{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "51",
    "document_number": "57",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 57 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page51 of 208\nA-47\n2/22/23, 1:25 PM SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6\npreviously filed under seal as Exhibits D, E, F, and G to the memorandum of law in support of Maxwell's first motion to suppress (Dkt. No. 134). Within one week, the parties shall confer and file under seal any proposed redactions to the memorandum decision, order, and transcripts. Any proposed redactions shall be narrowly tailored and shall be supported with reference to the Second Circuit's opinion in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The parties proposed redactions should not include any information that has already been made public. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/25/21)(jbo) (Entered: 06/25/2021)\n06/25/2021 304 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court grants the Defendant's request that going forward the Government shall only file updates if there are any material changes to Ms. Maxwell's conditions of confinement. See Dkt. No. 300 at 1. In the absence of any other specific or supported application for relief from the Defendant, the Court will take no further action at this time. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/25/2021)(bw) (Entered: 06/25/2021)\n06/25/2021 307 OPINION & ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell moves to suppress evidence obtained through a grand jury subpoena to a law firm involved in earlier civil litigation against her. She contends that because the documents sought by the subpoena were previously subject to a protective order, the Government obtained them in violation of her rights against compelled self-incrimination, against unreasonable searches and seizures, and to due process of law. For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that the Government did not violate Maxwell's constitutional rights when it obtained evidence covered by a protective order in her earlier civil case. It further finds that Maxwell is not entitled to suppression of any evidence or to an evidentiary hearing. The Court thus DENIES Maxwell's motions to suppress (Dkt. Nos. 133, 139) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/25/21)(jw) (Entered: 07/01/2021)\n06/30/2021 305 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: Pursuant to the Court's order of June 25, 2021 (Dkt. No. 303), any proposed redactions to the Court's opinion on Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence must be filed no later than today, June 30, 2021. Any proposed redactions to the other documents ordered unsealed in that order must be filed no later than July 2, 2021. The parties shall file a joint letter by each of these dates informing the Court if no redactions are sought. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/30/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 06/30/2021)\n06/30/2021 306 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated June 30, 2021 re: Joint Letter re June 25, 2021 Opinion and Order and Defense Exhibits Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 06/30/2021)\n07/01/2021 308 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. No party has proposed redactions to the Court's opinion on Maxwell's motions to suppress or the documents ordered unsealed in the Courts June 25, 2021 Order (Dkt. No. 303). Thus, the Court lifts the temporary seal on its June 25, 2021 opinion on Maxwells motions to suppress. It also unseals the April 9, 2019 memorandum decision and order on the Governments application to modify the protective order in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433, as well as the transcripts of the March 26, 2019 and April 9, 2019 ex parte hearings on that application, originally filed under seal as Exhibits D, E, F, and G to the memorandum of law in support of Maxwell's first motion to suppress (Dkt. No. 134). Maxwell shall file those exhibits on the public docket without redaction by July 2, 2021 (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 7/1/21) (jw) (Entered: 07/01/2021)\n07/01/2021 309 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, and Lara Pomerantz dated July 1, 2021 re: Local Rule 23.1 . Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Moe, Alison) (Entered: 07/01/2021)\nhttps://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1 47/113 DOJ-OGR-00020669",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 57 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page51 of 208",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-47",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2/22/23, 1:25 PM SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "previously filed under seal as Exhibits D, E, F, and G to the memorandum of law in support of Maxwell's first motion to suppress (Dkt. No. 134). Within one week, the parties shall confer and file under seal any proposed redactions to the memorandum decision, order, and transcripts. Any proposed redactions shall be narrowly tailored and shall be supported with reference to the Second Circuit's opinion in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The parties proposed redactions should not include any information that has already been made public. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/25/21)(jbo) (Entered: 06/25/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "06/25/2021 304 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court grants the Defendant's request that going forward the Government shall only file updates if there are any material changes to Ms. Maxwell's conditions of confinement. See Dkt. No. 300 at 1. In the absence of any other specific or supported application for relief from the Defendant, the Court will take no further action at this time. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/25/2021)(bw) (Entered: 06/25/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "06/25/2021 307 OPINION & ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell moves to suppress evidence obtained through a grand jury subpoena to a law firm involved in earlier civil litigation against her. She contends that because the documents sought by the subpoena were previously subject to a protective order, the Government obtained them in violation of her rights against compelled self-incrimination, against unreasonable searches and seizures, and to due process of law. For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that the Government did not violate Maxwell's constitutional rights when it obtained evidence covered by a protective order in her earlier civil case. It further finds that Maxwell is not entitled to suppression of any evidence or to an evidentiary hearing. The Court thus DENIES Maxwell's motions to suppress (Dkt. Nos. 133, 139) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/25/21)(jw) (Entered: 07/01/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "06/30/2021 305 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: Pursuant to the Court's order of June 25, 2021 (Dkt. No. 303), any proposed redactions to the Court's opinion on Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence must be filed no later than today, June 30, 2021. Any proposed redactions to the other documents ordered unsealed in that order must be filed no later than July 2, 2021. The parties shall file a joint letter by each of these dates informing the Court if no redactions are sought. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/30/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 06/30/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "06/30/2021 306 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated June 30, 2021 re: Joint Letter re June 25, 2021 Opinion and Order and Defense Exhibits Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 06/30/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "07/01/2021 308 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. No party has proposed redactions to the Court's opinion on Maxwell's motions to suppress or the documents ordered unsealed in the Courts June 25, 2021 Order (Dkt. No. 303). Thus, the Court lifts the temporary seal on its June 25, 2021 opinion on Maxwells motions to suppress. It also unseals the April 9, 2019 memorandum decision and order on the Governments application to modify the protective order in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433, as well as the transcripts of the March 26, 2019 and April 9, 2019 ex parte hearings on that application, originally filed under seal as Exhibits D, E, F, and G to the memorandum of law in support of Maxwell's first motion to suppress (Dkt. No. 134). Maxwell shall file those exhibits on the public docket without redaction by July 2, 2021 (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 7/1/21) (jw) (Entered: 07/01/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "07/01/2021 309 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, and Lara Pomerantz dated July 1, 2021 re: Local Rule 23.1 . Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Moe, Alison) (Entered: 07/01/2021)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1 47/113 DOJ-OGR-00020669",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Maurene Comey",
      "Alison Moe",
      "Lara Pomerantz",
      "Andrew Rohrbach"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "USA",
      "SDNY"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/28/2023",
      "06/25/2021",
      "06/30/2021",
      "07/01/2021",
      "07/02/2021",
      "March 26, 2019",
      "April 9, 2019"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 57",
      "Dkt. No. 134",
      "Dkt. No. 300",
      "Dkt. No. 303",
      "Dkt. Nos. 133, 139",
      "No. 15-cv-7433"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes various orders and letters from the court and the parties involved. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
}