23%

processing_index.json

@@ -5660,8 +5660,1271 @@
     "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005884.jpg",
     "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005885.jpg",
     "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005886.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005887.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005888.jpg",
     "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005889.jpg",
-    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005891.jpg"
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005890.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005891.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005892.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005893.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005894.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005895.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005896.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005897.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005898.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005899.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005900.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005901.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005902.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005903.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005904.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005905.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005906.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005907.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005908.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005909.jpg",
+    "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005910.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005911.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005912.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005913.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005914.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005915.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005916.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005917.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005918.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005919.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005920.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005921.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005922.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005923.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005924.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005925.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005926.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005927.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005928.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005929.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005930.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005931.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005932.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005933.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005934.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005935.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005936.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005937.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005938.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005939.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005940.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005941.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005942.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005943.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005944.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005945.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005946.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005947.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005948.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005949.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005950.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005951.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005952.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005953.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005954.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005955.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005956.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005957.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005958.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005959.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005960.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005961.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005962.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005963.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005964.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005965.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005966.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005967.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005968.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005969.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005970.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005971.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005972.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005973.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005974.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005975.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005976.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005977.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005978.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005979.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005980.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005981.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005982.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005983.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005984.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005985.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005986.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005987.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005988.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005989.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005990.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005991.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005992.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005993.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005994.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005995.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005996.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005997.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005998.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005999.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006000.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006001.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006002.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006003.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006004.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006005.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006006.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006007.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006008.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006009.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006010.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006011.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006012.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006013.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006014.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006015.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006016.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006017.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006018.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006019.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006020.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006021.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006022.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006023.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006024.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006025.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006026.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006027.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006028.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006029.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006030.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006031.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006032.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006033.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006034.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006035.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006036.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006037.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006038.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006039.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006040.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006041.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006042.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006043.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006044.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006045.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006046.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006047.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006048.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006049.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006050.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006051.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006052.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006053.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006054.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006055.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006056.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006057.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006058.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006059.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006060.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006061.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006062.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006063.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006064.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006065.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006066.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006067.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006068.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006069.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006070.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006071.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006072.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006073.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006074.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006075.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006076.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006077.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006078.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006079.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006080.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006081.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006082.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006083.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006084.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006085.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006086.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006087.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006088.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006089.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006090.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006091.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006092.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006093.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006094.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006095.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006096.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006097.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006098.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006099.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006100.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006101.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006102.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006103.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006104.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006105.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006106.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006107.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006108.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006109.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006110.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006111.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006112.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006113.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006114.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006115.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006116.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006117.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006118.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006119.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006120.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006121.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006122.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006123.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006124.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006125.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006126.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006127.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006128.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006129.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006130.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006131.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006132.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006133.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006134.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006135.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006136.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006137.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006138.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006139.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006140.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006141.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006142.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006143.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006144.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006145.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006146.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006147.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006148.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006149.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006150.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006151.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006152.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006153.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006154.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006155.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006156.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006157.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006158.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006159.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006160.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006161.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006162.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006163.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006164.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006165.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006166.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006167.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006168.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006169.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006170.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006171.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006172.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006173.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006174.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006175.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006176.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006177.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006178.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006179.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006180.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006181.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006182.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006183.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006184.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006185.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006186.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006187.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006188.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006189.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006190.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006191.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006192.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006193.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006194.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006195.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006196.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006197.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006198.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006199.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006200.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006201.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006202.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006203.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006204.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006205.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006206.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006207.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006208.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006209.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006210.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006211.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006212.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006213.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006214.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006215.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006216.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006217.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006218.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006219.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006220.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006221.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006222.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006223.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006224.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006225.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006226.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006227.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006228.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006229.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006230.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006231.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006232.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006233.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006234.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006235.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006236.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006237.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006238.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006239.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006240.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006241.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006242.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006243.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006244.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006245.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006246.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006247.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006248.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006249.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006250.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006251.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006252.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006253.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006254.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006255.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006256.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006257.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006258.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006259.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006260.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006261.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006262.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006263.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006264.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006265.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006266.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006267.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006268.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006269.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006270.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006271.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006272.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006273.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006274.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006275.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006276.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006277.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006278.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006279.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006280.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006281.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006282.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006283.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006284.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006285.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006286.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006287.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006288.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006289.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006290.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006291.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006292.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006293.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006294.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006295.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006296.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006297.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006298.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006299.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006300.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006301.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006302.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006303.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006304.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006305.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006306.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006307.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006308.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006309.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006310.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006311.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006312.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006313.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006314.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006315.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006316.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006317.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006318.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006319.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006320.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006321.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006322.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006323.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006324.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006325.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006326.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006327.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006328.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006329.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006330.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006331.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006332.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006333.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006334.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006335.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006336.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006337.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006338.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006339.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006340.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006341.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006342.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006343.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006344.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006345.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006346.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006347.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006348.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006349.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006350.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006351.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006352.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006353.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006354.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006355.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006356.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006357.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006358.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006359.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006360.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006361.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006362.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006363.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006364.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006365.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006366.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006367.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006368.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006369.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006370.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006371.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006372.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006373.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006374.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006375.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006376.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006377.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006378.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006379.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006380.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006381.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006382.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006383.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006384.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006385.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006386.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006387.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006388.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006389.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006390.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006391.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006392.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006393.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006394.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006395.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006396.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006397.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006398.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006399.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006400.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006401.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006402.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006403.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006404.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006405.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006406.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006407.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006408.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006409.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006410.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006411.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006412.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006413.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006414.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006415.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006416.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006417.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006418.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006419.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006420.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006421.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006422.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006423.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006424.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006425.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006426.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006427.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006428.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006429.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006430.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006431.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006432.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006433.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006434.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006435.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006436.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006437.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006438.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006439.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006440.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006441.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006442.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006443.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006444.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006445.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006446.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006447.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006448.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006449.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006450.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006451.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006452.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006453.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006454.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006455.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006456.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006457.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006458.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006459.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006460.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006461.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006462.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006463.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006464.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006465.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006466.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006467.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006468.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006469.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006470.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006471.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006472.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006473.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006474.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006475.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006476.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006477.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006478.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006479.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006480.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006481.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006482.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006483.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006484.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006485.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006486.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006487.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006488.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006489.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006490.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006491.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006492.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006493.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006494.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006495.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006496.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006497.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006498.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006499.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006500.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006501.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006502.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006503.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006504.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006505.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006506.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006507.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006508.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006509.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006510.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006511.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006512.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006513.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006514.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006515.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006516.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006517.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006518.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006519.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006520.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006521.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006522.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006523.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006524.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006525.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006526.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006527.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006528.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006529.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006530.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006531.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006532.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006533.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006534.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006535.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006536.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006537.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006538.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006539.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006540.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006541.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006542.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006543.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006544.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006545.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006546.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006547.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006548.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006549.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006550.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006551.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006552.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006553.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006554.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006555.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006556.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006557.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006558.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006559.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006560.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006561.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006562.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006563.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006564.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006565.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006566.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006567.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006568.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006569.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006570.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006571.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006572.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006573.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006574.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006575.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006576.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006577.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006578.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006579.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006580.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006581.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006582.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006583.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006584.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006585.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006586.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006587.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006588.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006589.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006590.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006591.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006592.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006593.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006594.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006595.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006596.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006597.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006598.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006599.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006600.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006601.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006602.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006603.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006604.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006605.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006606.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006607.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006608.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006609.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006610.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006611.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006612.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006613.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006614.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006615.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006616.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006617.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006618.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006619.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006620.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006621.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006622.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006623.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006624.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006625.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006626.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006627.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006628.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006629.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006630.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006631.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006632.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006633.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006634.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006635.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006636.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006637.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006638.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006639.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006640.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006641.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006642.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006643.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006644.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006645.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006646.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006647.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006648.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006649.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006650.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006651.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006652.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006653.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006654.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006655.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006656.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006657.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006658.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006659.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006660.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006661.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006662.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006663.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006664.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006665.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006666.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006667.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006668.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006669.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006670.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006671.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006672.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006673.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006674.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006675.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006676.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006677.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006678.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006679.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006680.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006681.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006682.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006683.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006684.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006685.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006686.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006687.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006688.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006689.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006690.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006691.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006692.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006693.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006694.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006695.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006696.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006697.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006698.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006699.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006700.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006701.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006702.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006703.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006704.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006705.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006706.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006707.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006708.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006709.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006710.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006711.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006712.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006713.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006714.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006715.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006716.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006717.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006718.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006719.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006720.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006721.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006722.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006723.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006724.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006725.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006726.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006727.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006728.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006729.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006730.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006731.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006732.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006733.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006734.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006735.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006736.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006737.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006738.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006739.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006740.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006741.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006742.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006743.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006744.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006745.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006746.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006747.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006748.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006749.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006750.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006751.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006752.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006753.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006754.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006755.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006756.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006757.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006758.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006759.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006760.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006761.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006762.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006763.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006764.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006765.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006766.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006767.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006768.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006769.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006770.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006771.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006772.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006773.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006774.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006775.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006776.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006777.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006778.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006779.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006780.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006781.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006782.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006783.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006784.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006785.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006786.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006787.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006788.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006789.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006790.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006791.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006792.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006793.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006794.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006795.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006796.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006797.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006798.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006799.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006800.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006801.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006802.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006803.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006804.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006805.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006806.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006807.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006808.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006809.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006810.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006811.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006812.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006813.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006814.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006815.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006816.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006817.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006818.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006819.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006820.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006821.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006822.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006823.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006824.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006825.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006826.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006827.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006828.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006829.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006830.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006831.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006832.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006833.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006834.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006835.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006836.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006837.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006838.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006839.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006840.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006841.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006842.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006843.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006844.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006845.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006846.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006847.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006848.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006849.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006850.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006851.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006852.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006853.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006854.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006855.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006856.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006857.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006858.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006859.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006860.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006861.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006862.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006863.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006864.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006865.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006866.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006867.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006868.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006869.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006870.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006871.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006872.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006873.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006874.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006875.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006876.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006877.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006878.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006879.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006880.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006881.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006882.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006883.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006884.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006885.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006886.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006887.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006888.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006889.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006890.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006891.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006892.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006893.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006894.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006895.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006896.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006897.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006898.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006899.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006900.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006901.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006902.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006903.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006904.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006905.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006906.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006907.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006908.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006909.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006910.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006911.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006912.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006913.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006914.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006915.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006916.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006917.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006918.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006919.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006920.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006921.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006922.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006923.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006924.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006925.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006926.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006927.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006928.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006929.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006930.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006931.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006932.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006933.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006934.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006935.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006936.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006937.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006938.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006939.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006940.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006941.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006942.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006943.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006944.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006945.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006946.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006947.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006948.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006949.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006950.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006951.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006952.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006953.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006954.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006955.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006956.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006957.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006958.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006959.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006960.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006961.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006962.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006963.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006964.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006965.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006966.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006967.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006968.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006969.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006970.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006971.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006972.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006973.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006974.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006975.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006976.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006977.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006978.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006979.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006980.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006981.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006982.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006983.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006984.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006985.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006986.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006987.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006988.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006989.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006990.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006991.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006992.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006993.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006994.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006995.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006996.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006997.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006998.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006999.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007000.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007001.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007002.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007003.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007004.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007005.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007006.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007007.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007008.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007009.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007010.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007011.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007012.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007013.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007014.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007015.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007016.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007017.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007018.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007019.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007020.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007021.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007022.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007023.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007024.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007025.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007026.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007027.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007028.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007029.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007030.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007031.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007032.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007033.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007034.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007035.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007036.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007037.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007038.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007039.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007040.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007041.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007042.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007043.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007044.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007045.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007046.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007047.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007048.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007049.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007050.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007051.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007052.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007053.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007054.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007055.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007056.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007057.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007058.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007059.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007060.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007061.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007062.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007063.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007064.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007065.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007066.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007067.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007068.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007069.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007070.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007071.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007072.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007073.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007074.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007075.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007076.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007077.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007078.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007079.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007080.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007081.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007082.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007083.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007084.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007085.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007086.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007087.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007088.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007089.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007090.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007091.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007092.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007093.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007094.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007095.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007096.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007097.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007098.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007099.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007100.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007101.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007102.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007103.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007104.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007105.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007106.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007107.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007108.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007109.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007110.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007111.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007112.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007113.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007114.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007115.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007116.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007117.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007118.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007119.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007120.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007121.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007122.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007123.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007124.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007125.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007126.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007127.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007128.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007129.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007130.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007131.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007132.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007133.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007134.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007135.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007136.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007137.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007138.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007139.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007140.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007141.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007142.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007143.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007144.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007145.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007146.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007147.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007148.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007149.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007150.jpg",
+    "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007153.jpg"
   ],
   "last_updated": "/Users/nickp/code/files"
 }

