{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "216", "document_number": "751", "date": "08/10/22", "document_type": "court transcript", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 216 of 261 1377\nLC6VMAX6\nMaguire - direct\n1 them?\n2 A. No, they were not.\n3 Q. How did those Post-Its get on the binders?\n4 A. That was by the FBI personnel labeling them.\n5 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n6 Your Honor, the government would offer Government\n7 Exhibits 925 and 925-R. 925-R is a public exhibit, and\n8 Government Exhibit 925 under seal.\n9 MR. EVERDELL: No objection.\n10 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.\n11 925 is admitted -- and what is the basis for seal?\n12 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the labels,\n13 there is identifying information for third parties.\n14 THE COURT: Okay. So 925 is admitted under seal.\n15 925-R is a redacted version of 925, and that is admitted as a\n16 public exhibit.\n17 (Government's Exhibits 925, 925-R received in\n18 evidence)\n19 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n20 Could we now publish Government Exhibit 925-R as a\n21 public exhibit, and ask the jurors to turn in their binders to\n22 what's in under seal as Government Exhibit 925.\n23 THE COURT: Right. You may.\n24 So you can publish 925-R, and the jurors may look --\n25 I'm sorry, 925-R you may publish. And the jurors may open\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012967", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 216 of 261 1377", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "LC6VMAX6\nMaguire - direct", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "1 them?\n2 A. No, they were not.\n3 Q. How did those Post-Its get on the binders?\n4 A. That was by the FBI personnel labeling them.\n5 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n6 Your Honor, the government would offer Government\n7 Exhibits 925 and 925-R. 925-R is a public exhibit, and\n8 Government Exhibit 925 under seal.\n9 MR. EVERDELL: No objection.\n10 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.\n11 925 is admitted -- and what is the basis for seal?\n12 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the labels,\n13 there is identifying information for third parties.\n14 THE COURT: Okay. So 925 is admitted under seal.\n15 925-R is a redacted version of 925, and that is admitted as a\n16 public exhibit.\n17 (Government's Exhibits 925, 925-R received in\n18 evidence)\n19 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n20 Could we now publish Government Exhibit 925-R as a\n21 public exhibit, and ask the jurors to turn in their binders to\n22 what's in under seal as Government Exhibit 925.\n23 THE COURT: Right. You may.\n24 So you can publish 925-R, and the jurors may look --\n25 I'm sorry, 925-R you may publish. And the jurors may open", "position": "main" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012967", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "MS. MOE", "MR. EVERDELL" ], "organizations": [ "FBI", "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C." ], "locations": [], "dates": [ "08/10/22" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "751", "925", "925-R", "DOJ-OGR-00012967" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage." }