{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "287",
    "document_number": "A-5744",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "C2GFDAU1 Brune - direct 287\n1 lawyers who choose not to practice. What I was very focused on\n2 was her highest level of education that did not include any law\n3 school.\n4 Q. You said that you found out more on May 18th?\n5 A. That's right.\n6 Q. What happened on May 18th?\n7 A. Well, on May 15th while I was out of the country, Ms.\n8 Trzaskoma handled the telephone conference with the Court where\n9 this issue was first raised. Is this right? Is this right?\n10 No. I'm wrong. What I'm talking about, the first time I\n11 learned about the voir dire is I think July 18th. What I'm\n12 trying to say is that --\n13 Q. Could I stop you there? Because I'm trying to keep in\n14 somewhat chronological order.\n15 A. I'm sorry, I got it wrong what I said earlier. What I'm\n16 trying to say is I learned about the Westlaw report after that\n17 conference with the Court that Ms. Trzaskoma handled so I think\n18 that puts us to July 18th.\n19 Q. All right, so now that we've got the days straightened\n20 out --\n21 A. Sorry about that.\n22 Q. You said a moment ago that Ms. Edelstein is the kind of\n23 person who wants to see documents, cases.\n24 A. She's a very thorough person.\n25 Q. Did she ask to see the suspension opinion that had been\n    (212) 805-0300\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU1 Brune - direct 287",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 lawyers who choose not to practice. What I was very focused on\n2 was her highest level of education that did not include any law\n3 school.\n4 Q. You said that you found out more on May 18th?\n5 A. That's right.\n6 Q. What happened on May 18th?\n7 A. Well, on May 15th while I was out of the country, Ms.\n8 Trzaskoma handled the telephone conference with the Court where\n9 this issue was first raised. Is this right? Is this right?\n10 No. I'm wrong. What I'm talking about, the first time I\n11 learned about the voir dire is I think July 18th. What I'm\n12 trying to say is that --\n13 Q. Could I stop you there? Because I'm trying to keep in\n14 somewhat chronological order.\n15 A. I'm sorry, I got it wrong what I said earlier. What I'm\n16 trying to say is I learned about the Westlaw report after that\n17 conference with the Court that Ms. Trzaskoma handled so I think\n18 that puts us to July 18th.\n19 Q. All right, so now that we've got the days straightened\n20 out --\n21 A. Sorry about that.\n22 Q. You said a moment ago that Ms. Edelstein is the kind of\n23 person who wants to see documents, cases.\n24 A. She's a very thorough person.\n25 Q. Did she ask to see the suspension opinion that had been",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(212) 805-0300\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "A-5744",
      "position": "header"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Brune",
      "Trzaskoma",
      "Edelstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "May 15th",
      "May 18th",
      "July 18th"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "C2GFDAU1",
      "A-5744",
      "(212) 805-0300"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a header and footer. The main content is a Q&A session between lawyers. The text is mostly printed, with a handwritten 'A-5744' at the top."
}