{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "16",
    "document_number": "757",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 16 of 49 1989 LC9VMAXT\n\n1 THE COURT: On scheduling, needless to say, I didn't send you a draft of the charge last night. I think my thinking is if the government rests today or tomorrow, which sounds like what we anticipate, I'll use the remainder of tomorrow, one, to hear the defense motions; and two, for me to work on the charge on my own, having already received your drafts.\n\n2 And then I'll send it to you at some point in advance of a charging conference, which we'll do next week. And again, I'm open to you telling me whether you want to do it in the evenings after testimony or on Saturday. I think really the analysis there depends on what the defense now anticipates as the length of its case.\n\n3 So are you in a position to give any additional estimate as to that?\n\n4 MR. PAGLIUCA: We don't, your Honor.\n\n5 I think we're hoping to take this evening and tomorrow to put those pieces together, and then provide the Court and the government with that analysis.\n\n6 THE COURT: Okay. Ms. Sternheim.\n\n7 MS. STERNHEIM: May I just say, I think it is our thinking at the moment that if we are going to be using the trial days, that our preference would be to Saturday for a charge conference. It seems that it would just be a more focused time.\n\n8 THE COURT: I think really the only reason not to do\n\n9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00013557",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 16 of 49 1989 LC9VMAXT",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: On scheduling, needless to say, I didn't send you a draft of the charge last night. I think my thinking is if the government rests today or tomorrow, which sounds like what we anticipate, I'll use the remainder of tomorrow, one, to hear the defense motions; and two, for me to work on the charge on my own, having already received your drafts.\n\n2 And then I'll send it to you at some point in advance of a charging conference, which we'll do next week. And again, I'm open to you telling me whether you want to do it in the evenings after testimony or on Saturday. I think really the analysis there depends on what the defense now anticipates as the length of its case.\n\n3 So are you in a position to give any additional estimate as to that?\n\n4 MR. PAGLIUCA: We don't, your Honor.\n\n5 I think we're hoping to take this evening and tomorrow to put those pieces together, and then provide the Court and the government with that analysis.\n\n6 THE COURT: Okay. Ms. Sternheim.\n\n7 MS. STERNHEIM: May I just say, I think it is our thinking at the moment that if we are going to be using the trial days, that our preference would be to Saturday for a charge conference. It seems that it would just be a more focused time.\n\n8 THE COURT: I think really the only reason not to do",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013557",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "MS. STERNHEIM"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "Saturday"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "757",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013557"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}