{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "94",
    "document_number": "20-2",
    "date": "04/01/2021",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page94 of 200\n\n1 THE COURT: I'm sorry, Ms. Moe, if I may pause you\n2 before moving on from those points.\n3 There is a basic dispute within the papers as to, I\n4 think, efforts similar to the ones you have described that are\n5 efforts to hide from authorities, which would certainly be an\n6 indication of risk of flight or whether, in light of the\n7 notoriety and public interest that the case has generated\n8 following the indictment of Mr. Epstein, whether it was an\n9 effort to protect privacy and hide from press for privacy\n10 reasons.\n11 How does the government suggest that that factual\n12 determination be resolved, if you agree that it should, and\n13 what is your general response to the veracity of that\n14 assertion?\n15 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n16 As we discussed in our reply brief, your Honor, in our\n17 view, there is no question these circumstances are relevant to\n18 the court's determination with respect to bail for a number of\n19 reasons.\n20 The first is, irrespective of the defendant's motive,\n21 these facts make clear to the court that the defendant has the\n22 ability to live in hiding, that she is good at it, that she is\n23 willing to do it even if it compromises her relationship and\n24 contacts with other people and, as the information provided by\n25 the real estate agent underscores, she is good at it and that\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00001035",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page94 of 200",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: I'm sorry, Ms. Moe, if I may pause you\n2 before moving on from those points.\n3 There is a basic dispute within the papers as to, I\n4 think, efforts similar to the ones you have described that are\n5 efforts to hide from authorities, which would certainly be an\n6 indication of risk of flight or whether, in light of the\n7 notoriety and public interest that the case has generated\n8 following the indictment of Mr. Epstein, whether it was an\n9 effort to protect privacy and hide from press for privacy\n10 reasons.\n11 How does the government suggest that that factual\n12 determination be resolved, if you agree that it should, and\n13 what is your general response to the veracity of that\n14 assertion?\n15 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n16 As we discussed in our reply brief, your Honor, in our\n17 view, there is no question these circumstances are relevant to\n18 the court's determination with respect to bail for a number of\n19 reasons.\n20 The first is, irrespective of the defendant's motive,\n21 these facts make clear to the court that the defendant has the\n22 ability to live in hiding, that she is good at it, that she is\n23 willing to do it even if it compromises her relationship and\n24 contacts with other people and, as the information provided by\n25 the real estate agent underscores, she is good at it and that",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001035",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Moe",
      "Mr. Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "04/01/2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 21-770",
      "Document 20-2",
      "3068530",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001035"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}