{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "2 of 21", "document_number": "444", "date": "11/12/21", "document_type": "Court Document", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 444 Filed 11/12/21 Page 2 of 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................................................. 1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................. 2 ARGUMENT ................................................................................................................................................... 5 I. Applicable Law ................................................................................................................................ 5 II. Evidence Related to Accuser-3 Is Not Proof of the Charged Conspiracies ....................................... 7 III. Evidence Related to Accuser-3 Is Not Admissible Under Rule 404(b) and Should be Excluded Under Rule 403 .................................................................................................................................... 10 IV. In the Alternative, the Court Should Preclude the Government and Accuser-3 from Representing that Accuser-3 Was a “Minor,” or that She Was “Sexually Abused” by Epstein, and Give the Jury an Appropriate Limiting Instruction ............................................................................................................................... 14 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................................. 16 i DOJ-OGR-00006628", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 444 Filed 11/12/21 Page 2 of 21", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS", "position": "top" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "Page", "position": "top" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................................................. 1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................. 2 ARGUMENT ................................................................................................................................................... 5 I. Applicable Law ................................................................................................................................ 5 II. Evidence Related to Accuser-3 Is Not Proof of the Charged Conspiracies ....................................... 7 III. Evidence Related to Accuser-3 Is Not Admissible Under Rule 404(b) and Should be Excluded Under Rule 403 .................................................................................................................................... 10 IV. In the Alternative, the Court Should Preclude the Government and Accuser-3 from Representing that Accuser-3 Was a “Minor,” or that She Was “Sexually Abused” by Epstein, and Give the Jury an Appropriate Limiting Instruction ............................................................................................................................... 14 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................................. 16", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "i", "position": "bottom" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00006628", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "Epstein", "Accuser-3" ], "organizations": [], "locations": [], "dates": [ "11/12/21" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "444", "DOJ-OGR-00006628" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The table of contents suggests that the document contains legal arguments and references to specific rules of evidence." }