{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "59",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "Table of Contents",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 59, 02/28/2023, 3475902, Page2 of 113\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nPage\nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES ...............................................................................................................................v\nSTATEMENT OF SUBJECT MATTER AND APPELLATE JURISDICTION .......................................................1\nSTATEMENT OF THE ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW ........................................................................2\nSTATEMENT OF THE CASE..........................................................................................................................4\nA. The Trial ..............................................................................................................................................6\nSUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ..................................................................................................................8\nINTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................11\nPOINT I\nALL COUNTS SHOULD BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT ...............13\nA. The NPA ............................................................................................................................................13\nB. Appellant may enforce the NPA as a third-party beneficiary...............................................................16\nC. The \"potential co-conspirators\" provision binds the USAO-SDNY, and Annabi is not to the contrary ........16\n1. Introduction...................................................................................................................................16\n2. Annabi does not apply because the NPA was negotiated and entered into outside of the Second Circuit .......................................................................................................................................................25\n3. Annabi does not apply to Count Six because that count falls wholly within the timeframe contemplated by the NPA...............................................................................................................................30\n4. There is affirmative indication that the NPA binds the USAO-SDNY .......................................................33\n5. If it is reasonable to conduct a hearing, then Annabi is a tiebreaker that only applies if ambiguity remains after the hearing ...............................................................................................................................38\ni\nDOJ-OGR-00021049",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ...............................................................................................................................v\nSTATEMENT OF SUBJECT MATTER AND APPELLATE JURISDICTION .......................................................1\nSTATEMENT OF THE ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW ........................................................................2\nSTATEMENT OF THE CASE..........................................................................................................................4\nA. The Trial ..............................................................................................................................................6\nSUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ..................................................................................................................8\nINTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................11\nPOINT I\nALL COUNTS SHOULD BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT ...............13\nA. The NPA ............................................................................................................................................13\nB. Appellant may enforce the NPA as a third-party beneficiary...............................................................16\nC. The \"potential co-conspirators\" provision binds the USAO-SDNY, and Annabi is not to the contrary ........16\n1. Introduction...................................................................................................................................16\n2. Annabi does not apply because the NPA was negotiated and entered into outside of the Second Circuit .......................................................................................................................................................25\n3. Annabi does not apply to Count Six because that count falls wholly within the timeframe contemplated by the NPA...............................................................................................................................30\n4. There is affirmative indication that the NPA binds the USAO-SDNY .......................................................33\n5. If it is reasonable to conduct a hearing, then Annabi is a tiebreaker that only applies if ambiguity remains after the hearing ...............................................................................................................................38",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021049",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "USAO-SDNY"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Second Circuit"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/28/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "59",
      "3475902"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a table of contents for a legal brief. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
}