{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "173",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 173 of 197 2714\nLCHVMAX6\n1\nMS. MENNINGER: Oh, yes, your Honor. I apologize. I have copies for the Court, and I gave a copy to the government.\n2\nTHE COURT: Okay.\n3\nMR. ROHRBACH: Judge Chin sets out the summary judgment standard on page 12.\n4\nTHE COURT: Yes.\n5\nDo you want to respond to the summary judgment point?\n6\nSo 201(b), the Court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute.\n7\nMS. MENNINGER: This was the government's motion for summary judgment; and it was Mr. Epstein's admission that that's when he vacated the premises. So I don't think that -- in terms of that's why I think that you need to take both the answers and the summary judgment together, rather than trying to introduce one or the other. It was the government's position that he abandoned in January of '96, and he admitted that.\n8\nMR. ROHRBACH: The defense is not offering any of these documents which contain the government's position, your Honor.\n9\nMS. MENNINGER: That's not true. Docket entry 52 is a submission by the government.\n10\nMR. ROHRBACH: I apologize. I'm talking about the summary judgment opinion and the answers, but not the government's claims, which is not a document -- I'll speak --\n11\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00016902",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 173 of 197 2714",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCHVMAX6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1\nMS. MENNINGER: Oh, yes, your Honor. I apologize. I have copies for the Court, and I gave a copy to the government.\n2\nTHE COURT: Okay.\n3\nMR. ROHRBACH: Judge Chin sets out the summary judgment standard on page 12.\n4\nTHE COURT: Yes.\n5\nDo you want to respond to the summary judgment point?\n6\nSo 201(b), the Court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute.\n7\nMS. MENNINGER: This was the government's motion for summary judgment; and it was Mr. Epstein's admission that that's when he vacated the premises. So I don't think that -- in terms of that's why I think that you need to take both the answers and the summary judgment together, rather than trying to introduce one or the other. It was the government's position that he abandoned in January of '96, and he admitted that.\n8\nMR. ROHRBACH: The defense is not offering any of these documents which contain the government's position, your Honor.\n9\nMS. MENNINGER: That's not true. Docket entry 52 is a submission by the government.\n10\nMR. ROHRBACH: I apologize. I'm talking about the summary judgment opinion and the answers, but not the government's claims, which is not a document -- I'll speak --\n11",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016902",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "MR. ROHRBACH",
      "Mr. Epstein",
      "Judge Chin"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "THE COURT",
      "THE GOVERNMENT"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "January of '96"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "763",
      "52",
      "201(b)",
      "212-805-0300",
      "DOJ-OGR-00016902"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}