{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "106",
    "document_number": "293-1",
    "date": "05/25/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 293-1 Filed 05/25/21 Page 106 of 349\n\nI think Jay [Lefkowitz] will try to talk you out of a registrable offense. Regardless of the merits of his argument, in order to get us down in time they made us an offer that included pleading to an offense against a minor (encouraging a minor into prostitution) and touted that we should be happy because it was registrable. For that reason alone, I don't think we should consider allowing them to come down from their own offer, either on this issue or on time of incarceration.\n\nLefkowitz attempted to reach Acosta that night, but Acosta directed Villafaña to return the call, and told Lourie that he did not want to open \"a backchannel\" with defense counsel. Lourie instructed Villafaña, \"U can tell [J]ay that [A]lex will not agree to a nonregistration offense.\"\n\nOn the morning of Friday, September 21, 2007, Villafaña emailed Acosta informing him that \"it looks like we will be [filing charges against] Mr. Epstein on Tuesday,\" reporting that the charging package was being reviewed by the West Palm Beach manager, and asking if anyone in the Miami office needed to review it. Villafaña also alerted Lourie that she had spoken that morning to Lefkowitz, who \"was waffling\" about Epstein pleading to a state charge that required sexual offender registration, and she noted that she would confer with Krischer and Belohlavek \"to make sure the defense doesn't try to do an end run.\"\n\nThat same morning, Epstein attorney Sanchez, who had not been involved in negotiations for several weeks, emailed Sloman, advising, \"[I] want to finalize the plea deal and there is only one issue outstanding and [I] do not believe that [A]lex has read all the defense submissions that would assist in his determination on this point . . . [U]pon resolution, we will be prepared to sign as soon as today.\" From his out-of-town vacation, Sloman forwarded the email to Acosta, who replied, \"Enjo[y] vacation. Working with [M]arie on this.\" Sloman also forwarded Sanchez's email to Lourie and asked, \"Do you know what she's talking about?\" Lourie responded that Sanchez \"has not been in any negotiations. Don't even engage with yet another cook.\"\n\nJ. The USAO Agrees Not to Criminally Charge \"Potential Co-Conspirators\"\n\nLefkowitz, in the meantime, sent Villafaña a revised draft NPA that proposed an 18-month sentence in the county jail, followed by 12 months of community control, and restored the provision for a trust fund for disbursement to an agreed-upon list of individuals \"who seek reimbursement by filing suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255.\" This defense draft retained the provision promising not to criminally charge Epstein's four female assistants and unnamed employees of the specific Epstein-owned corporate entity, but also extended the provision to \"any potential co-conspirators\" for any criminal charge arising from the ongoing federal investigation. This language had evolved from similar language that Villafaña had included in the USAO's earlier proposed draft federal plea agreement.122 Lefkowitz also again included the sentence\n\n122 The language in the USAO's draft federal plea agreement stated, \"This agreement resolves the federal criminal liability of the defendant and any co-conspirators in the Southern District of Florida growing out of any criminal conduct by those persons known to the [USAO] . . .\"\n\n79\n\nDOJ-OGR-00004403",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 293-1 Filed 05/25/21 Page 106 of 349",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "I think Jay [Lefkowitz] will try to talk you out of a registrable offense. Regardless of the merits of his argument, in order to get us down in time they made us an offer that included pleading to an offense against a minor (encouraging a minor into prostitution) and touted that we should be happy because it was registrable. For that reason alone, I don't think we should consider allowing them to come down from their own offer, either on this issue or on time of incarceration.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Lefkowitz attempted to reach Acosta that night, but Acosta directed Villafaña to return the call, and told Lourie that he did not want to open \"a backchannel\" with defense counsel. Lourie instructed Villafaña, \"U can tell [J]ay that [A]lex will not agree to a nonregistration offense.\"",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "On the morning of Friday, September 21, 2007, Villafaña emailed Acosta informing him that \"it looks like we will be [filing charges against] Mr. Epstein on Tuesday,\" reporting that the charging package was being reviewed by the West Palm Beach manager, and asking if anyone in the Miami office needed to review it. Villafaña also alerted Lourie that she had spoken that morning to Lefkowitz, who \"was waffling\" about Epstein pleading to a state charge that required sexual offender registration, and she noted that she would confer with Krischer and Belohlavek \"to make sure the defense doesn't try to do an end run.\"",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "That same morning, Epstein attorney Sanchez, who had not been involved in negotiations for several weeks, emailed Sloman, advising, \"[I] want to finalize the plea deal and there is only one issue outstanding and [I] do not believe that [A]lex has read all the defense submissions that would assist in his determination on this point . . . [U]pon resolution, we will be prepared to sign as soon as today.\" From his out-of-town vacation, Sloman forwarded the email to Acosta, who replied, \"Enjo[y] vacation. Working with [M]arie on this.\" Sloman also forwarded Sanchez's email to Lourie and asked, \"Do you know what she's talking about?\" Lourie responded that Sanchez \"has not been in any negotiations. Don't even engage with yet another cook.\"",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "J. The USAO Agrees Not to Criminally Charge \"Potential Co-Conspirators\"",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Lefkowitz, in the meantime, sent Villafaña a revised draft NPA that proposed an 18-month sentence in the county jail, followed by 12 months of community control, and restored the provision for a trust fund for disbursement to an agreed-upon list of individuals \"who seek reimbursement by filing suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255.\" This defense draft retained the provision promising not to criminally charge Epstein's four female assistants and unnamed employees of the specific Epstein-owned corporate entity, but also extended the provision to \"any potential co-conspirators\" for any criminal charge arising from the ongoing federal investigation. This language had evolved from similar language that Villafaña had included in the USAO's earlier proposed draft federal plea agreement.122 Lefkowitz also again included the sentence",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "122 The language in the USAO's draft federal plea agreement stated, \"This agreement resolves the federal criminal liability of the defendant and any co-conspirators in the Southern District of Florida growing out of any criminal conduct by those persons known to the [USAO] . . .\"",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "79",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00004403",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jay Lefkowitz",
      "Acosta",
      "Villafaña",
      "Lourie",
      "Epstein",
      "Sanchez",
      "Sloman",
      "Marie",
      "Krischer",
      "Belohlavek",
      "Alex"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "USAO",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "West Palm Beach",
      "Miami",
      "Southern District of Florida"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "September 21, 2007",
      "05/25/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 293-1",
      "18 U.S.C. § 2255",
      "DOJ-OGR-00004403"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The text is mostly printed, with some footnotes and a header. There are no visible stamps or handwritten text."
}