{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "56",
    "document_number": "642",
    "date": "03/11/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 642 Filed 03/11/22 Page 56 of 66\n\nc. Non-privileged emails or other written communications between Juror No. 50 and any other person, including any news or media organization about Juror No. 50's service as a juror in this case;\nd. Any record of payments to Juror No. 50 in exchange for any interview or information about his service as a juror in this case;\n2. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, or other social media networking platforms identified by the parties, to produce:\na. All communications to and from Juror No. 50 regarding his service as a juror in this case;\nb. All posts, comments, or photographs posted by Juror No. 50 regarding his service as a juror in this case.\nc. All documents reflecting dates on which Juror No. 50 opened or closed his accounts.\nB. The hearing itself\nThe misconduct identified potentially implicates all 12 jurors who rendered a verdict here. According to Juror No. 50 and the New York Times, one other juror did not disclose that he or she was the victim of sexual abuse as a child. Nevertheless, that juror's experiences were discussed apparently in support of Juror No. 50's position. What these two jurors disclosed to the (presumably) ten jurors who responded to the questionnaire truthfully will be relevant to determine the identity of the second juror and what Juror No. 50 said to the other jurors.\n49\nDOJ-OGR-00009748",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 642 Filed 03/11/22 Page 56 of 66",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "c. Non-privileged emails or other written communications between Juror No. 50 and any other person, including any news or media organization about Juror No. 50's service as a juror in this case;\nd. Any record of payments to Juror No. 50 in exchange for any interview or information about his service as a juror in this case;\n2. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, or other social media networking platforms identified by the parties, to produce:\na. All communications to and from Juror No. 50 regarding his service as a juror in this case;\nb. All posts, comments, or photographs posted by Juror No. 50 regarding his service as a juror in this case.\nc. All documents reflecting dates on which Juror No. 50 opened or closed his accounts.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "B. The hearing itself",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The misconduct identified potentially implicates all 12 jurors who rendered a verdict here. According to Juror No. 50 and the New York Times, one other juror did not disclose that he or she was the victim of sexual abuse as a child. Nevertheless, that juror's experiences were discussed apparently in support of Juror No. 50's position. What these two jurors disclosed to the (presumably) ten jurors who responded to the questionnaire truthfully will be relevant to determine the identity of the second juror and what Juror No. 50 said to the other jurors.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "49",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009748",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Juror No. 50"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "New York Times"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "03/11/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "642",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009748"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a case involving juror misconduct. The text is printed and legible, with no visible handwriting or stamps."
}