{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "20-mj-330 (JAD) Document 62 Filed 07/06/20 Page 2 of 33",
    "date": "July 6, 2020",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Cases: 1:20-mj-03302-JAD Document 62 Filed 07/06/20 Page 2 of 33 incorporated herein. See Standing Orders 20-5 (Mar. 20, 2020) and 20-21 (June 17, 2020).2 The hearing held today will be an initial appearance and removal hearing for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Today's hearing has been noticed as a video hearing. In the event defendant consents to proceed, the court makes the findings below. Before convening this video/telephone hearing, the court carefully considered the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to public court proceedings and the public's and press's First Amendment rights to in-person access to such proceedings. See Bucci v. United States, 662 F.3d 18, 22 (1st Cir. 2011) (citing Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39, 48 (1984)); Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Court of California, Riverside Cty., 464 U.S. 501, 509-10 (1984). This Order details my findings. II. Partial Rather Than Total Closure The court first finds that this video hearing constitutes a partial, rather than total, closure of these proceedings. The court so finds because the goals of public access will still be achieved: this proceeding is not being held in secret and the public, including members of the press, maintains the 2 All the court's Standing Orders regarding the COVID-19 outbreak can be found here: http://www.nhd.uscourts.gov/court-response-coronavirus-disease-covid-19. 2 DOJ-OGR-00001521",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Cases: 1:20-mj-03302-JAD Document 62 Filed 07/06/20 Page 2 of 33",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "incorporated herein. See Standing Orders 20-5 (Mar. 20, 2020) and 20-21 (June 17, 2020).2 The hearing held today will be an initial appearance and removal hearing for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Today's hearing has been noticed as a video hearing. In the event defendant consents to proceed, the court makes the findings below.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Before convening this video/telephone hearing, the court carefully considered the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to public court proceedings and the public's and press's First Amendment rights to in-person access to such proceedings. See Bucci v. United States, 662 F.3d 18, 22 (1st Cir. 2011) (citing Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39, 48 (1984)); Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Court of California, Riverside Cty., 464 U.S. 501, 509-10 (1984). This Order details my findings.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "II. Partial Rather Than Total Closure The court first finds that this video hearing constitutes a partial, rather than total, closure of these proceedings. The court so finds because the goals of public access will still be achieved: this proceeding is not being held in secret and the public, including members of the press, maintains the",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2 All the court's Standing Orders regarding the COVID-19 outbreak can be found here: http://www.nhd.uscourts.gov/court-response-coronavirus-disease-covid-19.",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2 DOJ-OGR-00001521",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "US Courts"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "California",
      "Riverside County",
      "Georgia"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "March 20, 2020",
      "June 17, 2020",
      "July 6, 2020",
      "1984",
      "2011"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-mj-330 (JAD)",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001521"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or order related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is from the United States District Court and discusses the court's decision to hold a video hearing due to the COVID-19 pandemic."
}