{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "5",
    "document_number": "769",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 769 Filed 08/10/22 Page 5 of 19 3096 LCLVMAXT\n1 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, what about \"3505-005 is not an admitted exhibit.\"\n2 admitted exhibit.\"\n3 MR. PAGLIUCA: If the Court is considering that, I\n4 think there needs to be a second sentence, which is, \"The\n5 testimony about 3505-005 has been provided in the transcript.\"\n6 MS. COMEY: That's redundant, your Honor. They know\n7 that; that's why they are asking the question. So I don't\n8 think it's necessary.\n9 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, it can't really hurt if it's\n10 redundant, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: That's true.\n12 I'm just writing it out.\n13 \"3505-005 is not an admitted exhibit. The testimony\n14 regarding 3505-005 is in the transcript you have regarding\n15 Carolyn's testimony.\"\n16 MR. PAGLIUCA: That's fine with us, your Honor.\n17 MS. COMEY: Fine with us, your Honor. Thank you.\n18 THE COURT: Okay. I'm happy to bring them out and do\n19 it orally or send in a note for efficiency.\n20 MS. COMEY: I think sending in a note will save time,\n21 your Honor, and makes sense.\n22 MR. PAGLIUCA: We agree.\n23 THE COURT: Okay. So let me just be clear.\n24 I'm going to say: I received your note regarding --\n25 I'll just say regarding 3505-005. 3505-005 is not an admitted\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 769 Filed 08/10/22 Page 5 of 19 3096 LCLVMAXT",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, what about \"3505-005 is not an admitted exhibit.\"\n2 admitted exhibit.\"\n3 MR. PAGLIUCA: If the Court is considering that, I\n4 think there needs to be a second sentence, which is, \"The\n5 testimony about 3505-005 has been provided in the transcript.\"\n6 MS. COMEY: That's redundant, your Honor. They know\n7 that; that's why they are asking the question. So I don't\n8 think it's necessary.\n9 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, it can't really hurt if it's\n10 redundant, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: That's true.\n12 I'm just writing it out.\n13 \"3505-005 is not an admitted exhibit. The testimony\n14 regarding 3505-005 is in the transcript you have regarding\n15 Carolyn's testimony.\"\n16 MR. PAGLIUCA: That's fine with us, your Honor.\n17 MS. COMEY: Fine with us, your Honor. Thank you.\n18 THE COURT: Okay. I'm happy to bring them out and do\n19 it orally or send in a note for efficiency.\n20 MS. COMEY: I think sending in a note will save time,\n21 your Honor, and makes sense.\n22 MR. PAGLIUCA: We agree.\n23 THE COURT: Okay. So let me just be clear.\n24 I'm going to say: I received your note regarding --\n25 I'll just say regarding 3505-005. 3505-005 is not an admitted",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. COMEY",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "Carolyn"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "769",
      "3505-005",
      "3096",
      "(212) 805-0300"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}