{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "183", "document_number": "763", "date": "08/10/22", "document_type": "court transcript", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 183 of 197 2724 LCHVMAX6\n1 THE COURT: And the defense.\n2 MS. STERNHEIM: It would not exceed the government's\n3 main closing argument, and hopefully would be shorter.\n4 THE COURT: Okay. It will be tight.\n5 So I'll tell them that we'll start at 9, and that they\n6 should prepare for the possibility of being kept until 5:30\n7 MS. STERNHEIM: We had proposed 6 o'clock.\n8 THE COURT: Okay.\n9 MS. COMEY: Obviously, your Honor, we will strive for\n10 efficiency in our arguments.\n11 THE COURT: Yes. Okay.\n12 I will say that. I need to give them an opportunity\n13 to let Ms. Williams know if that's not possible. I don't know\n14 if somebody has childcare responsibilities or the like.\n15 MS. STERNHEIM: Understood.\n16 That's why we wanted to raise it with you now.\n17 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor.\n18 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.\n19 Bring in the jury.\n20 (Jury present)\n21 THE COURT: Members of the jury, thank you so much for\n22 your patience. I greatly appreciate it.\n23 Mr. Everdell, you may proceed.\n24 MR. EVERDELL: Thank you, your Honor.\n25 Your Honor, at this time the parties have a number of\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014289", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 183 of 197 2724 LCHVMAX6", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "1 THE COURT: And the defense.\n2 MS. STERNHEIM: It would not exceed the government's\n3 main closing argument, and hopefully would be shorter.\n4 THE COURT: Okay. It will be tight.\n5 So I'll tell them that we'll start at 9, and that they\n6 should prepare for the possibility of being kept until 5:30\n7 MS. STERNHEIM: We had proposed 6 o'clock.\n8 THE COURT: Okay.\n9 MS. COMEY: Obviously, your Honor, we will strive for\n10 efficiency in our arguments.\n11 THE COURT: Yes. Okay.\n12 I will say that. I need to give them an opportunity\n13 to let Ms. Williams know if that's not possible. I don't know\n14 if somebody has childcare responsibilities or the like.\n15 MS. STERNHEIM: Understood.\n16 That's why we wanted to raise it with you now.\n17 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor.\n18 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.\n19 Bring in the jury.\n20 (Jury present)\n21 THE COURT: Members of the jury, thank you so much for\n22 your patience. I greatly appreciate it.\n23 Mr. Everdell, you may proceed.\n24 MR. EVERDELL: Thank you, your Honor.\n25 Your Honor, at this time the parties have a number of", "position": "main content" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014289", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "Ms. Sternheim", "Ms. Comey", "Ms. Williams", "Mr. Everdell" ], "organizations": [ "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C." ], "locations": [], "dates": [ "08/10/22" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "763", "DOJ-OGR-00014289" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage." }