{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "87 of 91",
    "document_number": "93",
    "date": "12/10/20",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 87 of 91 87\n\n1    the resources available to her, it is practically impossible to\n2    set financial bail conditions that could reasonably assure her\n3    appearance in court.\n4        Even if the picture of her financial resources were\n5    not opaque, as it is, detention would still be appropriate.\n6    Personally, the defendant not only has significant financial\n7    resources, but has demonstrated sophistication in hiding those\n8    resources and herself. After the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein,\n9    Ms. Maxwell retreated from view. She moved to New England,\n10   changing locations on multiple occasions, and appears to have\n11   made anonymous transactions both big and small. The defense\n12   said that she did all of this not to hide from the government\n13   but to maintain her privacy and avoid public and press\n14   scrutiny. Even assuming that Ms. Maxwell only wanted to hide\n15   from the press and public,  an assumption that the court does\n16   not share, but even assuming that's the case, her recent\n17   conduct underscores her extraordinary capacity to evade\n18   detection, even in the face of what the defense has\n19   acknowledged to be extreme and unusual efforts to locate her.\n20       Because of these concerns, even a bail package with\n21   electronic monitoring and home security guards would be\n22   insufficient. Were she to flee, the defendant could simply\n23   remove the monitoring bracelet and, as other courts have\n24   observed, home detention with electronic monitoring does not\n25   prevent flight. At best it limits a fleeing defendant's head\n\n    SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n    (212) 805-0300\n\n    DOJ-OGR-00001964",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 87 of 91 87",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "the resources available to her, it is practically impossible to set financial bail conditions that could reasonably assure her appearance in court. Even if the picture of her financial resources were not opaque, as it is, detention would still be appropriate. Personally, the defendant not only has significant financial resources, but has demonstrated sophistication in hiding those resources and herself. After the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein, Ms. Maxwell retreated from view. She moved to New England, changing locations on multiple occasions, and appears to have made anonymous transactions both big and small. The defense said that she did all of this not to hide from the government but to maintain her privacy and avoid public and press scrutiny. Even assuming that Ms. Maxwell only wanted to hide from the press and public,  an assumption that the court does not share, but even assuming that's the case, her recent conduct underscores her extraordinary capacity to evade detection, even in the face of what the defense has acknowledged to be extreme and unusual efforts to locate her. Because of these concerns, even a bail package with electronic monitoring and home security guards would be insufficient. Were she to flee, the defendant could simply remove the monitoring bracelet and, as other courts have observed, home detention with electronic monitoring does not prevent flight. At best it limits a fleeing defendant's head",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001964",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New England"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "12/10/20"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "Document 93",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001964"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or filing related to the case of Ms. Maxwell, discussing her financial resources and potential flight risk. The text is typed, with no handwritten content or stamps visible."
}