{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "164",
    "document_number": "78",
    "date": "06/29/2023",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page164 of 217\nSA-418\n\nM6SQmax1 49\n1 Because there are multiple counts, all within at least\n2 four offense levels of each other, I determine 5 units under\n3 3D1.4(a). And under 3D1.4, 5 units increases the total offense\n4 level of the group with the highest total offense level by 5\n5 from 27 to 32.\n6 Last, because the defendant engaged in a pattern of\n7 activity involving prohibited sexual conduct, the total offense\n8 level is increased by 5 from 32 to 37. 4B1.5(b)(1).\n9 In conclusion, I find the correct total offense level\n10 under the 2003 Guidelines is 37.\n11 No party disputes the defendant's Criminal History\n12 Category of I.\n13 Under the 2003 Guidelines, a Criminal History Category\n14 of I and total offense level of 37, produces a guideline range\n15 of 210 to 262 months' imprisonment.\n16 The range for the fine, again, under the 2003 manual\n17 is $20,000 to $200,000 for each count. That's 5E1.2(c)(3).\n18 The range for supervised release is three years to\n19 life. 5D1.2(a)(1) and (c) and 18 U.S.C. 3583(k), although I\n20 believe there is a -- yeah, I think that's supervised release.\n21 I don't want to hear repeated objections, but any\n22 objections based on anything I said that is new?\n23 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. With respect to the unit\n24 analysis, we wanted to note that under 3D1.4, a total of 5\n25 units adds 4 levels, not 5 levels. I think the next layer on\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C... (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00021594",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page164 of 217",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SA-418",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M6SQmax1 49",
      "position": "margin"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Because there are multiple counts, all within at least four offense levels of each other, I determine 5 units under 3D1.4(a). And under 3D1.4, 5 units increases the total offense level of the group with the highest total offense level by 5 from 27 to 32. Last, because the defendant engaged in a pattern of activity involving prohibited sexual conduct, the total offense level is increased by 5 from 32 to 37. 4B1.5(b)(1). In conclusion, I find the correct total offense level under the 2003 Guidelines is 37. No party disputes the defendant's Criminal History Category of I. Under the 2003 Guidelines, a Criminal History Category of I and total offense level of 37, produces a guideline range of 210 to 262 months' imprisonment. The range for the fine, again, under the 2003 manual is $20,000 to $200,000 for each count. That's 5E1.2(c)(3). The range for supervised release is three years to life. 5D1.2(a)(1) and (c) and 18 U.S.C. 3583(k), although I believe there is a -- yeah, I think that's supervised release. I don't want to hear repeated objections, but any objections based on anything I said that is new?",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. With respect to the unit analysis, we wanted to note that under 3D1.4, a total of 5 units adds 4 levels, not 5 levels. I think the next layer on",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C... (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021594",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "06/29/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 78",
      "3536039",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021594"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document. The text is mostly printed, with no handwritten content. There are no stamps or signatures visible in the provided image."
}