nickp 3 mesiacov pred
rodič
commit
f29057daef

+ 956 - 1
analyses.json

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 {
-  "total": 1350,
+  "total": 1386,
   "analyses": [
     {
       "document_id": "0063",
@@ -39691,6 +39691,961 @@
         "significance": "This document is potentially important as it relates to a legal case involving Paul M. Daugerdas, possibly involving financial or tax-related crimes. It could contain critical information or testimony relevant to the case's outcome.",
         "summary": "The document appears to be related to a legal case in the United States involving Paul M. Daugerdas and possibly others, dated February 15, 2012. It likely contains details about the proceedings, charges, or testimonies. The case seems to be significant enough to be noteworthy."
       }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5681",
+      "document_number": "A-5681",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Court Filing",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Tax Shelter Case",
+          "United States of America vs. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.",
+          "Legal Proceedings"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "Defendant in the case"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is a part of a significant court case involving tax shelters and potentially large financial implications, providing insight into the legal proceedings and arguments presented.",
+        "summary": "This is a page from a court filing in the case United States of America vs. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., dated February 15, 2012. The document is part of a larger legal proceeding, likely related to tax shelters or financial fraud. The case is ongoing, as indicated by the docket number and page numbering."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5682",
+      "document_number": "A-5682",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Court Filing",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Tax Evasion",
+          "Criminal Trial",
+          "Paul M. Daugerdas Case"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "Defendant in a criminal trial"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is potentially important as it is part of a significant criminal trial involving tax evasion charges against Paul M. Daugerdas.",
+        "summary": "This document appears to be a page from a court transcript or filing in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., dated February 15, 2012, and filed on February 24, 2012."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5683",
+      "document_number": "A-5683",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "court filing or deposition transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "tax shelter case",
+          "Paul M. Daugerdas trial",
+          "testimony of witness"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "defendant in the case"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is potentially important as it contains testimony or evidence presented in a significant court case involving tax shelters and potentially large financial transactions.",
+        "summary": "This document appears to be a transcript or filing from a court case (United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.) in the Southern District of New York, dated February 15, 2012, and filed in a later court proceeding in 2022."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5684",
+      "document_number": "A-5684",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Court Filing",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Tax Shelter Case",
+          "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+          "United States of America vs. Defendants"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "Defendant in the case"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is potentially important as it is a part of a court filing in a significant legal case involving tax shelters and allegations against Paul M. Daugerdas and other defendants.",
+        "summary": "This is a court document filed in the case United States of America vs. Paul M. Daugerdas et al., indicating ongoing litigation. The document is part of a larger filing (Document 616-1) and appears to be a page from a larger transcript or evidence submission. The case is being heard in the United States District Court."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5685",
+      "document_number": "A-5685",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Court Filing",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "United States of America vs. Paul M. Daugerdas et al.",
+          "Legal proceedings",
+          "Case details"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "Defendant in the case"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is potentially important as it relates to a significant legal case involving Paul M. Daugerdas and others, potentially shedding light on the details and progression of the case.",
+        "summary": "This is a court filing document from the case United States of America vs. Paul M. Daugerdas et al., dated February 15, 2012, and filed in a U.S. court."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5686",
+      "document_number": "A-5686",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Court Filing",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Tax Shelter",
+          "Fraudulent Scheme",
+          "IRS Investigation"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "Defendant in the case"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "JPMorgan Chase",
+            "role": "Bank involved in the alleged scheme"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is potentially important as it provides evidence of an alleged tax shelter scheme and the involvement of various parties, including financial institutions.",
+        "summary": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a case involving allegations of a fraudulent tax shelter scheme. The filing includes details about the scheme and the parties involved. It is part of a larger case (1:20-cv-00380-PAE) in the United States District Court."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5687",
+      "document_number": "A-5687",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "deposition transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "tax shelter",
+          "fraud allegations",
+          "financial transactions"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "defendant in the case"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is potentially important as it contains testimony related to a significant financial fraud case involving tax shelters, providing insight into the transactions and alleged wrongdoing.",
+        "summary": "The document appears to be a transcript of a deposition in a case involving Paul M. Daugerdas and others, with testimony related to financial transactions and potential fraud. The deposition is part of a larger legal proceeding in the Southern District of New York. The testimony is being recorded by Southern District Reporters."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5688",
+      "document_number": "A-5688",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Court Transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Trial proceedings",
+          "Witness testimony",
+          "Objections and court rulings"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "Defendant"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Okula",
+            "role": "Prosecutor or Attorney"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is a transcript of a court proceeding, likely a trial or hearing, and contains testimony, objections, and court rulings.",
+        "summary": "The document is a transcript of a court case, United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., containing witness testimony, objections, and court rulings. The transcript includes interactions between Okula and other parties, and covers various topics related to the trial. The document provides insight into the trial proceedings and the arguments presented."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5690",
+      "document_number": "A-5690",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "court filing - trial transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "tax shelter fraud",
+          "sentencing hearing",
+          "testimony of Denis Field"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "defendant"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Denis Field",
+            "role": "witness/testifying about tax shelter transactions"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is potentially important as it contains testimony related to a significant tax shelter fraud case, providing insight into the transactions and individuals involved.",
+        "summary": "This is a transcript from a sentencing hearing in the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, where Denis Field testified about tax shelter transactions and related matters. The testimony covers various aspects of the case, including the nature of the tax shelters and the involvement of the defendants. The document is part of a larger court filing."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5691",
+      "document_number": "A-5691",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "court filing",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "tax shelter case",
+          "Paul M. Daugerdas trial",
+          "United States of America vs. Paul M. Daugerdas et al."
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "defendant in the case"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is potentially important as it is part of a court filing in a significant tax shelter case involving Paul M. Daugerdas, providing insight into the proceedings and evidence presented.",
+        "summary": "This document appears to be an excerpt from a court transcript or filing in the case United States of America vs. Paul M. Daugerdas et al., dated February 15, 2012, and filed in the Southern District of New York."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5692",
+      "document_number": "A-5692",
+      "page_count": 2,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Court Transcript - Recross-examination",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Witness testimony",
+          "Tax evasion or financial crimes",
+          "Legal proceedings and court procedures"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "Defendant in the case"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is a court transcript of a recross-examination in a significant legal case involving financial crimes, providing insight into the legal proceedings and witness testimony.",
+        "summary": "The document is a transcript of a recross-examination in the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., containing detailed witness testimony and references to various legal and financial documents."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5693",
+      "document_number": "A-5693",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Court Transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Trial proceedings",
+          "Witness testimony",
+          "Legal arguments"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "Defendant"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Rosa",
+            "role": "Witness or person of interest"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Schectman",
+            "role": "Witness or attorney"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Rotert",
+            "role": "Witness or attorney"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document appears to be a transcript of a court proceeding, potentially a trial or hearing, involving the defendant Paul M. Daugerdas. The transcript reveals details about the case, witness testimony, and legal arguments.",
+        "summary": "The document is a transcript of a court proceeding in the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It contains testimony from various witnesses and discussions between attorneys and the court. The transcript provides insight into the trial proceedings and the topics discussed during the hearing."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5694",
+      "document_number": "A-5694",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Deposition Transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Witness testimony",
+          "Questioning by lawyers",
+          "Details of a case involving Paul M. Daugerdas"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "Defendant"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Shechtman",
+            "role": "Witness or person being questioned"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is a deposition transcript that provides insight into the testimony and questioning in a case involving Paul M. Daugerdas. It may be significant for understanding the details of the case and the evidence presented.",
+        "summary": "The document is a transcript of a deposition taken on February 15, 2012, in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It contains testimony from a witness, likely Shechtman, who is being questioned by lawyers. The transcript covers various topics related to the case."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5695",
+      "document_number": "A-5695",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Court Transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Trial proceedings",
+          "Witness testimony",
+          "Legal arguments"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "Defendant"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Sternheim",
