{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "452",
    "date": "11/12/21",
    "document_type": "Table of Contents",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 452 Filed 11/12/21 Page 2 of 84\n\nTable of Contents\n\nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT ........................................................................................................................... 3\nARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................................... 4\nI. The Court Should Admit the Testimony of Dr. Lisa Rocchio.................................................................... 4\nA. Applicable Law ............................................................................................................................... 5\nB. Discussion ....................................................................................................................................... 9\n1. Dr. Rocchio's Opinions on Coercion and Attachment are Admissible ....................................... 10\n2. Dr. Rocchio's Opinion on the Relationship Between Trust and Victim Awareness of Their Abuse is Admissible ............................................................................................................................... 22\n3. Dr. Rocchio's Opinion on the Long-Term Consequences of Abuse is Admissible ..................... 23\n4. Dr. Rocchio's Opinion About the Significance of the Presence of Third Parties is Admissible ......................................................................................................................................................... 25\n5. Dr. Rocchio's Opinion on Delayed Disclosure is Admissible .................................................... 27\nII. The Evidence Contained in the Government's October 11, 2021 Letter is Admissible ....................... 32\nA. Applicable Law ............................................................................................................................. 33\nB. Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 35\n1. The Evidence is Admissible As Direct Evidence, or in the Alternative, Under Rule 404(b) .. 35\n2. The Government Has Met and Exceeded Its Notice Obligations ............................................. 39\nIII. The Testimony of Minor Victim-3 is Admissible ..................................................................................... 41\nA. Background ................................................................................................................................... 41\nB. Applicable Law ............................................................................................................................. 44\nC. Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 45\nIV. There is No Basis to Preclude Co-Conspirator Statements at Trial ..................................................... 54\nA. Background ................................................................................................................................... 55\nB. Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 58\n\nDOJ-OGR-00006710",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 452 Filed 11/12/21 Page 2 of 84",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Table of Contents",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ........................................................................................................................... 3\nARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................................... 4\nI. The Court Should Admit the Testimony of Dr. Lisa Rocchio.................................................................... 4\nA. Applicable Law ............................................................................................................................... 5\nB. Discussion ....................................................................................................................................... 9\n1. Dr. Rocchio's Opinions on Coercion and Attachment are Admissible ....................................... 10\n2. Dr. Rocchio's Opinion on the Relationship Between Trust and Victim Awareness of Their Abuse is Admissible ............................................................................................................................... 22\n3. Dr. Rocchio's Opinion on the Long-Term Consequences of Abuse is Admissible ..................... 23\n4. Dr. Rocchio's Opinion About the Significance of the Presence of Third Parties is Admissible ......................................................................................................................................................... 25\n5. Dr. Rocchio's Opinion on Delayed Disclosure is Admissible .................................................... 27\nII. The Evidence Contained in the Government's October 11, 2021 Letter is Admissible ....................... 32\nA. Applicable Law ............................................................................................................................. 33\nB. Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 35\n1. The Evidence is Admissible As Direct Evidence, or in the Alternative, Under Rule 404(b) .. 35\n2. The Government Has Met and Exceeded Its Notice Obligations ............................................. 39\nIII. The Testimony of Minor Victim-3 is Admissible ..................................................................................... 41\nA. Background ................................................................................................................................... 41\nB. Applicable Law ............................................................................................................................. 44\nC. Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 45\nIV. There is No Basis to Preclude Co-Conspirator Statements at Trial ..................................................... 54\nA. Background ................................................................................................................................... 55\nB. Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 58",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00006710",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Dr. Lisa Rocchio",
      "Minor Victim-3"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "October 11, 2021",
      "11/12/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 452",
      "DOJ-OGR-00006710"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a table of contents for a legal brief or court filing. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
}