{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "168", "document_number": "761", "date": "08/10/22", "document_type": "court transcript", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 168 of 246 LCGVMAX5 Loftus - cross (At sidebar) THE COURT: Is her testimony on her CV? MS. STERNHEIM: Judge -- THE COURT: Is her testimony on her CV? MS. STERNHEIM: No. THE COURT: I just wanted to know that. MS. STERNHEIM: I don't believe it has testimony. It's a CV of her academic pursuits, her awards, her publications. THE COURT: Not the cases she's testified. MS. STERNHEIM: No. THE COURT: Okay. Go ahead. MS. STERNHEIM: Your Honor, I certainly understand the desire on the part of the government to do some character assassination. But the fact of the matter, testifying in a high-profile case is being used in a way that is very insidious here. I don't understand what the purpose is. Are they getting into her testimony in that case? MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I'm happy to respond. So the witness has financial incentive to testify on behalf of the defense. It's not a question of just getting paid by the defendant in this case. Over her career she has used her testimony as a defense -- as an expert for the defense to testify at trials. In her book she has a chapter, the book that she has SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00016651", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 168 of 246 LCGVMAX5 Loftus - cross", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "(At sidebar) THE COURT: Is her testimony on her CV? MS. STERNHEIM: Judge -- THE COURT: Is her testimony on her CV? MS. STERNHEIM: No. THE COURT: I just wanted to know that. MS. STERNHEIM: I don't believe it has testimony. It's a CV of her academic pursuits, her awards, her publications. THE COURT: Not the cases she's testified. MS. STERNHEIM: No. THE COURT: Okay. Go ahead. MS. STERNHEIM: Your Honor, I certainly understand the desire on the part of the government to do some character assassination. But the fact of the matter, testifying in a high-profile case is being used in a way that is very insidious here. I don't understand what the purpose is. Are they getting into her testimony in that case? MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I'm happy to respond. So the witness has financial incentive to testify on behalf of the defense. It's not a question of just getting paid by the defendant in this case. Over her career she has used her testimony as a defense -- as an expert for the defense to testify at trials. In her book she has a chapter, the book that she has", "position": "main" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016651", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "MS. STERNHEIM", "MS. POMERANTZ" ], "organizations": [ "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C." ], "locations": [], "dates": [ "08/10/22" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "761", "DOJ-OGR-00016651" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a sidebar discussion between the court and lawyers. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The footer contains a reference number 'DOJ-OGR-00016651' which may indicate it's a document from the Department of Justice." }