{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "202", "document_number": "753", "date": "08/10/22", "document_type": "court transcript", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 202 of 264 1643 LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross 1 illegal acts. And then if you turn back to 12, 12 says, 2 Epstein's a wealthy financier with a lavish home, wealth, a 3 network of assistants and employees used his resource and 4 influence over a vulnerable minor child to engage in a 5 systematic pattern of sexually exploited behavior. 6 I mean, on its terms, it references additional people. 7 And so, on its face, it's not exclusive and I think that puts 8 it in a different position. 9 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, with regard to this 10 exhibit, I was simply offering discrete factual paragraphs. 11 THE COURT: Right. But 206 -- so 206 was the one that 12 we began with. I don't think that paragraph is factually 13 inconsistent with the testimony for precisely the reason I've 14 just indicated. 15 MR. PAGLIUCA: I think we left off with 206. 16 THE COURT: So what's the next paragraph? 17 MR. PAGLIUCA: I mean, I can go through it and tell 18 you all the paragraphs that I'm intending to introduce or 19 ask -- 20 THE COURT: So 206 is not inconsistent. Therefore, 21 the objection is sustained. 22 What's the next paragraph? 23 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, let me look at 206 and hopefully 24 respond to that. 25 THE COURT: That's fine. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013215", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 202 of 264 1643 LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "1 illegal acts. And then if you turn back to 12, 12 says, 2 Epstein's a wealthy financier with a lavish home, wealth, a 3 network of assistants and employees used his resource and 4 influence over a vulnerable minor child to engage in a 5 systematic pattern of sexually exploited behavior. 6 I mean, on its terms, it references additional people. 7 And so, on its face, it's not exclusive and I think that puts 8 it in a different position. 9 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, with regard to this 10 exhibit, I was simply offering discrete factual paragraphs. 11 THE COURT: Right. But 206 -- so 206 was the one that 12 we began with. I don't think that paragraph is factually 13 inconsistent with the testimony for precisely the reason I've 14 just indicated. 15 MR. PAGLIUCA: I think we left off with 206. 16 THE COURT: So what's the next paragraph? 17 MR. PAGLIUCA: I mean, I can go through it and tell 18 you all the paragraphs that I'm intending to introduce or 19 ask -- 20 THE COURT: So 206 is not inconsistent. Therefore, 21 the objection is sustained. 22 What's the next paragraph? 23 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, let me look at 206 and hopefully 24 respond to that. 25 THE COURT: That's fine.", "position": "main" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013215", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "Epstein", "MR. PAGLIUCA" ], "organizations": [ "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C." ], "locations": [], "dates": [ "08/10/22" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "753", "206", "12", "DOJ-OGR-00013215" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage." }