{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "20 of 33",
    "document_number": "32",
    "date": "07/18/19",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 20 of 33\nwas unanimously affirmed, on November 17, 2011, by a panel of five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court. People v. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011).\nNotwithstanding Judge Pickholz's order, according to a July 10, 2019 investigative report by the New York Post, as noted, Mr. Epstein has never reported as a sex offender to New York law enforcement. See July 10, 2019 NY Post Article. \"The NYPD cop assigned to monitor Epstein has repeatedly complained to [the New York County District Attorney's] Sex Crimes Unit that Epstein wasn't in compliance, according to a source familiar with the matter.\" Id. Mr. Epstein's alleged failure to comply with his New York sex offender obligations would appear to undermine defense counsel's premise that Mr. Epstein's \"perfect compliance\" and \"meticulous obedience,\" Dkt. 6 at 1, 5, to his sex offender registration obligations should lead to his release.\nSee LaFontaine, 210 F.3d at 135 n.6 (where the Court ordered detention noting that the defendant \"had previously disregarded court orders\").\nThe Court has also read the story in the July 17, 2019, New York Post in which attorney Brad Edwards contends that while Epstein was serving his Florida state sentence (after pleading guilty to procuring a minor under 18 for prostitution and solicitation of prostitution), Epstein was allowed to leave the jail on work release. While on work release \"[h]e was having . . . female visitors . . . and continuing to engage in . . . [sexual] conduct . . . while he was in 'jail'.\" Mr. Edwards is counsel to one of Mr. Epstein's victims. See Reuven Fenton and Kate Sheehy, Jeffrey Epstein had sex den while serving time; lawyer, New York Post, July 16, 2019. The Court is also aware of an article published by Palm Beach CBS local news which reports that the Palm Beach County Sherriff's Office \"disputes [the] claim that Jeffrey Epstein had sex on work release.\" A spokeswoman for the sheriff's office is quoted as saying \"If he violated any conditions of his\n20\nDOJ-OGR-00000491",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 20 of 33",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "was unanimously affirmed, on November 17, 2011, by a panel of five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court. People v. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011).\nNotwithstanding Judge Pickholz's order, according to a July 10, 2019 investigative report by the New York Post, as noted, Mr. Epstein has never reported as a sex offender to New York law enforcement. See July 10, 2019 NY Post Article. \"The NYPD cop assigned to monitor Epstein has repeatedly complained to [the New York County District Attorney's] Sex Crimes Unit that Epstein wasn't in compliance, according to a source familiar with the matter.\" Id. Mr. Epstein's alleged failure to comply with his New York sex offender obligations would appear to undermine defense counsel's premise that Mr. Epstein's \"perfect compliance\" and \"meticulous obedience,\" Dkt. 6 at 1, 5, to his sex offender registration obligations should lead to his release.\nSee LaFontaine, 210 F.3d at 135 n.6 (where the Court ordered detention noting that the defendant \"had previously disregarded court orders\").\nThe Court has also read the story in the July 17, 2019, New York Post in which attorney Brad Edwards contends that while Epstein was serving his Florida state sentence (after pleading guilty to procuring a minor under 18 for prostitution and solicitation of prostitution), Epstein was allowed to leave the jail on work release. While on work release \"[h]e was having . . . female visitors . . . and continuing to engage in . . . [sexual] conduct . . . while he was in 'jail'.\" Mr. Edwards is counsel to one of Mr. Epstein's victims. See Reuven Fenton and Kate Sheehy, Jeffrey Epstein had sex den while serving time; lawyer, New York Post, July 16, 2019. The Court is also aware of an article published by Palm Beach CBS local news which reports that the Palm Beach County Sherriff's Office \"disputes [the] claim that Jeffrey Epstein had sex on work release.\" A spokeswoman for the sheriff's office is quoted as saying \"If he violated any conditions of his",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "20",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000491",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "Judge Pickholz",
      "Brad Edwards",
      "Reuven Fenton",
      "Kate Sheehy"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "New York State Supreme Court",
      "New York County District Attorney's Office",
      "New York Post",
      "Palm Beach County Sherriff's Office",
      "Palm Beach CBS local news"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York",
      "Florida",
      "Palm Beach"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "November 17, 2011",
      "July 10, 2019",
      "July 17, 2019",
      "July 16, 2019",
      "July 18, 2019"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 32",
      "Dkt. 6",
      "89 A.D.3d 570",
      "933 N.Y.S.2d 239",
      "210 F.3d",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000491"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Jeffrey Epstein. It includes references to various news articles and court documents. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is page 20 of 33."
}