{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "4",
    "document_number": "532",
    "date": "12/09/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 532 Filed 12/09/21 Page 4 of 8\nThe Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nDecember 8, 2021\nPage 4\nFor her part, Ms. Maxwell wasn't even shown a book, let alone a book that was either two inches thick or 1/4 inch thick. She was shown photocopies of pages from something, the origin of which no one knows.\nSecond, even if Deposition Exhibit 13 was the same as Exhibit 52 (which it isn't), Ms. Maxwell's testimony about Exhibit 13 is insufficient to authenticate or lay the foundation for the admission of Exhibit 52. Ms. Maxwell expressly and repeatedly disclaimed any knowledge of who created Deposition Exhibit 13, when it was created, and whether it was a complete and accurate copy of whatever it was copied from:\nQ. How was this document created?\nA. I don't know how this document was created.\nApril 2016 TR, p 312.\nQ. You were involved in the creation of this document?\nA. I think you can see from the date that it's 2004, 2005, so no.\nId. at 313\nQ. Did you ever have to keep track of address or phone contact information for Jeffrey Epstein?\nA. That was not my job.\nQ. Did you ever do it?\nA. I am not responsible for keeping his numbers so that wasn't my job at all.\nId. at 314.\nQ. Do you know how this book was created?\nA. No.\nId. at 317.\nDOJ-OGR-00008268",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 532 Filed 12/09/21 Page 4 of 8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nDecember 8, 2021\nPage 4",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "For her part, Ms. Maxwell wasn't even shown a book, let alone a book that was either two inches thick or 1/4 inch thick. She was shown photocopies of pages from something, the origin of which no one knows.\nSecond, even if Deposition Exhibit 13 was the same as Exhibit 52 (which it isn't), Ms. Maxwell's testimony about Exhibit 13 is insufficient to authenticate or lay the foundation for the admission of Exhibit 52. Ms. Maxwell expressly and repeatedly disclaimed any knowledge of who created Deposition Exhibit 13, when it was created, and whether it was a complete and accurate copy of whatever it was copied from:",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Q. How was this document created?\nA. I don't know how this document was created.\nApril 2016 TR, p 312.\nQ. You were involved in the creation of this document?\nA. I think you can see from the date that it's 2004, 2005, so no.\nId. at 313\nQ. Did you ever have to keep track of address or phone contact information for Jeffrey Epstein?\nA. That was not my job.\nQ. Did you ever do it?\nA. I am not responsible for keeping his numbers so that wasn't my job at all.\nId. at 314.\nQ. Do you know how this book was created?\nA. No.\nId. at 317.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008268",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Jeffrey Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "December 8, 2021",
      "12/09/21",
      "2004",
      "2005",
      "April 2016"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 532",
      "Exhibit 13",
      "Exhibit 52",
      "DOJ-OGR-00008268"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to the case of Ms. Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is well-formatted and legible."
}