{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "150",
    "document_number": "20-2",
    "date": "04/01/2021",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page150 of 200\nk7e2MaxC kjc\n1 the resources available to her, it is practically impossible to\n2 set financial bail conditions that could reasonably assure her\n3 appearance in court.\n4 Even if the picture of her financial resources were\n5 not opaque, as it is, detention would still be appropriate.\n6 Personally, the defendant not only has significant financial\n7 resources, but has demonstrated sophistication in hiding those\n8 resources and herself. After the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein,\n9 Ms. Maxwell retreated from view. She moved to New England,\n10 changing locations on multiple occasions, and appears to have\n11 made anonymous transactions both big and small. The defense\n12 said that she did all of this not to hide from the government\n13 but to maintain her privacy and avoid public and press\n14 scrutiny. Even assuming that Ms. Maxwell only wanted to hide\n15 from the press and public, an assumption that the court does\n16 not share, but even assuming that's the case, her recent\n17 conduct underscores her extraordinary capacity to evade\n18 detection, even in the face of what the defense has\n19 acknowledged to be extreme and unusual efforts to locate her.\n20 Because of these concerns, even a bail package with\n21 electronic monitoring and home security guards would be\n22 insufficient. Were she to flee, the defendant could simply\n23 remove the monitoring bracelet and, as other courts have\n24 observed, home detention with electronic monitoring does not\n25 prevent flight. At best it limits a fleeing defendant's head\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00001091",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page150 of 200",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "k7e2MaxC kjc",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 the resources available to her, it is practically impossible to\n2 set financial bail conditions that could reasonably assure her\n3 appearance in court.\n4 Even if the picture of her financial resources were\n5 not opaque, as it is, detention would still be appropriate.\n6 Personally, the defendant not only has significant financial\n7 resources, but has demonstrated sophistication in hiding those\n8 resources and herself. After the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein,\n9 Ms. Maxwell retreated from view. She moved to New England,\n10 changing locations on multiple occasions, and appears to have\n11 made anonymous transactions both big and small. The defense\n12 said that she did all of this not to hide from the government\n13 but to maintain her privacy and avoid public and press\n14 scrutiny. Even assuming that Ms. Maxwell only wanted to hide\n15 from the press and public, an assumption that the court does\n16 not share, but even assuming that's the case, her recent\n17 conduct underscores her extraordinary capacity to evade\n18 detection, even in the face of what the defense has\n19 acknowledged to be extreme and unusual efforts to locate her.\n20 Because of these concerns, even a bail package with\n21 electronic monitoring and home security guards would be\n22 insufficient. Were she to flee, the defendant could simply\n23 remove the monitoring bracelet and, as other courts have\n24 observed, home detention with electronic monitoring does not\n25 prevent flight. At best it limits a fleeing defendant's head",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001091",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New England"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "04/01/2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 21-770",
      "Document 20-2",
      "3068530",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001091"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The text is typed and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps. The document is from the Southern District Reporters, P.C. and includes a reference number and contact information."
}