{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "83",
    "document_number": "A-5823",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1 Filed 02/24/22 Page 83 of 117\nA-5823\nC2rdaU4 Schoeman - cross 366\n1 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.\n2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n3 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:\n4 Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that correct?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good.\n10 MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was sharing this information or her deliberative process with you?\n14 THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We, having spent many months of trial together, often shared information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing information during the course of the trial. But I have described I think the entirety of the conversation.\n19 THE COURT: Anything further?\n20 MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down. (Witness excused)\n23 MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the same law firm.\n24 BARRY H. BERKE,\n25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00009427",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1 Filed 02/24/22 Page 83 of 117",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "A-5823",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2rdaU4 Schoeman - cross 366",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.\n2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n3 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:\n4 Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that correct?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good.\n10 MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was sharing this information or her deliberative process with you?\n14 THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We, having spent many months of trial together, often shared information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing information during the course of the trial. But I have described I think the entirety of the conversation.\n19 THE COURT: Anything further?\n20 MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down. (Witness excused)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "23 MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the same law firm.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "BARRY H. BERKE,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009427",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Shechtman",
      "Mr. Schoeman",
      "Ms. Trzaskoma",
      "Mr. Okula",
      "Mr. Parse",
      "Barry Berke",
      "Barry H. Berke"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "May 13th",
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cv-03038-PAE",
      "616-1",
      "A-5823",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009427"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document is a court transcript with a clear structure. The text is mostly printed, with one handwritten annotation 'A-5823' at the top. The document contains a redirect examination of Mr. Schoeman by Mr. Shechtman. The transcript includes the names of individuals involved in the trial and the court reporter information at the bottom."
}