{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "9",
    "document_number": "93",
    "date": "12/10/20",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 9 of 91\n9\n1    in this case. As the chief judge of the district has\n2    recognized in order number 20MC176, COVID-19 remains a national\n3    emergency that restricts normal operations of the courts.\n4    Conducting this proceeding in person is not safely feasible.\n5        Second, the measures taken by the court are no broader\n6    than necessary to address the challenges posed by the pandemic.\n7    Although the number of seats in the jury assembly room is\n8    limited to 60, it is necessary to do so for public and\n9    courthouse staff safety and is closely equivalent to the number\n10   of people who would be able to watch an in-court proceeding in\n11   a regular-sized courtroom. The number of people who will be\n12   able to hear the live audio of this proceeding far exceeds\n13   access under normal in-person circumstances.\n14       Lastly, given the safety and technology limitations,\n15   there are no reasonable alternatives to the measures the court\n16   has taken.\n17       Accordingly, the access provided is fully in accord\n18   with the First and Sixth Amendment public trial rights.\n19       With those preliminary matters out of the way,\n20   counsel, I propose we turn to the arraignment.\n21       Ms. Moe, am I correct that this is an arraignment on\n22   the S1 superseding indictment?\n23       MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor.\n24       THE COURT: Can you explain what the difference is\n25   between the S1 and the original indictment?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00001886",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 9 of 91",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "9",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1    in this case. As the chief judge of the district has\n2    recognized in order number 20MC176, COVID-19 remains a national\n3    emergency that restricts normal operations of the courts.\n4    Conducting this proceeding in person is not safely feasible.\n5        Second, the measures taken by the court are no broader\n6    than necessary to address the challenges posed by the pandemic.\n7    Although the number of seats in the jury assembly room is\n8    limited to 60, it is necessary to do so for public and\n9    courthouse staff safety and is closely equivalent to the number\n10   of people who would be able to watch an in-court proceeding in\n11   a regular-sized courtroom. The number of people who will be\n12   able to hear the live audio of this proceeding far exceeds\n13   access under normal in-person circumstances.\n14       Lastly, given the safety and technology limitations,\n15   there are no reasonable alternatives to the measures the court\n16   has taken.\n17       Accordingly, the access provided is fully in accord\n18   with the First and Sixth Amendment public trial rights.\n19       With those preliminary matters out of the way,\n20   counsel, I propose we turn to the arraignment.\n21       Ms. Moe, am I correct that this is an arraignment on\n22   the S1 superseding indictment?\n23       MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor.\n24       THE COURT: Can you explain what the difference is\n25   between the S1 and the original indictment?",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001886",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Moe"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "12/10/20"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "Document 93",
      "20MC176",
      "S1",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001886"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript, with a formal tone and language. The content is related to a court proceeding and discusses the measures taken due to COVID-19. The footer contains the name and contact information of the court reporter and a reference number."
}