{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "3", "document_number": "794", "date": "07/23/25", "document_type": "Court Document", "has_handwriting": true, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 794 Filed 07/23/25 Page 3 of 3\nFed. Grand Jury Procs., 760 F.2d 436, 439 (2d Cir. 1985) (“Recognizing the importance of secrecy to the proper functioning of the grand jury system, the Supreme Court has established a strict test of particularized need[.]”); United States v. Sobotka, 623 F.2d 764, 768 (2d Cir. 1980) (“[T]he showing of need [for grand jury materials] must be made ‘with particularity’ so that ‘the secrecy of the proceedings (may be) lifted discretely and limitedly.”) (quoting Procter & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. at 682–83)); United States v. Laster, 313 F. App’x 369, 371 (2d Cir. 2009) (similar).\nSO ORDERED.\nDated: July 23, 2025 New York, New York\nPAUL A. ENGELMAYER United States District Judge", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 794 Filed 07/23/25 Page 3 of 3", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "Fed. Grand Jury Procs., 760 F.2d 436, 439 (2d Cir. 1985) (“Recognizing the importance of secrecy to the proper functioning of the grand jury system, the Supreme Court has established a strict test of particularized need[.]”); United States v. Sobotka, 623 F.2d 764, 768 (2d Cir. 1980) (“[T]he showing of need [for grand jury materials] must be made ‘with particularity’ so that ‘the secrecy of the proceedings (may be) lifted discretely and limitedly.”) (quoting Procter & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. at 682–83)); United States v. Laster, 313 F. App’x 369, 371 (2d Cir. 2009) (similar).", "position": "main" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "SO ORDERED.", "position": "main" }, { "type": "handwritten", "content": "Paul A. Engelmayr", "position": "signature" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "PAUL A. ENGELMAYER United States District Judge", "position": "main" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "Dated: July 23, 2025 New York, New York", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "3", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00015057", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "Paul A. Engelmayr" ], "organizations": [ "Supreme Court", "Procter & Gamble Co." ], "locations": [ "New York" ], "dates": [ "July 23, 2025", "1985", "1980", "2009" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "794", "760 F.2d 436", "623 F.2d 764", "313 F. App'x 369", "356 U.S.", "DOJ-OGR-00015057" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court order from a United States District Judge. The text is mostly printed, with a handwritten signature. There are no visible stamps or redactions." }