{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "197",
    "document_number": "751",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 197 of 261 1358 LC6VMAX6\n\n1 We'll bring in the jury.\n2 Counsel, was I right, those other 900 exhibits needed redaction of photos of individuals?\n3 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to those exhibits, just so I'm sure I understand --\n4 THE COURT: 911, for example. It looks like there's a photo in the right corner.\n5 MS. MOE: I just wanted to make sure we'd redacted the right thing. I received a note about that issue.\n6 We weren't sure whether the issue was the painting over the mantel -- we've redacted that -- or whether there was something else.\n7 THE COURT: No. On the right-hand side there's a table with a lamp. There's a lamp marked D and there's a photo of -- I can't quite tell, but I'm sure if somebody looked closely, they could tell of an individual.\n8 MS. MOE: Oh, I see. Sorry, your Honor, I had not noticed that. We will unredact the painting and re-mark it to redact that photograph, if the Court requests.\n9 THE COURT: Well, you tell me. Does it need to be redacted to protect privacy interests? I don't know -- for example, I don't know if this is a witness. I don't know.\n10 MS. MOE: Apologies, your Honor. I'm not familiar with the person in this photograph. I can't tell from the photograph. We certainly have no objection to redacting it for\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012948",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 197 of 261 1358 LC6VMAX6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 We'll bring in the jury.\n2 Counsel, was I right, those other 900 exhibits needed redaction of photos of individuals?\n3 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to those exhibits, just so I'm sure I understand --\n4 THE COURT: 911, for example. It looks like there's a photo in the right corner.\n5 MS. MOE: I just wanted to make sure we'd redacted the right thing. I received a note about that issue.\n6 We weren't sure whether the issue was the painting over the mantel -- we've redacted that -- or whether there was something else.\n7 THE COURT: No. On the right-hand side there's a table with a lamp. There's a lamp marked D and there's a photo of -- I can't quite tell, but I'm sure if somebody looked closely, they could tell of an individual.\n8 MS. MOE: Oh, I see. Sorry, your Honor, I had not noticed that. We will unredact the painting and re-mark it to redact that photograph, if the Court requests.\n9 THE COURT: Well, you tell me. Does it need to be redacted to protect privacy interests? I don't know -- for example, I don't know if this is a witness. I don't know.\n10 MS. MOE: Apologies, your Honor. I'm not familiar with the person in this photograph. I can't tell from the photograph. We certainly have no objection to redacting it for",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012948",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "751",
      "911",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012948"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion about redacting photographs. The text is mostly clear, but there are some minor formatting issues."
}