{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "23",
    "document_number": "109-1",
    "date": "09/17/2024",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 109-1, 09/17/2024, 3634097, Page23 of 26\n\n\"materially different\" from the allegations in the Indictment.48 The evidence indicated that Maxwell transported Jane to New York for sexual abuse and conspired to do the same. Maxwell knew that the evidence also included conduct in New Mexico.49 Furthermore, Maxwell cannot demonstrate \"substantial prejudice.\" Maxwell received—over three weeks before trial—notes of Jane's interview recording the abuse she suffered in New Mexico. This is enough to conclude that Maxwell was not \"unfairly and substantially\" prejudiced.50\n\n5. Maxwell's Sentence Was Procedurally Reasonable\n\nLastly, Maxwell argues that her sentence was procedurally unreasonable because the District Court erred in applying a leadership sentencing enhancement under the Sentencing Guidelines and inadequately explained its above-Guidelines sentence.51 We disagree.\n\n48 Dove, 884 F.3d at 149.\n\n49 As the District Court found, \"[t]he Indictment charged a scheme to sexually abuse underage girls in New York. In service of this scheme, the Indictment alleged that Epstein and the Defendant groomed the victims for abuse at various properties and in various states, including Epstein's ranch in New Mexico.\" A-393.\n\n50 See United States v. Lebedev, 932 F.3d 40, 54 (2d Cir. 2019) (concluding that a defendant was not \"unfairly and substantially\" prejudiced because \"[t]he government disclosed the evidence and exhibits . . . four weeks prior to trial\").\n\n51 At sentencing, the District Court calculated a Guidelines range of 188 to 235 months' imprisonment and sentenced Maxwell to a slightly above-Guidelines term of 240 months' imprisonment.\n\n23\nDOJ-OGR-00000024",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 109-1, 09/17/2024, 3634097, Page23 of 26",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "\"materially different\" from the allegations in the Indictment.48 The evidence indicated that Maxwell transported Jane to New York for sexual abuse and conspired to do the same. Maxwell knew that the evidence also included conduct in New Mexico.49 Furthermore, Maxwell cannot demonstrate \"substantial prejudice.\" Maxwell received—over three weeks before trial—notes of Jane's interview recording the abuse she suffered in New Mexico. This is enough to conclude that Maxwell was not \"unfairly and substantially\" prejudiced.50",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "5. Maxwell's Sentence Was Procedurally Reasonable",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Lastly, Maxwell argues that her sentence was procedurally unreasonable because the District Court erred in applying a leadership sentencing enhancement under the Sentencing Guidelines and inadequately explained its above-Guidelines sentence.51 We disagree.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "48 Dove, 884 F.3d at 149.",
      "position": "footnote"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "49 As the District Court found, \"[t]he Indictment charged a scheme to sexually abuse underage girls in New York. In service of this scheme, the Indictment alleged that Epstein and the Defendant groomed the victims for abuse at various properties and in various states, including Epstein's ranch in New Mexico.\" A-393.",
      "position": "footnote"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "50 See United States v. Lebedev, 932 F.3d 40, 54 (2d Cir. 2019) (concluding that a defendant was not \"unfairly and substantially\" prejudiced because \"[t]he government disclosed the evidence and exhibits . . . four weeks prior to trial\").",
      "position": "footnote"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "51 At sentencing, the District Court calculated a Guidelines range of 188 to 235 months' imprisonment and sentenced Maxwell to a slightly above-Guidelines term of 240 months' imprisonment.",
      "position": "footnote"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "23",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000024",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell",
      "Jane",
      "Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "District Court"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York",
      "New Mexico"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "09/17/2024"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "109-1",
      "3634097",
      "884 F.3d",
      "932 F.3d 40",
      "A-393",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000024"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Maxwell, discussing her sentence and allegations against her. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and legible."
}