{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "13",
    "document_number": "212-2",
    "date": "04/16/21",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 212-2 Filed 04/16/21 Page 13 of 30\nApp.-0816\nG4LMGIUC 12\n1 four individuals had sexually abused her prior to ever meeting\n2 Mr. Epstein.\n3 If she has evidence that she already was suffering\n4 from depression or some type of mental health disorder before\n5 meeting our client, Ms. Maxwell, or Mr. Epstein, then her\n6 flashbacks, if you will, could be related to other incidents\n7 that she has put out in the press. And she, I believe, has\n8 also told the press that she was in a drug rehabilitation\n9 facility at the time that she met Mr. Epstein.\n10 Obviously, to the extent she was under the influence\n11 of drugs, which is what she has told the press, at the time she\n12 met him, she persisted in being addicted to drugs during the\n13 time that she knew Mr. Epstein, and it certainly relates to all\n14 of her requests for, I believe she has requested $30 million in\n15 damages, your Honor, not just from the defamation, but also\n16 harkening back to what she claims were her years as a sex abuse\n17 victim.\n18 THE COURT: What's the basis of your statement that we\n19 will call it the flashback?\n20 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I believe --\n21 THE COURT: Because, quite frankly, I was unaware of\n22 that. Is that my error? Are you telling me something that's\n23 not quite right?\n24 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I believe that is what\n25 plaintiff has alleged in her complaint. If you can give me a\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00003815",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 212-2 Filed 04/16/21 Page 13 of 30",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "App.-0816",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "G4LMGIUC 12\n1 four individuals had sexually abused her prior to ever meeting\n2 Mr. Epstein.\n3 If she has evidence that she already was suffering\n4 from depression or some type of mental health disorder before\n5 meeting our client, Ms. Maxwell, or Mr. Epstein, then her\n6 flashbacks, if you will, could be related to other incidents\n7 that she has put out in the press. And she, I believe, has\n8 also told the press that she was in a drug rehabilitation\n9 facility at the time that she met Mr. Epstein.\n10 Obviously, to the extent she was under the influence\n11 of drugs, which is what she has told the press, at the time she\n12 met him, she persisted in being addicted to drugs during the\n13 time that she knew Mr. Epstein, and it certainly relates to all\n14 of her requests for, I believe she has requested $30 million in\n15 damages, your Honor, not just from the defamation, but also\n16 harkening back to what she claims were her years as a sex abuse\n17 victim.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "18 THE COURT: What's the basis of your statement that we\n19 will call it the flashback?\n20 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I believe --\n21 THE COURT: Because, quite frankly, I was unaware of\n22 that. Is that my error? Are you telling me something that's\n23 not quite right?\n24 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I believe that is what\n25 plaintiff has alleged in her complaint. If you can give me a",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00003815",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Mr. Epstein",
      "MS. MENNINGER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "04/16/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "212-2",
      "DOJ-OGR-00003815",
      "$30 million"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the text."
}