{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "113", "document_number": "16166201", "date": "02/24/22", "document_type": "Court Transcript", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cv-00330-PAE Document 1616620 Filed 02/24/22 Page 113 of 117 A-5826\n369\nC2rda4u Berke - direct\n1 copy machines and other things and often spent time back there,\n2 I remember talking to Ms. Brune about the note.\n3 I recall her saying that they had identified a person\n4 with the same name who had been a disbarred lawyer. I recall\n5 saying to her, well, that can't be, because she certainly isn't\n6 a lawyer. I said, I assume she was asked what her educational\n7 background was. I remember Ms. Brune said she did, she was\n8 asked, she said that she had a BA degree. Ms. Brune told me\n9 what it was in. I don't recall as I sit here. But it was some\n10 humanities. I recall saying, well, definitely it can't be the\n11 same person. She said, that's what I think as well.\n12 That was really the end of it. I would say the\n13 conversation probably did not last more than two, three minutes\n14 at most. Then I recall we left the room and that was it.\n15 Q. She said, that's what I think as well?\n16 A. That's what I recall.\n17 MR. SHECHTMAN: No further questions.\n18 THE COURT: Cross-examination.\n19 CROSS-EXAMINATION\n20 BY MR. OKULA:\n21 Q. Good afternoon, Mr. Berke.\n22 A. Good afternoon, Mr. Okula.\n23 Q. I get to check one of the things off my bucket list.\n24 A. I just hope you didn't prepare too much for it.\n25 Q. Would you agree with me, Mr. Berke, that if an attorney\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00009430", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cv-00330-PAE Document 1616620 Filed 02/24/22 Page 113 of 117 A-5826", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "369\nC2rda4u Berke - direct", "position": "top" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "1 copy machines and other things and often spent time back there,\n2 I remember talking to Ms. Brune about the note.\n3 I recall her saying that they had identified a person\n4 with the same name who had been a disbarred lawyer. I recall\n5 saying to her, well, that can't be, because she certainly isn't\n6 a lawyer. I said, I assume she was asked what her educational\n7 background was. I remember Ms. Brune said she did, she was\n8 asked, she said that she had a BA degree. Ms. Brune told me\n9 what it was in. I don't recall as I sit here. But it was some\n10 humanities. I recall saying, well, definitely it can't be the\n11 same person. She said, that's what I think as well.\n12 That was really the end of it. I would say the\n13 conversation probably did not last more than two, three minutes\n14 at most. Then I recall we left the room and that was it.\n15 Q. She said, that's what I think as well?\n16 A. That's what I recall.\n17 MR. SHECHTMAN: No further questions.\n18 THE COURT: Cross-examination.", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "19 CROSS-EXAMINATION\n20 BY MR. OKULA:\n21 Q. Good afternoon, Mr. Berke.\n22 A. Good afternoon, Mr. Okula.\n23 Q. I get to check one of the things off my bucket list.\n24 A. I just hope you didn't prepare too much for it.\n25 Q. Would you agree with me, Mr. Berke, that if an attorney", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009430", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "Ms. Brune", "Mr. Berke", "Mr. Okula", "Mr. Shechtman" ], "organizations": [ "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C." ], "locations": [], "dates": [ "02/24/22" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cv-00330-PAE", "1616620", "A-5826", "DOJ-OGR-00009430" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The content includes a direct examination and cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Berke." }