{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "15",
    "document_number": "14",
    "date": "07/15/19",
    "document_type": "SORA HEARING",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 14 Filed 07/15/19 Page 15 of 18\nSORA HEARING page 14\n1 Recency of prior offense less than three years,\n2 they gave him zero.\n3 Drug or alcohol abuse history, they gave him zero.\n4 Acceptance of responsibility, they gave him zero.\n5 Conduct while confined, they gave him zero.\n6 And supervision, they gave him zero.\n7 Living employment situation, zero.\n8 They gave him 130 points, which is the highest\n9 level, and I agree with that.\n10 MR. LEFKOWITZ: If I could be heard for one\n11 moment.\n12 It appears that the state board made its\n13 determination based on access to a police report in Florida.\n14 The prosecutor, the lead prosecutor, the lead sex\n15 crimes prosecutor in Palm Beach made a determination that\n16 the complainants and the police report itself was not\n17 credible and decided not to prosecute on the basis of all of\n18 that.\n19 In addition, there has been through the course of\n20 the last few years some civil litigation, as you might\n21 imagine, involving these matters and we now have sworn\n22 testimony in evidence from the complainants themselves\n23 disclaiming much of what appears in the police report.\n24 So, Your Honor, we would submit and this is not to\n25 make light in any way of the conduct what Mr. Epstein did or\nVikki J. Benkel\nSenior Court Reporter\nDOJ-OGR-00000380",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 14 Filed 07/15/19 Page 15 of 18",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SORA HEARING page 14",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Recency of prior offense less than three years,\n2 they gave him zero.\n3 Drug or alcohol abuse history, they gave him zero.\n4 Acceptance of responsibility, they gave him zero.\n5 Conduct while confined, they gave him zero.\n6 And supervision, they gave him zero.\n7 Living employment situation, zero.\n8 They gave him 130 points, which is the highest\n9 level, and I agree with that.\n10 MR. LEFKOWITZ: If I could be heard for one\n11 moment.\n12 It appears that the state board made its\n13 determination based on access to a police report in Florida.\n14 The prosecutor, the lead prosecutor, the lead sex\n15 crimes prosecutor in Palm Beach made a determination that\n16 the complainants and the police report itself was not\n17 credible and decided not to prosecute on the basis of all of\n18 that.\n19 In addition, there has been through the course of\n20 the last few years some civil litigation, as you might\n21 imagine, involving these matters and we now have sworn\n22 testimony in evidence from the complainants themselves\n23 disclaiming much of what appears in the police report.\n24 So, Your Honor, we would submit and this is not to\n25 make light in any way of the conduct what Mr. Epstein did or",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Vikki J. Benkel\nSenior Court Reporter",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000380",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. LEFKOWITZ",
      "Mr. Epstein",
      "Vikki J. Benkel"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [
      "Florida",
      "Palm Beach"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "07/15/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 14",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000380"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}