{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "615",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 615 Filed 02/24/22 Page 2 of 49\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................... 1\n\nBACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 2\nI. The Jury Selection Process....................................................................................... 2\nII. Juror 50's Questionnaire and Voir Dire .................................................................... 6\nIII. Juror 50's Public Statements Following the Verdict ............................................... 8\n\nARGUMENT ......................................................................................................................... 10\nI. The Defendant's Motion for a New Trial Should Be Denied on the Current Record 10\nA. Applicable Law ................................................................................................... 10\nB. Discussion ........................................................................................................... 13\n1. The Defendant Has Failed To Satisfy the First Prong of McDonough ................ 13\n2. The Defendant Has Failed to Satisfy the Second Prong of McDonough ............. 19\nII. The Court Should Schedule a Limited Hearing Regarding Juror 50 ....................... 30\nA. Applicable Law ................................................................................................... 30\nB. Discussion ........................................................................................................... 31\n1. The Court Should Conduct the Questioning ....................................................... 32\n2. The Scope of the Hearing Should Be Limited..................................................... 33\n3. There Is No Basis to Call Any Other Juror as a Witness .................................... 37\n4. The Defendant's \"Discovery\" Request Should Be Denied .................................... 40\nIII. The Court Should Provide Juror 50 with a Copy of His Questionnaire\nBefore Any Hearing ................................................................................................... 42\n\nCONCLUSION ....................................................................................................................... 47\n\n2\n\nDOJ-OGR-00009121",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 615 Filed 02/24/22 Page 2 of 49",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................... 1\n\nBACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 2\nI. The Jury Selection Process....................................................................................... 2\nII. Juror 50's Questionnaire and Voir Dire .................................................................... 6\nIII. Juror 50's Public Statements Following the Verdict ............................................... 8\n\nARGUMENT ......................................................................................................................... 10\nI. The Defendant's Motion for a New Trial Should Be Denied on the Current Record 10\nA. Applicable Law ................................................................................................... 10\nB. Discussion ........................................................................................................... 13\n1. The Defendant Has Failed To Satisfy the First Prong of McDonough ................ 13\n2. The Defendant Has Failed to Satisfy the Second Prong of McDonough ............. 19\nII. The Court Should Schedule a Limited Hearing Regarding Juror 50 ....................... 30\nA. Applicable Law ................................................................................................... 30\nB. Discussion ........................................................................................................... 31\n1. The Court Should Conduct the Questioning ....................................................... 32\n2. The Scope of the Hearing Should Be Limited..................................................... 33\n3. There Is No Basis to Call Any Other Juror as a Witness .................................... 37\n4. The Defendant's \"Discovery\" Request Should Be Denied .................................... 40\nIII. The Court Should Provide Juror 50 with a Copy of His Questionnaire\nBefore Any Hearing ................................................................................................... 42\n\nCONCLUSION ....................................................................................................................... 47",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009121",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "615",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009121"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The table of contents suggests that the document discusses a defendant's motion for a new trial and issues related to Juror 50. The document is well-formatted and free of significant damage or redactions."
}