{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "20",
    "document_number": "204-12",
    "date": "04/16/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204-12 Filed 04/16/21 Page 20 of 30\nrandomly selected and sent questionnaires, they are less likely to return the questionnaire, and/or they are more likely to be found not qualified as a juror when they return the questionnaire, and/or they are more likely to be excused when found qualified, and, hence, African Americans and Hispanics are less likely to be moved from the master jury wheel onto the qualified jury wheel (reason 7). As a result of this, the percent of African Americans on the qualified jury wheel is 2.58 percentage points lower and the percent of Hispanics is 2.59 percentage points lower. This accounts for all of the absolute difference between the qualified jury wheel and master jury wheel and 69.9% of the absolute difference between the qualified jury wheel and the community for African Americans and 71.2% for Hispanics.\n38. The summary of the results of the analysis of the impact of the various causes on the difference between the qualified jury wheel and the community are presented in the table below.\nANALYSIS OF ABSOLUTE DISPARITY BETWEEN QUALIFIED JURY WHEEL AND COMMUNITY AND THE CAUSES AND IMPACT OF THE CAUSES ON THE ABSOLUTE DISPARITY\nEntity\nCause of differences between entity demographics:\nQualified jury wheel\nDue to differences in being found to be qualified as a juror or being excused\nDue to clerical error in handling alternative mailing address\nMaster wheel\nFailure to consider inactive voters except in Dutchess\nDue to underrepresenting counties in both Manhattan and White Plains\nMaster wheel if simple random sample\nDifferences in U S citizens voting age and those registered to vote and/or disconnect in time between community benchmark and voter lists\nCommunity\nDOJ-OGR-00003640",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204-12 Filed 04/16/21 Page 20 of 30",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "randomly selected and sent questionnaires, they are less likely to return the questionnaire, and/or they are more likely to be found not qualified as a juror when they return the questionnaire, and/or they are more likely to be excused when found qualified, and, hence, African Americans and Hispanics are less likely to be moved from the master jury wheel onto the qualified jury wheel (reason 7). As a result of this, the percent of African Americans on the qualified jury wheel is 2.58 percentage points lower and the percent of Hispanics is 2.59 percentage points lower. This accounts for all of the absolute difference between the qualified jury wheel and master jury wheel and 69.9% of the absolute difference between the qualified jury wheel and the community for African Americans and 71.2% for Hispanics.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "38. The summary of the results of the analysis of the impact of the various causes on the difference between the qualified jury wheel and the community are presented in the table below.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "ANALYSIS OF ABSOLUTE DISPARITY BETWEEN QUALIFIED JURY WHEEL AND COMMUNITY AND THE CAUSES AND IMPACT OF THE CAUSES ON THE ABSOLUTE DISPARITY",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Entity\nCause of differences between entity demographics:\nQualified jury wheel\nDue to differences in being found to be qualified as a juror or being excused\nDue to clerical error in handling alternative mailing address\nMaster wheel\nFailure to consider inactive voters except in Dutchess\nDue to underrepresenting counties in both Manhattan and White Plains\nMaster wheel if simple random sample\nDifferences in U S citizens voting age and those registered to vote and/or disconnect in time between community benchmark and voter lists\nCommunity",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00003640",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Manhattan",
      "White Plains",
      "Dutchess"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "04/16/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "204-12",
      "DOJ-OGR-00003640"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to jury selection demographics. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
}