{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "262", "document_number": "759", "date": "08/10/22", "document_type": "court transcript", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 262 of 267 2290 LCAVMAX8\n1 be a hardship to keep them indefinitely and have them come back\n2 and wait a week to deliberate on a case that's ready to be\n3 adjudicated.\n4 So, again, I don't think the Court needs to reach this\n5 issue given the timing; but if the jury was prepared to sit\n6 this entire week and hear evidence, there's no reason they\n7 couldn't also be here and be deliberating. I think we should\n8 be respectful of the jury's time. And dismissing them for yet\n9 another extremely lengthy break, I think, runs contrary to the\n10 efficient way the Court has run this trial. And if this case\n11 can be resolved --\n12 THE COURT: Well, thank you. That's not what they\n13 usually call it.\n14 MS. MOE: And I think, you know, the best way to be\n15 respectful of the jurors' time is to let them have the case.\n16 THE COURT: Okay. It's premature. We'll see where we\n17 are. My thinking was -- I think we'll see where we are.\n18 I suppose my point was since we're doing the charging\n19 conference on the 18th, I do want counsel to be prepared to\n20 turn to closings the day following the completion of the\n21 evidence. We'll see where that is and the like. But I don't\n22 want to keep starting and stopping. So we'll use our time, but\n23 I'm mindful of your concern, Ms. Sternheim, and we'll see where\n24 we are.\n25 MS. STERNHEIM: I would just like to add that we\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013853", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 262 of 267 2290 LCAVMAX8", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "1 be a hardship to keep them indefinitely and have them come back\n2 and wait a week to deliberate on a case that's ready to be\n3 adjudicated.\n4 So, again, I don't think the Court needs to reach this\n5 issue given the timing; but if the jury was prepared to sit\n6 this entire week and hear evidence, there's no reason they\n7 couldn't also be here and be deliberating. I think we should\n8 be respectful of the jury's time. And dismissing them for yet\n9 another extremely lengthy break, I think, runs contrary to the\n10 efficient way the Court has run this trial. And if this case\n11 can be resolved --\n12 THE COURT: Well, thank you. That's not what they\n13 usually call it.\n14 MS. MOE: And I think, you know, the best way to be\n15 respectful of the jurors' time is to let them have the case.\n16 THE COURT: Okay. It's premature. We'll see where we\n17 are. My thinking was -- I think we'll see where we are.\n18 I suppose my point was since we're doing the charging\n19 conference on the 18th, I do want counsel to be prepared to\n20 turn to closings the day following the completion of the\n21 evidence. We'll see where that is and the like. But I don't\n22 want to keep starting and stopping. So we'll use our time, but\n23 I'm mindful of your concern, Ms. Sternheim, and we'll see where\n24 we are.\n25 MS. STERNHEIM: I would just like to add that we", "position": "main content" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013853", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "Ms. Moe", "Ms. Sternheim" ], "organizations": [ "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.", "DOJ" ], "locations": [], "dates": [ "08/10/22", "18th" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "759", "DOJ-OGR-00013853" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage." }