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005911.json

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "1",
+    "document_number": "397-2",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "Exhibit",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 1 of 45 Exhibit B DOJ-OGR-00005911",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 1 of 45",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Exhibit B",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005911",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [],
+    "organizations": [
+      "DOJ"
+    ],
+    "locations": [],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "397-2",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005911"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a clear header and footer. The main content is labeled 'Exhibit B'."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005918.json

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "8 of 45",
+    "document_number": "397-2",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 8 of 45 (continued) Table I. (continued) Study Alaggia (2010) Fontes and Pummer (2010) Ungar, Barter, McConnech, Tutty, and Fathom. (2009a) Summary Findings Themes Sample Design Purpose The study presents a comprehensive socio-ecological analysis of CSA disclosure. Of note, 42% had disclosed the abuse during childhood; 26% had not disclosed because they had repressed the memory of the abuse; and the remainder had attempted some form of disclosure, but it was not successful. A retrospective approach that could be affected by recall issues. One of the few works that adds knowledge to cultural contextual factors affecting CSA disclosure. Uniquely combines findings with an in-depth study of CSA disclosure. Recommendations made to (1) disclose CSA details; (2) question cultural competency; and (3) culture stands as an important factor in disclosure, not so much in CSA cases which are not so different. Youths' experiences of CSA disclosure were examined in a national sample of 1621 youths. Evaluation forms were completed by youth owing to participation in abuse prevention programs.",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 8 of 45 (continued)",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Table I. (continued)",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Study Alaggia (2010) Fontes and Pummer (2010) Ungar, Barter, McConnech, Tutty, and Fathom. (2009a)",
+      "position": "left column"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Summary Findings Themes Sample Design Purpose",
+      "position": "left column"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "The study presents a comprehensive socio-ecological analysis of CSA disclosure. Of note, 42% had disclosed the abuse during childhood; 26% had not disclosed because they had repressed the memory of the abuse; and the remainder had attempted some form of disclosure, but it was not successful. A retrospective approach that could be affected by recall issues.",
+      "position": "middle column"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "One of the few works that adds knowledge to cultural contextual factors affecting CSA disclosure. Uniquely combines findings with an in-depth study of CSA disclosure. Recommendations made to (1) disclose CSA details; (2) question cultural competency; and (3) culture stands as an important factor in disclosure, not so much in CSA cases which are not so different.",
+      "position": "middle column"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Youths' experiences of CSA disclosure were examined in a national sample of 1621 youths. Evaluation forms were completed by youth owing to participation in abuse prevention programs.",
+      "position": "right column"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "266",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005918",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Alaggia",
+      "Fontes",
+      "Pummer",
+      "Ungar",
+      "Barter",
+      "McConnech",
+      "Tutty",
+      "Fathom"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "DOJ"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "United States"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "2010",
+      "2009",
+      "10/29/21"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "397-2",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005918"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a case involving child sexual abuse (CSA). The page is part of a larger document, and the text is a continuation of a table summarizing various studies on CSA disclosure. The document is well-formatted and easy to read, with clear headings and concise summaries of the studies."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005920.json

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "10 of 45",
+    "document_number": "397-2",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "Court Document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 10 of 45 Table 1. (continued) Study Purpose Design Sample Findings Summary Priebe and Svedin (2008) This study aimed to investigate disclosure patterns and examine predictors of disclosure and nondisclosure. Participants completed 65-item questionnaires that included questions about background, consensual sex, sexual abuse experiences, noncontact abuse (e.g., exhibitionism), and female- and male-perpetrated CSA and whether they disclosed CSA or not. The sample consisted of 4,339 high school students in Sweden (2,324 boys). The mean age of the participants was 18.15 years. This study used a subsample of 1,962 participants who reported CSA and answered disclosure questions. Fewer had reported the abuse to a professional (contact abuse) with more severe CSA, but over 69% of boys (23%) and girls (6%) reported disclosure to someone. More of the sexual abuse boys experienced was key to disclosure; father or other male relative, rather than a female abuser. A qualitative component of the study provided a broader understanding of disclosure processes. Study focused on male survivors of CSA disclosure challenges for male survivors of CSA: (1) To understand three issues: (1) To understand",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 10 of 45",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Table 1. (continued)",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Study Purpose Design Sample Findings Summary",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Priebe and Svedin (2008) This study aimed to investigate disclosure patterns and examine predictors of disclosure and nondisclosure. Participants completed 65-item questionnaires that included questions about background, consensual sex, sexual abuse experiences, noncontact abuse (e.g., exhibitionism), and female- and male-perpetrated CSA and whether they disclosed CSA or not. The sample consisted of 4,339 high school students in Sweden (2,324 boys). The mean age of the participants was 18.15 years. This study used a subsample of 1,962 participants who reported CSA and answered disclosure questions. Fewer had reported the abuse to a professional (contact abuse) with more severe CSA, but over 69% of boys (23%) and girls (6%) reported disclosure to someone. More of the sexual abuse boys experienced was key to disclosure; father or other male relative, rather than a female abuser. A qualitative component of the study provided a broader understanding of disclosure processes.",
+      "position": "body"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Study focused on male survivors of CSA disclosure challenges for male survivors of CSA: (1) To understand three issues: (1) To understand",
+      "position": "body"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "268",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005920",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Priebe",
+      "Svedin",
+      "Sorenson",
+      "Keaating",
+      "Grosman"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "DOJ"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "Sweden",
+      "Caucasian",
+      "African American"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21",
+      "2008"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "397-2",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005920"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case, specifically a table from a study on child sexual abuse disclosure."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005921.json

