{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "224",
    "document_number": "204",
    "date": "04/16/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 224 of 239 departments, and public officers in the executive, legislative, or judicial branches of the State or Federal Government who are actively engaged in the performance of official duties. Id. at Art. V; 28 U.S.C. § 1863(b)(6). Finally, because jury service for certain groups of individuals would \"entail undue hardship or extreme inconvenience,\" those individuals are excused or deferred upon individual request. SDNY Jury Plan at Art. VI. These groups include: (1) Persons over 70 years of age; (2) Persons having legal custody and active daily care of a child under the age of 12, or who are essential to the daily care of aged or infirm persons; (3) Persons who have satisfactorily served as grand or petit jurors in a State or Federal court within the last four years; (4) Volunteer safety personnel; and (5) Persons as to whom a judge finds, for any other reason, that jury service would constitute an undue hardship and extreme inconvenience. Id. The names of individuals who are determined to be qualified to serve as jurors, and are not \"exempt, excused, or deferred,\" comprise the Qualified Jury Wheels—one for service at the Manhattan courthouse and one for service at the White Plains courthouse. Id., Art. IV.A-B. When jurors are needed, names are drawn randomly from the Qualified Jury Wheels, and summonses are sent to those whose names are drawn. Id., Art. IV.C. After being summoned, these individuals are randomly assigned to jury panels as needed, for individual trials and grand juries at the courthouse corresponding to the Qualified Wheel from which they were drawn. Id. B. Applicable Law \"The Sixth Amendment guarantees a criminal defendant a jury selected from a fair cross section of the community.\" United States v. Rioux, 97 F.3d 648, 654 (2d Cir. 1996). In Duren v. Missouri, the Supreme Court articulated a three part test that defendants must meet in order to 197 DOJ-OGR-00003158",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 224 of 239",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "departments, and public officers in the executive, legislative, or judicial branches of the State or Federal Government who are actively engaged in the performance of official duties. Id. at Art. V; 28 U.S.C. § 1863(b)(6). Finally, because jury service for certain groups of individuals would \"entail undue hardship or extreme inconvenience,\" those individuals are excused or deferred upon individual request. SDNY Jury Plan at Art. VI. These groups include: (1) Persons over 70 years of age; (2) Persons having legal custody and active daily care of a child under the age of 12, or who are essential to the daily care of aged or infirm persons; (3) Persons who have satisfactorily served as grand or petit jurors in a State or Federal court within the last four years; (4) Volunteer safety personnel; and (5) Persons as to whom a judge finds, for any other reason, that jury service would constitute an undue hardship and extreme inconvenience. Id. The names of individuals who are determined to be qualified to serve as jurors, and are not \"exempt, excused, or deferred,\" comprise the Qualified Jury Wheels—one for service at the Manhattan courthouse and one for service at the White Plains courthouse. Id., Art. IV.A-B. When jurors are needed, names are drawn randomly from the Qualified Jury Wheels, and summonses are sent to those whose names are drawn. Id., Art. IV.C. After being summoned, these individuals are randomly assigned to jury panels as needed, for individual trials and grand juries at the courthouse corresponding to the Qualified Wheel from which they were drawn. Id.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "B. Applicable Law",
      "position": "subsection header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "\"The Sixth Amendment guarantees a criminal defendant a jury selected from a fair cross section of the community.\" United States v. Rioux, 97 F.3d 648, 654 (2d Cir. 1996). In Duren v. Missouri, the Supreme Court articulated a three part test that defendants must meet in order to",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "197",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00003158",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "Supreme Court"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Manhattan",
      "White Plains",
      "Missouri"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "04/16/21",
      "1996"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 204",
      "28 U.S.C. § 1863(b)(6)",
      "97 F.3d 648",
      "DOJ-OGR-00003158"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to jury selection. It is a printed document with no handwritten text or stamps. The text is clear and legible."
}