{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "3",
    "document_number": "20-cr-0330",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-0330-AJN Document 11892 Filed 03/22/21 Page 3 of 12 escape; and that the Defendant's lack of candor regarding her family ties and financial situations raised serious doubts as to her willingness to comply with any conditions imposed by the Court. See Dkt. No. 106. On February 23, 2021, the Defendant filed a third motion for release on bail. Dkt. No. 160 (\"Def. Mot.\"). The Government opposed the Defendant's motion on March 9, 2021. Dkt. No. 165 (\"Gov't Opp'n\"). The Defendant filed her reply under temporary seal on March 16, 2021. II. Legal Standard The parties dispute whether the divestiture of jurisdiction rule precludes this Court from granting the Defendant's third bail motion while Defendant's bail appeal is pending. See Gov't Opp'n at 2–3; Reply at 2–3; see also United States v. Rodgers, 101 F.3d 247, 251 (2d Cir. 1996) (\"As a general matter, 'the filing of a notice of appeal is an event of jurisdictional significance—it confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.'\") (citation omitted). Under Rule 37(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, however, the Court unquestionably has authority to defer considering the motion, deny the motion, or state either that it would grant the motion if the court of appeals remands for that purpose or that the motion raises a substantial issue. Fed. R. Crim. P. 37(a). Because the Court denies the Defendant's motion, it does not resolve the question of whether it would have jurisdiction to grant it. Pretrial detainees have a right to bail under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and under the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3141, et seq. The Bail Reform Act requires that a court release a defendant \"subject to the least restrictive further condition, or combination of conditions, that [it] determines will reasonably assure the appearance of the 3 DOJ-OGR-00001276",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-0330-AJN Document 11892 Filed 03/22/21 Page 3 of 12",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "escape; and that the Defendant's lack of candor regarding her family ties and financial situations raised serious doubts as to her willingness to comply with any conditions imposed by the Court. See Dkt. No. 106. On February 23, 2021, the Defendant filed a third motion for release on bail. Dkt. No. 160 (\"Def. Mot.\"). The Government opposed the Defendant's motion on March 9, 2021. Dkt. No. 165 (\"Gov't Opp'n\"). The Defendant filed her reply under temporary seal on March 16, 2021.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "II. Legal Standard",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The parties dispute whether the divestiture of jurisdiction rule precludes this Court from granting the Defendant's third bail motion while Defendant's bail appeal is pending. See Gov't Opp'n at 2–3; Reply at 2–3; see also United States v. Rodgers, 101 F.3d 247, 251 (2d Cir. 1996) (\"As a general matter, 'the filing of a notice of appeal is an event of jurisdictional significance—it confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.'\") (citation omitted). Under Rule 37(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, however, the Court unquestionably has authority to defer considering the motion, deny the motion, or state either that it would grant the motion if the court of appeals remands for that purpose or that the motion raises a substantial issue. Fed. R. Crim. P. 37(a). Because the Court denies the Defendant's motion, it does not resolve the question of whether it would have jurisdiction to grant it.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Pretrial detainees have a right to bail under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and under the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3141, et seq. The Bail Reform Act requires that a court release a defendant \"subject to the least restrictive further condition, or combination of conditions, that [it] determines will reasonably assure the appearance of the",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "3",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001276",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "February 23, 2021",
      "March 9, 2021",
      "March 16, 2021",
      "03/22/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-cr-0330",
      "Dkt. No. 106",
      "Dkt. No. 160",
      "Dkt. No. 165",
      "101 F.3d 247",
      "18 U.S.C. § 3141",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001276"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The text is well-formatted and legible. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}