{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "146",
    "date": "02/04/21",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 146 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 16\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nPage\nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................................................ 1\nSUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3\nARGUMENT ................................................................................................................................................... 5\nI. All References to Accuser-3 Should Be Stricken as Surplusage ............................................................... 5\nA. The Indictment Is Insufficient to Allege a Conspiracy as to Accuser-3 ................................................ 6\nB. The Allegations Regarding Accuser-3 Are Irrelevant to the Alleged Conspiracies ............................... 7\nC. The Allegations Regarding Accuser-3 Are Unduly Prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell ..................................... 9\nII. In the Alternative, the Government Should Be Required to Demonstrate the Admissibility of Evidence Regarding Accuser-3 Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) ........ 10\nCONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................ 11\ni\nDOJ-OGR-00002677",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 146 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 16",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................................................ 1\nSUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3\nARGUMENT ................................................................................................................................................... 5\nI. All References to Accuser-3 Should Be Stricken as Surplusage ............................................................... 5\nA. The Indictment Is Insufficient to Allege a Conspiracy as to Accuser-3 ................................................ 6\nB. The Allegations Regarding Accuser-3 Are Irrelevant to the Alleged Conspiracies ............................... 7\nC. The Allegations Regarding Accuser-3 Are Unduly Prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell ..................................... 9\nII. In the Alternative, the Government Should Be Required to Demonstrate the Admissibility of Evidence Regarding Accuser-3 Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) ........ 10\nCONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................ 11",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "i",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002677",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Accuser-3"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/04/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "146",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002677"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The table of contents suggests that the document argues for the exclusion of certain allegations and evidence related to 'Accuser-3'. The document is well-formatted and free of significant damage or redactions."
}