{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2 of 21",
    "document_number": "387",
    "date": "10/29/21",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 387 Filed 10/29/21 Page 2 of 21\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nPage\nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................ 1\nBACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 2\nARGUMENT .................................................................................................................... 5\nI. Applicable Law ......................................................................................................... 5\nII. Evidence Related to Accuser-3 Is Not Proof of the Charged Conspiracies ................ 7\nIII. Evidence Related to Accuser-3 Is Not Admissible Under Rule 404(b) and Should be Excluded Under Rule 403 ................................................................................................ 10\nIV. In the Alternative, the Court Should Preclude the Government and Accuser-3 from Representing that Accuser-3 Was a “Minor,” or that She Was “Sexually Abused” by Epstein, and Give the Jury an Appropriate Limiting Instruction ....................................... 14\nCONCLUSION ................................................................................................................ 16\ni\nDOJ-OGR-00005666",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 387 Filed 10/29/21 Page 2 of 21",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Page\nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................ 1\nBACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 2\nARGUMENT .................................................................................................................... 5\nI. Applicable Law ......................................................................................................... 5\nII. Evidence Related to Accuser-3 Is Not Proof of the Charged Conspiracies ................ 7\nIII. Evidence Related to Accuser-3 Is Not Admissible Under Rule 404(b) and Should be Excluded Under Rule 403 ................................................................................................ 10\nIV. In the Alternative, the Court Should Preclude the Government and Accuser-3 from Representing that Accuser-3 Was a “Minor,” or that She Was “Sexually Abused” by Epstein, and Give the Jury an Appropriate Limiting Instruction ....................................... 14\nCONCLUSION ................................................................................................................ 16",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "i\nDOJ-OGR-00005666",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Epstein",
      "Accuser-3"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "10/29/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "387",
      "DOJ-OGR-00005666"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The content is a table of contents for a legal argument. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}