{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "34",
    "document_number": "36",
    "date": "07/24/19",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 34 of 74 34\n1 of recidivism is not always that, oh, I'm not going to do this\n2 conduct anymore. It's more of a psychological aspect I would say.\n3\n4 But they measure recidivism rates -- for example, one study that I saw -- and I'll put this up on the docket so you'll know what I was looking at -- measures recidivism at five years, at ten years, and at fifteen years.\n7\n8 And the response, the percentage of recidivism actually goes up at 15 years. I'm not going to quote the percent. I know it, but I don't know how accurate it is, but it is substantially higher than the recidivism rate at five years, for example.\n11\n12 So all I'm saying is I don't think it's so clear that with the passage of time, the presumption, so to speak, evaporates or disappears.\n14\n15 There is other discussion in some of these studies that sex crimes are the most difficult to evaluate in relation to recidivism and a lot of other concepts because in sex crimes, victims very often don't come forward.\n18\n19 This is not a phenomenon when we hear in this case or even in anther case on the news that where was the victim then, didn't come forward. That's not an uncommon phenomenon having to do with a whole complex number of factors. So a lot of these cases are never reported.\n24\n25 I don't know that you can just draw the conclusion\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00000544",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 34 of 74 34",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 of recidivism is not always that, oh, I'm not going to do this\n2 conduct anymore. It's more of a psychological aspect I would say.\n3\n4 But they measure recidivism rates -- for example, one study that I saw -- and I'll put this up on the docket so you'll know what I was looking at -- measures recidivism at five years, at ten years, and at fifteen years.\n7\n8 And the response, the percentage of recidivism actually goes up at 15 years. I'm not going to quote the percent. I know it, but I don't know how accurate it is, but it is substantially higher than the recidivism rate at five years, for example.\n11\n12 So all I'm saying is I don't think it's so clear that with the passage of time, the presumption, so to speak, evaporates or disappears.\n14\n15 There is other discussion in some of these studies that sex crimes are the most difficult to evaluate in relation to recidivism and a lot of other concepts because in sex crimes, victims very often don't come forward.\n18\n19 This is not a phenomenon when we hear in this case or even in anther case on the news that where was the victim then, didn't come forward. That's not an uncommon phenomenon having to do with a whole complex number of factors. So a lot of these cases are never reported.\n24\n25 I don't know that you can just draw the conclusion",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000544",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "07/24/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "36",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000544"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document. The text is typed, and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps. The document includes a case number, document number, and filing date in the header."
}