{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "54",
    "document_number": "467",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 467 Filed 11/15/21 Page 54 of 158 54 LBAGmax2 Rocchio - Direct\n\nTHE COURT: Can you repeat that, please.\n\nMS. POMERANTZ: The first two sentences of that paragraph starting with \"currently\" and ending with \"has occurred or is occurring.\"\n\nTHE COURT: Thank you.\n\nBY MS. POMERANTZ:\n\nQ. Dr. Rocchio, what is your response to those two sentences?\nA. Again, I think that I would not agree with those conclusions. I also think it's important to recognize that this article was published many years ago. And there's certainly been evolutions and additional literature since the time of publication. But even at the time of publication, I think it's a little misleading. If they're defining consensus there as universal agreement as to exact -- everything within the process of grooming, then sure. But when we're talking about any pattern of behavior or any phenomenon within the social science, it's a complicated phenomenon. You're never going to get universal agreement among experts. That's why you have to look at what's the particular definition used within a study.\n\nBut most definitely, there's consensus within the scientific literature about the phenomenon not only of grooming, but the phenomenon of child sexual abuse itself, what the experiences are of the victim and what the behaviors are of the offender and also the impact of those behaviors, in terms\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00007233",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 467 Filed 11/15/21 Page 54 of 158 54",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LBAGmax2 Rocchio - Direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: Can you repeat that, please.\n\nMS. POMERANTZ: The first two sentences of that paragraph starting with \"currently\" and ending with \"has occurred or is occurring.\"\n\nTHE COURT: Thank you.\n\nBY MS. POMERANTZ:\n\nQ. Dr. Rocchio, what is your response to those two sentences?\nA. Again, I think that I would not agree with those conclusions. I also think it's important to recognize that this article was published many years ago. And there's certainly been evolutions and additional literature since the time of publication. But even at the time of publication, I think it's a little misleading. If they're defining consensus there as universal agreement as to exact -- everything within the process of grooming, then sure. But when we're talking about any pattern of behavior or any phenomenon within the social science, it's a complicated phenomenon. You're never going to get universal agreement among experts. That's why you have to look at what's the particular definition used within a study.\n\nBut most definitely, there's consensus within the scientific literature about the phenomenon not only of grooming, but the phenomenon of child sexual abuse itself, what the experiences are of the victim and what the behaviors are of the offender and also the impact of those behaviors, in terms",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007233",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. POMERANTZ",
      "Dr. Rocchio"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "467",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007233"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}