{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "260 of 262",
    "document_number": "755",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 260 of 262 1971 LC8VMAX8\n1 THE COURT: I guess the question is so you presumably need resolution before the close of the government's case.\n2\n3 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.\n4 THE COURT: That could be -- it could be tomorrow, but\n5 I suppose -- well, if you want resolution tomorrow, following briefing by both sides, then you'll be mindful of the Court's schedule.\n6\n7 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.\n8\n9 THE COURT: And I would need briefing completed, I think, by 10 p.m. tonight.\n10\n11 Now, if I have till Friday to resolve it, if I have till Friday to resolve it, then you can have till midnight, I suppose. But I gather we don't know whether we'll have the jury here on Friday or not.\n12\n13 MR. ROHRBACH: Since we don't know, the government would prefer to brief it tonight. We could propose doing simultaneous briefing at 10 p.m.\n14\n15 THE COURT: No, no, no. I don't think that makes sense, because I don't know what new argument the government is going to make and neither does the defense.\n16\n17 MR. ROHRBACH: That makes sense.\n18 THE COURT: So I'll say 7 for the government, 10 for the defense.\n19\n20 MR. PAGLIUCA: That's fine, your Honor.\n21 And it may be quick on our side, since it seems to me SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013538",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 260 of 262 1971 LC8VMAX8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: I guess the question is so you presumably need resolution before the close of the government's case.\n2\n3 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.\n4 THE COURT: That could be -- it could be tomorrow, but\n5 I suppose -- well, if you want resolution tomorrow, following briefing by both sides, then you'll be mindful of the Court's schedule.\n6\n7 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.\n8\n9 THE COURT: And I would need briefing completed, I think, by 10 p.m. tonight.\n10\n11 Now, if I have till Friday to resolve it, if I have till Friday to resolve it, then you can have till midnight, I suppose. But I gather we don't know whether we'll have the jury here on Friday or not.\n12\n13 MR. ROHRBACH: Since we don't know, the government would prefer to brief it tonight. We could propose doing simultaneous briefing at 10 p.m.\n14\n15 THE COURT: No, no, no. I don't think that makes sense, because I don't know what new argument the government is going to make and neither does the defense.\n16\n17 MR. ROHRBACH: That makes sense.\n18 THE COURT: So I'll say 7 for the government, 10 for the defense.\n19\n20 MR. PAGLIUCA: That's fine, your Honor.\n21 And it may be quick on our side, since it seems to me",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013538",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. ROHRBACH",
      "THE COURT",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "Friday"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "755",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013538"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}