{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "1", "document_number": "185", "date": "03/26/21", "document_type": "Letter", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 185 Filed 03/26/21 Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 March 26, 2021 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully writes to bring the Court's attention to a recent decision by Judge Crotty in United States v. Schulte, 17 Cr. 548 (PAC), which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 (\"Schulte Op.\"). In that case, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on November 16, 2020 (see 17 Cr. 548 (PAC), ECF No. 435), which was virtually identical in multiple respects to the January 25, 2021 motion to dismiss the indictment filed by defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in the above-captioned case (see 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), ECF No. 126). Like Maxwell, the defendant in Schulte asserted, among other things, a claim under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, arguing that the indictment should be dismissed because the grand jury sitting in White Plains unfairly underrepresented Black and Hispanic individuals. Judge Crotty rejected those claims in their entirety and denied the defendant's motion to dismiss. Judge Crotty's thorough, well-reasoned decision supports the Government's position in this case. DOJ-OGR-00002820", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 185 Filed 03/26/21 Page 1 of 2", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "U.S. Department of Justice", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "United States Attorney Southern District of New York", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 March 26, 2021", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "BY ECF", "position": "top" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007", "position": "top" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)", "position": "top" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully writes to bring the Court's attention to a recent decision by Judge Crotty in United States v. Schulte, 17 Cr. 548 (PAC), which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 (\"Schulte Op.\"). In that case, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on November 16, 2020 (see 17 Cr. 548 (PAC), ECF No. 435), which was virtually identical in multiple respects to the January 25, 2021 motion to dismiss the indictment filed by defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in the above-captioned case (see 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), ECF No. 126). Like Maxwell, the defendant in Schulte asserted, among other things, a claim under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, arguing that the indictment should be dismissed because the grand jury sitting in White Plains unfairly underrepresented Black and Hispanic individuals. Judge Crotty rejected those claims in their entirety and denied the defendant's motion to dismiss. Judge Crotty's thorough, well-reasoned decision supports the Government's position in this case.", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002820", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "Alison J. Nathan", "Ghislaine Maxwell", "Crotty" ], "organizations": [ "U.S. Department of Justice", "United States Attorney" ], "locations": [ "New York", "White Plains" ], "dates": [ "March 26, 2021", "November 16, 2020", "January 25, 2021" ], "reference_numbers": [ "20 Cr. 330 (AJN)", "17 Cr. 548 (PAC)", "ECF No. 435", "ECF No. 126", "DOJ-OGR-00002820" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a formal letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to a U.S. District Judge, discussing a recent court decision and its relevance to an ongoing case." }