{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2 of 28",
    "document_number": "507",
    "date": "11/24/21",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 507 Filed 11/24/21 Page 2 of 28\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT ....................................................... 1\nI. APPLICABLE LAW ............................................................... 1\nII. THE COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF DR. RYAN HALL ....... 4\nA. Dr. Hall's Opinions Are Irrelevant ............................................... 5\nB. The Bases of Dr. Hall's Opinions Are Not Independently Admissible ............ 12\nC. Any Undisclosed Significance of Dr. Hall's Opinions Is Inadmissible ........... 14\nD. Dr. Hall's Fact Testimony Is Inadmissible ........................................... 15\nIII. THE COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF BENNETT GERSHMAN ....................................................... 20\nIV. BEFORE THE DEFENDANT'S REMAINING WITNESSES OFFER EXPERT TESTIMONY, THE DEFENDANT SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE 21\nA. Robert Kelso and John Lopez ....................................................... 22\nB. Forensic Document Specialists ....................................................... 24\nCONCLUSION ........................................................................ 26\n\nDOJ-OGR-00008043",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 507 Filed 11/24/21 Page 2 of 28",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ....................................................... 1\nI. APPLICABLE LAW ............................................................... 1\nII. THE COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF DR. RYAN HALL ....... 4\nA. Dr. Hall's Opinions Are Irrelevant ............................................... 5\nB. The Bases of Dr. Hall's Opinions Are Not Independently Admissible ............ 12\nC. Any Undisclosed Significance of Dr. Hall's Opinions Is Inadmissible ........... 14\nD. Dr. Hall's Fact Testimony Is Inadmissible ........................................... 15\nIII. THE COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF BENNETT GERSHMAN ....................................................... 20\nIV. BEFORE THE DEFENDANT'S REMAINING WITNESSES OFFER EXPERT TESTIMONY, THE DEFENDANT SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE 21\nA. Robert Kelso and John Lopez ....................................................... 22\nB. Forensic Document Specialists ....................................................... 24\nCONCLUSION ........................................................................ 26",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008043",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Dr. Ryan Hall",
      "Bennett Gershman",
      "Robert Kelso",
      "John Lopez"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/24/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "507",
      "DOJ-OGR-00008043"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a table of contents. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
}