{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "3",
    "document_number": "94",
    "date": "10/08/2020",
    "document_type": "Table of Authorities",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 94, 10/08/2020, 2948481, Page3 of 23\n\nTable of Authorities\n\nCases\nBrown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019)...............................................8, 16\nIn re Teligent, Inc., 640 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2011)...............................................1\nMartindell v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979)................................................passim\nNixon v. Warner Commc'ns, 435 U.S. 589 (1978)...............................................16\nPuerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506 U.S. 139 (1993).....2\nUnited States v. Caparros, 800 F.2d 23 (2d Cir. 1986).......................................5\nUnited States v. Sells Eng'g, Inc., 463 U.S. 418 (1983).......................................14\nWill v. Hallock, 546 U.S. 345 (2006)................................................2, 7\n\nStatutes\n28 U.S.C. § 1291........................................................3\n\nRules\nFed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)................................................13, 14\n\nConstitutional Provisions\nU.S. CONST. amend. V................................................9, 16\nU.S. CONST. amend. VI ................................................16\nii\nDOJ-OGR-00019649",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 94, 10/08/2020, 2948481, Page3 of 23",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Table of Authorities",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Cases\nBrown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019)...............................................8, 16\nIn re Teligent, Inc., 640 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2011)...............................................1\nMartindell v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979)................................................passim\nNixon v. Warner Commc'ns, 435 U.S. 589 (1978)...............................................16\nPuerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506 U.S. 139 (1993).....2\nUnited States v. Caparros, 800 F.2d 23 (2d Cir. 1986).......................................5\nUnited States v. Sells Eng'g, Inc., 463 U.S. 418 (1983).......................................14\nWill v. Hallock, 546 U.S. 345 (2006)................................................2, 7",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Statutes\n28 U.S.C. § 1291........................................................3",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Rules\nFed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)................................................13, 14",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Constitutional Provisions\nU.S. CONST. amend. V................................................9, 16\nU.S. CONST. amend. VI ................................................16",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "ii",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019649",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Brown",
      "Maxwell",
      "Martindell",
      "Nixon",
      "Will",
      "Hallock"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Teligent, Inc.",
      "International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.",
      "Warner Commc'ns",
      "Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth.",
      "Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.",
      "United States",
      "Sells Eng'g, Inc."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Puerto Rico"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "2019",
      "2011",
      "1979",
      "1978",
      "1993",
      "1986",
      "1983",
      "2006"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-3061",
      "94",
      "2948481",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019649"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a table of authorities from a legal case, with a clear and organized structure. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}