{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "600",
    "date": "02/11/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 600 Filed 02/11/22 Page 2 of 37\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nPage\n\nARGUMENT............................................................................................................................... 1\n\nI. The Court Must Vacate Ms. Maxwell's Convictions on the Mann Act Counts Due to a Constructive Amendment/Variance from the Crimes Charged in the Indictment......... 1\n\nA. Background Facts................................................................................................................ 3\n\n1. Legal Instructions to the Jury....................................................................................... 3\n2. The Jury Note................................................................................................................. 6\n\nB. Applicable Law ................................................................................................................... 7\n\nC. The \"Core of Criminality\" of the Mann Act Counts Was a Scheme to Entice or Cause Underaged Girls to Travel to New York with an Intent to Violate New York Law............................................................................................................................... 9\n\nD. There is a Substantial Likelihood that Ms. Maxwell Was Convicted on Three of the Mann Act Counts Based on Conduct Not Charged in the Indictment............................................................................................................................... 11\n\nE. The Variance Between the Proof at Trial and the Allegations in the Indictment Substantially Prejudiced Ms. Maxwell..................................................................... 16\n\nII. The Court Should Enter Judgment on Only One of the Three Conspiracy Counts Because They Are Multiplicitous....................................................................................... 18\n\nA. Applicable Law ................................................................................................................. 19\n\nB. The Proof at Trial Established, at Most, a Single Conspiracy........................................... 21\n\n1. Overlap of Participants and Time ................................................................................ 22\n2. Similarity of Operation, Common Objectives, and Geographic Scope....................... 23\n3. Common Overt Acts ..................................................................................................... 24\n4. Degree of Interdependence Between the Conspiracies................................................ 24\n\nIII. The Court Should Vacate Ms. Maxwell's Conviction and Dismiss the S2 Indictment Due to Pre-Indictment Delay............................................................................................... 25\n\nA. Flight Records - Passenger Manifests and Shoppers Travel Records............................... 26\n\nB. Financial Documents - Bank Records and Credit Card Records ....................................... 27\ni\nDOJ-OGR-00008926",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 600 Filed 02/11/22 Page 2 of 37",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Page",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "ARGUMENT............................................................................................................................... 1",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "I. The Court Must Vacate Ms. Maxwell's Convictions on the Mann Act Counts Due to a Constructive Amendment/Variance from the Crimes Charged in the Indictment......... 1",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A. Background Facts................................................................................................................ 3",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1. Legal Instructions to the Jury....................................................................................... 3",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2. The Jury Note................................................................................................................. 6",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "B. Applicable Law ................................................................................................................... 7",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C. The \"Core of Criminality\" of the Mann Act Counts Was a Scheme to Entice or Cause Underaged Girls to Travel to New York with an Intent to Violate New York Law............................................................................................................................... 9",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "D. There is a Substantial Likelihood that Ms. Maxwell Was Convicted on Three of the Mann Act Counts Based on Conduct Not Charged in the Indictment............................................................................................................................... 11",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "E. The Variance Between the Proof at Trial and the Allegations in the Indictment Substantially Prejudiced Ms. Maxwell..................................................................... 16",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "II. The Court Should Enter Judgment on Only One of the Three Conspiracy Counts Because They Are Multiplicitous....................................................................................... 18",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A. Applicable Law ................................................................................................................. 19",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "B. The Proof at Trial Established, at Most, a Single Conspiracy........................................... 21",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1. Overlap of Participants and Time ................................................................................ 22",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2. Similarity of Operation, Common Objectives, and Geographic Scope....................... 23",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "3. Common Overt Acts ..................................................................................................... 24",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "4. Degree of Interdependence Between the Conspiracies................................................ 24",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "III. The Court Should Vacate Ms. Maxwell's Conviction and Dismiss the S2 Indictment Due to Pre-Indictment Delay............................................................................................... 25",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A. Flight Records - Passenger Manifests and Shoppers Travel Records............................... 26",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "B. Financial Documents - Bank Records and Credit Card Records ....................................... 27",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "i",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008926",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/11/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 600",
      "DOJ-OGR-00008926"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The table of contents outlines various arguments and sections related to the case."
}