{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "18", "document_number": "536", "date": "12/10/21", "document_type": "court transcript", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 536 Filed 12/10/21 Page 18 of 43 18 LBNAMAXTps\n\n1 MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor. We made it available for inspection this summer. We notified the defense in a letter that it was available for inspection. The defense asked for an inspection the week before our conference on November 1st. I made it available for inspection that day. They personally inspected it. We're happy to continue to make that available for inspection to the defense.\n\n2 THE COURT: I'm very happy to hear that. Thank you. I appreciate that. And I think that takes care of that for now.\n\n3 I guess one question: I think, given the uncertainty as to admission, the government should not mention it in its opening.\n\n4 MS. MOE: Of course, your Honor. Thank you.\n\n5 THE COURT: Anything before we move on?\n\n6 MR. PAGLIUCA: No, your Honor. Thank you.\n\n7 THE COURT: So next is the admissibility of co-conspirator statements. I do appreciate the efforts to come to reasonable agreement, of course, with the defense preserving objections as to ultimate admissibility. Based on the law, of course the government has to make the showing that's required during the course of the trial.\n\n8 There are two statements that are exemplars that remain in issue, and I think, starting with the second one first: so the second one, it seems to me, is not being offered\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 536 Filed 12/10/21 Page 18 of 43 18 LBNAMAXTps", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor. We made it available for inspection this summer. We notified the defense in a letter that it was available for inspection. The defense asked for an inspection the week before our conference on November 1st. I made it available for inspection that day. They personally inspected it. We're happy to continue to make that available for inspection to the defense.", "position": "main content" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "THE COURT: I'm very happy to hear that. Thank you. I appreciate that. And I think that takes care of that for now.", "position": "main content" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "I guess one question: I think, given the uncertainty as to admission, the government should not mention it in its opening.", "position": "main content" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "MS. MOE: Of course, your Honor. Thank you.", "position": "main content" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "THE COURT: Anything before we move on?", "position": "main content" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "MR. PAGLIUCA: No, your Honor. Thank you.", "position": "main content" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "THE COURT: So next is the admissibility of co-conspirator statements. I do appreciate the efforts to come to reasonable agreement, of course, with the defense preserving objections as to ultimate admissibility. Based on the law, of course the government has to make the showing that's required during the course of the trial.", "position": "main content" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "There are two statements that are exemplars that remain in issue, and I think, starting with the second one first: so the second one, it seems to me, is not being offered", "position": "main content" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "MS. MOE", "THE COURT", "MR. PAGLIUCA" ], "organizations": [ "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C." ], "locations": [], "dates": [ "November 1st", "12/10/21" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "Document 536" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage." }