+            "role": "Witness or Attorney"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is a transcript of a court proceeding, potentially related to a significant financial or white-collar crime case involving Paul M. Daugerdas.",
+        "summary": "The document is a transcript of a court proceeding in the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It contains testimony, legal arguments, and rulings by the court. The transcript includes references to various witnesses and attorneys, including Sternheim."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5696",
+      "document_number": "A-5696",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Court Filing or Legal Document",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Legal case against Paul M. Daugerdas",
+          "United States vs. Daugerdas et al.",
+          "Potential financial or white-collar crime case"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "Defendant in the case"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is potentially important as it relates to a legal proceeding involving Paul M. Daugerdas, possibly related to financial crimes or other serious offenses. The specifics of the case could reveal details about the charges and the legal arguments presented.",
+        "summary": "The document appears to be related to a court case titled 'United States of America vs. Paul M. Daugerdas et al.' dated February 15, 2012. It likely contains legal arguments, charges, or proceedings related to the case against Daugerdas and others. The exact nature of the case and its outcomes would depend on the full content of the document."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5697",
+      "document_number": "A-5697",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Court Filing",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Tax Shelter Fraud",
+          "Sentencing",
+          "Restitution"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "Defendant"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Dennis J. Lerner",
+            "role": "Defense Attorney"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "John H. Hillebrecht",
+            "role": "Prosecutor"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is potentially important as it relates to a significant tax shelter fraud case involving Paul M. Daugerdas and others, providing insight into the legal proceedings and sentencing.",
+        "summary": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the sentencing of Paul M. Daugerdas, who was involved in a tax shelter fraud scheme. The filing includes details about restitution and sentencing. It is a government exhibit filed in a U.S. District Court case."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5698",
+      "document_number": "A-5698",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Court Filing",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Criminal Case",
+          "United States vs. Paul M. Daugerdas et al.",
+          "Tax or Financial Crime"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "Defendant in a criminal case"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is potentially important as it relates to a significant criminal case involving financial or tax crimes, and may contain evidence or testimony relevant to the case.",
+        "summary": "This appears to be a page from a court filing in a criminal case (1:20-cr-00338-PAE) involving Paul M. Daugerdas and others, dated February 24, 2022, referencing a document from February 15, 2012."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5699",
+      "document_number": "A-5699",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Court Transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Criminal trial proceedings",
+          "United States v. Daugerdas et al.",
+          "Tax-related crimes"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "William H. Pauley III",
+            "role": "Presiding District Judge"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Paul M. Daugerdas",
+            "role": "Defendant"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Preet Bharara",
+            "role": "United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Stanley J. Okula",
+            "role": "Assistant United States Attorney"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is a transcript of a hearing in a significant criminal case involving tax-related crimes, providing insight into the proceedings and the roles of key individuals involved.",
+        "summary": "The document is a transcript of a hearing on February 16, 2012, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, presided over by Judge William H. Pauley III, in the case United States v. Daugerdas et al."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5700",
+      "document_number": "A-5700",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Court Filing or Transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Court case proceedings",
+          "Hearing transcript",
+          "Legal testimony"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [],
+        "significance": "This document appears to be a transcript or filing in a significant court case, potentially involving government or regulatory matters given the 'DOJ' prefix in the reference number.",
+        "summary": "This document is a court filing or transcript, labeled as 'CZGFDAU1 Hearing 243', from the Southern District court, with a reference number indicating a possible connection to a Department of Justice (DOJ) matter."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5701",
+      "document_number": "A-5701",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Court Transcript or Hearing Appearance Record",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Court appearances",
+          "Legal representation",
+          "Hearing proceedings"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Caroline Rule",
+            "role": "Attorney for Defendant Field"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Sharon McCarthy",
+            "role": "Attorney for Defendant Field"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Paul Shechtman",
+            "role": "Attorney for Defendant Parse"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Adam Murphy",
+            "role": "Attorney for Defendant Parse"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Bobbi C. Sternheim",
+            "role": "Attorney for Ms. Conrad"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Christine Mazzella",
+            "role": "Special Agent - IRS"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is potentially important as it records the appearances and representations at a court hearing, which can be crucial for understanding the legal proceedings and the parties involved.",
+        "summary": "The document lists the appearances and representations at a court hearing, including the attorneys for the defendants and a special agent from the IRS. It provides details on who was present and their roles. The hearing is likely related to a case involving Defendants Field and Parse, and Ms. Conrad."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5702",
+      "document_number": "A-5702",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Court Transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Stipulation regarding Deputy Weiss's testimony",
+          "Admission of exhibits into evidence",
+          "Defense resting its case and prosecution calling its next witness"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Paul Daugerdas",
+            "role": "Defendant"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Mr. Gair",
+            "role": "Defense Attorney"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Mr. Okula",
+            "role": "Prosecutor"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Ms. Davis",
+            "role": "Prosecutor"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Susan Brune",
+            "role": "Prosecution Witness"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Deputy Weiss",
+            "role": "Witness whose testimony was stipulated to"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is a transcript of a court hearing where the defense and prosecution discuss stipulations, exhibit admissions, and the progression of the trial.",
+        "summary": "The defense and prosecution reach a stipulation regarding Deputy Weiss's testimony, and two exhibits (PMD 4 and PMD 27) are admitted into evidence. The defense rests its case, and the prosecution calls Susan Brune as its next witness."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5703",
+      "document_number": "A-5703",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Deposition transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Witness testimony",
+          "Background information of witness Susan Brune",
+          "Legal qualifications and experience"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Susan Elizabeth Brune",
+            "role": "Witness"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "MS. Davis",
+            "role": "Prosecutor/Examiner"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "THE COURT",
+            "role": "Judge/Presiding Officer"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is potentially important as it contains the sworn testimony of Susan Brune, providing insight into her background and qualifications as a witness.",
+        "summary": "The document is a transcript of a hearing where Susan Brune is testifying as a witness. She is questioned about her background, education, and legal experience. Brune confirms she attended Harvard Law School and has been a practicing lawyer for almost 25 years."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5704",
+      "document_number": "A-5704",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "deposition transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "witness background",
+          "career history",
+          "law firm founding"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Brune",
+            "role": "witness, former assistant US attorney, and law firm partner"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Hillary Richard",
+            "role": "law firm partner and civil lawyer"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document provides background information on a key witness, likely relevant to the case's credibility assessment or testimony context.",
+        "summary": "The witness, Brune, testifies about his career history, including his time as an assistant US attorney in the Southern District of New York and his subsequent founding of the law firm Brune & Richard in 1998."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5705",
+      "document_number": "A-5705",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "deposition",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "litigation involvement",
+          "trial experience",
+          "attention to detail"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Brune",
+            "role": "witness being deposed"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This deposition transcript provides insight into Brune's role in a trial and their experience with litigation and grand jury investigations, potentially relevant to understanding their testimony or credibility.",
+        "summary": "The deposition questions Brune about their involvement in a trial, their experience with trials and grand jury investigations, and their attention to detail. Brune clarifies their role and that of another person, and discusses their experience as a defense lawyer and in the government. The testimony highlights Brune's pride in their law firm and their efforts to pay attention to detail."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5706",
+      "document_number": "A-5706",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "deposition transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "The success of a law firm and its relation to winning cases",
+          "The role of a lawyer's reputation and marketing (e.g., website biography)",
+          "The qualities and characteristics of a lawyer (strategic choices, preparation, advocacy)"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Brune",
+            "role": "Lawyer being deposed, likely a partner at Brune & Richard law firm"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This deposition transcript provides insight into the lawyer's views on the importance of winning cases and how their firm's reputation is presented, potentially relevant to a case involving legal malpractice, professional conduct, or business practices.",
+        "summary": "The deposition questions Brune about the success of his law firm, the importance of winning cases, and how his website biography presents his skills and qualities as a lawyer. Brune acknowledges the importance of winning cases and confirms that his website highlights his strategic decision-making, preparation, and advocacy skills."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5707",
+      "document_number": "A-5707",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "deposition transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "attorney-client relationship",
+          "decision-making in legal representation",
+          "communication with the court"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Brune",
+            "role": "attorney for David Parse"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "David Parse",
+            "role": "client in the case"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document provides insight into the attorney-client relationship and decision-making process in a specific court case, potentially relevant to understanding the dynamics of the case and the role of the attorney.",
