{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "244", "document_number": "767", "date": "08/10/22", "document_type": "Court Document", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 244 of 257 3078\nLCKCmax9 Charge\n1 from the fact that any person, in addition to the defendant, is\n2 not on trial here. You also may not speculate as to the\n3 reasons why other persons are not on trial. Those matters are\n4 wholly outside your concern and have no bearing on your\n5 function as jurors in deciding the case before you.\n6 Instruction No. 55: Preparation of Witnesses.\n7 You've heard evidence during the trial that witnesses\n8 have discussed the facts of the case and the testimony with the\n9 government lawyers, the defense lawyers, their own lawyers\n10 before the witnesses appeared in court. Although you may\n11 consider that fact while you're evaluating witness's\n12 credibility, I should tell you there is nothing either unusual\n13 or improper about a witness meeting with lawyers before\n14 testifying so that the witness can be aware of the subjects he\n15 or she will be questioned about, focus on those subjects, and\n16 have the opportunity to review relevant exhibits before being\n17 questioned about them. Such consultation helps conserve your\n18 time and the Court's time. It would be unusual for a lawyer to\n19 call a witness without such consultation. The weight you give\n20 to the witness's preparation for his or her testimony and what\n21 inferences you draw from such preparation are matters\n22 completely within your discretion.\n23 Instruction No. 56: Redaction of Evidentiary Items.\n24 We have, among the exhibits received in evidence, some\n25 documents that are redacted. Redacted means that part of a\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00017265", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 244 of 257 3078", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "LCKCmax9 Charge", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "1 from the fact that any person, in addition to the defendant, is\n2 not on trial here. You also may not speculate as to the\n3 reasons why other persons are not on trial. Those matters are\n4 wholly outside your concern and have no bearing on your\n5 function as jurors in deciding the case before you.\n6 Instruction No. 55: Preparation of Witnesses.\n7 You've heard evidence during the trial that witnesses\n8 have discussed the facts of the case and the testimony with the\n9 government lawyers, the defense lawyers, their own lawyers\n10 before the witnesses appeared in court. Although you may\n11 consider that fact while you're evaluating witness's\n12 credibility, I should tell you there is nothing either unusual\n13 or improper about a witness meeting with lawyers before\n14 testifying so that the witness can be aware of the subjects he\n15 or she will be questioned about, focus on those subjects, and\n16 have the opportunity to review relevant exhibits before being\n17 questioned about them. Such consultation helps conserve your\n18 time and the Court's time. It would be unusual for a lawyer to\n19 call a witness without such consultation. The weight you give\n20 to the witness's preparation for his or her testimony and what\n21 inferences you draw from such preparation are matters\n22 completely within your discretion.\n23 Instruction No. 56: Redaction of Evidentiary Items.\n24 We have, among the exhibits received in evidence, some\n25 documents that are redacted. Redacted means that part of a", "position": "main content" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00017265", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [], "organizations": [ "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C." ], "locations": [], "dates": [ "08/10/22" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "767", "DOJ-OGR-00017265" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or jury instruction from a federal court case. The text is printed and there are no visible handwritten annotations or stamps. The document includes a header with case information and a footer with the name and contact information of the court reporter." }