{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "1",
    "document_number": "368",
    "date": "10/25/21",
    "document_type": "Court Order",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": true
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 368 Filed 10/25/21 Page 1 of 2\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\nUnited States of America,\n-v-\nGhislaine Maxwell,\nDefendant.\nALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:\nOn October 18, 2021, the parties filed their respective motions in limine. Dkt. Nos. 355, 357, 358. Responses are due today, October 25, 2021. The parties are further ORDERED that reply briefs, if any, are due by October 27, 2021. Each sides' responses and any replies must be filed as a single document. For example, the Government should file an omnibus response brief to all of the motions in limine filed by the Defendant, and the Defendant should file an omnibus response brief to the Government's omnibus motion in limine. Similarly, any reply by the Defendant should be an omnibus reply document and same for the Government.\nThe parties filed their motions in limine temporarily under seal to allow for the other side's proposal and the Court's consideration of redactions. See Dkt. Nos. 358-59. Each side should consider the other party's briefs—including any responses filed on October 25, and any replies filed on October 27—and indicate whether they seek any additional redaction requests.\nThe parties are ORDERED to file on the public docket all briefing with both parties' proposed redactions, and a joint letter justifying any requested redactions by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006), on or before October 29, 2021.\nSO ORDERED.\n1\nDOJ-OGR-00005375",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 368 Filed 10/25/21 Page 1 of 2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "United States of America,\n-v-\nGhislaine Maxwell,\nDefendant.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "stamp",
      "content": "USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 10/25/21",
      "position": "margin"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "20-CR-330 (AJN)\nORDER",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "On October 18, 2021, the parties filed their respective motions in limine. Dkt. Nos. 355, 357, 358. Responses are due today, October 25, 2021. The parties are further ORDERED that reply briefs, if any, are due by October 27, 2021. Each sides' responses and any replies must be filed as a single document. For example, the Government should file an omnibus response brief to all of the motions in limine filed by the Defendant, and the Defendant should file an omnibus response brief to the Government's omnibus motion in limine. Similarly, any reply by the Defendant should be an omnibus reply document and same for the Government.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The parties filed their motions in limine temporarily under seal to allow for the other side's proposal and the Court's consideration of redactions. See Dkt. Nos. 358-59. Each side should consider the other party's briefs—including any responses filed on October 25, and any replies filed on October 27—and indicate whether they seek any additional redaction requests.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The parties are ORDERED to file on the public docket all briefing with both parties' proposed redactions, and a joint letter justifying any requested redactions by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006), on or before October 29, 2021.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SO ORDERED.",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005375",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Alison J. Nathan"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States District Court",
      "Second Circuit"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York",
      "Onondaga"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "October 18, 2021",
      "October 25, 2021",
      "October 27, 2021",
      "October 29, 2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 368",
      "Dkt. Nos. 355, 357, 358",
      "20-CR-330 (AJN)",
      "435 F.3d 110"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It appears to be a standard court document with no significant damage or redactions."
}