+        "summary": "The document is a transcript of a deposition where an attorney, Brune, is being questioned about their representation of David Parse. Brune testifies about making strategic decisions on behalf of Parse and the trust Parse had in them and their firm. The questioning also touches on Brune's willingness to raise issues with the court."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5708",
+      "document_number": "A-5708",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "deposition",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "attorney's conduct",
+          "representation of client",
+          "court proceedings"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Brune",
+            "role": "attorney being questioned"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is potentially important as it reveals the attorney's approach to representing their client and their interactions with the court, which could be relevant to the case's outcome.",
+        "summary": "The document is a transcript of an attorney, Brune, being questioned about their representation of a client, David Parse. Brune testifies about being a 'forceful advocate' and the extent of their certainty when raising issues with the court. The questioning touches on the attorney's conduct and their approach to advocacy."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5709",
+      "document_number": "A-5709",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "deposition",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Representation of a client in a criminal case",
+          "Relationship between the lawyer and their client",
+          "Hierarchy and decision-making within the law firm Brune & Richard"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Brune",
+            "role": "client and named partner of Brune & Richard"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Ms. Richard",
+            "role": "named partner of Brune & Richard"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is potentially important as it provides insight into the relationship between Brune and his lawyer, as well as the inner workings of the law firm Brune & Richard, which may be relevant to the case.",
+        "summary": "The deposition transcript reveals the lawyer's long-standing relationship with Brune, their personal and professional motivations for representing him, and the hierarchy within the law firm Brune & Richard. The lawyer testifies to being the ultimate decision-maker on cases they lead, including this one. The testimony highlights the lawyer's personal connection to Brune and their belief in his innocence."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5710",
+      "document_number": "A-5710",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "deposition transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "jury selection process",
+          "roles and responsibilities within a law firm",
+          "case preparation and management"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Brune",
+            "role": "witness being deposed"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Trzaskoma",
+            "role": "partner at the law firm, involved in jury selection details"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This deposition transcript provides insight into the roles and responsibilities of individuals within a law firm handling a case, particularly regarding jury selection.",
+        "summary": "The witness, Brune, testifies about their firm's handling of jury selection in a case, confirming that partner Trzaskoma was involved in gathering information about potential jurors and was supervised by Brune."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5711",
+      "document_number": "A-5711",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "Deposition Transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Trial preparation",
+          "Legal team composition",
+          "Jury selection"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Brune",
+            "role": "Witness being deposed"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Edelstein",
+            "role": "Partner on the case"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Adam Hollander",
+            "role": "Associate in the New York office"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Randy Kim",
+            "role": "Partner in the San Francisco office"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Vivienne Stapp",
+            "role": "Associate in the San Francisco office"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Kendra Melrose",
+            "role": "Member of the legal team (role not specified)"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This deposition transcript provides insight into the composition and dynamics of the legal team involved in a court case, potentially shedding light on their strategies and interactions.",
+        "summary": "The witness, Brune, is questioned about the legal team assembled for a trial, including partners and associates, and their roles. The discussion also touches on communication during jury selection."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5712",
+      "document_number": "A-5712",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "deposition",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "attorneys and non-attorney personnel working on the Parse matter",
+          "roles and responsibilities of team members",
+          "identification of specific individuals involved in the case"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Brune",
+            "role": "witness being deposed"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Melissa Desori",
+            "role": "associate attorney working on the Parse matter"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "David Elbaum",
+            "role": "attorney who worked briefly on expert testimony issues"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Brendan Henry",
+            "role": "paralegal"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Jenson Smith",
+            "role": "paralegal"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Ariel Stoddard",
+            "role": "paralegal"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Nancy Ma",
+            "role": "paralegal"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "David Benhamou",
+            "role": "presumably a non-attorney team member, exact role not specified"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This deposition testimony provides insight into the team composition and roles of individuals working on the Parse matter, potentially relevant to understanding the case's development and key players.",
+        "summary": "The witness, Brune, is questioned about the team working on the Parse matter, identifying attorneys and paralegals involved, including Melissa Desori, David Elbaum, and several paralegals. Brune confirms the involvement of various non-attorney personnel and provides some details about their roles."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5713",
+      "document_number": "A-5713",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "deposition transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "office staff and their roles",
+          "jury consultant in a specific case",
+          "voir dire proceedings"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Nancy",
+            "role": "paralegal from the San Francisco office"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Ken Renta",
+            "role": "managing clerk responsible for filings and briefs"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Dennis Donahue",
+            "role": "jury consultant hired for the case"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This deposition transcript provides insight into the roles of various staff members in a law firm and the involvement of a jury consultant in a specific case, potentially shedding light on the firm's practices and the case's proceedings.",
+        "summary": "The deponent discusses their law firm's staff, including a managing clerk and a jury consultant, Dennis Donahue, who was hired for a specific case and was present during voir dire. The firm's administrative structure and outside help are also touched upon."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5714",
+      "document_number": "A-5714",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "deposition transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "collaboration with Kramer Levin firm",
+          "hiring of Nardello firm",
+          "investigative work"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Brune",
+            "role": "witness being deposed"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Julie Blackman",
+            "role": "expert or consultant hired by Kramer Levin"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Mr. Nardello",
+            "role": "private investigator hired by Kramer Levin and the witness's team"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Kramer",
+            "role": "likely a key figure associated with the Kramer Levin law firm"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This deposition transcript reveals details about the collaboration between the witness's team and Kramer Levin, as well as their investigative efforts, potentially related to a significant case.",
+        "summary": "The witness testifies about their collaboration with Kramer Levin, the hiring of Julie Blackman and the Nardello firm, and the role of Mr. Nardello as a private investigator. The Nardello firm was hired jointly with Kramer Levin to perform investigative work. The witness confirms that Mr. Nardello was an Assistant United States Attorney before becoming a private investigator."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5715",
+      "document_number": "A-5715",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "deposition transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Research on potential jurors",
+          "Role of the Nardello firm in the case",
+          "Team members involved in the case preparation"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Brune",
+            "role": "Witness being deposed"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Nardello",
+            "role": "Head of the Nardello firm, involved in juror research"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Suann Ingle",
+            "role": "Member of the defense team, responsible for graphics and PowerPoint presentation"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This document is potentially important as it reveals details about the defense team's preparation and research on potential jurors, as well as the roles of various team members.",
+        "summary": "The witness, Brune, discusses the role of the Nardello firm in researching potential jurors using database research, and the involvement of Suann Ingle in creating graphics for the case. Brune clarifies that the Nardello firm's instructions were to limit their research to database work only."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5716",
+      "document_number": "A-5716",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "deposition transcript",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Courtroom arrangements and access to technology",
+          "Team members and their roles",
+          "Graphics preparation for jury addresses"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Donna Kane",
+            "role": "Someone from Decision Quest who shared something with Kramer Levin"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Lori Edelstein",
+            "role": "Team member with laptop access to emails in court"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Theresa Trzaskoma",
+            "role": "Team member who handled courtroom access to emails and internet"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This deposition transcript provides insight into the trial preparation and courtroom arrangements made by the witness's team, potentially relevant to understanding their strategy or potential interactions during the trial.",
+        "summary": "The witness discusses their team's courtroom arrangements, including access to emails and the internet, and mentions Donna Kane from Decision Quest. They also clarify their own limited use of technology during the trial."
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "document_id": "a-5717",
+      "document_number": "A-5717",
+      "page_count": 1,
+      "analysis": {
+        "document_type": "deposition",
+        "key_topics": [
+          "Ethical obligations of an officer of the court",
+          "Disclosure of information regarding juror misconduct",
+          "Discussion about Juror No. 1 and potential misconduct"
+        ],
+        "key_people": [
+          {
+            "name": "Ms. Brune",
+            "role": "Witness being deposed, officer of the court"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Theresa Trzaskoma",
+            "role": "Person who had a discussion with Ms. Brune about Juror No. 1"
+          }
+        ],
+        "significance": "This deposition is potentially important because it reveals the witness's understanding of their ethical obligations and their actions regarding potential juror misconduct, which could impact the validity of a trial verdict.",
+        "summary": "The deposition involves questioning Ms. Brune about her role as an officer of the court and her obligations to disclose information about potential juror misconduct. Ms. Brune discusses a conversation she had with Theresa Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1 and a note related to legal concepts. The questioning highlights a potential issue with the timeliness and nature of Ms. Brune's disclosure to the court."
+      }
     }
   ]
 }

