{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "14",
    "document_number": "14",
    "date": "07/15/19",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 14 Filed 07/15/19 Page 14 of 18\nSORA HEARING page 13\ngoing to be deemed a Level Three sex offender with no designation, correct?\nTHE COURT: Correct.\nMS. MUSUMECI: For purposes of the appeal I believe that Your Honor --\nTHE COURT: Give me the board's scoring.\nThe board has scored use of violence the least, 10.\nSexual contact with victim, 25. I agree.\nNumber of victims, three or more. He only plead guilty to one, but apparently there were more than one and I think the People concede that although they say it was not reliable.\nDuration of offense, conduct with victim, continuing course of sexual misconduct, the People have told me it was continuing for 20 points.\nAge of victim 11 through 16, he got 20 points for that, and she was 16 at the time.\nOther victim characteristics, there was no mental disable or helplessness. I agree.\nRelationship with victim stranger, 20 points.\nAge at first act of sexual misconduct, 20 or less. They scored him zero on that.\nNumber and nature of prior crimes, no history, they scored him five on that.\nVikki J. Benkel Senior Court Reporter\nDOJ-OGR-00000379",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 14 Filed 07/15/19 Page 14 of 18",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SORA HEARING page 13",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "going to be deemed a Level Three sex offender with no designation, correct?\nTHE COURT: Correct.\nMS. MUSUMECI: For purposes of the appeal I believe that Your Honor --\nTHE COURT: Give me the board's scoring.\nThe board has scored use of violence the least, 10.\nSexual contact with victim, 25. I agree.\nNumber of victims, three or more. He only plead guilty to one, but apparently there were more than one and I think the People concede that although they say it was not reliable.\nDuration of offense, conduct with victim, continuing course of sexual misconduct, the People have told me it was continuing for 20 points.\nAge of victim 11 through 16, he got 20 points for that, and she was 16 at the time.\nOther victim characteristics, there was no mental disable or helplessness. I agree.\nRelationship with victim stranger, 20 points.\nAge at first act of sexual misconduct, 20 or less. They scored him zero on that.\nNumber and nature of prior crimes, no history, they scored him five on that.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Vikki J. Benkel Senior Court Reporter",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000379",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MUSUMECI",
      "Vikki J. Benkel"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "07/15/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 14",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000379"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}