{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "3", "document_number": "383", "date": "10/29/21", "document_type": "court document", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 383 Filed 10/29/21 Page 3 of 40\nG. Evidence or Argument About the Minor Victims' Consent is Categorically Inadmissible ............................................................................................................................ 35\nH. The Court Should Be Wary of the Defense Refusal to Address the Government's Motions ............................................................................................................................ 37\nI. The Court Should Not Allow the Defense to Suggest to the Jury That The Defendant Prevailed Against the Minor Victims in Litigation. ............................................................................................................................ 38\nCONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................ 38\n2\nDOJ-OGR-00005557", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 383 Filed 10/29/21 Page 3 of 40", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "G. Evidence or Argument About the Minor Victims' Consent is Categorically Inadmissible ............................................................................................................................ 35", "position": "top" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "H. The Court Should Be Wary of the Defense Refusal to Address the Government's Motions ............................................................................................................................ 37", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "I. The Court Should Not Allow the Defense to Suggest to the Jury That The Defendant Prevailed Against the Minor Victims in Litigation. ............................................................................................................................ 38", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................ 38", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "2", "position": "bottom" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005557", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [], "organizations": [ "DOJ" ], "locations": [], "dates": [ "10/29/21" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "383", "DOJ-OGR-00005557" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is paginated, with this being page 3 of 40." }