{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "1:20-mj-00132-AJ",
    "date": "07/02/2020",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ Document 2 Filed 07/02/20 Page 2 of 7 incorporated herein. See Standing Orders 20-5 (Mar. 20, 2020) and 20-21 (June 17, 2020).2 The hearing held today will be an initial appearance and removal hearing for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Today's hearing has been noticed as a video hearing. In the event defendant consents to proceed, the court makes the findings below. Before convening this video/telephone hearing, the court carefully considered the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to public court proceedings and the public's and press's First Amendment rights to in-person access to such proceedings. See Bucci v. United States, 662 F.3d 18, 22 (1st Cir. 2011) (citing Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39, 48 (1984)); Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Court of California, Riverside Cty., 464 U.S. 501, 509-10 (1984). This Order details my findings. II. Partial Rather Than Total Closure The court first finds that this video hearing constitutes a partial, rather than total, closure of these proceedings. The court so finds because the goals of public access will still be achieved: this proceeding is not being held in secret and the public, including members of the press, maintains the 2 All the court's Standing Orders regarding the COVID-19 outbreak can be found here: http://www.nhd.uscourts.gov/court-response-coronavirus-disease-covid-19. 2 DOJ-OGR-00019224",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ Document 2 Filed 07/02/20 Page 2 of 7",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "incorporated herein. See Standing Orders 20-5 (Mar. 20, 2020) and 20-21 (June 17, 2020).2 The hearing held today will be an initial appearance and removal hearing for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Today's hearing has been noticed as a video hearing. In the event defendant consents to proceed, the court makes the findings below. Before convening this video/telephone hearing, the court carefully considered the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to public court proceedings and the public's and press's First Amendment rights to in-person access to such proceedings. See Bucci v. United States, 662 F.3d 18, 22 (1st Cir. 2011) (citing Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39, 48 (1984)); Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Court of California, Riverside Cty., 464 U.S. 501, 509-10 (1984). This Order details my findings.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "II. Partial Rather Than Total Closure",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The court first finds that this video hearing constitutes a partial, rather than total, closure of these proceedings. The court so finds because the goals of public access will still be achieved: this proceeding is not being held in secret and the public, including members of the press, maintains the",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2 All the court's Standing Orders regarding the COVID-19 outbreak can be found here: http://www.nhd.uscourts.gov/court-response-coronavirus-disease-covid-19.",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019224",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "US Courts",
      "Department of Justice"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "California",
      "Riverside County",
      "United States"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "March 20, 2020",
      "June 17, 2020",
      "July 2, 2020",
      "1984",
      "2011"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-mj-00132-AJ",
      "20-5",
      "20-21",
      "662 F.3d 18",
      "467 U.S. 39",
      "464 U.S. 501",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019224"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is mostly printed, with no handwritten content. There are no visible stamps or signatures. The document is related to a court hearing that was held via video conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic."
}