{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "4",
    "document_number": "723",
    "date": "07/12/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 723 Filed 07/12/22 Page 4 of 13\nThe Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nDecember 16, 2021\nPage 4\nthat the alleged sexualized massages occurred. These alleged sexualized massages are the basis of the charges in this case.\nThe government seeks to preclude testimony from Eva, Michelle, and Kelly on the ground that their testimony does not contradict Jane's allegations and that, in any event, their testimony concerns \"collateral matters\" The government is wrong on both counts.\nA. Eva Dubin's testimony will contradict Jane's testimony.\nEva Dubin's testimony will contradict Jane's testimony. As to Eva, this is what Jane testified to on the stand:\n- \"[A] woman named Eva . . . joined in\" the group sexualized massages. TR at 525.\n- Eva \"joined in [the group sexualized massages] with Sophie.\" Id. at 526.\n- Eva \"joined in the group scenario.\" Id.\n- Eva \"knew the routine.\" Id.\n- Eva \"could confirm her story.\" Id.\nIn her interviews with the government, Jane had this to say about Eva. In a February 2020 interview with the government, see 3509-008, p 4, Jane said:\n- Jane's first sexual encounter with Mr. Epstein occurred in the pool house. Id. at 4.\n- The next sexual encounter occurred in the bedroom or the massage room. Id.\n- There was a short period of time in which the encounters only involved Mr. Epstein. Id.\n- Ms. Maxwell then became involved. Id.\n- The first time Ms. Maxwell was involved, there were two other girls as well—Sophie and Eva, who joined in. Id.\nDOJ-OGR-00011366",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 723 Filed 07/12/22 Page 4 of 13\nThe Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nDecember 16, 2021\nPage 4",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "that the alleged sexualized massages occurred. These alleged sexualized massages are the basis of the charges in this case.\nThe government seeks to preclude testimony from Eva, Michelle, and Kelly on the ground that their testimony does not contradict Jane's allegations and that, in any event, their testimony concerns \"collateral matters\" The government is wrong on both counts.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A. Eva Dubin's testimony will contradict Jane's testimony.\nEva Dubin's testimony will contradict Jane's testimony. As to Eva, this is what Jane testified to on the stand:\n- \"[A] woman named Eva . . . joined in\" the group sexualized massages. TR at 525.\n- Eva \"joined in [the group sexualized massages] with Sophie.\" Id. at 526.\n- Eva \"joined in the group scenario.\" Id.\n- Eva \"knew the routine.\" Id.\n- Eva \"could confirm her story.\" Id.\nIn her interviews with the government, Jane had this to say about Eva. In a February 2020 interview with the government, see 3509-008, p 4, Jane said:\n- Jane's first sexual encounter with Mr. Epstein occurred in the pool house. Id. at 4.\n- The next sexual encounter occurred in the bedroom or the massage room. Id.\n- There was a short period of time in which the encounters only involved Mr. Epstein. Id.\n- Ms. Maxwell then became involved. Id.\n- The first time Ms. Maxwell was involved, there were two other girls as well—Sophie and Eva, who joined in. Id.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00011366",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Eva",
      "Michelle",
      "Kelly",
      "Jane",
      "Mr. Epstein",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Sophie",
      "Eva Dubin"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "December 16, 2021",
      "07/12/22",
      "February 2020"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "723",
      "3509-008",
      "DOJ-OGR-00011366"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case involving allegations of sexual misconduct. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten annotations."
}