{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "12", "document_number": "741", "date": "08/10/22", "document_type": "court transcript", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 106\nLBTVMAX1\n1\nMS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.\n2\nI just wanted to confirm that in doing alternating\n3\nstrikes, we would start or the government would start. I'm not\n4\nsure.\n5\nTHE COURT: I think since the defense has ten, the\n6\ndefense should start.\n7\nMS. STERNHEIM: So two/one, one/two, two/one, and till\n8\nwe get to the one and one and one.\n9\nTHE COURT: That's fine with me. Ms. Comey?\n10\nMS. COMEY: That's fine with the government, your\n11\nHonor.\n12\nTHE COURT: Okay. So the defense will do two;\n13\ngovernment is one; defense, two; government, one.\n14\nMS. STERNHEIM: Usually it's one and then two.\n15\nTHE COURT: That's fine.\n16\nMS. STERNHEIM: Alternating.\n17\nTHE COURT: That's fine. Or you can -- as you know, I\n18\ndon't do alternating strikes.\n19\nMS. STERNHEIM: I know. And I appreciate that --\n20\nTHE COURT: I've given into the requests of both sides\n21\nto do it this way. You can just alternate one, one, and the\n22\ndefense goes, or you could do what you proposed.\n23\nMS. STERNHEIM: I think we're fine with the typical\n24\nway.\n25\nMS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. The typical way is fine.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00016122", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 106", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "LBTVMAX1", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016122", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "1\nMS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.\n2\nI just wanted to confirm that in doing alternating\n3\nstrikes, we would start or the government would start. I'm not\n4\nsure.\n5\nTHE COURT: I think since the defense has ten, the\n6\ndefense should start.\n7\nMS. STERNHEIM: So two/one, one/two, two/one, and till\n8\nwe get to the one and one and one.\n9\nTHE COURT: That's fine with me. Ms. Comey?\n10\nMS. COMEY: That's fine with the government, your\n11\nHonor.\n12\nTHE COURT: Okay. So the defense will do two;\n13\ngovernment is one; defense, two; government, one.\n14\nMS. STERNHEIM: Usually it's one and then two.\n15\nTHE COURT: That's fine.\n16\nMS. STERNHEIM: Alternating.\n17\nTHE COURT: That's fine. Or you can -- as you know, I\n18\ndon't do alternating strikes.\n19\nMS. STERNHEIM: I know. And I appreciate that --\n20\nTHE COURT: I've given into the requests of both sides\n21\nto do it this way. You can just alternate one, one, and the\n22\ndefense goes, or you could do what you proposed.\n23\nMS. STERNHEIM: I think we're fine with the typical\n24\nway.\n25\nMS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. The typical way is fine.", "position": "main content" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "MS. STERNHEIM", "THE COURT", "MS. COMEY" ], "organizations": [ "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C." ], "locations": [], "dates": [ "08/10/22" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-AJN", "741", "DOJ-OGR-00016122" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage." }