{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "1 of 3",
    "document_number": "335",
    "date": "09/03/21",
    "document_type": "Court Order",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": true
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 335 Filed 09/03/21 Page 1 of 3\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\nUnited States of America,\n-v-\nGhislaine Maxwell,\nDefendant.\nALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:\nDefendant seeks the Government's \"disclosure of the identities of the unnamed co-conspirators alleged in the S2 indictment.\" Dkt. No. 331 at 1. In its August 13 Opinion & Order, this Court noted that the Government had not objected to Defendant's two prior requests that the Government identify the unnamed co-conspirators. Dkt. No. 317 at 12 n.1; see also Dkt. No. 331 at 1. On August 18, 2021, the Government filed a letter stating that it \"objects to any requirement that it provide an exhaustive list of co-conspirators, whether in a bill of particulars or otherwise . . . absent further order of the Court.\" Dkt. No. 320 at 1. The Court concludes that the Government's objection comes too late as the Government had multiple opportunities to raise its objection before this Court issued its opinion. For this and the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that at the same time that the Government discloses Jencks Act materials, the Government must also disclose to the Defendant the identities of all unnamed co-conspirators alleged in the S2 indictment to whom it will refer at trial. See United States v. Bin Laden, 92 F. Supp. 2d 225, 241 (S.D.N.Y. 2000).\nEven if the Court were to find that the Government had not waived its objection, it would find unpersuasive the Government's justifications for withholding this information. \"In considering whether to grant a request for identification of unnamed co-conspirators, 'the Court\n1\nDOJ-OGR-00005040",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 335 Filed 09/03/21 Page 1 of 3",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "United States of America,\n-v-\nGhislaine Maxwell,\nDefendant.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Defendant seeks the Government's \"disclosure of the identities of the unnamed co-conspirators alleged in the S2 indictment.\" Dkt. No. 331 at 1. In its August 13 Opinion & Order, this Court noted that the Government had not objected to Defendant's two prior requests that the Government identify the unnamed co-conspirators. Dkt. No. 317 at 12 n.1; see also Dkt. No. 331 at 1. On August 18, 2021, the Government filed a letter stating that it \"objects to any requirement that it provide an exhaustive list of co-conspirators, whether in a bill of particulars or otherwise . . . absent further order of the Court.\" Dkt. No. 320 at 1. The Court concludes that the Government's objection comes too late as the Government had multiple opportunities to raise its objection before this Court issued its opinion. For this and the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that at the same time that the Government discloses Jencks Act materials, the Government must also disclose to the Defendant the identities of all unnamed co-conspirators alleged in the S2 indictment to whom it will refer at trial. See United States v. Bin Laden, 92 F. Supp. 2d 225, 241 (S.D.N.Y. 2000).",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Even if the Court were to find that the Government had not waived its objection, it would find unpersuasive the Government's justifications for withholding this information. \"In considering whether to grant a request for identification of unnamed co-conspirators, 'the Court",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005040",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "stamp",
      "content": "USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 9/3/21",
      "position": "margin"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Bin Laden"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States District Court",
      "United States of America"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Southern District of New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "09/03/21",
      "August 13",
      "August 18, 2021",
      "2000"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 335",
      "Dkt. No. 331",
      "Dkt. No. 317",
      "Dkt. No. 320"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It appears to be a formal legal document with no visible redactions or damage."
}