+ 23 - 1
processing_index.json

@@ -10498,8 +10498,30 @@
     "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010723.jpg",
     "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010724.jpg",
     "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010725.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010726.jpg",
     "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010727.jpg",
-    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010728.jpg"
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010728.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010729.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010730.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010731.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010732.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010733.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010734.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010735.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010736.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010737.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010738.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010739.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010740.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010741.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010742.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010743.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010744.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010745.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010746.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010747.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010748.jpg",
+    "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010749.jpg"
   ],
   "last_updated": "/Users/nickp/code/files"
 }

+ 101 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010726.json

@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": null,
+    "document_number": null,
+    "date": "June 25, 2022",
+    "document_type": "Letter",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM\n212-243-1100 · Main\n917-912-9698 · Cell\n888-587-4737 · Fax\n225 Broadway, Suite 715\nNew York, NY 10007\nbcsternheim@mac.com\n\nJune 25, 2022\n\nHonorable Alison J. Nathan\nSitting By Designation\nUnited States District Court\n40 Foley Square\nNew York, NY 10010\n\nRe: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell\nS2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)\n\nDear Judge Nathan:\n\nI write to inform the Court of a recent development which may require postponement of Tuesday's sentencing proceeding. Yesterday, without having conducted a psychological evaluation and without justification, the MDC placed Ms. Maxwell on suicide watch. She is not permitted to possess and review legal documents and is not permitted paper or pen. This has prevented her from preparing for sentencing.\n\nMs. Maxwell was abruptly removed from general population and returned to solitary confinement, this time without any clothing, toothpaste, soap, legal papers, etc. She was provided a \"suicide smock\" and is given a few sheets of toilet paper on request. This morning, a psychologist evaluated Ms. Maxwell and determined she is not suicidal.\n\nI met with Ms. Maxwell today (after a 97-minute delay following my arrival at the facility). She is not suicidal. Currently, she is unable to properly prepare for sentencing. If Ms. Maxwell remains on suicide watch, is prohibited from reviewing legal materials prior to sentencing, becomes sleep deprived, and is denied sufficient time to meet with and confer with counsel, we will be formally moving on Monday for an adjournment.\n\nVery truly yours,\n\n/s/\nBOBBI C. STERNHEIM\n\ncc: Counsel of Record\n\nDOJ-OGR-00010726",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "212-243-1100 · Main\n917-912-9698 · Cell\n888-587-4737 · Fax\n225 Broadway, Suite 715\nNew York, NY 10007\nbcsternheim@mac.com",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "June 25, 2022",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nSitting By Designation\nUnited States District Court\n40 Foley Square\nNew York, NY 10010",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell\nS2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Dear Judge Nathan:",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "I write to inform the Court of a recent development which may require postponement of Tuesday's sentencing proceeding. Yesterday, without having conducted a psychological evaluation and without justification, the MDC placed Ms. Maxwell on suicide watch. She is not permitted to possess and review legal documents and is not permitted paper or pen. This has prevented her from preparing for sentencing.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Ms. Maxwell was abruptly removed from general population and returned to solitary confinement, this time without any clothing, toothpaste, soap, legal papers, etc. She was provided a \"suicide smock\" and is given a few sheets of toilet paper on request. This morning, a psychologist evaluated Ms. Maxwell and determined she is not suicidal.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "I met with Ms. Maxwell today (after a 97-minute delay following my arrival at the facility). She is not suicidal. Currently, she is unable to properly prepare for sentencing. If Ms. Maxwell remains on suicide watch, is prohibited from reviewing legal materials prior to sentencing, becomes sleep deprived, and is denied sufficient time to meet with and confer with counsel, we will be formally moving on Monday for an adjournment.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Very truly yours,",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "signature",
+      "content": "/s/\nBOBBI C. STERNHEIM",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "cc: Counsel of Record",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010726",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Alison J. Nathan",
+      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
+      "Bobbi C. Sternheim"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "United States District Court",
+      "MDC"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "New York"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "June 25, 2022",
+      "Monday"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00010726"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a formal letter from Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter discusses Maxwell's recent placement on suicide watch and its impact on her ability to prepare for sentencing. The document is well-formatted and free of significant damage or redactions."
+}

