{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "49",
    "document_number": "765",
    "date": "08/10/2022",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 49 of 95 2787\n\n1 MR. EVERDELL: And then the next page, page 45,\n2 line 1, there's the word \"minor,\" which would be \"an individual\n3 under the age of 18.\"\n4 MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, in this paragraph, since\n5 this is the conspiracy that applies to multiple minors, I think\n6 it should be \"individuals under the age of 18\" rather than just\n7 one.\n8 MR. EVERDELL: That's fine.\n9 THE COURT: For the second -- yeah. Right. So that\n10 is important that we're doing these one at a time. So line 24,\n11 it's \"an individual under the age of 18.\" And then the next\n12 page, page 45, line 1, it's --\n13 MR. ROHRBACH: I think they both should be --\n14 THE COURT: They both should be \"an individual under\n15 the age of --\"\n16 MR. ROHRBACH: I think they both should be\n17 \"individuals under the age of 18.\"\n18 THE COURT: I'm sorry. You're right. They're both\n19 the conspiracy.\n20 MR. EVERDELL: That's right, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: Okay. I apologize. Let me start again.\n22 So Instruction No. 34, line 24, \"individuals under the age of\n23 18,\" on line 24; and then the following page, line 1, same\n24 change, \"individuals under the age of 18\"; and then same change\n25 on line 3.\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00016975",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 49 of 95 2787",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MR. EVERDELL: And then the next page, page 45,\n2 line 1, there's the word \"minor,\" which would be \"an individual\n3 under the age of 18.\"\n4 MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, in this paragraph, since\n5 this is the conspiracy that applies to multiple minors, I think\n6 it should be \"individuals under the age of 18\" rather than just\n7 one.\n8 MR. EVERDELL: That's fine.\n9 THE COURT: For the second -- yeah. Right. So that\n10 is important that we're doing these one at a time. So line 24,\n11 it's \"an individual under the age of 18.\" And then the next\n12 page, page 45, line 1, it's --\n13 MR. ROHRBACH: I think they both should be --\n14 THE COURT: They both should be \"an individual under\n15 the age of --\"\n16 MR. ROHRBACH: I think they both should be\n17 \"individuals under the age of 18.\"\n18 THE COURT: I'm sorry. You're right. They're both\n19 the conspiracy.\n20 MR. EVERDELL: That's right, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: Okay. I apologize. Let me start again.\n22 So Instruction No. 34, line 24, \"individuals under the age of\n23 18,\" on line 24; and then the following page, line 1, same\n24 change, \"individuals under the age of 18\"; and then same change\n25 on line 3.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016975",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MR. ROHRBACH",
      "THE COURT"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "765",
      "DOJ-OGR-00016975"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion between MR. EVERDELL, MR. ROHRBACH, and THE COURT about changes to be made to a legal document regarding the term 'minor' and 'individuals under the age of 18'. The document is well-formatted and clear."
}