{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "9",
    "document_number": "109-1",
    "date": "09/17/2024",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 109-1, 09/17/2024, 3634097, Page9 of 26\nDistrict Court imposed a $750,000 fine and a $300 mandatory special assessment. This appeal followed.\nII. DISCUSSION\n1. The NPA Between Epstein and USAO-SDFL Did Not Bar Maxwell's Prosecution by USAO-SDNY\nMaxwell sought dismissal of the charges in the Indictment on the grounds that the NPA made between Epstein and USAO-SDFL immunized her from prosecution on all counts as a third-party beneficiary of the NPA. The District Court denied the motion, rejecting Maxwell's arguments. We agree. We review de novo the denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment.9\nIn arguing that the NPA barred her prosecution by USAO-SDNY, Maxwell cites the portion of the NPA in which \"the United States [ ] agree[d] that it w[ould] not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein.\"10 We hold that the NPA with USAO-SDFL does not bind USAO-SDNY.\nIt is well established in our Circuit that \"[a] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement\n9 See, e.g., United States v. Walters, 910 F.3d 11, 22 (2d Cir. 2018).\n10 A-178.\n9\nDOJ-OGR-00000010",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 109-1, 09/17/2024, 3634097, Page9 of 26",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "District Court imposed a $750,000 fine and a $300 mandatory special assessment. This appeal followed.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "II. DISCUSSION",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1. The NPA Between Epstein and USAO-SDFL Did Not Bar Maxwell's Prosecution by USAO-SDNY",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Maxwell sought dismissal of the charges in the Indictment on the grounds that the NPA made between Epstein and USAO-SDFL immunized her from prosecution on all counts as a third-party beneficiary of the NPA. The District Court denied the motion, rejecting Maxwell's arguments. We agree. We review de novo the denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment.9",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "In arguing that the NPA barred her prosecution by USAO-SDNY, Maxwell cites the portion of the NPA in which \"the United States [ ] agree[d] that it w[ould] not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein.\"10 We hold that the NPA with USAO-SDFL does not bind USAO-SDNY.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "It is well established in our Circuit that \"[a] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "9 See, e.g., United States v. Walters, 910 F.3d 11, 22 (2d Cir. 2018).",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "10 A-178.",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "9",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000010",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell",
      "Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "District Court",
      "USAO-SDFL",
      "USAO-SDNY",
      "United States Attorney"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "09/17/2024"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "109-1",
      "3634097",
      "910 F.3d 11",
      "A-178"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court document related to the case of Maxwell, discussing the NPA between Epstein and USAO-SDFL and its implications for Maxwell's prosecution by USAO-SDNY. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and clear."
}