{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "19",
    "document_number": "20-1",
    "date": "04/01/2021",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 21-770, Document 20-1, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page19 of 31\nofficer who issued an order of detention to, by subsequent order, \"permit the temporary release of the person ... to the extent that the judicial officer determines such release to be necessary for preparation of the person's defense or for another compelling reason.\" § 3142(i).\n\nThe presumption of innocence should not be paid mere lip service, the court held, and being held without the ability to see counsel face-to-face was \"no way to prepare for trial.\"\n\nMs. Maxwell presents a more compelling case than Robertson for temporary release under § 3142(i). Courts considering whether pretrial release is necessary have considered: \"(1) [the] time and opportunity the defendant has to prepare for the trial and to participate in his defense; (2) the complexity of the case and volume of information; and (3) expense and inconvenience associated with preparing while incarcerated.\" Robertson, (citing United States v. Boatwright, 2020 WL 1639855, at *4 (D. Nev. Apr. 2, 2020) (unreported) (citations omitted).\n\nTrial is set for July. There is precious little time left to prepare and participate in that preparation. The discovery involves millions of pages of documents. Ms. Maxwell cannot conduct searches of these documents; she cannot print them and spread them out on a desk for review; she cannot make notes on the documents; and she cannot move\n17\nDOJ-OGR-00000929",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 21-770, Document 20-1, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page19 of 31",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "officer who issued an order of detention to, by subsequent order, \"permit the temporary release of the person ... to the extent that the judicial officer determines such release to be necessary for preparation of the person's defense or for another compelling reason.\" § 3142(i).\n\nThe presumption of innocence should not be paid mere lip service, the court held, and being held without the ability to see counsel face-to-face was \"no way to prepare for trial.\"\n\nMs. Maxwell presents a more compelling case than Robertson for temporary release under § 3142(i). Courts considering whether pretrial release is necessary have considered: \"(1) [the] time and opportunity the defendant has to prepare for the trial and to participate in his defense; (2) the complexity of the case and volume of information; and (3) expense and inconvenience associated with preparing while incarcerated.\" Robertson, (citing United States v. Boatwright, 2020 WL 1639855, at *4 (D. Nev. Apr. 2, 2020) (unreported) (citations omitted).\n\nTrial is set for July. There is precious little time left to prepare and participate in that preparation. The discovery involves millions of pages of documents. Ms. Maxwell cannot conduct searches of these documents; she cannot print them and spread them out on a desk for review; she cannot make notes on the documents; and she cannot move",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "17",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000929",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell",
      "Robertson",
      "Boatwright"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [
      "Nevada"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "04/01/2021",
      "Apr. 2, 2020",
      "July"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 21-770",
      "Document 20-1",
      "3068530",
      "2020 WL 1639855",
      "§ 3142(i)",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000929"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ms. Maxwell, discussing her pretrial detention and the challenges she faces in preparing for trial while incarcerated. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is page 19 of 31."
}