{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "3",
    "document_number": "777",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 777 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 13 3169 LCT1MAXT\n1 (In open court)\n2 THE COURT: Aside from the private information we discussed, I showed this note, Court Exhibit 18, to counsel,\n3 and they too can't read the third name listed well enough to be able to respond to it, so I am going to put a note to the jury asking for clarification on that. And we're gathering the other materials. And I will craft a response to the schedule issue that I'll come back and run by counsel. So I'll step down to do that. Thank you.\n10 THE DEPUTY CLERK: All rise.\n11 (Recess; 9:44 a.m.)\n12 (In open court; 9:54 a.m.)\n13 THE COURT: All right. So we brought some of the transcripts back. I sent my note back asking for clarification on the third name. And then I want you to let me know specifically how you'd like me to respond to the scheduling question. So just to read it again:\n18 \"May we have clarification regarding our schedule going forward. Are we required to continue deliberations every day, including 12/31 and 1/1/2022, until we reach a verdict? We ask in order to plan our schedules accordingly.\"\n22 So my inclination is to say:\n23 \"You asked about the schedule going forward. Yes, you will continue deliberations as needed every day going forward, including,\" and I think -- I mean, they mentioned 12/31 and\n25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014736",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 777 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 13 3169 LCT1MAXT",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(In open court)\nTHE COURT: Aside from the private information we discussed, I showed this note, Court Exhibit 18, to counsel,\nand they too can't read the third name listed well enough to be able to respond to it, so I am going to put a note to the jury asking for clarification on that. And we're gathering the other materials. And I will craft a response to the schedule issue that I'll come back and run by counsel. So I'll step down to do that. Thank you.\nTHE DEPUTY CLERK: All rise.\n(Recess; 9:44 a.m.)\n(In open court; 9:54 a.m.)\nTHE COURT: All right. So we brought some of the transcripts back. I sent my note back asking for clarification on the third name. And then I want you to let me know specifically how you'd like me to respond to the scheduling question. So just to read it again:\n\"May we have clarification regarding our schedule going forward. Are we required to continue deliberations every day, including 12/31 and 1/1/2022, until we reach a verdict? We ask in order to plan our schedules accordingly.\"\nSo my inclination is to say:\n\"You asked about the schedule going forward. Yes, you will continue deliberations as needed every day going forward, including,\" and I think -- I mean, they mentioned 12/31 and",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014736",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "12/31",
      "1/1/2022"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "777",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014736"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}