{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "35",
    "document_number": "36",
    "date": "07/24/19",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 35 of 74\nthat -- by the way, you're suggesting that the measure of recidivism is a reported classic case by the prosecutor, state or federal, indictment, etc., etc.\nThat may not even occur in most instances because a lot of cases that are even referred to prosecutor offices are never formalized or never brought.\nSo I'm not sure that the passage of time, without more and without more study and with let's say discipline of a defendant -- I'm not sure that that gets us there.\nMR. WEINBERG: I guess I would have two responses.\nTHE COURT: Sure.\nMR. WEINBERG: One, that the level of publicity brought to Mr. Epstein and brought in this case and even brought before the bringing of this case, his wealth which makes him an attractive civil defendant as well as a criminal defendant -- and there have been a number of complaints or threats or notices or demands by different civil lawyers.\nBut there is an unprecedented amount of publicity that would mobilize and motivate people who were victimized by him.\nIf there were any people victimized by him after 2005, it is utterly lacking in the average case where some victim doesn't know that they've got an ear, whether it's an ear of the civil bar or an ear of the United States Attorney, to receive, positively receive, and embrace an allegation against Mr. Epstein.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00000545",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 35 of 74",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "that -- by the way, you're suggesting that the measure of recidivism is a reported classic case by the prosecutor, state or federal, indictment, etc., etc.\nThat may not even occur in most instances because a lot of cases that are even referred to prosecutor offices are never formalized or never brought.\nSo I'm not sure that the passage of time, without more and without more study and with let's say discipline of a defendant -- I'm not sure that that gets us there.\nMR. WEINBERG: I guess I would have two responses.\nTHE COURT: Sure.\nMR. WEINBERG: One, that the level of publicity brought to Mr. Epstein and brought in this case and even brought before the bringing of this case, his wealth which makes him an attractive civil defendant as well as a criminal defendant -- and there have been a number of complaints or threats or notices or demands by different civil lawyers.\nBut there is an unprecedented amount of publicity that would mobilize and motivate people who were victimized by him.\nIf there were any people victimized by him after 2005, it is utterly lacking in the average case where some victim doesn't know that they've got an ear, whether it's an ear of the civil bar or an ear of the United States Attorney, to receive, positively receive, and embrace an allegation against Mr. Epstein.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000545",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Epstein",
      "Mr. Weinberg"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States Attorney",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "2005",
      "07/24/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 36",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000545"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}