{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "29",
    "document_number": "36",
    "date": "07/24/19",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 29 of 74\nknow if there are more -- 12 cases, all of which involve a minor victim - kidnapping, sex trafficking of children, aggravated sexual abuse, sexual abuse, offenses resulting in death, sexual exploitation of children, selling and buying of children, the production of sexually explicit depictions of a minor for importation into the United States, crimes involving the transportation of minor victims, coercion and enticement, transport of minors, and use of interstate facilities to transmit information about a minor.\nAll of those -- there may be others, but those are the ones we found -- also carried this presumption of remand instead of bail.\nMR. WEINBERG: Yes, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Presumption.\nMR. WEINBERG: Yes, your Honor. If we're looking at 1591 -- and I'm not here today to in any way diminish the gravity of the allegations against Mr. Epstein, but it's far away from the heartland of 1591 commercial sex trafficking that deals with servitude and deals with enslavement and deals with pimps, if I can use that word, selling women for commercial profit.\nWe've provided the Court with some of the division in the law, including decisions by this Court, by Judge Jones relying on a South Dakota opinion, by the chief justice that finds the statute inapplicable.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00000539",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 29 of 74",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "know if there are more -- 12 cases, all of which involve a minor victim - kidnapping, sex trafficking of children, aggravated sexual abuse, sexual abuse, offenses resulting in death, sexual exploitation of children, selling and buying of children, the production of sexually explicit depictions of a minor for importation into the United States, crimes involving the transportation of minor victims, coercion and enticement, transport of minors, and use of interstate facilities to transmit information about a minor.\nAll of those -- there may be others, but those are the ones we found -- also carried this presumption of remand instead of bail.\nMR. WEINBERG: Yes, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Presumption.\nMR. WEINBERG: Yes, your Honor. If we're looking at 1591 -- and I'm not here today to in any way diminish the gravity of the allegations against Mr. Epstein, but it's far away from the heartland of 1591 commercial sex trafficking that deals with servitude and deals with enslavement and deals with pimps, if I can use that word, selling women for commercial profit.\nWe've provided the Court with some of the division in the law, including decisions by this Court, by Judge Jones relying on a South Dakota opinion, by the chief justice that finds the statute inapplicable.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000539",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Weinberg",
      "Mr. Epstein",
      "Judge Jones"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "United States",
      "South Dakota"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "07/24/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 36",
      "1591",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000539"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}