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "11 of 45",
+    "document_number": "397-2",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 11 of 45 (continued) Summary Findings Sample Design Purpose and content of the present study Table 1. (cont nued) Study",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 11 of 45",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "(continued)",
+      "position": "margin"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Summary Findings Sample Design Purpose and content of the present study Table 1. (cont nued) Study",
+      "position": "body"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "269",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005921",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [],
+    "organizations": [
+      "DOJ"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "Puerto Rico",
+      "Cuba"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21",
+      "2007"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "397-2",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005921"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case, with a table summarizing research findings on child sexual abuse disclosure."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005924.json

@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "14 of 45",
+    "document_number": "397-2",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 14 of 45 Table 1. (continued) Study Purpose Design Sample Findings Summary Sta er and Nelson-Garde (2005) The purpose of this study was to understand the process of CSA disclosure and how this unfolded for ado escent gr's who had experienced CSA. Examined and subsequent consequences of CSA. Samp econs sted of 34 part pants from four groups: Sessions were seen between 60 and 90 m n and were audio taped and transcribed for content ana ysis. Us ng purpos ve samp ng of survivors of CSA, 24 ad teen (ages of 18 between 1.5 and 6 years) were recruited by 57% male and 43% female agen ts. The study emp oyed a LIM—a design/ ca des geno ca phenomenon or construct that drives or promote CSA d'sc osure—and to address gaps n knowledge about what, when, and under what c rcumstances v ct ms of CSA d'sc ose. (continued) Findings The mothers said they were concerned about negative effects for the ch dren as a consequence of d'sc osure. They reported n three major doma ns: (1) self-phase, where they coser to the d'sc osure process, coser to the abuse and d'sc osure occurred. Sma groups of pea ado escent gr's who survived sexua gr's who had survived sexua abuse a so served as constuants and were encouraged to share the know edge for the benefit of prof essiona pract oners. This study prov ded a contextua exam nat on of the entr d'sc osure process and what adult d ren and c rcumstances that occurred n ch dhood suscept b e n memory fa espec a y when these memories were forgotten. Th s study expanded types of CSA d'sc osures to more fu y understand how d ren and adult d'sc ose. And under what c rcumstances that occurred n ch dhood suscept b e n memory fa espec a y when these memories were forgotten. Over ha f the study samp e d d not frget these 272",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 14 of 45",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Table 1. (continued)",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Study Purpose Design Sample Findings Summary",
+      "position": "margin"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Sta er and Nelson-Garde (2005) The purpose of this study was to understand the process of CSA disclosure and how this unfolded for ado escent gr's who had experienced CSA. Examined and subsequent consequences of CSA.",
+      "position": "main content"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Samp econs sted of 34 part pants from four groups: Sessions were seen between 60 and 90 m n and were audio taped and transcribed for content ana ysis.",
+      "position": "main content"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Us ng purpos ve samp ng of survivors of CSA, 24 ad teen (ages of 18 between 1.5 and 6 years) were recruited by 57% male and 43% female agen ts.",
+      "position": "main content"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "The study emp oyed a LIM—a design/ ca des geno ca phenomenon or construct that drives or promote CSA d'sc osure—and to address gaps n knowledge about what, when, and under what c rcumstances v ct ms of CSA d'sc ose.",
+      "position": "main content"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "(continued)",
+      "position": "main content"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Findings The mothers said they were concerned about negative effects for the ch dren as a consequence of d'sc osure. They reported n three major doma ns: (1) self-phase, where they coser to the d'sc osure process, coser to the abuse and d'sc osure occurred. Sma groups of pea ado escent gr's who survived sexua gr's who had survived sexua abuse a so served as constuants and were encouraged to share the know edge for the benefit of prof essiona pract oners.",
+      "position": "main content"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "This study prov ded a contextua exam nat on of the entr d'sc osure process and what adult d ren and c rcumstances that occurred n ch dhood suscept b e n memory fa espec a y when these memories were forgotten.",
+      "position": "main content"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Th s study expanded types of CSA d'sc osures to more fu y understand how d ren and adult d'sc ose. And under what c rcumstances that occurred n ch dhood suscept b e n memory fa espec a y when these memories were forgotten. Over ha f the study samp e d d not frget these",
+      "position": "main content"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "272",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Sta er",
+      "Nelson-Garde"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [],
+    "locations": [],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21",
+      "2005",
+      "2004"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "397-2",
+      "DOI-OGR-00005924"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court document related to a case involving child sexual abuse (CSA). The text is mostly printed, with some rotated text. The content discusses various studies on CSA disclosure and its consequences."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005925.json

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "15",
+    "document_number": "397-2",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "Court Document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 15 of 45\n\nTable 1. (continued)\n\nStudy\tPurpose\n\nCr ma Base Pac and Romto (2004)\tThe main goals of this study were to understand\n\nJonzon and Lindbad (2004)\tStudy purpose was to explore how abuse exposure traits are related to CSA\n\nDesign\tSample\n\nIn-depth telephone (anonymous) interviews were obtained after exp n informed asent was obta ned. Three invest gators\n\nAdult women reporting CSA by someone close before the age of 18 and someone close at the age of 18 and had\n\nSummary\tFindings\n\nreve on of events are a so potent a prob em n reca\n\n68% delayed disclosure unt\n\nat the time of the first adult hood. At the time of the study, one of the lots of support networks\n\nprev us y estab shed categor es: Three verba\n\nabuse character st cs abuse by mu t p e\n\naverage age of abuse onset was 6.5 years; 42% of the part c pants\n\n122 adult women between 20 and 60 (average age of 41 years) reporting\n\nCSA by someone cose before the age of 18 and had\n",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 15 of 45",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Table 1. (continued)",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Study\tPurpose\n\nCr ma Base Pac and Romto (2004)\tThe main goals of this study were to understand\n\nJonzon and Lindbad (2004)\tStudy purpose was to explore how abuse exposure traits are related to CSA",
+      "position": "body"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Design\tSample\n\nIn-depth telephone (anonymous) interviews were obtained after exp n informed asent was obta ned. Three invest gators\n\nAdult women reporting CSA by someone close before the age of 18 and had\n",
+      "position": "body"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Summary\tFindings\n\nreve on of events are a so potent a prob em n reca\n\n68% delayed disclosure unt\n\nat the time of the first adult hood. At the time of the study, one of the lots of support networks\n\nprev us y estab shed categor es: Three verba\n\nabuse character st cs abuse by mu t p e\n\naverage age of abuse onset was 6.5 years; 42% of the part c pants\n\n122 adult women between 20 and 60 (average age of 41 years) reporting\n\nCSA by someone cose before the age of 18 and had",
+      "position": "body"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "273",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005925",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Cr ma Base Pac",
+      "Romto",
+      "Jonzon",
+      "Lindbad"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "DOJ"
+    ],
+    "locations": [],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21",
+      "2004"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "397-2",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005925"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court document, likely related to a criminal case involving child sexual abuse (CSA). The text is mostly printed, with some minor formatting issues and typos. The content is a table summarizing various studies on CSA."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005946.json

