{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "A-5904",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "CAC3PARC\n2\n1   (In open court)\n2       THE DEPUTY CLERK: Case of United States of America v.\n3   David Parse. Appearances for the government?\n4       MS. DAVIS: Good afternoon, your Honor. Nanette Davis\n5   and Stanley J. Okula, Jr. for the government.\n6       THE COURT: Good afternoon, Ms. Davis.\n7       MR. SCHECHTMAN: Paul Shechtman for Mr. Parse. Ali\n8   Feingold who is a paralegal who has worked on this matter is\n9   with me, and obviously Mr. Parse is here.\n10      THE COURT: Good afternoon, Mr. Shechtman. And I note\n11  the presence of Mr. Parse at counsel table.\n12      This is oral argument on the defendant Parse's motion\n13  for a new trial. Do you wish to be heard, Mr. Shechtman?\n14      MR. SCHECHTMAN: I do, your Honor. As your Honor now\n15  knows and from the papers, there is only one issue here which\n16  is a question of ineffective assistance of counsel.\n17      THE COURT: If you can just pull the mike a little\n18  closer. It has been a long week.\n19      MR. SCHECHTMAN: I understand. I think for all of us.\n20  Justice O'Connor once said that Strickland was the\n21  most cited case that she ever wrote, and I say that because I\n22  assume the Court is quite familiar with it and the legal\n23  standard. And obviously the standard is two part.\n24      I would like to think though, I may be proven wrong,\n25  that if we get to prejudice, we should prevail. But we can\n    SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n    (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "CAC3PARC\n2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(In open court)\nTHE DEPUTY CLERK: Case of United States of America v.\nDavid Parse. Appearances for the government?\nMS. DAVIS: Good afternoon, your Honor. Nanette Davis\nand Stanley J. Okula, Jr. for the government.\nTHE COURT: Good afternoon, Ms. Davis.\nMR. SCHECHTMAN: Paul Shechtman for Mr. Parse. Ali\nFeingold who is a paralegal who has worked on this matter is\nwith me, and obviously Mr. Parse is here.\nTHE COURT: Good afternoon, Mr. Shechtman. And I note\nthe presence of Mr. Parse at counsel table.\nThis is oral argument on the defendant Parse's motion\nfor a new trial. Do you wish to be heard, Mr. Shechtman?\nMR. SCHECHTMAN: I do, your Honor. As your Honor now\nknows and from the papers, there is only one issue here which\nis a question of ineffective assistance of counsel.\nTHE COURT: If you can just pull the mike a little\ncloser. It has been a long week.\nMR. SCHECHTMAN: I understand. I think for all of us.\nJustice O'Connor once said that Strickland was the\nmost cited case that she ever wrote, and I say that because I\nassume the Court is quite familiar with it and the legal\nstandard. And obviously the standard is two part.\nI would like to think though, I may be proven wrong,\nthat if we get to prejudice, we should prevail. But we can",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "David Parse",
      "Nanette Davis",
      "Stanley J. Okula, Jr.",
      "Paul Shechtman",
      "Ali Feingold",
      "Justice O'Connor"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States of America",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "A-5904",
      "Case No. 20-cr-00308-LJL",
      "Document 644 Filed 03/22/21 Page 2 of 7",
      "DOJ-OGR-00010159"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}