{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "225",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 225 of 257 3059 LCKCmax9 Charge\n\n1 In addition, you need not be unanimous as to which overt act you find to have been committed. It is sufficient as long as all of you find that at least one overt act was committed by one of the conspirators.\n\n2 As to Counts One and Three, the government has to prove that at least one of the overt acts in furtherance of that conspiracy involved a witness other than Kate. Put simply, you may not convict Ms. Maxwell on Counts One or Three solely on the basis of Kate's testimony or an overt act involving Kate.\n\n3 You are further instructed that the overt act need not have been committed at precisely at the time alleged in the indictment. It is sufficient if you are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that it occurred at or about the time and place stated.\n\n4 Instruction No. 37: Counts One, Three, and Five: Conspiracy to Violate Federal Law - Fourth Element.\n\n5 The fourth and final element which the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that the overt act was committed for the purpose of carrying out the unlawful agreement.\n\n6 In order for the government to satisfy this element, it must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that at least one overt act was knowingly and willfully done by at least one coconspirator in furtherance of some object or purpose of the\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014625",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 225 of 257 3059 LCKCmax9 Charge",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 In addition, you need not be unanimous as to which overt act you find to have been committed. It is sufficient as long as all of you find that at least one overt act was committed by one of the conspirators.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2 As to Counts One and Three, the government has to prove that at least one of the overt acts in furtherance of that conspiracy involved a witness other than Kate. Put simply, you may not convict Ms. Maxwell on Counts One or Three solely on the basis of Kate's testimony or an overt act involving Kate.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "3 You are further instructed that the overt act need not have been committed at precisely at the time alleged in the indictment. It is sufficient if you are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that it occurred at or about the time and place stated.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "4 Instruction No. 37: Counts One, Three, and Five: Conspiracy to Violate Federal Law - Fourth Element.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "5 The fourth and final element which the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that the overt act was committed for the purpose of carrying out the unlawful agreement.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "6 In order for the government to satisfy this element, it must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that at least one overt act was knowingly and willfully done by at least one coconspirator in furtherance of some object or purpose of the",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014625",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Kate",
      "Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014625"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to a conspiracy case involving Ms. Maxwell. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is from the Southern District Court and was filed on August 10, 2022."
}