{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "8", "document_number": "439", "date": "11/12/21", "document_type": "court document", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 439 Filed 11/12/21 Page 8 of 69\nYokohama Rubber Co. LTD v. Stamford Tyres Int'l PTE LTD, No. SA-CV-0700010-CJCMGLX, 2008 WL 11342955 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2008)............................................................3\nStatutes\nFla Stat. § 796.07 ............................................................................................................................47, 48\nFla. Stat. § 794.05(1).......................................................................................................................46\nNew York State Penal Law § 130.55...............................................................................................47\nNM Stat. Ann. § 30-9-13(A)(1) ........................................................................................................46\nNY Penal Law Ann. § 130.03(3)(a)..................................................................................................46\nOther Authorities\n1 McCormick On Evid. § 47 (7th ed.) ................................................................................................26\nABA Criminal Justice Standards, Defense Function, Standard 4-7.5(b)...........................................51\nFrance Penal Code, Article 227-25 ...................................................................................................46\nWright & Miller, 30B Fed. Prac. & Proc. Evid.(2021 ed.).................................................................26, 27\nRules\nFed. R. Evid. 401 ...........................................................................................................................27, 36\nFed. R. Evid. 403 ...........................................................................................................................35, 36\nFed. R. Evid. 404(b).......................................................................................................................50, 51\nFed. R. Evid. 801 ...........................................................................................................................passim\nFed. R. Evid. 802 .............................................................................................................................54\nFed. R. Evid. 803 .............................................................................................................................54\nvii\nDOJ-OGR-00006425", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 439 Filed 11/12/21 Page 8 of 69", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "Yokohama Rubber Co. LTD v. Stamford Tyres Int'l PTE LTD, No. SA-CV-0700010-CJCMGLX, 2008 WL 11342955 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2008)............................................................3", "position": "top" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "Statutes\nFla Stat. § 796.07 ............................................................................................................................47, 48\nFla. Stat. § 794.05(1).......................................................................................................................46\nNew York State Penal Law § 130.55...............................................................................................47\nNM Stat. Ann. § 30-9-13(A)(1) ........................................................................................................46\nNY Penal Law Ann. § 130.03(3)(a)..................................................................................................46", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "Other Authorities\n1 McCormick On Evid. § 47 (7th ed.) ................................................................................................26\nABA Criminal Justice Standards, Defense Function, Standard 4-7.5(b)...........................................51\nFrance Penal Code, Article 227-25 ...................................................................................................46\nWright & Miller, 30B Fed. Prac. & Proc. Evid.(2021 ed.).................................................................26, 27", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "Rules\nFed. R. Evid. 401 ...........................................................................................................................27, 36\nFed. R. Evid. 403 ...........................................................................................................................35, 36\nFed. R. Evid. 404(b).......................................................................................................................50, 51\nFed. R. Evid. 801 ...........................................................................................................................passim\nFed. R. Evid. 802 .............................................................................................................................54\nFed. R. Evid. 803 .............................................................................................................................54", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "vii", "position": "bottom" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00006425", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [], "organizations": [ "Yokohama Rubber Co. LTD", "Stamford Tyres Int'l PTE LTD", "ABA" ], "locations": [ "New York", "Florida", "New Mexico", "France", "California" ], "dates": [ "11/12/21", "Feb. 19, 2008" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "Document 439", "SA-CV-0700010-CJCMGLX", "2008 WL 11342955", "DOJ-OGR-00006425" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a list of statutes, other authorities, and rules cited in the document. The page is clean and free of handwritten notes or stamps." }