{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "4",
    "document_number": "499",
    "date": "11/23/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499 Filed 11/23/21 Page 4 of 28\nUnited States v. Jordan, 924 F. Supp. 443 (W.D.N.Y. 1996).............................................. 22\nUnited States v. Lumpkin, 192 F.3d 280 (2d Cir. 1999) ....................................................... 14\nUnited States v. Mathis, 264 F.3d 321 (3d. Cir. 2001) ........................................................ 21\nUnited States v. Moore, 786 F.2d 1308 (5th Cir. 1986).......................................................... 17\nUnited States v. Randall, No. 19 Cr. 131 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y.)..................................................... 9\nUnited States v. Rodriguez-Felix, 450 F.3d 1117 (10th Cir. 2006) ........................................... 21\nUnited States v. Smith, 156 F.3d 1046 (10th Cir. 1998) ........................................................ 21\nUnited States v. Smith, 621 F. Supp.2d 1207 (M.D. Ala. 2009)................................................ 21\nUnited States v. Smith, 736 F.2d 1103 (6th Cir. 1984) .......................................................... 18\nUnited States v. Smithers, 212 F.3d 306 (6th Cir. 2000) ....................................................... 18, 21\nUnited States v. Stevens, 935 F.2d 1380 (3d Cir. 1991) ........................................................ 18\nUnited States v. Telles, 6 F.4th 1086 (9th Cir. 2021)............................................................. 14\nUnited States v. Torres, No. 20-CR-608 (DLC), 2021 WL 1947503 ......................................... 14\nOther Authorities\nJed Rakoff and Thomas Albright, Identifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification (Natl. Res. Counc. 2014) ........................................................................................................................ 18\nRakoff J & Loftus EF, The intractability of inaccurate eyewitness identification (2018) ........ 18\nRules\nFed. R. Evid. 702 ........................................................................................................................ passim\nFed. R. Evid. 702, Advisory Committee Notes, 2000 Amendments............................................. 5, 7, 10, 12\nFed. R. Evid. 703 ........................................................................................................................ 6\nFed. R. Evid. 704 ........................................................................................................................ 5\nConstitutional Provisions\nU.S. Const. Amend. V ................................................................................................................. 2, 3\nU.S. Const. Amend. VI ................................................................................................................. 2, 3\nDOJ-OGR-00007469",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499 Filed 11/23/21 Page 4 of 28",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "United States v. Jordan, 924 F. Supp. 443 (W.D.N.Y. 1996).............................................. 22\nUnited States v. Lumpkin, 192 F.3d 280 (2d Cir. 1999) ....................................................... 14\nUnited States v. Mathis, 264 F.3d 321 (3d. Cir. 2001) ........................................................ 21\nUnited States v. Moore, 786 F.2d 1308 (5th Cir. 1986).......................................................... 17\nUnited States v. Randall, No. 19 Cr. 131 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y.)..................................................... 9\nUnited States v. Rodriguez-Felix, 450 F.3d 1117 (10th Cir. 2006) ........................................... 21\nUnited States v. Smith, 156 F.3d 1046 (10th Cir. 1998) ........................................................ 21\nUnited States v. Smith, 621 F. Supp.2d 1207 (M.D. Ala. 2009)................................................ 21\nUnited States v. Smith, 736 F.2d 1103 (6th Cir. 1984) .......................................................... 18\nUnited States v. Smithers, 212 F.3d 306 (6th Cir. 2000) ....................................................... 18, 21\nUnited States v. Stevens, 935 F.2d 1380 (3d Cir. 1991) ........................................................ 18\nUnited States v. Telles, 6 F.4th 1086 (9th Cir. 2021)............................................................. 14\nUnited States v. Torres, No. 20-CR-608 (DLC), 2021 WL 1947503 ......................................... 14",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Other Authorities",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Jed Rakoff and Thomas Albright, Identifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification (Natl. Res. Counc. 2014) ........................................................................................................................ 18\nRakoff J & Loftus EF, The intractability of inaccurate eyewitness identification (2018) ........ 18",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Rules",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Fed. R. Evid. 702 ........................................................................................................................ passim\nFed. R. Evid. 702, Advisory Committee Notes, 2000 Amendments............................................. 5, 7, 10, 12\nFed. R. Evid. 703 ........................................................................................................................ 6\nFed. R. Evid. 704 ........................................................................................................................ 5",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Constitutional Provisions",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "U.S. Const. Amend. V ................................................................................................................. 2, 3\nU.S. Const. Amend. VI ................................................................................................................. 2, 3",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007469",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jordan",
      "Lumpkin",
      "Mathis",
      "Moore",
      "Randall",
      "Rodriguez-Felix",
      "Smith",
      "Smithers",
      "Stevens",
      "Telles",
      "Torres",
      "Jed Rakoff",
      "Thomas Albright",
      "Loftus EF"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States",
      "Natl. Res. Counc."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "W.D.N.Y.",
      "2d Cir.",
      "3d. Cir.",
      "5th Cir.",
      "S.D.N.Y.",
      "10th Cir.",
      "M.D. Ala.",
      "6th Cir.",
      "9th Cir.",
      "DLC"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "1996",
      "1999",
      "2001",
      "1986",
      "2006",
      "1998",
      "2009",
      "1984",
      "2000",
      "1991",
      "2021",
      "2014",
      "2018",
      "2000"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "499",
      "19 Cr. 131",
      "20-CR-608",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007469"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a list of legal authorities and references. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes."
}