+ 75 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010729.json

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "1",
+    "document_number": "679",
+    "date": "06/26/22",
+    "document_type": "Letter",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": true
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 679 Filed 06/26/22 Page 1 of 4 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 June 26, 2022 By ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan, Sitting by Designation United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the Court's June 25, 2022 Order directing the Government to confer with the Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center (\"MDC\") regarding the defendant's access to legal materials and counsel.1 This morning, the Government spoke directly with the Warden and the Chief Psychologist of the MDC. Based on that conversation, the Government understands that the defendant currently has access to all of her legal documents in hard copy and is able to confer with defense counsel. Accordingly, there is no basis to adjourn sentencing in this matter. 1 The Government first learned of the defendant's newly raised concerns about her conditions of confinement through the publicly filed letter from defense counsel last night. (Dkt. No. 677). Defense counsel did not confer with or seek assistance directly from the Government before filing that letter. 1 DOJ-OGR-00010729",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 679 Filed 06/26/22 Page 1 of 4",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 June 26, 2022",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "By ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan, Sitting by Designation United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the Court's June 25, 2022 Order directing the Government to confer with the Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center (\"MDC\") regarding the defendant's access to legal materials and counsel.1 This morning, the Government spoke directly with the Warden and the Chief Psychologist of the MDC. Based on that conversation, the Government understands that the defendant currently has access to all of her legal documents in hard copy and is able to confer with defense counsel. Accordingly, there is no basis to adjourn sentencing in this matter.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "1 The Government first learned of the defendant's newly raised concerns about her conditions of confinement through the publicly filed letter from defense counsel last night. (Dkt. No. 677). Defense counsel did not confer with or seek assistance directly from the Government before filing that letter.",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "1 DOJ-OGR-00010729",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "stamp",
+      "content": "",
+      "position": "left margin"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Alison J. Nathan",
+      "Ghislaine Maxwell"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "U.S. Department of Justice",
+      "United States Attorney",
+      "Metropolitan Detention Center"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "New York",
+      "Southern District of New York"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "June 26, 2022",
+      "June 25, 2022"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "Document 679",
+      "S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
+      "Dkt. No. 677",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00010729"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to the Honorable Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter is dated June 26, 2022, and is in response to a court order from June 25, 2022. The document contains a stamp on the left margin."
+}

Rozdielové dáta súboru neboli zobrazené, pretože súbor je príliš veľký
+ 9 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010730.json


Rozdielové dáta súboru neboli zobrazené, pretože súbor je príliš veľký
+ 9 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010731.json


+ 74 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010732.json

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "4",
+    "document_number": "679",
+    "date": "06/26/22",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 679 Filed 06/26/22 Page 4 of 4 previously housed. Accordingly, there is no reason the defendant cannot get the same amount of sleep while on suicide watch as she did in general population. Given the defendant's continued access to her legal documents and to counsel, there is no reason to adjourn sentencing in this matter. The Government respectfully submits that sentencing should proceed as scheduled on June 28, 2022. Respectfully submitted, DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney By: s/ Maurene Comey Alison Moe Lara Pomerantz Andrew Rohrbach Assistant United States Attorneys Southern District of New York Cc: Defense Counsel (by ECF) 4 DOJ-OGR-00010732",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 679 Filed 06/26/22 Page 4 of 4",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "previously housed. Accordingly, there is no reason the defendant cannot get the same amount of sleep while on suicide watch as she did in general population. Given the defendant's continued access to her legal documents and to counsel, there is no reason to adjourn sentencing in this matter. The Government respectfully submits that sentencing should proceed as scheduled on June 28, 2022.",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Respectfully submitted, DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "By: s/ Maurene Comey Alison Moe Lara Pomerantz Andrew Rohrbach Assistant United States Attorneys Southern District of New York",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Cc: Defense Counsel (by ECF)",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "4",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010732",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "DAMIAN WILLIAMS",
+      "Maurene Comey",
+      "Alison Moe",
+      "Lara Pomerantz",
+      "Andrew Rohrbach"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "United States Attorney",
+      "Southern District of New York"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "New York"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "06/26/22",
+      "June 28, 2022"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "Document 679",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00010732"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
+}

+ 97 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010733.json

@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "1 of 3",
+    "document_number": "680",
+    "date": "06/26/22",
+    "document_type": "Letter",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 680 Filed 06/26/22 Page 1 of 3 LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM 212-243-1100 * Main 917-912-9698 * Cell 888-587-4737 * Fax 225 Broadway, Suite 715 New York, NY 10007 bcsternheim@mac.com June 26, 2022 Honorable Alison J. Nathan Sitting By Designation United States District Court 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: In connection with the upcoming sentencing proceeding and supplementing Ms. Maxwell's Sentencing Memorandum (Dkt. 663) as Exhibit K, enclosed please find a letter from an MDC inmate in general population expressing her positive impressions of Ms. Maxwell. Very truly yours, /s/ BOBBI C. STERNHEIM Enc. cc: Counsel of Record DOJ-OGR-00010733",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 680 Filed 06/26/22 Page 1 of 3",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "212-243-1100 * Main 917-912-9698 * Cell 888-587-4737 * Fax 225 Broadway, Suite 715 New York, NY 10007 bcsternheim@mac.com",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "June 26, 2022",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Honorable Alison J. Nathan Sitting By Designation United States District Court 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Dear Judge Nathan: In connection with the upcoming sentencing proceeding and supplementing Ms. Maxwell's Sentencing Memorandum (Dkt. 663) as Exhibit K, enclosed please find a letter from an MDC inmate in general population expressing her positive impressions of Ms. Maxwell.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Very truly yours,",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "signature",
+      "content": "/s/ BOBBI C. STERNHEIM",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Enc. cc: Counsel of Record",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010733",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Alison J. Nathan",
+      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
+      "Bobbi C. Sternheim"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "United States District Court",
+      "LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "New York",
+      "NY",
+      "Broadway",
+      "Foley Square"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "June 26, 2022",
+      "06/26/22"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "680",
+      "S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
+      "Dkt. 663",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00010733"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document is a letter from Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter includes a reference to an enclosed letter from an MDC inmate. The document appears to be a formal legal document, with proper formatting and language."
+}

+ 44 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010734.json

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "2",
+    "document_number": "680",
+    "date": "06/26/22",
+    "document_type": "Exhibit",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 680 Filed 06/26/22 Page 2 of 3 EXHIBIT K DOJ-OGR-00010734",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 680 Filed 06/26/22 Page 2 of 3",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "EXHIBIT K",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010734",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [],
+    "organizations": [
+      "DOJ"
+    ],
+    "locations": [],
+    "dates": [
+      "06/26/22"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "680",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00010734"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a clear header and footer. The main content is labeled 'EXHIBIT K'."
+}