@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "36 of 45",
+    "document_number": "397-2",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 36 of 45\nDisclosure Patterns in Child Sexual Abuse 169\nSmith DW, Letourneau EJ, Saunders BE, Kilpatrick DG, Resnick, HS, Best CL. 2000. Delay in disclosure of childhood rape: Results from a national survey. Child Abuse & Neglect 24: 273 287.\nStaller KM, Nelson Gardell D. 2005. \"A burden in your heart\": Lessons of disclosure from female preadolescent and adolescent survivors of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect 29: 1415 1432.\nSummit R. 1983. The child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome. Child Abuse & Neglect 7(2): 177 193\nUngar M, Barter K, McConnell S, Tutty L, Fairholm J. 2009a. Patterns of disclosure among youth. Qualitative Social Work 8(3): 341 356. DOI: 10.1177/1473325009337842.\nUngar M, Tutty LM, McConnell S, Barter K, Fairholm J. 2009b. What Canadian youth tell us about disclosing abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33: 699 708.\nZwi KJ, Woolfenden SR, Wheeler DM, O'Brien TA, Tait P, Williams KW. 2007. School based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Review 3: CD004380.\nChild Abuse Rev. Vol. 24: 159 169 (2015)\nDOI: 10.1002/car\nCopyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.\nDOJ-OGR-00005946",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 36 of 45",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Disclosure Patterns in Child Sexual Abuse 169",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Smith DW, Letourneau EJ, Saunders BE, Kilpatrick DG, Resnick, HS, Best CL. 2000. Delay in disclosure of childhood rape: Results from a national survey. Child Abuse & Neglect 24: 273 287.\nStaller KM, Nelson Gardell D. 2005. \"A burden in your heart\": Lessons of disclosure from female preadolescent and adolescent survivors of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect 29: 1415 1432.\nSummit R. 1983. The child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome. Child Abuse & Neglect 7(2): 177 193\nUngar M, Barter K, McConnell S, Tutty L, Fairholm J. 2009a. Patterns of disclosure among youth. Qualitative Social Work 8(3): 341 356. DOI: 10.1177/1473325009337842.\nUngar M, Tutty LM, McConnell S, Barter K, Fairholm J. 2009b. What Canadian youth tell us about disclosing abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33: 699 708.\nZwi KJ, Woolfenden SR, Wheeler DM, O'Brien TA, Tait P, Williams KW. 2007. School based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Review 3: CD004380.",
+      "position": "main content"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Child Abuse Rev. Vol. 24: 159 169 (2015)\nDOI: 10.1002/car",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005946",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Smith DW",
+      "Letourneau EJ",
+      "Saunders BE",
+      "Kilpatrick DG",
+      "Resnick, HS",
+      "Best CL",
+      "Staller KM",
+      "Nelson Gardell D",
+      "Summit R",
+      "Ungar M",
+      "Barter K",
+      "McConnell S",
+      "Tutty L",
+      "Fairholm J",
+      "Tutty LM",
+      "Zwi KJ",
+      "Woolfenden SR",
+      "Wheeler DM",
+      "O'Brien TA",
+      "Tait P",
+      "Williams KW"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd."
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "Canada"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "2000",
+      "2005",
+      "1983",
+      "2009",
+      "2007",
+      "2013",
+      "2015",
+      "10/29/21"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "397-2",
+      "CD004380",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005946"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a list of references related to child sexual abuse. The text is printed and there is no handwriting or stamps present. The document is from a legal case with the identifier '1:20-cr-00330-PAE' and is document number '397-2' filed on '10/29/21'. The references are from various academic journals and publications."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005956.json

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "1",
+    "document_number": "398",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "Court Document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 1 of 52\n\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\n\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\n\nv.\n\nGHISLAINE MAXWELL,\n\nDefendant.\n\nS2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)\n\nGHISLAINE MAXWELL'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF\nHER MOTIONS IN LIMINE\n\nJeffrey S. Pagliuca\nLaura A. Menninger\nHADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.\n150 East 10th Avenue\nDenver, CO 80203\nPhone: 303-831-7364\n\nChristian R. Everdell\nCOHEN & GRESSER LLP\n800 Third Avenue\nNew York, NY 10022\nPhone: 212-957-7600\n\nBobbi C. Sternheim\nLaw Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim\n225 Broadway, Suite 715\nNew York, NY 10007\nPhone: 212-243-1100\n\nAttorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell\n\nDOJ-OGR-00005956",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 1 of 52",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\n\nv.\n\nGHISLAINE MAXWELL,\n\nDefendant.\n\nS2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF\nHER MOTIONS IN LIMINE",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Jeffrey S. Pagliuca\nLaura A. Menninger\nHADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.\n150 East 10th Avenue\nDenver, CO 80203\nPhone: 303-831-7364\n\nChristian R. Everdell\nCOHEN & GRESSER LLP\n800 Third Avenue\nNew York, NY 10022\nPhone: 212-957-7600\n\nBobbi C. Sternheim\nLaw Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim\n225 Broadway, Suite 715\nNew York, NY 10007\nPhone: 212-243-1100",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005956",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
+      "Jeffrey S. Pagliuca",
+      "Laura A. Menninger",
+      "Christian R. Everdell",
+      "Bobbi C. Sternheim"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
+      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
+      "HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.",
+      "COHEN & GRESSER LLP",
+      "Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "New York",
+      "Denver",
+      "CO",
+      "NY"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "Document 398",
+      "S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005956"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing in a criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005958.json

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "3",
+    "document_number": "398",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 3 of 52\n\nVI. THE GOVERNMENT CONCEDES THAT IT WILL NOT OFFER EVIDENCE OF MS. MAXWELL'S ALLEGED FALSE STATEMENTS AND AGREES TO MS. MAXWELL'S PROPOSED REDACTIONS32\nVII. THE COURT SHOULD HOLD A PRE-TRIAL EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON MS. MAXWELL'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDENTIFICATION. 32\nVIII. GOVERNMENT AGREES NOT TO ELICIT LAW ENFORCEMENT OPINION TESTIMONY 35\nIX. THE COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE TESTIMONY ABOUT ANY ALLEGED \"RAPE\" BY JEFFREY EPSTEIN 36\nXII. REFERENCE TO ACCUSERS AS \"VICTIMS\" IS IMPROPER VOUCHING 38\nXIII. THE COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE INTRODUCTION OF GOVERNMENT EXHIBITS 52, 251, 288, 294, 313, 606 AND THE SEARCH OF EL BRILLO WAY 41\nA. The Court Should Exclude the Challenged Government Exhibits ....................... 41\nB. Government Exhibit 52............................................................... 42\nC. The Palm Beach Search of El Brillo Way............................................... 42\nD. ................................................................................................ 43\nE. The Twin Torpedoes................................................................... 43\nF. Government Exhibit 313............................................................... 44\nG. Government Exhibit 606............................................................... 44\nii\nDOJ-OGR-00005958",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 3 of 52",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "VI. THE GOVERNMENT CONCEDES THAT IT WILL NOT OFFER EVIDENCE OF MS. MAXWELL'S ALLEGED FALSE STATEMENTS AND AGREES TO MS. MAXWELL'S PROPOSED REDACTIONS32\nVII. THE COURT SHOULD HOLD A PRE-TRIAL EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON MS. MAXWELL'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDENTIFICATION. 32\nVIII. GOVERNMENT AGREES NOT TO ELICIT LAW ENFORCEMENT OPINION TESTIMONY 35\nIX. THE COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE TESTIMONY ABOUT ANY ALLEGED \"RAPE\" BY JEFFREY EPSTEIN 36\nXII. REFERENCE TO ACCUSERS AS \"VICTIMS\" IS IMPROPER VOUCHING 38\nXIII. THE COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE INTRODUCTION OF GOVERNMENT EXHIBITS 52, 251, 288, 294, 313, 606 AND THE SEARCH OF EL BRILLO WAY 41",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "A. The Court Should Exclude the Challenged Government Exhibits ....................... 41\nB. Government Exhibit 52............................................................... 42\nC. The Palm Beach Search of El Brillo Way............................................... 42\nD. ................................................................................................ 43\nE. The Twin Torpedoes................................................................... 43\nF. Government Exhibit 313............................................................... 44\nG. Government Exhibit 606............................................................... 44",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "ii",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005958",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "MS. MAXWELL",
+      "JEFFREY EPSTEIN"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [],
+    "locations": [
+      "Palm Beach",
+      "El Brillo Way"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "Document 398",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005958",
+      "52",
+      "251",
+      "288",
+      "294",
+      "313",
+      "606"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of MS. MAXWELL. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document has a header with case information and a footer with a reference number."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005961.json

