{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "59",
    "document_number": "36",
    "date": "07/24/19",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 59 of 74 59\n1 MR. WEINBERG: I do understand, but it's the\n2 complexity and the magnitude of the pretrial preparation, not\n3 just the sentencing consequences that requires us to put that\n4 issue before the Court.\n5 Second, I'm not here to say there should be those kind\n6 of monetary conditions. I know, at least in my state, the\n7 Commonwealth of Massachusetts, there's a movement that I read\n8 regularly about in the Boston Globe -- maybe it's similar\n9 here -- to stop that state practice.\n10 THE COURT: It is.\n11 MR. WEINBERG: Third, the Bail Reform Act, the federal\n12 Bail Reform Act of 1984, has a provision saying that a\n13 defendant should not be denied release based on their inability\n14 to satisfy a monetary condition. So I think to some extent\n15 Congress disapproves of locking someone up because there's a\n16 $500 bail that they can't make.\n17 I'm 73 years old. I grew up in the Warren Court\n18 where life was different, and the criminal justice system got\n19 politicized to some extent. I think there is almost the\n20 reaction to the excess, the overcriminalization, the\n21 overimprisonment that characterized the 1980's and the war on\n22 crime and the war on drugs.\n23 So I at least stand here, as someone with over 45\n24 years of observation, and believe and hope that one of the\n25 areas that we begin to reverse the excess is in keeping so many\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00000569",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 59 of 74 59",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MR. WEINBERG: I do understand, but it's the complexity and the magnitude of the pretrial preparation, not just the sentencing consequences that requires us to put that issue before the Court. Second, I'm not here to say there should be those kind of monetary conditions. I know, at least in my state, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, there's a movement that I read regularly about in the Boston Globe -- maybe it's similar here -- to stop that state practice. THE COURT: It is. MR. WEINBERG: Third, the Bail Reform Act, the federal Bail Reform Act of 1984, has a provision saying that a defendant should not be denied release based on their inability to satisfy a monetary condition. So I think to some extent Congress disapproves of locking someone up because there's a $500 bail that they can't make. I'm 73 years old. I grew up in the Warren Court where life was different, and the criminal justice system got politicized to some extent. I think there is almost the reaction to the excess, the overcriminalization, the overimprisonment that characterized the 1980's and the war on crime and the war on drugs. So I at least stand here, as someone with over 45 years of observation, and believe and hope that one of the areas that we begin to reverse the excess is in keeping so many",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000569",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. WEINBERG"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "THE COURT",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "Boston Globe"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Massachusetts"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "07/24/19",
      "1984",
      "1980's"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 36",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000569"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}