{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "14",
    "document_number": "73",
    "date": "05/27/2021",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page14 of 24\n\n\"the weight of the evidence against the person\"; and (3) the \"history and characteristics of the person.\" 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g).\n\n26. This Court applies \"deferential review to a district court's order of detention.\" United States v. Watkins, 940 F.3d 152, 158 (2d Cir. 2019). It reviews for clear error the district court's findings regarding risk of flight and whether the proposed bail package would reasonably assure the defendant's appearance in court, see United States v. English, 629 F.3d 311, 319 (2d Cir. 2011); United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987), and will reverse only if \"on the entire evidence,\" it is \"left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed,\" Sabhnani, 493 F.3d at 75.\n\n27. Once a defendant has been ordered detained, a judicial officer may \"permit the temporary release of the person, in the custody of a United States marshal or another appropriate person, to the extent that the judicial officer determines such release to be necessary for preparation of the person's defense or for another compelling reason.\" 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i). The defendant bears the burden of showing that temporary release is necessary. See United States v. Scarborough, 821 F. App'x 598, 600 (6th Cir. 2020); United States v. Belardo, No. 20 Cr. 126 (LTS), 2020 WL 1689789, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 7, 2020). This Court has not resolved whether it reviews a district court's temporary release decision for",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page14 of 24",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "\"the weight of the evidence against the person\"; and (3) the \"history and characteristics of the person.\" 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g).",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "26. This Court applies \"deferential review to a district court's order of detention.\" United States v. Watkins, 940 F.3d 152, 158 (2d Cir. 2019). It reviews for clear error the district court's findings regarding risk of flight and whether the proposed bail package would reasonably assure the defendant's appearance in court, see United States v. English, 629 F.3d 311, 319 (2d Cir. 2011); United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987), and will reverse only if \"on the entire evidence,\" it is \"left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed,\" Sabhnani, 493 F.3d at 75.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "27. Once a defendant has been ordered detained, a judicial officer may \"permit the temporary release of the person, in the custody of a United States marshal or another appropriate person, to the extent that the judicial officer determines such release to be necessary for preparation of the person's defense or for another compelling reason.\" 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i). The defendant bears the burden of showing that temporary release is necessary. See United States v. Scarborough, 821 F. App'x 598, 600 (6th Cir. 2020); United States v. Belardo, No. 20 Cr. 126 (LTS), 2020 WL 1689789, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 7, 2020). This Court has not resolved whether it reviews a district court's temporary release decision for",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "14",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001454",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Watkins",
      "English",
      "Shakur",
      "Sabhnani",
      "Scarborough",
      "Belardo"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "S.D.N.Y."
    ],
    "dates": [
      "05/27/2021",
      "Apr. 7, 2020"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 21-770",
      "Document 73",
      "18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)",
      "18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)",
      "940 F.3d 152",
      "629 F.3d 311",
      "817 F.2d 189",
      "493 F.3d at 75",
      "821 F. App'x 598",
      "No. 20 Cr. 126 (LTS)",
      "2020 WL 1689789"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court document, likely a memorandum or opinion, discussing the detention and temporary release of a defendant. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
}