{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "120",
    "document_number": "499-2",
    "date": "11/23/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 120 of 159119 LBAGmax4 Rocchio - Cross 1 that you're describing occur; correct? 2 A. Correct. 3 Q. So you are making an assumption that whatever you are 4 hearing is accurate; correct? 5 A. It depends on the context whether or not I'm making that 6 assumption. 7 Q. You would make that assumption in order to label it 8 grooming; correct? 9 A. I would, for example, in a forensic context, I wouldn't say 10 this is grooming or grooming happened. I would say the 11 individual described behaviors that are consistent with 12 grooming, for example. 13 Q. But for purposes of your testimony in this case, when 14 you're talking about what you're describing as grooming, 15 there's an underlying assumption that either there's an 16 attempted sexual assault or exploitation or actual sexual 17 assault or exploitation, otherwise it's not grooming; correct? 18 A. I wouldn't agree that it's an assumption. It's part of the 19 definition. So -- 20 Q. We're kind of going circular here. 21 THE COURT: Yes. So we'll move on. There are 22 fruitful arguments in cross-examination here, I hope you'll get 23 to that soon. 24 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you, your Honor. 25 BY MR. PAGLIUCA: SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00007988",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 120 of 159119",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LBAGmax4 Rocchio - Cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 that you're describing occur; correct? 2 A. Correct. 3 Q. So you are making an assumption that whatever you are 4 hearing is accurate; correct? 5 A. It depends on the context whether or not I'm making that 6 assumption. 7 Q. You would make that assumption in order to label it 8 grooming; correct? 9 A. I would, for example, in a forensic context, I wouldn't say 10 this is grooming or grooming happened. I would say the 11 individual described behaviors that are consistent with 12 grooming, for example. 13 Q. But for purposes of your testimony in this case, when 14 you're talking about what you're describing as grooming, 15 there's an underlying assumption that either there's an 16 attempted sexual assault or exploitation or actual sexual 17 assault or exploitation, otherwise it's not grooming; correct? 18 A. I wouldn't agree that it's an assumption. It's part of the 19 definition. So -- 20 Q. We're kind of going circular here. 21 THE COURT: Yes. So we'll move on. There are 22 fruitful arguments in cross-examination here, I hope you'll get 23 to that soon. 24 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you, your Honor. 25 BY MR. PAGLIUCA:",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007988",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/23/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "499-2",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007988"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}