{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "205",
    "document_number": "204",
    "date": "04/16/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 205 of 239\nto particulars furnished,\" it can \"restrict unduly the Government's ability to present its case.\" Henry, 861 F. Supp. at 1197; see also Mitlof, 2014 WL 4243657, at *2 (recognizing that \"care must be taken\" because \"[t]he government's presentation of evidence at trial is limited to the particulars contained in the bill\"); United States v. Samsonov, No. 07 Cr. 1198 (CM), 2009 WL 176721, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2009) (\"The vehicle of a bill of particulars serves to inform a defendant of the nature of the charge, when he is otherwise insufficiently informed, and must not be misused to compel disclosure of how much the Government can prove, nor to foreclose the Government from using proof it may develop as the trial approaches.\"). Moreover, where the Government's provision of particulars is tantamount to an itemized preview of its proof, it creates the very real danger that a defendant will \"tailor her testimony to explain away the Government's case.\" Henry, 861 F. Supp. at 1197. These concerns animate the rule that \"if the defendant has been given adequate notice of the charges against her and can prepare fully for trial with reasonably diligent efforts, the Government cannot be required to disclose additional details about its case.\" Id.\n2. Discussion\nThere is no basis for a bill of particulars in this case. The charges against the defendant are clear from the face of the Indictment, which provides significant detail regarding the charged crimes. As is apparent from the 18-page Indictment, the charges concern the defendant's participation in conspiracies to transport and entice minor girls to travel with the intent that they engage in illegal sex acts with Jeffrey Epstein from 1994 through 1997, and the defendant's attempt to cover up that conduct during her civil deposition testimony in 2016. Specifically, the Indictment makes plain that the defendant is charged with engaging in a conspiracy to transport minor girls with intent that they engage in sexual activity with Epstein, engaging in a conspiracy to entice",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 205 of 239",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "to particulars furnished,\" it can \"restrict unduly the Government's ability to present its case.\" Henry, 861 F. Supp. at 1197; see also Mitlof, 2014 WL 4243657, at *2 (recognizing that \"care must be taken\" because \"[t]he government's presentation of evidence at trial is limited to the particulars contained in the bill\"); United States v. Samsonov, No. 07 Cr. 1198 (CM), 2009 WL 176721, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2009) (\"The vehicle of a bill of particulars serves to inform a defendant of the nature of the charge, when he is otherwise insufficiently informed, and must not be misused to compel disclosure of how much the Government can prove, nor to foreclose the Government from using proof it may develop as the trial approaches.\"). Moreover, where the Government's provision of particulars is tantamount to an itemized preview of its proof, it creates the very real danger that a defendant will \"tailor her testimony to explain away the Government's case.\" Henry, 861 F. Supp. at 1197. These concerns animate the rule that \"if the defendant has been given adequate notice of the charges against her and can prepare fully for trial with reasonably diligent efforts, the Government cannot be required to disclose additional details about its case.\" Id.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2. Discussion",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "There is no basis for a bill of particulars in this case. The charges against the defendant are clear from the face of the Indictment, which provides significant detail regarding the charged crimes. As is apparent from the 18-page Indictment, the charges concern the defendant's participation in conspiracies to transport and entice minor girls to travel with the intent that they engage in illegal sex acts with Jeffrey Epstein from 1994 through 1997, and the defendant's attempt to cover up that conduct during her civil deposition testimony in 2016. Specifically, the Indictment makes plain that the defendant is charged with engaging in a conspiracy to transport minor girls with intent that they engage in sexual activity with Epstein, engaging in a conspiracy to entice",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "178",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00003139",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jeffrey Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [
      "S.D.N.Y."
    ],
    "dates": [
      "04/16/21",
      "1994",
      "1997",
      "2016",
      "Jan. 23, 2009"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 204",
      "07 Cr. 1198 (CM)",
      "DOJ-OGR-00003139"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case involving charges against a defendant for conspiracy and other crimes related to Jeffrey Epstein. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes."
}