{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "3",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 197 2544\nLCFCmax1\n1 asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege, I'm not sure whether that --\n2\n3 THE COURT: I don't have a pleading, I have --\n4 MS. MENNINGER: Well, a letter from a third party.\n5 That person also was under our subpoena. I don't know if your Honor views that as sufficient record on a Fifth Amendment assertion. We have not released the person from their subpoena. It wasn't styled as a motion to quash. So I'm a little bit unsure. Otherwise, we would like that witness to testify, as well.\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11 So, if your Honor deems it necessary to have a further record on it or a formal pleading from that witness, the witness is represented by counsel, Compton counsel, a former AUSA. So I don't know what their intentions are with regard to their client testifying beyond what the Court received in that letter.\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17 THE COURT: As I said yesterday, I don't have an application. And I asked if you have an application.\n18\n19 MS. MENNINGER: I don't.\n20 THE COURT: And now the application is, Judge, tell me what you think we should do.\n21\n22 MS. MENNINGER: No, it would be similar. We have a valid subpoena on the person and I would ask to enforce the subpoena and have the witness come testify. And if --\n23\n24\n25 THE COURT: Have you communicated with counsel as to\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 197 2544",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCFCmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege, I'm not sure whether that --\n2\n3 THE COURT: I don't have a pleading, I have --\n4 MS. MENNINGER: Well, a letter from a third party.\n5 That person also was under our subpoena. I don't know if your Honor views that as sufficient record on a Fifth Amendment assertion. We have not released the person from their subpoena. It wasn't styled as a motion to quash. So I'm a little bit unsure. Otherwise, we would like that witness to testify, as well.\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11 So, if your Honor deems it necessary to have a further record on it or a formal pleading from that witness, the witness is represented by counsel, Compton counsel, a former AUSA. So I don't know what their intentions are with regard to their client testifying beyond what the Court received in that letter.\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17 THE COURT: As I said yesterday, I don't have an application. And I asked if you have an application.\n18\n19 MS. MENNINGER: I don't.\n20 THE COURT: And now the application is, Judge, tell me what you think we should do.\n21\n22 MS. MENNINGER: No, it would be similar. We have a valid subpoena on the person and I would ask to enforce the subpoena and have the witness come testify. And if --\n23\n24\n25 THE COURT: Have you communicated with counsel as to",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "763",
      "2544",
      "212-805-0300"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}