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "6",
+    "document_number": "398",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 6 of 52\n\nStatutes\n18 U.S.C. § 1591....................................................... 37\n18 U.S.C. § 2422....................................................... 28\n18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) .................................................... 28\nN.Y. Penal Law § 130.55.............................................. 28\n\nOther Authorities\n6 Handbook of Fed. Evid. § 801:25 (9th ed.) ....................... 5\n\nRules\nFed. R. Crim. 16......................................................... 17\nFed. R. Evid. 104 ........................................................ 41\nFed. R. Evid. 401 ........................................................ 22, 43\nFed. R. Evid. 402 ........................................................ 10, 16, 43, 44\nFed. R. Evid. 403 ........................................................ passim\nFed. R. Evid. 404(b)..................................................... passim\nFed. R. Evid. 412 ........................................................ 14, 18, 22\nFed. R. Evid. 702 ........................................................ 17, 21, 22\nFed. R. Evid. 801 ........................................................ 2, 3, 5\n\nv\nDOJ-OGR-00005961",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 6 of 52",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Statutes\n18 U.S.C. § 1591....................................................... 37\n18 U.S.C. § 2422....................................................... 28\n18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) .................................................... 28\nN.Y. Penal Law § 130.55.............................................. 28",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Other Authorities\n6 Handbook of Fed. Evid. § 801:25 (9th ed.) ....................... 5",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Rules\nFed. R. Crim. 16......................................................... 17\nFed. R. Evid. 104 ........................................................ 41\nFed. R. Evid. 401 ........................................................ 22, 43\nFed. R. Evid. 402 ........................................................ 10, 16, 43, 44\nFed. R. Evid. 403 ........................................................ passim\nFed. R. Evid. 404(b)..................................................... passim\nFed. R. Evid. 412 ........................................................ 14, 18, 22\nFed. R. Evid. 702 ........................................................ 17, 21, 22\nFed. R. Evid. 801 ........................................................ 2, 3, 5",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "v",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005961",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [],
+    "organizations": [
+      "Department of Justice"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "New York"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "398",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005961"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a list of statutes, other authorities, and rules cited in the document. The page number is 6 out of 52."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005966.json

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "11",
+    "document_number": "398",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 11 of 52\n\nD. There are Substantial Issues with the Government's Anticipated Position\n\nFor a statement to fall within the definition of Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(E), \"a court must find (1) that there was a conspiracy, (2) that its members included the declarant and the party against whom the statement is offered, and (3) that the statement was made both (a) during the course of and (b) in furtherance of the conspiracy.\" United States v. Tracy, 12 F.3d 1186, 1196 (2d Cir. 1993). A cursory review of the discovery produced related to one purported co-conspirator demonstrates the folly of proceeding as the government persists.\n\n[REDACTED TEXT BLOCK]\n\nThe government failed to follow the Court's Order and fails to explain why it did not disclose the statements as ordered. Accordingly, the Court should prohibit introduction of any alleged co-conspirator statements at trial.\n\n5\n\nDOJ-OGR-00005966",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 11 of 52",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "D. There are Substantial Issues with the Government's Anticipated Position",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "For a statement to fall within the definition of Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(E), \"a court must find (1) that there was a conspiracy, (2) that its members included the declarant and the party against whom the statement is offered, and (3) that the statement was made both (a) during the course of and (b) in furtherance of the conspiracy.\" United States v. Tracy, 12 F.3d 1186, 1196 (2d Cir. 1993). A cursory review of the discovery produced related to one purported co-conspirator demonstrates the folly of proceeding as the government persists.",
+      "position": "body"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "other",
+      "content": "[REDACTED TEXT BLOCK]",
+      "position": "body"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "The government failed to follow the Court's Order and fails to explain why it did not disclose the statements as ordered. Accordingly, the Court should prohibit introduction of any alleged co-conspirator statements at trial.",
+      "position": "body"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "5",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005966",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [],
+    "organizations": [
+      "Court"
+    ],
+    "locations": [],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "398",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005966"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document contains a redacted text block. The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005968.json

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "13",
+    "document_number": "398",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 13 of 52\n\n\"In assessing whether a district court properly admitted other act evidence, we consider whether (1) it was offered for a proper purpose; (2) it was relevant to a material issue in dispute; (3) its probative value is substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect; and (4) the trial court gave an appropriate limiting instruction to the jury if so requested by the defendant.\" United States v. Arroyo, 600 F. App'x 11, 13 (2d Cir. 2015) (summary order) (quoting United States v. LaFlam, 369 F.3d 153, 156 (2d Cir. 2004)). are offered for improper purposes, i.e., propensity, are not relevant to any material issue in dispute and their probative value is substantially outweighed by their prejudicial effect.\n\nA. Bear No Relationship to the Charged Conspiracy, Reflect Pure Propensity Evidence, and Otherwise are Unduly Prejudicial\n\nThe government's argument for admissibility of is breathtaking in its claims and unsupported by admissible evidence. Without expert testimony or even bothering to interview , the government contends represent \"direct evidence\" of a conspiracy (to recruit, groom, and sexually abuse minor females or to entice, transport or traffic them for Jeffrey Epstein's sexual pleasure) that Resp. at 36.\n\n2 The proffered evidence is found at GX 401-404, 409-410 and 413 .",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 13 of 52",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "\"In assessing whether a district court properly admitted other act evidence, we consider whether (1) it was offered for a proper purpose; (2) it was relevant to a material issue in dispute; (3) its probative value is substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect; and (4) the trial court gave an appropriate limiting instruction to the jury if so requested by the defendant.\" United States v. Arroyo, 600 F. App'x 11, 13 (2d Cir. 2015) (summary order) (quoting United States v. LaFlam, 369 F.3d 153, 156 (2d Cir. 2004)). are offered for improper purposes, i.e., propensity, are not relevant to any material issue in dispute and their probative value is substantially outweighed by their prejudicial effect.",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "A. Bear No Relationship to the Charged Conspiracy, Reflect Pure Propensity Evidence, and Otherwise are Unduly Prejudicial",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "The government's argument for admissibility of is breathtaking in its claims and unsupported by admissible evidence. Without expert testimony or even bothering to interview , the government contends represent \"direct evidence\" of a conspiracy (to recruit, groom, and sexually abuse minor females or to entice, transport or traffic them for Jeffrey Epstein's sexual pleasure) that Resp. at 36.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "2 The proffered evidence is found at GX 401-404, 409-410 and 413 .",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "7",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005968",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Jeffrey Epstein"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [],
+    "locations": [],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "398",
+      "GX 401-404",
+      "409-410",
+      "413"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with redactions. The text is mostly printed, with some footnotes and citations. The content discusses the admissibility of evidence in a court case."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005969.json

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "14",
+    "document_number": "398",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 14 of 52 The government contends that reveal \"defendant's intent and motive,\" but their argument is defies logic. This is exactly the type of evidence forbidden by Rule 404(b). See United States v. Angelilli, 660 F.2d 23, 40-41 (2d Cir. 1981) (\"While we conclude that the custom and practice evidence was admissible for the purposes we have discussed, we agree with the defendants that Rule 404(b) barred its use to prove that the individual defendants acted in conformity with the custom and practice. ...\"). Even if the Court overlooks the government's failure to provide notice, absence of relevance to the charged conspiracy, and the government's failure to set forth a non-propensity ground for admissibility, should also be excluded under Rules 401 and 403, as they do not tend to make any fact of consequence more or less probable, and their probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice and confusing the issues. 8 DOJ-OGR-00005969",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 14 of 52",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "The government contends that reveal \"defendant's intent and motive,\" but their argument is defies logic.",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "This is exactly the type of evidence forbidden by Rule 404(b). See United States v. Angelilli, 660 F.2d 23, 40-41 (2d Cir. 1981) (\"While we conclude that the custom and practice evidence was admissible for the purposes we have discussed, we agree with the defendants that Rule 404(b) barred its use to prove that the individual defendants acted in conformity with the custom and practice. ...\").",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Even if the Court overlooks the government's failure to provide notice, absence of relevance to the charged conspiracy, and the government's failure to set forth a non-propensity ground for admissibility, should also be excluded under Rules 401 and 403, as they do not tend to make any fact of consequence more or less probable, and their probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice and confusing the issues.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "8",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005969",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [],
+    "organizations": [],
+    "locations": [],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "Document 398",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005969"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with redactions. The text is mostly printed, with some blacked-out sections."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005970.json

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "15",
+    "document_number": "398",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 15 of 52 9 DOJ-OGR-00005970",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 15 of 52",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "9",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005970",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [],
+    "organizations": [
+      "DOJ"
+    ],
+    "locations": [],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "398",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005970"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document is heavily redacted, with most of the content obscured by black bars. The visible text is limited to the header, footer, and a few isolated numbers."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005971.json

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "16",
+    "document_number": "398",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 16 of 52 Maxwell strongly disputes that suggestion. Notably, as the Court can tell, the government did not offer any evidence (or any offer of proof in their Response) that this document was in fact 10 DOJ-OGR-00005971",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 16 of 52",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Maxwell strongly disputes that suggestion. Notably, as the Court can tell, the government did not offer any evidence (or any offer of proof in their Response) that this document was in fact",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "10",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005971",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Maxwell"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "DOJ"
+    ],
+    "locations": [],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "398",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005971"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document contains redactions, likely for sensitive or personal information."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005972.json

