{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "35 of 50",
    "document_number": "645",
    "date": "03/11/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 35 of 50 35 M38TMAX1 from The Independent, about the consequences of him coming forward, which is: This is a momentous decision you're making. So I don't see how he squares his comments about I never thought by talking to the press that I would come forward and be known this way, when in fact I think there was a lengthy discussion he had with a journalist about this very fact. THE COURT: He said that he recognized by talking to the press about it that it would be known publicly. MR. EVERDELL: I think he may have said that, but I think at the same time he's saying I didn't think this would be known by my parents and my friends. I don't know how you square those responses. To me -- and I know this was the subject of argument that you don't want to hear at this point, but his responses are simply not credible on this point because he's talking out of both sides of his mouth: I didn't think I would be known, but yet I did know I would be known. It makes no sense to me. I'm curious to hear more about what I perceive as blatant conflict in answers about a discussion with a journalist about the consequences of going forward. THE COURT: You want me to ask about what he discussed with which journalist? MR. EVERDELL: Lucia, who I believe is The Independent journalist. So I would -- I'm sorry it's not coming out very focused, I apologize, but: You had discussed before in responses to my questions about the fact that you didn't think SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00010250",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 35 of 50 35",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M38TMAX1 from The Independent, about the consequences of him coming forward, which is: This is a momentous decision you're making. So I don't see how he squares his comments about I never thought by talking to the press that I would come forward and be known this way, when in fact I think there was a lengthy discussion he had with a journalist about this very fact.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: He said that he recognized by talking to the press about it that it would be known publicly.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MR. EVERDELL: I think he may have said that, but I think at the same time he's saying I didn't think this would be known by my parents and my friends. I don't know how you square those responses. To me -- and I know this was the subject of argument that you don't want to hear at this point, but his responses are simply not credible on this point because he's talking out of both sides of his mouth: I didn't think I would be known, but yet I did know I would be known. It makes no sense to me. I'm curious to hear more about what I perceive as blatant conflict in answers about a discussion with a journalist about the consequences of going forward.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: You want me to ask about what he discussed with which journalist?",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MR. EVERDELL: Lucia, who I believe is The Independent journalist. So I would -- I'm sorry it's not coming out very focused, I apologize, but: You had discussed before in responses to my questions about the fact that you didn't think",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010250",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "Lucia"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "The Independent",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "03/11/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "645",
      "DOJ-OGR-00010250"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}