{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "34",
    "document_number": "207",
    "date": "04/16/21",
    "document_type": "Court Order",
    "has_handwriting": true,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 34 of 34\n\nThe Court ORDERS the Government to confirm within one week whether it considers any evidence related to negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement to constitute Brady or Rule 16 material and, if so, to confirm that it has or will disclose such evidence.\n\nThe Court further ORDERS the parties to negotiate a final schedule for all pretrial disclosures that remain outstanding, including: Brady, Giglio, and Jenks Act materials, including co-conspirator statements; non-testifying witness statements; testifying witness statements; the identity of victims alleged in the indictment; 404(b) material; and the Government's witness list.\n\nThe Court also requires the parties to negotiate a schedule for any additional or supplemental motions briefing in light of the S2 indictment. The Court ORDERS a joint proposal to be submitted by April 21, 2021. If agreement is not reached, the parties shall submit their respective proposals.\n\nThe Court further ORDERS Maxwell to show cause by April 21, 2021 why her motion to dismiss the S1 superseding indictment under the Sixth Amendment (Dkt. No. 125) should not be denied as moot.\n\nSO ORDERED.\n\nDated: April 16, 2021\nNew York, New York\n\nALISON J. NATHAN\nUnited States District Judge\n\n34\nDOJ-OGR-00003708",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 34 of 34",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Court ORDERS the Government to confirm within one week whether it considers any evidence related to negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement to constitute Brady or Rule 16 material and, if so, to confirm that it has or will disclose such evidence.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Court further ORDERS the parties to negotiate a final schedule for all pretrial disclosures that remain outstanding, including: Brady, Giglio, and Jenks Act materials, including co-conspirator statements; non-testifying witness statements; testifying witness statements; the identity of victims alleged in the indictment; 404(b) material; and the Government's witness list.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Court also requires the parties to negotiate a schedule for any additional or supplemental motions briefing in light of the S2 indictment. The Court ORDERS a joint proposal to be submitted by April 21, 2021. If agreement is not reached, the parties shall submit their respective proposals.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Court further ORDERS Maxwell to show cause by April 21, 2021 why her motion to dismiss the S1 superseding indictment under the Sixth Amendment (Dkt. No. 125) should not be denied as moot.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SO ORDERED.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Dated: April 16, 2021\nNew York, New York",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "signature",
      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN\nUnited States District Judge",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "34\nDOJ-OGR-00003708",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "ALISON J. NATHAN",
      "Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Government"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "April 16, 2021",
      "April 21, 2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 207",
      "Dkt. No. 125",
      "DOJ-OGR-00003708"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court order from a legal case. It is well-formatted and legible. The signature of the judge is present at the bottom of the page."
}