+ 29 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010735.json

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": null,
+    "document_number": null,
+    "date": null,
+    "document_type": "handwritten note",
+    "has_handwriting": true,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "When Ghisiane Maxwell first arrived in the unit, She introduced herself to everyone with a handshake.\"Hi l'am Maxwell\" She says with a smile genuine and kind. It took all of us by surprise. Within one week of Maxwell arriving, She had volunteered to teach ESL, Teach Yoga, and help women with their GED. I believe It's important to know that there are also positive opinions, some of which are among inmates in the Unit. I believe that is also good to point out the good in people. ~Tatiana Venegas",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "handwritten",
+      "content": "When Ghisiane Maxwell first arrived in the unit, She introduced herself to everyone with a handshake.\"Hi l'am Maxwell\" She says with a smile genuine and kind. It took all of us by surprise. Within one week of Maxwell arriving, She had volunteered to teach ESL, Teach Yoga, and help women with their GED. I believe It's important to know that there are also positive opinions, some of which are among inmates in the Unit. I believe that is also good to point out the good in people. ~Tatiana Venegas",
+      "position": "middle"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Ghisiane Maxwell",
+      "Tatiana Venegas"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [],
+    "locations": [],
+    "dates": [],
+    "reference_numbers": []
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document is a handwritten note on white paper. The handwriting is legible, and the content appears to be a testimonial or statement about Ghisiane Maxwell's behavior in a correctional unit."
+}

+ 80 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010736.json

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "1",
+    "document_number": "681",
+    "date": "06/26/22",
+    "document_type": "Court Document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": true
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 681 Filed 06/26/22 Page 1 of 1 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 June 26, 2022 By ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan, Sitting by Designation United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: In response to the Court's June 26, 2022 Order, the Government respectfully submits the motion filed by Kate's attorney that accompanied her impact statement. Respectfully submitted, DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney By: s/ Maurene Comey Alison Moe Lara Pomerantz Andrew Rohrbach Assistant United States Attorneys Southern District of New York Cc: Defense Counsel (by ECF) DOJ-OGR-00010736",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 681 Filed 06/26/22 Page 1 of 1",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "stamp",
+      "content": "",
+      "position": "margin"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 June 26, 2022",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "By ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan, Sitting by Designation United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: In response to the Court's June 26, 2022 Order, the Government respectfully submits the motion filed by Kate's attorney that accompanied her impact statement.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Respectfully submitted, DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney By: s/ Maurene Comey Alison Moe Lara Pomerantz Andrew Rohrbach Assistant United States Attorneys Southern District of New York",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Cc: Defense Counsel (by ECF) DOJ-OGR-00010736",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Alison J. Nathan",
+      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
+      "Kate",
+      "Damian Williams",
+      "Maurene Comey",
+      "Alison Moe",
+      "Lara Pomerantz",
+      "Andrew Rohrbach"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "U.S. Department of Justice",
+      "United States Attorney",
+      "United States District Court",
+      "Southern District of New York"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "New York"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "June 26, 2022",
+      "06/26/22"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "681",
+      "S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00010736"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, submitting a motion filed by Kate's attorney. The document is signed by Damian Williams, United States Attorney, and several Assistant United States Attorneys. The document includes a stamp from the U.S. Department of Justice."
+}

+ 89 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010737.json

@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "1",
+    "document_number": "681-1",
+    "date": "06/26/22",
+    "document_type": "Court Document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 681-1 Filed 06/26/22 Page 1 of 7\n\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\n\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\nPlaintiff,\nv.\nGHISLAINE MAXWELL,\nDefendant.\n\nCase No. 1:20-cr-330\n\nMOTION OF KATE TO BE ALLOWED TO DELIVER A VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT AT SENTENCING\n\nJane Doe, who testified at the trial in this matter under the pseudonym Kate, through undersigned counsel, files this motion for the Court to be allowed to deliver a victim impact statement, orally and in court, at the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 28. In support of this motion, the undersigned states as follows:\n\nINTRODUCTION\n\nAt trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, Kate testified about her experience with Ghislaine Maxwell. The jury found that Maxwell had committed crimes charged in the indictment beyond a reasonable doubt. Now, at sentencing, the Court has greater freedom to consider the full scope of the harms that Maxwell's crimes have caused. See 18 U.S.C. § 3661 (\"no limitation shall be placed on the information concerning the background, character, and conduct of a person convicted of an offense which a court of the United States may receive and consider for the purpose of imposing an appropriate sentence.\") Kate seeks to assist the Court in that effort by providing an oral victim impact statement at sentencing.\n\n1\n\nDOJ-OGR-00010737",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 681-1 Filed 06/26/22 Page 1 of 7",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\nPlaintiff,\nv.\nGHISLAINE MAXWELL,\nDefendant.",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case No. 1:20-cr-330",
+      "position": "margin"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "MOTION OF KATE TO BE ALLOWED TO DELIVER A VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT AT SENTENCING",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Jane Doe, who testified at the trial in this matter under the pseudonym Kate, through undersigned counsel, files this motion for the Court to be allowed to deliver a victim impact statement, orally and in court, at the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 28. In support of this motion, the undersigned states as follows:",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "INTRODUCTION",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "At trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, Kate testified about her experience with Ghislaine Maxwell. The jury found that Maxwell had committed crimes charged in the indictment beyond a reasonable doubt. Now, at sentencing, the Court has greater freedom to consider the full scope of the harms that Maxwell's crimes have caused. See 18 U.S.C. § 3661 (\"no limitation shall be placed on the information concerning the background, character, and conduct of a person convicted of an offense which a court of the United States may receive and consider for the purpose of imposing an appropriate sentence.\") Kate seeks to assist the Court in that effort by providing an oral victim impact statement at sentencing.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "1",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010737",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Jane Doe",
+      "Kate",
+      "Ghislaine Maxwell"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
+      "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "NEW YORK"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "06/26/22",
+      "June 28"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "681-1",
+      "1:20-cr-330",
+      "18 U.S.C. § 3661",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00010737"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
+}

Rozdielové dáta súboru neboli zobrazené, pretože súbor je príliš veľký
+ 9 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010738.json


Rozdielové dáta súboru neboli zobrazené, pretože súbor je príliš veľký
+ 9 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010739.json


Rozdielové dáta súboru neboli zobrazené, pretože súbor je príliš veľký
+ 9 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010740.json


Rozdielové dáta súboru neboli zobrazené, pretože súbor je príliš veľký
+ 9 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010741.json


