epstein's residence when she was 14 years old. I found Carolyn\n4 to be credible and credit her testimony. I'm not persuaded by\n5 the arguments to the contrary. Moreover, @Sean's credible\n6 testimony corroborated Carolyn's recollection.\n7 Paragraph 59, the defendant makes two objections.\n8 Same objection to Carolyn being 14. For the reasons I've\n9 stated, that's overruled. She objects to Carolyn's assertion\n10 that she visited Epstein's residence more than a hundred times.\n11 I overrule that objection. Again, I credit Carolyn's\n12 testimony. She testified that she went to the house \"over 100\n13 times.\" I reject the suggestion that this is improbable based\n14 on Epstein's travel schedule.\n15 Paragraphs 61 and 62 again object to Carolyn's age,\n16 and I overrule for the same reasons.\n17 Paragraph 64, three objections. First, the defendant\n18 objects to Carolyn's assertion that she visited the Palm Beach\n19 residence over a hundred times and her assertion that she was\n20 14. For the reasons I've given, I overrule those objections.\n21 She objects to the assertion that Carolyn stopped performing\n22 sexualized massages in 2001 when she was 18 years old and\n23 argues that the evidence indicates she was 17 years old. We're\n24 going to take up the issue of this timing question with respect\n25 to the issue of which Guidelines Manual controls. So I'll skip\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00011532",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 13 of 101 13 M6SQmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 inconsistent and unreliable. I overrule this objection.\n2 Carolyn testified at trial that Virginia first brought her to\n3 Epstein's residence when she was 14 years old. I found Carolyn\n4 to be credible and credit her testimony. I'm not persuaded by\n5 the arguments to the contrary. Moreover, @Sean's credible\n6 testimony corroborated Carolyn's recollection.\n7 Paragraph 59, the defendant makes two objections.\n8 Same objection to Carolyn being 14. For the reasons I've\n9 stated, that's overruled. She objects to Carolyn's assertion\n10 that she visited Epstein's residence more than a hundred times.\n11 I overrule that objection. Again, I credit Carolyn's\n12 testimony. She testified that she went to the house \"over 100\n13 times.\" I reject the suggestion that this is improbable based\n14 on Epstein's travel schedule.\n15 Paragraphs 61 and 62 again object to Carolyn's age,\n16 and I overrule for the same reasons.\n17 Paragraph 64, three objections. First, the defendant\n18 objects to Carolyn's assertion that she visited the Palm Beach\n19 residence over a hundred times and her assertion that she was\n20 14. For the reasons I've given, I overrule those objections.\n21 She objects to the assertion that Carolyn stopped performing\n22 sexualized massages in 2001 when she was 18 years old and\n23 argues that the evidence indicates she was 17 years old. We're\n24 going to take up the issue of this timing question with respect\n25 to the issue of which Guidelines Manual controls. So I'll skip",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00011532",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Carolyn",
      "Virginia",
      "Epstein",
      "Sean"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Palm Beach"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "07/22/22",
      "2001"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "737",
      "DOJ-OGR-00011532"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to a case involving Jeffrey Epstein. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The content discusses the credibility of a witness named Carolyn and objections raised by the defendant."
}