{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "1",
    "document_number": "303",
    "date": "06/25/2021",
    "document_type": "Court Order",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": true
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 303 Filed 06/25/21 Page 1 of 2\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\nUnited States of America,\n-v-\nGhislaine Maxwell,\nDefendant.\n20-cr-330 (AJN)\nORDER\nALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:\nMaxwell's motions to suppress evidence (Dkt. Nos. 133, 139) are DENIED. The Court sets out its reasoning in an opinion concurrently filed under temporary seal to allow Maxwell and the Government the opportunity to propose redactions. The parties may file under seal any proposed redactions to the opinion within three days.\nThe Court further ORDERS that the April 9, 2019 memorandum decision and order on the Government's application to modify the protective order in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433, as well as the transcripts of the March 26, 2019 and April 9, 2019 ex parte hearings on that application shall be unsealed. These documents were previously filed under seal as Exhibits D, E, F, and G to the memorandum of law in support of Maxwell's first motion to suppress (Dkt. No. 134). Within one week, the parties shall confer and file under seal any proposed redactions to the memorandum decision, order, and transcripts.\nAny proposed redactions shall be narrowly tailored and shall be supported with reference to the Second Circuit's opinion in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The parties' proposed redactions should not include any information that has already been made public.\nDOJ-OGR-00004780",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 303 Filed 06/25/21 Page 1 of 2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "United States of America,\n-v-\nGhislaine Maxwell,\nDefendant.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "stamp",
      "content": "USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 6/25/2021",
      "position": "margin"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "20-cr-330 (AJN)\nORDER",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:\nMaxwell's motions to suppress evidence (Dkt. Nos. 133, 139) are DENIED. The Court sets out its reasoning in an opinion concurrently filed under temporary seal to allow Maxwell and the Government the opportunity to propose redactions. The parties may file under seal any proposed redactions to the opinion within three days.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Court further ORDERS that the April 9, 2019 memorandum decision and order on the Government's application to modify the protective order in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433, as well as the transcripts of the March 26, 2019 and April 9, 2019 ex parte hearings on that application shall be unsealed. These documents were previously filed under seal as Exhibits D, E, F, and G to the memorandum of law in support of Maxwell's first motion to suppress (Dkt. No. 134). Within one week, the parties shall confer and file under seal any proposed redactions to the memorandum decision, order, and transcripts.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Any proposed redactions shall be narrowly tailored and shall be supported with reference to the Second Circuit's opinion in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The parties' proposed redactions should not include any information that has already been made public.",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00004780",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Alison J. Nathan"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States District Court",
      "Southern District of New York",
      "Second Circuit"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York",
      "Onondaga"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "06/25/2021",
      "April 9, 2019",
      "March 26, 2019"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 303",
      "20-cr-330 (AJN)",
      "Dkt. Nos. 133, 139",
      "15-cv-7433",
      "Dkt. No. 134"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It appears to be a formal legal document with no handwritten text or significant damage."
}