+ 80 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010742.json

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "6",
+    "document_number": "681-1",
+    "date": "06/26/22",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 681-1 Filed 06/26/22 Page 6 of 7\n\nconsider at sentencing. See Fed. R. Evid. 1101(d)(3); United States v. Croxford, 324 F. Supp. 2d 1230, 1240 (D. Utah 2004); United States v. Fennel, 65 F.3d 812, 813 (10th Cir. 1995).\n\nOf particular importance in confirming the broad power of courts at sentencing is a broad federal provision—18 U.S.C. § 3661—which states “no limitation shall be placed on the information concerning the background, character, and conduct of a person convicted of an offense which a court of the United States may receive and consider for the purpose of imposing an appropriate sentence” (emphasis added). The critical words “no limitation” grant a sentencing court extremely broad discretionary authority over what sentencing information will be considered. The Second Circuit, for example, has recognized the broad scope of this provision. See United States v. Morrison, 778 F.3d 396, 400–01 (2d Cir. 2015). The Second Circuit noted that § 3661 contains “emphatic language” which “preclude[s] categorical proscriptions on ‘any factor concerning the background, character, and conduct of the defendant, with the exception of invidious factors.’” Id. (emphasis in original) (citing United States v. Cavera, 550 F.3d 180, 191 (2d Cir.2008) (en banc)).\n\nIn view of these authorities, the court has discretionary to hear from anyone it believes would have useful information for sentencing. Kate respectfully submits that hearing from her will help the court in imposing a fair and just sentence and that she should be allowed to speak.\n\nCONCLUSION\n\nFor all these reasons, the Court should allow Kate to deliver an oral victim impact statement at defendant Maxwell’s sentencing, or, at a minimum, provide her additional time to brief the issue.\n\nDated: June 22, 2022.\n\n6\n\nDOJ-OGR-00010742",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 681-1 Filed 06/26/22 Page 6 of 7",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "consider at sentencing. See Fed. R. Evid. 1101(d)(3); United States v. Croxford, 324 F. Supp. 2d 1230, 1240 (D. Utah 2004); United States v. Fennel, 65 F.3d 812, 813 (10th Cir. 1995).\n\nOf particular importance in confirming the broad power of courts at sentencing is a broad federal provision—18 U.S.C. § 3661—which states “no limitation shall be placed on the information concerning the background, character, and conduct of a person convicted of an offense which a court of the United States may receive and consider for the purpose of imposing an appropriate sentence” (emphasis added). The critical words “no limitation” grant a sentencing court extremely broad discretionary authority over what sentencing information will be considered. The Second Circuit, for example, has recognized the broad scope of this provision. See United States v. Morrison, 778 F.3d 396, 400–01 (2d Cir. 2015). The Second Circuit noted that § 3661 contains “emphatic language” which “preclude[s] categorical proscriptions on ‘any factor concerning the background, character, and conduct of the defendant, with the exception of invidious factors.’” Id. (emphasis in original) (citing United States v. Cavera, 550 F.3d 180, 191 (2d Cir.2008) (en banc)).\n\nIn view of these authorities, the court has discretionary to hear from anyone it believes would have useful information for sentencing. Kate respectfully submits that hearing from her will help the court in imposing a fair and just sentence and that she should be allowed to speak.",
+      "position": "main content"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "CONCLUSION",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "For all these reasons, the Court should allow Kate to deliver an oral victim impact statement at defendant Maxwell’s sentencing, or, at a minimum, provide her additional time to brief the issue.",
+      "position": "main content"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Dated: June 22, 2022.",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "6",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010742",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Kate",
+      "Maxwell"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "United States Court",
+      "Second Circuit",
+      "Department of Justice"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "Utah"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "June 22, 2022",
+      "2004",
+      "1995",
+      "2015",
+      "2008"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "Document 681-1",
+      "18 U.S.C. § 3661",
+      "324 F. Supp. 2d 1230",
+      "65 F.3d 812",
+      "778 F.3d 396",
+      "550 F.3d 180",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00010742"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The text is well-formatted and easy to read. There are no visible redactions or damages."
+}

+ 54 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010743.json

@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "7",
+    "document_number": "681-1",
+    "date": "06/26/22",
+    "document_type": "court document",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 681-1 Filed 06/26/22 Page 7 of 7 Respectfully Submitted, EDWARDS POTTINGER, LLC /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Brittany N. Henderson 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Email: ecf@epllc.com brad@epllc.com brittany@epllc.com 7 DOJ-OGR-00010743",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 681-1 Filed 06/26/22 Page 7 of 7",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Respectfully Submitted, EDWARDS POTTINGER, LLC /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Brittany N. Henderson 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Email: ecf@epllc.com brad@epllc.com brittany@epllc.com",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "7",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010743",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Bradley J. Edwards",
+      "Brittany N. Henderson"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "EDWARDS POTTINGER, LLC"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "Fort Lauderdale, FL"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "06/26/22"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "681-1",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00010743"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a signature block. The text is clear and legible."
+}

+ 80 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010744.json

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "1",
+    "document_number": "682",
+    "date": "06/24/22",
+    "document_type": "Court Order",
+    "has_handwriting": false,
+    "has_stamps": true
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 682 Filed 06/24/22 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, -v- Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ALISON J. NATHAN, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation: The Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) \"guarantees to the victims of federal crimes an array of substantive and participatory rights, including the rights to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court involving release, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding, to confer with the attorney for the Government in the case, and to receive full and timely restitution as provided in law.\" United States v. Murillo-Bejerano (In re Rendon Galvis), 564 F.3d 170, 174 (2d Cir. 2009) (per curiam) (cleaned up). \"In any court proceeding involving an offense against a crime victim, the court shall ensure that the crime victim is afforded th[ose] rights.\" 18 U.S.C. § 3771(b)(1). In accordance with the procedure required by this Court's prior order, Dkt. No. 671, the Government has provided statements from seven individuals asserting they are crime victims under the CVRA. As explained below, the Court will permit all seven individuals to provide statements and the Defendant's request for redactions is denied. As a preliminary matter, the Defendant does not object to the inclusion of statements from three of these individuals: Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre. Accordingly, their written submissions are deemed part of the record and to the extent Annie Farmer, Kate, and/or Giuffre seek permission to make an oral statement at sentencing, that request is granted. 1 DOJ-OGR-00010744",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 682 Filed 06/24/22 Page 1 of 4",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "United States of America, -v- Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant.",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "20-CR-330 (AJN) ORDER",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation: The Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) \"guarantees to the victims of federal crimes an array of substantive and participatory rights, including the rights to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court involving release, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding, to confer with the attorney for the Government in the case, and to receive full and timely restitution as provided in law.\" United States v. Murillo-Bejerano (In re Rendon Galvis), 564 F.3d 170, 174 (2d Cir. 2009) (per curiam) (cleaned up). \"In any court proceeding involving an offense against a crime victim, the court shall ensure that the crime victim is afforded th[ose] rights.\" 18 U.S.C. § 3771(b)(1). In accordance with the procedure required by this Court's prior order, Dkt. No. 671, the Government has provided statements from seven individuals asserting they are crime victims under the CVRA. As explained below, the Court will permit all seven individuals to provide statements and the Defendant's request for redactions is denied. As a preliminary matter, the Defendant does not object to the inclusion of statements from three of these individuals: Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre. Accordingly, their written submissions are deemed part of the record and to the extent Annie Farmer, Kate, and/or Giuffre seek permission to make an oral statement at sentencing, that request is granted.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "1",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "stamp",
+      "content": "USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: DATE FILED: 6/24/22",
+      "position": "margin"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010744",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
+      "Alison J. Nathan",
+      "Annie Farmer",
+      "Kate",
+      "Virginia Giuffre"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "United States District Court",
+      "United States of America"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "New York"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "06/24/22"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "Document 682",
+      "20-CR-330 (AJN)",
+      "Dkt. No. 671",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00010744"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It appears to be a formal and official document, with no visible redactions or damage."
+}

Rozdielové dáta súboru neboli zobrazené, pretože súbor je príliš veľký
+ 9 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010745.json


Rozdielové dáta súboru neboli zobrazené, pretože súbor je príliš veľký
+ 9 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010746.json


