{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "232", "document_number": "749", "date": "08/10/22", "document_type": "court transcript", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 232 of 236 1136 LC3KMAX8\n\n1 MS. MOE: Your Honor, would the end of the day of\n2 midnight on Saturday be acceptable to the Court on timing?\n3 THE COURT: Let's do 8:00 o'clock on Saturday for the\n4 government, 8:00 o'clock on Sunday for the defense, I'll take\n5 between 8:00 p.m. and Monday morning to read your papers and\n6 resolve it.\n7 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n8 THE COURT: Okay, Mr. Everdell?\n9 MR. EVERDELL: That's fine for the defense.\n10 THE COURT: I received the first round of briefing on\n11 the attorney-client privilege issue from the defense.\n12 So the government's is due when?\n13 MR. ROHRBACH: Our brief is due on Monday right now,\n14 your Honor.\n15 THE COURT: On Monday? I wanted to indicate, I know\n16 you raised that the witness' attorney might want to weigh in.\n17 So if they do, you can convey that they could put in a letter\n18 at that same timing.\n19 MR. ROHRBACH: We will. Thank you, your Honor.\n20 THE COURT: Okay.\n21 Redaction issues: As I indicated, I do want the video\n22 reviewed and a public version.\n23 I want to encourage also, I think a lot of the photos\n24 that came in, a lot of the exhibits that came in, could have\n25 redacted versions so that just the images of the witnesses who\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00018333", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 232 of 236 1136 LC3KMAX8", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "1 MS. MOE: Your Honor, would the end of the day of\n2 midnight on Saturday be acceptable to the Court on timing?\n3 THE COURT: Let's do 8:00 o'clock on Saturday for the\n4 government, 8:00 o'clock on Sunday for the defense, I'll take\n5 between 8:00 p.m. and Monday morning to read your papers and\n6 resolve it.\n7 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n8 THE COURT: Okay, Mr. Everdell?\n9 MR. EVERDELL: That's fine for the defense.\n10 THE COURT: I received the first round of briefing on\n11 the attorney-client privilege issue from the defense.\n12 So the government's is due when?\n13 MR. ROHRBACH: Our brief is due on Monday right now,\n14 your Honor.\n15 THE COURT: On Monday? I wanted to indicate, I know\n16 you raised that the witness' attorney might want to weigh in.\n17 So if they do, you can convey that they could put in a letter\n18 at that same timing.\n19 MR. ROHRBACH: We will. Thank you, your Honor.\n20 THE COURT: Okay.\n21 Redaction issues: As I indicated, I do want the video\n22 reviewed and a public version.\n23 I want to encourage also, I think a lot of the photos\n24 that came in, a lot of the exhibits that came in, could have\n25 redacted versions so that just the images of the witnesses who", "position": "main" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00018333", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "MS. MOE", "THE COURT", "MR. EVERDELL", "MR. ROHRBACH" ], "organizations": [ "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C." ], "locations": [], "dates": [ "Saturday", "Sunday", "Monday" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "749", "DOJ-OGR-00018333" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the text." }