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "17",
+    "document_number": "398",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 17 of 52\ndrafted by Ms. Maxwell. Compare GX 417-B, 418-B, 420-B, 420-B (all purporting to represent metadata of other emails with the author identified). Such arguments are based on outdated stereotypes and reveal a reliance on character evidence that the Rules of Evidence specifically disallow. This Court should reject the belated, insufficient, improper argument that are direct evidence of the charged conspiracy, should find they are propensity evidence barred by Rule 404(b) and should also exclude them under Rule 403 as more prejudicial than probative. B. 11 DOJ-OGR-00005972",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 17 of 52",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "drafted by Ms. Maxwell. Compare GX 417-B, 418-B, 420-B, 420-B (all purporting to represent metadata of other emails with the author identified).",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Such arguments are based on outdated stereotypes and reveal a reliance on character evidence that the Rules of Evidence specifically disallow.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "This Court should reject the belated, insufficient, improper argument that are direct evidence of the charged conspiracy, should find they are propensity evidence barred by Rule 404(b) and should also exclude them under Rule 403 as more prejudicial than probative.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "B.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "11",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005972",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Maxwell"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "Court",
+      "DOJ"
+    ],
+    "locations": [],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "398",
+      "GX 417-B",
+      "418-B",
+      "420-B",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005972"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document contains redactions, likely for sensitive or personal information."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005973.json

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "18",
+    "document_number": "398",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 18 of 52\n\n1.\n\nMot. at 7. Defense counsel had insufficient time to review, investigate or rebut the admissibility of the materials as direct evidence less than one week later on October 18th. For that reason, the Motion did not move to exclude the evidence as direct evidence but rather sought additional time in which to do so. Given the drafting of hundreds of pages of pleadings in the last week, counsel is still unprepared to make the required showing on the direct evidence point and seeks additional time in which to do so.\n\n5 Bear in mind that the government also moved to exclude evidence that these same \"abused\" individuals reported to the police that they had no interactions or dealings with Ms. Maxwell. Gov't Motion in Limine at 42 (\"The defendant is not charged with committing crimes against [the] victims [who reported that they had no interactions or dealings with Ms. Maxwell].\") The fact that the government clearly intends to rely on how open the alleged abuse was, the relevance of evidence that even the people who claim they were abused by Epstein during the same time frame but without any knowledge or participation by Ms. Maxwell becomes highly relevant to rebut such testimony.\n\n12",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 18 of 52",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "1.\n\nMot. at 7. Defense counsel had insufficient time to review, investigate or rebut the admissibility of the materials as direct evidence less than one week later on October 18th. For that reason, the Motion did not move to exclude the evidence as direct evidence but rather sought additional time in which to do so. Given the drafting of hundreds of pages of pleadings in the last week, counsel is still unprepared to make the required showing on the direct evidence point and seeks additional time in which to do so.",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "5 Bear in mind that the government also moved to exclude evidence that these same \"abused\" individuals reported to the police that they had no interactions or dealings with Ms. Maxwell. Gov't Motion in Limine at 42 (\"The defendant is not charged with committing crimes against [the] victims [who reported that they had no interactions or dealings with Ms. Maxwell].\") The fact that the government clearly intends to rely on how open the alleged abuse was, the relevance of evidence that even the people who claim they were abused by Epstein during the same time frame but without any knowledge or participation by Ms. Maxwell becomes highly relevant to rebut such testimony.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "12",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005973",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Ms. Maxwell",
+      "Epstein"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "Government"
+    ],
+    "locations": [],
+    "dates": [
+      "October 18th",
+      "10/29/21"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "398",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005973"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with redactions. The text is mostly legible, but some parts are blacked out."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005981.json

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "26 of 52",
+    "document_number": "398",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 26 of 52\nsituation here, in which the alleged \"groomer\" was not the person who perpetrated the alleged abuse.\n- Even where the \"groomer\" and \"perpetrator\" are the same person, courts have recognized the unreliability of grooming testimony. United States v. Gonyer, No. 1:12-CR-00021-JAW, 2012 WL 3043020, at *2-3 (D. Me. July 24, 2012); United States v. Raymond, 700 F. Supp. 2d 142, 146-47 (D. Me. 2010); United States v. Schneider, No. CRIM.A. 10-29, 2010 WL 3734055, at *4 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 22, 2010); see also United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041-NGG-VMS, 2019 WL 2212639, at *7 (E.D.N.Y. May 22, 2019); United States v. Burns, No. 07 CR 556, 2009 WL 3617448, at *5 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 27, 2009) (criticizing the \"grooming theory\" in the context of a sentencing guidelines calculation).\n- The government tries to distinguish United States v. Raymond by saying that the expert's own book in that case \"disavow[ed] [its] reliability . . . for legal use.\" Resp. at 14. But that is exactly the situation here, because the primary article on which the government relies—Exhibit A to its response—flatly says \"that grooming is not a construct that ought to be used in forensic settings as it does not meet some of the criteria in the Daubert standard.\" Resp., Ex. A, p 19.\n- The government says Rocchio's opinions are not \"anecdotal.\" But that's not right either, as her endorsement makes clear: Rocchio's opinions are based \"on her education and training on psychological trauma, traumatic stress, interpersonal violence, and sexual abuse [and her] extensive clinical experience treating individuals who suffered sexual abuse and trauma in childhood and adolescence,\n20\nDOJ-OGR-00005981",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 26 of 52",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "situation here, in which the alleged \"groomer\" was not the person who perpetrated the alleged abuse.",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "- Even where the \"groomer\" and \"perpetrator\" are the same person, courts have recognized the unreliability of grooming testimony. United States v. Gonyer, No. 1:12-CR-00021-JAW, 2012 WL 3043020, at *2-3 (D. Me. July 24, 2012); United States v. Raymond, 700 F. Supp. 2d 142, 146-47 (D. Me. 2010); United States v. Schneider, No. CRIM.A. 10-29, 2010 WL 3734055, at *4 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 22, 2010); see also United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041-NGG-VMS, 2019 WL 2212639, at *7 (E.D.N.Y. May 22, 2019); United States v. Burns, No. 07 CR 556, 2009 WL 3617448, at *5 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 27, 2009) (criticizing the \"grooming theory\" in the context of a sentencing guidelines calculation).",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "- The government tries to distinguish United States v. Raymond by saying that the expert's own book in that case \"disavow[ed] [its] reliability . . . for legal use.\" Resp. at 14. But that is exactly the situation here, because the primary article on which the government relies—Exhibit A to its response—flatly says \"that grooming is not a construct that ought to be used in forensic settings as it does not meet some of the criteria in the Daubert standard.\" Resp., Ex. A, p 19.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "- The government says Rocchio's opinions are not \"anecdotal.\" But that's not right either, as her endorsement makes clear: Rocchio's opinions are based \"on her education and training on psychological trauma, traumatic stress, interpersonal violence, and sexual abuse [and her] extensive clinical experience treating individuals who suffered sexual abuse and trauma in childhood and adolescence,",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "20",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005981",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [],
+    "organizations": [
+      "United States"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "Maine",
+      "Pennsylvania",
+      "New York",
+      "Illinois"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "July 24, 2012",
+      "September 22, 2010",
+      "May 22, 2019",
+      "October 27, 2009",
+      "October 29, 2021"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "1:12-CR-00021-JAW",
+      "CRIM.A. 10-29",
+      "18-CR-2041-NGG-VMS",
+      "07 CR 556",
+      "398",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005981"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing discussing the reliability of 'grooming testimony' in a legal context. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and legible."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005982.json