+ 95 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010747.json

@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "4",
+    "document_number": "682",
+    "date": "06/24/22",
+    "document_type": "Court Order",
+    "has_handwriting": true,
+    "has_stamps": false
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 682 Filed 06/24/22 Page 4 of 4\n\nthe Government correctly notes, while these statements do implicate privacy interests that might justify certain redactions, those interests here belong to the witnesses themselves, none of whom has sought to submit her statement under seal. Dkt. No. 673 at 2. It follows that the Defendant fails to present any sufficiently weighty countervailing factors or higher values to override the presumption in favor of public access. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 124 (2d Cir. 2006). Accordingly, the Defendant's request for redactions is denied.\n\nIn sum, all seven written statements received by the Court are deemed part of the record.\n\nThe Court will consider them only for what they permissibly may be considered. The Government shall promptly docket the written statements without redactions. Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre may present an in-person statement at sentencing if they wish to do so.\n\nThe Government shall provide copies of this Order to counsel for the seven individuals who submitted statements by no later than today, June 24, 2022.\n\nSO ORDERED.\n\nDated: June 24, 2022\nNew York, New York\n\nALISON J. NATHAN\nUnited States Circuit Judge,\nsitting by designation\n\n4\nDOJ-OGR-00010747",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 682 Filed 06/24/22 Page 4 of 4",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "the Government correctly notes, while these statements do implicate privacy interests that might justify certain redactions, those interests here belong to the witnesses themselves, none of whom has sought to submit her statement under seal. Dkt. No. 673 at 2. It follows that the Defendant fails to present any sufficiently weighty countervailing factors or higher values to override the presumption in favor of public access. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 124 (2d Cir. 2006). Accordingly, the Defendant's request for redactions is denied.",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "In sum, all seven written statements received by the Court are deemed part of the record.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "The Court will consider them only for what they permissibly may be considered. The Government shall promptly docket the written statements without redactions. Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre may present an in-person statement at sentencing if they wish to do so.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "The Government shall provide copies of this Order to counsel for the seven individuals who submitted statements by no later than today, June 24, 2022.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "SO ORDERED.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Dated: June 24, 2022\nNew York, New York",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "handwritten",
+      "content": "Alison J. Nathan",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN\nUnited States Circuit Judge,\nsitting by designation",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "4",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010747",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Annie Farmer",
+      "Kate",
+      "Virginia Giuffre",
+      "Alison J. Nathan"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "Government",
+      "Court"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "New York"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "June 24, 2022",
+      "06/24/22"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "Document 682",
+      "Dkt. No. 673",
+      "435 F.3d 110",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00010747"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document is a court order with a clear and legible text. It contains a mix of printed and handwritten text, with the judge's signature being the handwritten part."
+}

+ 102 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010748.json

@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "1",
+    "document_number": "683",
+    "date": "06/25/22",
+    "document_type": "Court Order",
+    "has_handwriting": true,
+    "has_stamps": true
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 683 Filed 06/25/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, -v- Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ALISON J. NATHAN, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation: The parties are ORDERED to submit their positions on Ms. Ransome and Ms. Stein's motion, Dkt. No. 675, which the Court received for the first time today, by 10:00 a.m. tomorrow, June 26, 2022. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 25, 2022 New York, New York ALISON J. NATHAN United States Circuit Judge Sitting by Designation USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 6/25/22 20-CR-330 (AJN) ORDER DOJ-OGR-00010748",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 683 Filed 06/25/22 Page 1 of 1",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "United States of America, -v- Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant.",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation:",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "The parties are ORDERED to submit their positions on Ms. Ransome and Ms. Stein's motion, Dkt. No. 675, which the Court received for the first time today, by 10:00 a.m. tomorrow, June 26, 2022.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "SO ORDERED.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Dated: June 25, 2022 New York, New York",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "handwritten",
+      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN United States Circuit Judge Sitting by Designation",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "stamp",
+      "content": "USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 6/25/22",
+      "position": "margin"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "20-CR-330 (AJN) ORDER",
+      "position": "margin"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010748",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
+      "ALISON J. NATHAN",
+      "Ms. Ransome",
+      "Ms. Stein"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
+      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
+      "United States Circuit Judge"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "New York"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "June 25, 2022",
+      "June 26, 2022",
+      "06/25/22"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "Document 683",
+      "20-CR-330 (AJN)",
+      "Dkt. No. 675",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00010748"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is signed by ALISON J. NATHAN, a United States Circuit Judge sitting by designation. The document is electronically filed and has a stamp indicating the filing date."
+}

+ 109 - 0
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010749.json

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "document_metadata": {
+    "page_number": "1",
+    "document_number": "684",
+    "date": "06/26/22",
+    "document_type": "Court Order",
+    "has_handwriting": true,
+    "has_stamps": true
+  },
+  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 684 Filed 06/26/22 Page 1 of 1\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\nUnited States of America,\n-v-\nGhislaine Maxwell,\nDefendant.\n20-CR-330 (AJN)\nORDER\nALISON J. NATHAN, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation:\nThe Defendant's letter in response to the Court's order regarding the CVRA references a motion by Kate's attorney that accompanied her impact statement. Dkt. No. 672 at 2 n.1. The Court is not in receipt of this motion. The Government is ORDERED to docket the motion referenced by the Defendant as soon as possible but no later than midnight tonight, June 26, 2022.\nSO ORDERED.\nDated: June 26, 2022 New York, New York\nALISON J. NATHAN\nUnited States Circuit Judge\nSitting by Designation\n1\nDOJ-OGR-00010749",
+  "text_blocks": [
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 684 Filed 06/26/22 Page 1 of 1",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
+      "position": "header"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "United States of America,\n-v-\nGhislaine Maxwell,\nDefendant.",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "20-CR-330 (AJN)",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "ORDER",
+      "position": "top"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation:",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "The Defendant's letter in response to the Court's order regarding the CVRA references a motion by Kate's attorney that accompanied her impact statement. Dkt. No. 672 at 2 n.1. The Court is not in receipt of this motion. The Government is ORDERED to docket the motion referenced by the Defendant as soon as possible but no later than midnight tonight, June 26, 2022.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "SO ORDERED.",
+      "position": "middle"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "Dated: June 26, 2022 New York, New York",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "handwritten",
+      "content": "Alison J. Nathan",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN\nUnited States Circuit Judge\nSitting by Designation",
+      "position": "bottom"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "stamp",
+      "content": "USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 6/26/22",
+      "position": "margin"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "1",
+      "position": "footer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "printed",
+      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010749",
+      "position": "footer"
+    }
+  ],
+  "entities": {
+    "people": [
+      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
+      "Alison J. Nathan",
+      "Kate"
+    ],
+    "organizations": [
+      "United States District Court",
+      "United States Circuit Judge"
+    ],
+    "locations": [
+      "New York"
+    ],
+    "dates": [
+      "June 26, 2022",
+      "06/26/22"
+    ],
+    "reference_numbers": [
+      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
+      "Document 684",
+      "20-CR-330 (AJN)",
+      "Dkt. No. 672",
+      "DOJ-OGR-00010749"
+    ]
+  },
+  "additional_notes": "The document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is signed by Alison J. Nathan, a United States Circuit Judge sitting by designation. The document is related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell."
+}

Niektoré súbory nie sú zobrazené, pretože je v týchto rozdielových dátach zmenené mnoho súborov