{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "19",
    "document_number": "140",
    "date": "02/04/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 19 of 22\nHere, the government did not even attempt the Martindell process the Attorney General attempted in Palmieri.\nIII. The government's violation of the Fifth Amendment requires suppression.\nThe Fifth Amendment provides: \"No person . . . shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.\" U.S. CONST. amend. V. For three separate reasons violates the Fifth Amendment.\nFirst, the Fifth Amendment \"proscribe[s] the compelled production of . . . a Testimonial Communication that is incriminating.\" Fisher, 425 U.S. at 408; see Dionisio, 410 U.S. at 11 (\"The grand jury cannot require a witness to testify against himself.\") The subpoena to contravenes this proscription because it literally \"compels production\" of Maxwell's incriminating testimony ().\nSecond, \"a compulsory production of the private books and papers . . . [also] is compelling . . . him to be a witness against himself, within the meaning of the fifth amendment.\" Boyd, 116 U.S. at 634-35. Even if the subpoena does not literally require Maxwell to \"testify against herself,\" Dionisio, 410 U.S. at 11, Maxwell's were private and confidential under the Protective Order. Supra Part I.B. Compelling production of these is itself a Fifth Amendment violation.\nThird, the government's circumvention of Martindell unconstitutionally burdens Maxwell's Fifth Amendment rights.\n. But Martindell protects Maxwell from the government's conduct, and it authorized her to give under the shield of the Protective Order without worrying whether the government could \"insinuate itself\" into the\n15\nDOJ-OGR-00002567",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 19 of 22",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Here, the government did not even attempt the Martindell process the Attorney General attempted in Palmieri.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "III. The government's violation of the Fifth Amendment requires suppression.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Fifth Amendment provides: \"No person . . . shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.\" U.S. CONST. amend. V. For three separate reasons violates the Fifth Amendment.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "First, the Fifth Amendment \"proscribe[s] the compelled production of . . . a Testimonial Communication that is incriminating.\" Fisher, 425 U.S. at 408; see Dionisio, 410 U.S. at 11 (\"The grand jury cannot require a witness to testify against himself.\") The subpoena to contravenes this proscription because it literally \"compels production\" of Maxwell's incriminating testimony ().",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Second, \"a compulsory production of the private books and papers . . . [also] is compelling . . . him to be a witness against himself, within the meaning of the fifth amendment.\" Boyd, 116 U.S. at 634-35. Even if the subpoena does not literally require Maxwell to \"testify against herself,\" Dionisio, 410 U.S. at 11, Maxwell's were private and confidential under the Protective Order. Supra Part I.B. Compelling production of these is itself a Fifth Amendment violation.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Third, the government's circumvention of Martindell unconstitutionally burdens Maxwell's Fifth Amendment rights.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": ". But Martindell protects Maxwell from the government's conduct, and it authorized her to give under the shield of the Protective Order without worrying whether the government could \"insinuate itself\" into the",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "15",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002567",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/04/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "Document 140",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002567"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with redactions. The text is mostly printed, with some citations and references to court cases and amendments."
}