@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "27",
+    "document_number": "398",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 27 of 52\n\nas well as [her] experience conducting forensic psychological evaluations of people who have experienced sexual abuse and trauma.\" Mot. Ex. 1, p 2.\n\nThe government tries to disclaim the importance of error rates. Resp. at 15-17. But it's not just that Rocchio cannot identify an error rate, it's that her implicit conclusion is that she doesn't have an error rate. That is, all her patients are telling the truth when they say they were groomed, so any evidence that matches what her patients have told her is therefore evidence of grooming.\n\nBut even if the error-rate discussion were misplaced, that doesn't mean Rocchio's opinions are reliable. As a \"qualitative\" matter, and as the government's own Exhibit A concedes, there are no \"reliable principles and methods' to define and detect grooming.\" Govt. Resp., Ex. A, p 19 (quoting Fed. R. Evid. 702).\n\nThe government apparently expects that, \"somehow, a lay jury without guidance [will] apply [Rocchio's] analyses reliably to the facts of a case in determining guilt.\" See Raymond, 700 F. Supp. 2d at 150 (rejecting argument that a jury could do just that). This Court should not, as the government request, simply punt the matter to the jury. Resp. at 17-18. The Court is the gatekeeper. It must ensure the evidence is reliable and relevant. If it's not both, it has no place in a criminal jury trial, because it will \"radically simplify\" an otherwise complex case, Burns, 2009 WL 3617448, at *5, and it will, as the United States Supreme Court has cautioned, prejudicially mislead the jury, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 595 (1993) (\"Expert evidence can be both powerful and quite misleading because of the difficulty in evaluating it.\")",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 27 of 52",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "as well as [her] experience conducting forensic psychological evaluations of people who have experienced sexual abuse and trauma.\" Mot. Ex. 1, p 2.\n\nThe government tries to disclaim the importance of error rates. Resp. at 15-17. But it's not just that Rocchio cannot identify an error rate, it's that her implicit conclusion is that she doesn't have an error rate. That is, all her patients are telling the truth when they say they were groomed, so any evidence that matches what her patients have told her is therefore evidence of grooming.\n\nBut even if the error-rate discussion were misplaced, that doesn't mean Rocchio's opinions are reliable. As a \"qualitative\" matter, and as the government's own Exhibit A concedes, there are no \"reliable principles and methods' to define and detect grooming.\" Govt. Resp., Ex. A, p 19 (quoting Fed. R. Evid. 702).\n\nThe government apparently expects that, \"somehow, a lay jury without guidance [will] apply [Rocchio's] analyses reliably to the facts of a case in determining guilt.\" See Raymond, 700 F. Supp. 2d at 150 (rejecting argument that a jury could do just that). This Court should not, as the government request, simply punt the matter to the jury. Resp. at 17-18. The Court is the gatekeeper. It must ensure the evidence is reliable and relevant. If it's not both, it has no place in a criminal jury trial, because it will \"radically simplify\" an otherwise complex case, Burns, 2009 WL 3617448, at *5, and it will, as the United States Supreme Court has cautioned, prejudicially mislead the jury, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 595 (1993) (\"Expert evidence can be both powerful and quite misleading because of the difficulty in evaluating it.\")",
+      "position": "main body"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "21",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005982",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Rocchio"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "United States Supreme Court"
+    ],
+    "locations": [],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21",
+      "1993"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "398",
+      "2009 WL 3617448",
+      "509 U.S. 579",
+      "700 F. Supp. 2d at 150"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case, discussing the reliability of expert testimony and the importance of error rates in forensic psychological evaluations. The text is well-formatted and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005983.json

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "28 of 52",
+    "document_number": "398",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 28 of 52\n\nThe government denies Ms. Maxwell's argument that \"a lay jury will be unable to apply Dr. Rocchio's analyses to the facts of this case\" because \"[t]hat is not how Rule 702 works.\" Resp. at 20. Responds the government: \"That is precisely how Rule 702 works in cases where experts testify about general principles, which the Rule contemplates.\" Id. at 21. Surely that is not right when, as here, the \"general principles\" are unreliable. Fed. R. Evid. 702, Advisory Committee Note (if expert testifies to general principles but not apply them, \"the testimony [must] be reliable\"). See also Mot. at 10; Raymond, 700 F. Supp. 2d at 150 n.12 (expert testimony about general principles is helpful only when it \"describe[s] widely recognized and highly predictable and verifiable phenomena\").\n\nThe government attempts to fault Ms. Maxwell for making \"no argument that the minor victims in this case are distinctive in some way such that general principles of psychology may diverge as to them.\" Resp. at 18. This argument flips the proper analysis on its head. It's the government's burden to prove reliability. E.g., United States v. Williams, 506 F.3d 151, 160 (2d Cir. 2007). It's not Ms. Maxwell's burden to prove unreliability (though if it were her burden, she would have met it).\n\nThe government says that \"the causal connection between . . . psychological problems and child sexual abuse is outside the experience of the average juror\" and is relevant to the alleged victims' credibility. Resp. at 24. It's not, and any minor probative value the evidence has is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403. And as explained in the Rule 412 motion today, if Rocchio offers testimony and the government presents argument\n\n22\nDOJ-OGR-00005983",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 28 of 52",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "The government denies Ms. Maxwell's argument that \"a lay jury will be unable to apply Dr. Rocchio's analyses to the facts of this case\" because \"[t]hat is not how Rule 702 works.\" Resp. at 20. Responds the government: \"That is precisely how Rule 702 works in cases where experts testify about general principles, which the Rule contemplates.\" Id. at 21. Surely that is not right when, as here, the \"general principles\" are unreliable. Fed. R. Evid. 702, Advisory Committee Note (if expert testifies to general principles but not apply them, \"the testimony [must] be reliable\"). See also Mot. at 10; Raymond, 700 F. Supp. 2d at 150 n.12 (expert testimony about general principles is helpful only when it \"describe[s] widely recognized and highly predictable and verifiable phenomena\").",
+      "position": "body"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "The government attempts to fault Ms. Maxwell for making \"no argument that the minor victims in this case are distinctive in some way such that general principles of psychology may diverge as to them.\" Resp. at 18. This argument flips the proper analysis on its head. It's the government's burden to prove reliability. E.g., United States v. Williams, 506 F.3d 151, 160 (2d Cir. 2007). It's not Ms. Maxwell's burden to prove unreliability (though if it were her burden, she would have met it).",
+      "position": "body"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "The government says that \"the causal connection between . . . psychological problems and child sexual abuse is outside the experience of the average juror\" and is relevant to the alleged victims' credibility. Resp. at 24. It's not, and any minor probative value the evidence has is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403. And as explained in the Rule 412 motion today, if Rocchio offers testimony and the government presents argument",
+      "position": "body"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "22",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005983",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Ms. Maxwell",
+      "Dr. Rocchio"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "United States"
+    ],
+    "locations": [],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21",
+      "2007"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "Document 398",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005983",
+      "506 F.3d 151",
+      "700 F. Supp. 2d"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case United States v. Maxwell. The text discusses the admissibility of expert testimony and the government's burden to prove reliability. The document is well-formatted and free of significant damage or redactions."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005984.json

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "29",
+    "document_number": "398",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 29 of 52\nalong these lines, that will open the door to other sexual behavior evidence. That door can remain at least partially closed if Rocchio is not permitted to offer her irrelevant and unfairly prejudicial testimony.\n- The government still hasn't explained how it helps the jury to be told that a victim of sexual abuse might make an immediate disclosure, or she might make an incremental disclosure, or she might make a delayed disclosure. Resp. at 27-30. And when the government says, \"[s]exual abuse also impacts the way memory is encoded,\" that opinion is far outside Rocchio's expertise because the parties agree that she is not an expert in \"the human brain or memory generally.\" Resp. at 30 n.7.\nC. At a minimum, this Court should hold a Daubert hearing.\nThere is ample reason for this Court to exclude Rocchio's testimony outright. At the very least, Ms. Maxwell is entitled to a Daubert hearing. The government implicitly concedes as much. In a footnote, the government acknowledges the decision in United States v. Raniere, in which Judge Garaufis ordered a Daubert hearing on the government's proposed expert testimony on grooming. 2019 WL 2212639, at *7-8. In that case, however, the government withdrew its endorsement rather than submit to a Daubert hearing. Resp. at 19 n.3.\nJudge Garaufis reasoned that even if other courts in other cases had admitted testimony about grooming, \"that [did] not make Dr. Hughes's opinion about grooming techniques reliable under the Daubert standard,\" if only because \"her extensive academic and clinical experience appears focused on victims of sexual abuse, not perpetrators.\" See id. at *7. The same is true here, particularly because Rocchio has no experience in, and there is no authority supporting her opinions on, grooming-by-proxy. Quite the contrary. The government's late-breaking disclosure states:\n23\nDOJ-OGR-00005984",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 29 of 52",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "along these lines, that will open the door to other sexual behavior evidence. That door can remain at least partially closed if Rocchio is not permitted to offer her irrelevant and unfairly prejudicial testimony.\n- The government still hasn't explained how it helps the jury to be told that a victim of sexual abuse might make an immediate disclosure, or she might make an incremental disclosure, or she might make a delayed disclosure. Resp. at 27-30. And when the government says, \"[s]exual abuse also impacts the way memory is encoded,\" that opinion is far outside Rocchio's expertise because the parties agree that she is not an expert in \"the human brain or memory generally.\" Resp. at 30 n.7.",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "C. At a minimum, this Court should hold a Daubert hearing.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "There is ample reason for this Court to exclude Rocchio's testimony outright. At the very least, Ms. Maxwell is entitled to a Daubert hearing. The government implicitly concedes as much. In a footnote, the government acknowledges the decision in United States v. Raniere, in which Judge Garaufis ordered a Daubert hearing on the government's proposed expert testimony on grooming. 2019 WL 2212639, at *7-8. In that case, however, the government withdrew its endorsement rather than submit to a Daubert hearing. Resp. at 19 n.3.\nJudge Garaufis reasoned that even if other courts in other cases had admitted testimony about grooming, \"that [did] not make Dr. Hughes's opinion about grooming techniques reliable under the Daubert standard,\" if only because \"her extensive academic and clinical experience appears focused on victims of sexual abuse, not perpetrators.\" See id. at *7. The same is true here, particularly because Rocchio has no experience in, and there is no authority supporting her opinions on, grooming-by-proxy. Quite the contrary. The government's late-breaking disclosure states:",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "23",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005984",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Rocchio",
+      "Maxwell",
+      "Garaufis",
+      "Hughes"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "DOJ"
+    ],
+    "locations": [],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "Document 398",
+      "2019 WL 2212639",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005984"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The text discusses the admissibility of expert testimony and the need for a Daubert hearing. The document is well-formatted and free of significant damage or redactions."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005985.json

