{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "41",
    "document_number": "765",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 41 of 95 2779 LCI1MAX1\nwhich is on the next page, page 26. The third element says that the defendant knew that Jane was less than 17 years old.\nTHE COURT: Do you want to do bracket?\nMR. EVERDELL: Yeah, I think we should do a bracket.\nTHE COURT: Mr. Rohrbach?\nMR. ROHRBACH: That's fine. The government proposed perhaps an awkward instruction I think to perhaps explain this to the jury. This is an elegant solution.\nTHE COURT: I spent an inordinate amount of time thinking through precisely this question, and I decided that it's best just to do this because it would just be confusing. I mean, it is a separate element, but it would just be confusing. So I think this is a good suggestion.\nPage 25. So we'll take out -- we'll, why don't we do this. Why don't we do \"under [the age of 17 years] in interstate commerce.\"\nMR. EVERDELL: That's fine, your Honor.\nMR. ROHRBACH: That's fine with the government.\nMR. EVERDELL: That's perfectly acceptable.\nTHE COURT: So page 25, line 4, \"Any individual under [the age of 17 years] in interstate commerce.\"\nOkay. What's next?\nMR. EVERDELL: We covered page 26 already, so -- and on page 27, I believe there's an \"or foreign\" issue, so line 5.\nTHE COURT: Yes. Page 27, line 5, deleting \"or\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014345",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 41 of 95 2779 LCI1MAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "which is on the next page, page 26. The third element says that the defendant knew that Jane was less than 17 years old.\nTHE COURT: Do you want to do bracket?\nMR. EVERDELL: Yeah, I think we should do a bracket.\nTHE COURT: Mr. Rohrbach?\nMR. ROHRBACH: That's fine. The government proposed perhaps an awkward instruction I think to perhaps explain this to the jury. This is an elegant solution.\nTHE COURT: I spent an inordinate amount of time thinking through precisely this question, and I decided that it's best just to do this because it would just be confusing. I mean, it is a separate element, but it would just be confusing. So I think this is a good suggestion.\nPage 25. So we'll take out -- we'll, why don't we do this. Why don't we do \"under [the age of 17 years] in interstate commerce.\"\nMR. EVERDELL: That's fine, your Honor.\nMR. ROHRBACH: That's fine with the government.\nMR. EVERDELL: That's perfectly acceptable.\nTHE COURT: So page 25, line 4, \"Any individual under [the age of 17 years] in interstate commerce.\"\nOkay. What's next?\nMR. EVERDELL: We covered page 26 already, so -- and on page 27, I believe there's an \"or foreign\" issue, so line 5.\nTHE COURT: Yes. Page 27, line 5, deleting \"or",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014345",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "765",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014345"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion between the court and lawyers about jury instructions. The text is mostly printed, with no handwritten content or stamps visible."
}