{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "17",
    "document_number": "21-7780",
    "date": "07/07/20",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case: 20-cr-00330 Document #: 18 Filed: 07/07/20 Page: 17 of 260\nFrance and the United Kingdom.13 Notably, two weeks ago, this Court recognized in United States v. Abdellatif El Mokadem, No. 19-CR-646 (AJN), 2020 WL 3440515 (S.D.N.Y. June 23, 2020) that “concerns regarding risk of flight are mitigated by the ongoing [COVID-19] pandemic, which has understandably curtailed travel across the country, and, indeed, around the world.” Id. at *1. In that case, despite finding detention to be warranted on two prior occasions, the Court concluded that the government could no longer establish flight risk and ordered the defendant released pending sentencing. Id. (“Taking account of the COVID-19 pandemic, which had not yet reached this country when the Court last considered Defendant’s custody status, the balance now clearly and convincingly tips in Defendant’s favor……” ). Consideration of this factor weighs heavily in favor of release on the proposed bail conditions here.\n2. The Nature and Circumstances of the Charges and the Weight of the Evidence Militate in Favor of Bail\nThe Defense Has Rebutted the Presumption Relating to Certain of the Charges. The government relies on the statutory presumption of detention applicable to offenses involving minor victims. (Gov. Mem. at 4-5.) But unlike the position it took with Epstein, the government does not contend that Ms. Maxwell poses any danger to the community, or that she suffers from compulsive or addictive sexual proclivities. See United States v. Epstein, 425 F. Supp. 3d 306, 314-15 (S.D.N.Y. 2019). Even according to the indictment, Ms. Maxwell’s alleged participation in offenses involving minors ended in 1997. Here, the only\n13 See, e.g., E.U. Formalizes Reopening, Barring Travelers From U.S., N.Y. Times, (June 30, 2020), available at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/30/world/europe/eu-reopening-blocks-us-travelers.html (confirming that the European Union will not open its borders to travelers from the United States, and “[t]ravelers’ country of residence, not their nationality, will be the determining factor for their ability to travel to countries in the European Union”); England Drops Its Quarantine for Most Visitors, but Not Those From the U.S., N.Y. Times (July 3, 2020), available at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/03/world/europe/britain-quarantine-us-coronavirus.html (confirming that England will leave mandatory 14-day quarantine restrictions in place for travelers coming from the United States).\n17\nDOJ-OGR-00000978",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case: 20-cr-00330 Document #: 18 Filed: 07/07/20 Page: 17 of 260",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "France and the United Kingdom.13 Notably, two weeks ago, this Court recognized in United States v. Abdellatif El Mokadem, No. 19-CR-646 (AJN), 2020 WL 3440515 (S.D.N.Y. June 23, 2020) that “concerns regarding risk of flight are mitigated by the ongoing [COVID-19] pandemic, which has understandably curtailed travel across the country, and, indeed, around the world.” Id. at *1. In that case, despite finding detention to be warranted on two prior occasions, the Court concluded that the government could no longer establish flight risk and ordered the defendant released pending sentencing. Id. (“Taking account of the COVID-19 pandemic, which had not yet reached this country when the Court last considered Defendant’s custody status, the balance now clearly and convincingly tips in Defendant’s favor……” ). Consideration of this factor weighs heavily in favor of release on the proposed bail conditions here.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2. The Nature and Circumstances of the Charges and the Weight of the Evidence Militate in Favor of Bail",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Defense Has Rebutted the Presumption Relating to Certain of the Charges. The government relies on the statutory presumption of detention applicable to offenses involving minor victims. (Gov. Mem. at 4-5.) But unlike the position it took with Epstein, the government does not contend that Ms. Maxwell poses any danger to the community, or that she suffers from compulsive or addictive sexual proclivities. See United States v. Epstein, 425 F. Supp. 3d 306, 314-15 (S.D.N.Y. 2019). Even according to the indictment, Ms. Maxwell’s alleged participation in offenses involving minors ended in 1997. Here, the only",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "13 See, e.g., E.U. Formalizes Reopening, Barring Travelers From U.S., N.Y. Times, (June 30, 2020), available at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/30/world/europe/eu-reopening-blocks-us-travelers.html (confirming that the European Union will not open its borders to travelers from the United States, and “[t]ravelers’ country of residence, not their nationality, will be the determining factor for their ability to travel to countries in the European Union”); England Drops Its Quarantine for Most Visitors, but Not Those From the U.S., N.Y. Times (July 3, 2020), available at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/03/world/europe/britain-quarantine-us-coronavirus.html (confirming that England will leave mandatory 14-day quarantine restrictions in place for travelers coming from the United States).",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "17",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000978",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Abdellatif El Mokadem",
      "Epstein",
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "European Union",
      "N.Y. Times",
      "S.D.N.Y.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "France",
      "United Kingdom",
      "United States",
      "England"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "June 23, 2020",
      "June 30, 2020",
      "July 3, 2020",
      "1997"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-cr-00330",
      "19-CR-646",
      "2020 WL 3440515",
      "425 F. Supp. 3d 306",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000978"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text discusses the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on bail conditions and the nature of the charges against Ms. Maxwell. The document includes citations to legal precedents and news articles. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}