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "30 of 52",
+    "document_number": "398",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 30 of 52\n\nThus currently it appears that grooming is not a construct that ought to be used in forensic settings as it does not meet some of the criteria in the Daubert standard. . . . Right now it does not appear to be the case that there are \"reliable principles and methods\" to define and detect grooming.\n\nId. at 19 (emphasis added).\n\nAt a minimum, therefore, this Court should hold a Daubert hearing.\n\nIV. THE COURT SHOULD EXCLUDE EVIDENCE RELATED\n\nThe government's arguments in favor of admitting evidence related as direct evidence of the charged conspiracies all but concede that the evidence is more appropriately considered under Rule 404(b). In an effort to bolster their position, the government makes the sweeping assertion that as long as was under the age of 18, her evidence is admissible as direct evidence of the conspiracy. That is a fundamentally incorrect statement of the law and should be rejected. The government's arguments for admitting evidence under Rule 404(b) and for denying the defense's requested limiting instruction are similarly baseless. The Court should therefore exclude evidence related to or, if it is admitted, give the jury the requested limiting instruction.7\n\nThe government advances four principal arguments for why evidence related to should be admitted as direct evidence of the charged conspiracies: (1) her testimony allegedly shows a \"pattern\" of how Epstein and Ms. Maxwell sexually abused young women and establishes Ms. Maxwell's \"intent\" to participate in the charged conspiracies (Resp. at 45-46),\n\n(2) her allegations are included in the S2 Indictment and are therefore not covered by Rule\n\n7 As it pertains to and the other accusers, the defense will be submitting proposed jury instructions and special verdict findings.\n\n24\n\nDOJ-OGR-00005985",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 30 of 52",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Thus currently it appears that grooming is not a construct that ought to be used in forensic settings as it does not meet some of the criteria in the Daubert standard. . . . Right now it does not appear to be the case that there are \"reliable principles and methods\" to define and detect grooming.",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Id. at 19 (emphasis added).",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "At a minimum, therefore, this Court should hold a Daubert hearing.",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "IV. THE COURT SHOULD EXCLUDE EVIDENCE RELATED",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "The government's arguments in favor of admitting evidence related as direct evidence of the charged conspiracies all but concede that the evidence is more appropriately considered under Rule 404(b). In an effort to bolster their position, the government makes the sweeping assertion that as long as was under the age of 18, her evidence is admissible as direct evidence of the conspiracy. That is a fundamentally incorrect statement of the law and should be rejected. The government's arguments for admitting evidence under Rule 404(b) and for denying the defense's requested limiting instruction are similarly baseless. The Court should therefore exclude evidence related to or, if it is admitted, give the jury the requested limiting instruction.7",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "The government advances four principal arguments for why evidence related to should be admitted as direct evidence of the charged conspiracies: (1) her testimony allegedly shows a \"pattern\" of how Epstein and Ms. Maxwell sexually abused young women and establishes Ms. Maxwell's \"intent\" to participate in the charged conspiracies (Resp. at 45-46),",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "(2) her allegations are included in the S2 Indictment and are therefore not covered by Rule",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "7 As it pertains to and the other accusers, the defense will be submitting proposed jury instructions and special verdict findings.",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "24",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005985",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Epstein",
+      "Ms. Maxwell"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [],
+    "locations": [],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "Document 398",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00005985"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of United States v. Maxwell. The text discusses the admissibility of certain evidence and the government's arguments in favor of admitting it. The document includes redactions, likely to protect the identities of individuals involved in the case."
+}

results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005990.json

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "35",
+    "document_number": "398",
+    "date": "10/29/21",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 35 of 52\nvictim's age, you must find that the defendant knew that the victim was less than seventeen years old.\") (emphasis added).\nIt is unclear whether the government is now claiming that to admit evidence as proof of the Mann Act conspiracies, it only needs to prove that was under the age of 18 at the time of the alleged abuse and that Ms. Maxwell did not need to know anything about age, or that Ms. Maxwell only needed to know that was under the age of 18. Either one is a misstatement of the law. For \"sexual activity\" to be \"criminal,\" it must be illegal under the laws of the jurisdiction where the sex acts allegedly took place. If those crimes are based on lack of consent due to age, it is only illegal if the alleged victim is under the age of consent in that jurisdiction. And according to the government's own proposed jury instructions, Ms. Maxwell can only be found guilty of the Mann Act conspiracies if she knew (and the other alleged victims) were under the age of consent in the particular jurisdictions where the sex acts allegedly took place. Because was, at all times, over the age of consent in the relevant jurisdictions, her evidence is not within the scope of the charged conspiracies and is therefore not admissible as direct evidence. At the very least, because it is not \"manifestly clear\" that evidence is proof of the charged conspiracies, \"the proper course is to proceed under Rule 404(b).\" United States v. Townsend, No. S1 06 CR. 34 (JFK), 2007 WL 1288597, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 1, 2007) (citing United States v. Nektalov, 325 F. Supp. 2d 367, 372 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)).\nevidence should also be excluded under Rule 404(b) and Rule 403.\nAs argued in our initial Motion, evidence that Ms. Maxwell allegedly encouraged an adult to engage in legal sexual activity is not, in any way, evidence of her intent to facilitate Epstein's\n29\nDOJ-OGR-00005990",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 Filed 10/29/21 Page 35 of 52",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "victim's age, you must find that the defendant knew that the victim was less than seventeen years old.\") (emphasis added).\nIt is unclear whether the government is now claiming that to admit evidence as proof of the Mann Act conspiracies, it only needs to prove that was under the age of 18 at the time of the alleged abuse and that Ms. Maxwell did not need to know anything about age, or that Ms. Maxwell only needed to know that was under the age of 18. Either one is a misstatement of the law. For \"sexual activity\" to be \"criminal,\" it must be illegal under the laws of the jurisdiction where the sex acts allegedly took place. If those crimes are based on lack of consent due to age, it is only illegal if the alleged victim is under the age of consent in that jurisdiction. And according to the government's own proposed jury instructions, Ms. Maxwell can only be found guilty of the Mann Act conspiracies if she knew (and the other alleged victims) were under the age of consent in the particular jurisdictions where the sex acts allegedly took place. Because was, at all times, over the age of consent in the relevant jurisdictions, her evidence is not within the scope of the charged conspiracies and is therefore not admissible as direct evidence. At the very least, because it is not \"manifestly clear\" that evidence is proof of the charged conspiracies, \"the proper course is to proceed under Rule 404(b).\" United States v. Townsend, No. S1 06 CR. 34 (JFK), 2007 WL 1288597, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 1, 2007) (citing United States v. Nektalov, 325 F. Supp. 2d 367, 372 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)).\nevidence should also be excluded under Rule 404(b) and Rule 403.\nAs argued in our initial Motion, evidence that Ms. Maxwell allegedly encouraged an adult to engage in legal sexual activity is not, in any way, evidence of her intent to facilitate Epstein's",
+      "position": "main content"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "29",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005990",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Ms. Maxwell",
+      "Epstein"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "DOJ"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "S.D.N.Y."
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "10/29/21",
+      "May 1, 2007",
+      "2004"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "Document 398",
+      "S1 06 CR. 34 (JFK)",
+      "325 F. Supp. 2d 367"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with redactions. The text is mostly printed, with no handwritten content or stamps visible."
+}