{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "69",
    "document_number": "465",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 69 of 127 69 LB1TMAX3\n1 Act, there's no count charged in the indictment for which the\n2 defendant could be convicted -- again, setting aside -- I'm not\n3 dealing with the statute of limitations issue, put it out of\n4 your mind. So assuming no statute of limitations issue, could\n5 the defendant be convicted of any count charged in the\n6 indictment based on the evidence as it pertains to this?\n7 MS. MOE: No, your Honor, we have not charged the case\n8 that way, and that testimony alone wouldn't satisfy those\n9 crimes charged.\n10 THE COURT: And is the government's position that this\n11 individual could be deemed a victim for restitution purposes or\n12 any legal purpose with respect to the crimes charged in this\n13 case and the case that the government is going to put on?\n14 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with apologies, I haven't\n15 thought through the restitution issue. I would want to confer\n16 with my office about that. I'm not certain, your Honor.\n17 THE COURT: Well, if the defendant can't be indicted\n18 based on this conduct -- again, assuming no statute of\n19 limitations issue, assuming that the jury adopts and accepts\n20 all of the testimony as true, the defendant couldn't be\n21 convicted of any of the crimes charged based on that conduct,\n22 how could that individual be deemed a victim of the crime\n23 charged?\n24 MS. MOE: I understand the Court's point, your Honor.\n25 I guess my concern is that the distinction between charging\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00007120",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 69 of 127 69",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LB1TMAX3\n1 Act, there's no count charged in the indictment for which the\n2 defendant could be convicted -- again, setting aside -- I'm not\n3 dealing with the statute of limitations issue, put it out of\n4 your mind. So assuming no statute of limitations issue, could\n5 the defendant be convicted of any count charged in the\n6 indictment based on the evidence as it pertains to this?\n7 MS. MOE: No, your Honor, we have not charged the case\n8 that way, and that testimony alone wouldn't satisfy those\n9 crimes charged.\n10 THE COURT: And is the government's position that this\n11 individual could be deemed a victim for restitution purposes or\n12 any legal purpose with respect to the crimes charged in this\n13 case and the case that the government is going to put on?\n14 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with apologies, I haven't\n15 thought through the restitution issue. I would want to confer\n16 with my office about that. I'm not certain, your Honor.\n17 THE COURT: Well, if the defendant can't be indicted\n18 based on this conduct -- again, assuming no statute of\n19 limitations issue, assuming that the jury adopts and accepts\n20 all of the testimony as true, the defendant couldn't be\n21 convicted of any of the crimes charged based on that conduct,\n22 how could that individual be deemed a victim of the crime\n23 charged?\n24 MS. MOE: I understand the Court's point, your Honor.\n25 I guess my concern is that the distinction between charging",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007120",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 465",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007120"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}