{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "10",
    "document_number": "36",
    "date": "07/24/19",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 10 of 74\n\n1 the defense what additional insight about this episode they can\n2 share with us to support their position in these proceedings.\n3 So, as all good lawyers, I reserve the right to have\n4 more questions, and I probably will.\n5 But I'm happy to begin with Mr. Rossmiller and have\n6 you heard on the issue of remand versus bail. If you can\n7 include some or all of these questions in your presentation,\n8 that would be great.\n9 MR. ROSSMILLER: Yes, your Honor.\n10 Your Honor, the government seeks pretrial detention in\n11 this case due to the extraordinary risk of flight and the\n12 danger presented by the defendant to the community, a danger\n13 that is not speculative but, rather, is evident from his prior\n14 actions. As a result, we join with the recommendation from\n15 pretrial services and the requests of the victims that the\n16 defendant be detained.\n17 As the Court pointed out, with the sex trafficking\n18 offense charged here, there is a presumption that no\n19 combination of release conditions could reasonably assure the\n20 defendant's appearance and the protection of the public.\n21 The Court asked whether the presumption has been\n22 rebutted, and the answer is no. There has been no information\n23 provided by the defendant to rebut that presumption in this\n24 case.\n25 And in particular, as the Court noted, the defendant\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00000520",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 10 of 74",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 the defense what additional insight about this episode they can\n2 share with us to support their position in these proceedings.\n3 So, as all good lawyers, I reserve the right to have\n4 more questions, and I probably will.\n5 But I'm happy to begin with Mr. Rossmiller and have\n6 you heard on the issue of remand versus bail. If you can\n7 include some or all of these questions in your presentation,\n8 that would be great.\n9 MR. ROSSMILLER: Yes, your Honor.\n10 Your Honor, the government seeks pretrial detention in\n11 this case due to the extraordinary risk of flight and the\n12 danger presented by the defendant to the community, a danger\n13 that is not speculative but, rather, is evident from his prior\n14 actions. As a result, we join with the recommendation from\n15 pretrial services and the requests of the victims that the\n16 defendant be detained.\n17 As the Court pointed out, with the sex trafficking\n18 offense charged here, there is a presumption that no\n19 combination of release conditions could reasonably assure the\n20 defendant's appearance and the protection of the public.\n21 The Court asked whether the presumption has been\n22 rebutted, and the answer is no. There has been no information\n23 provided by the defendant to rebut that presumption in this\n24 case.\n25 And in particular, as the Court noted, the defendant",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000520",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Rossmiller"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "07/24/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 36",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000520"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with clear and legible text. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}